Endodontik Çalışmalarda Deney Hayvanlarının Kullanımı ve Seçim Kriterleri

Öz

Hayvan deneyleri, hayvanların bilimsel çalışmalarda kullanılması olarak tanımlanır. Bu deneyler insanlar ve hayvanlarda var olan hastalıklar hakkında bilgi edinilmesinde, yeni bir madde veya yeni bir cerrahi tekniğin test edilmesinde bilim adamlarına yardımcı olmaktadır. Hayvan modelleri endodontide önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Bu derlemede, bir hayvan çalışması planlarken hayvan modelinin seçimi ve çalışmalarda etik prensiplerin uygulanması ele alınmıştır. Sonuç olarak endodontide kök hücre çalışmaları dışındaki dışındaki bütün çalışmalar fare, rat ve dağ gelincikleri üzerinde yapılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Laboratuvar Hayvanları, Hayvan Deneyleri, Endodonti

Using and Selection Criterias of Laboratory Animals with Experimental Purpose in Endodontics

Öz

Animal experimentation is the use of animals in scientific research. Animal experimants help scientists understand diseases that exist animals and humans, for example new medicines oe new surgical techniques. Animal models have an significiant place in endodontics. Planning the animal experiments, choosing the animal models and the applying ethical principles, in researchs have been included in this review. We concluded that the animal experimants could be conducted on rats, mices and ferrets except the stem cell researches which must be done on dogs as an animal model in endodontics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Laboratory Animals, Animal Experiments, Endodontics

Kaynakça

1. Başaran A.Deney Hayvanları. 1inci baskı.48, Nisan Kitabevi, Eskişehir, 2003.
2. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WJ, Beckerman T. Experimentally induced infection by oral anaerobic microorganisms in a mouse model. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1992; 7(4):253–256.
3. Feuille F, Ebersole JL, Kesavalu L, Stepfen MJ, Holt SC. Mixed infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum in a murine lesion model. potential synergistic effects on virulence, Infect Immun 1996; 64 (6): 2094–2100.
4. Sobrinho AP, Barros MH, Nicoli JR, Carvalho MA, Farias LM, Bambirra EA, Bahia MG, Vieira EC. Experimental root canal infections in conventional and germ–free mice. J Endod 1998; 24 (6): 405–408.
5. Atkinson MA, Leiter EH. The NOD mouse model of type I diabetes: as good as it gets?. Nature Med. 1999; 5 (6): 601–604.
6. Fouad A, Barry J, Russo J, Radolf J, Zhu Q. Periapical lesion progression with controlled microbial inoculation in a type I diabetic mouse model. J Endod 2002; 28 (1): 8–16.
7. Moretton TR, Brown CE Jr, Legan JJ, Kafrawy AH. Periapical Lesion Progression with Controlled Microbial Inoculation in a Type I Diabetic Mouse Model. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 52 (3): 528–533.
8. de Melo Maltos SM, Ribeiro Sobrinho AP, Silva FV, Nicoli JR, Roque de Carvalho MA, Vieira LQ, de Macêdo Farias L. Bacterial concentrations determine the ability to implant in the root canal system and translocate to lymph nodes in germ–free mice. J Endod 2003; 29 (1): 24–27.

9. Faria G, Celes MR, De Rossi A, Silva LA, Silva JS, Rossi MA. Evaluation of chlorhexidine toxicity injected in the paw of mice and added to cultured I929 fibroblasts. J Endod 2007;33(6):715–722
10. Rezende TM, Vieira LQ, Sobrinho AP, Oliveira RR, Taubman MA, Kawai T. The influence of mineral trioxide aggregate on adaptive immune responses to endodontic pathogens in mice. J Endod 2008; 34 (9): 1066–1071.
11. Mutoh N, Watabe H, Chieda K, Tani–Ishii N. Expression of Toll–like receptor 2 and 4 in inflamed pulp in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. J Endod 2009; 35 (7): 975–980.
12. Alshwaimi E, Purcell P, Kawai T, Sasaki H, Oukka M, Campos–Neto A, Stashenko P. Regulatory T cells in mouse periapical lesions. J Endod 2009; 35 (9): 1229–1233.
13. Metzger Z, Lin YY, Dimeo F, Ambrose WW, Trope M, Arnold RR. Synergistic pathogenicity of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum in the mouse subcutaneous chamber model. J Endod 2009; 35 (1): 86–94.
14. Garlet TP, Fukada SY, Saconato IF, Avila–Campos MJ, da Silva TA, Garlet GP, Cunha Fde Q. CCR2 deficiency results in increased osteolysis in experimental periapical lesions in mice. J Endod 2010; 36 (2): 244–250.
15. Flake NM, Zweifel LS. Behavioral effects of pulp exposure in mice lacking cannabinoid receptor 2. J Endod 2012; 38 (1): 86–90.
16. Zortuk M, Kıraç E. Laboratuvar hayvanlarının deneysel amaçla protetik diş tedavisi alanında kullanım prosedürleri. Erciyes Univ Sağlık Bilim Derg 2010; 19 (3): 226–231.
17. Garcia Lda F, Marques AA, Roselino Lde M, Pires– de–Souza Fde C, Consani S. Biocompatibility evaluation of Epiphany/Resilon root canal filling system in subcutaneous tissue of rats. J Endod 2010; 36 (1): 110–114.
18. Huxley HG. The histology of rat molar tooth fissure plaque. Arch Oral Biol 1971; 16 (11): 1311–1328.
19. Stashenko P, Wang CY, Tani–ishii N, Yu SM. Pathogenesis of induced rat periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994, 78 (4): 494–502.
20. Muruzabal M, Eurasquin J. Discussion of methods and criteria in evaluation of periapical response. Int Dent J 1970, 20 (3): 539–554.
21. Dammaschke T. Rat molar teeth as a study model for direct pulp capping research in dentistry. Lab Anim 2010; 44 (1): 1–6.
22. Guo W, Gong K, Shi H, Zhu G, He Y, Ding B, Wen L, Jin Y. Dental follicle cells and treated dentin matrix scaffold for tissue engineering the tooth root. Biomaterials 2012; 33 (5): 1291–1302.
23. Oikawa T, Nomura Y, Arai C, Noda K, Hanada N, Nakamura Y. Mechanism of active eruption of molars in adolescent rats. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33 (3): 221– 227.
24. Duarte PM, Tezolin KR, Figueiredo MF, Feres M, Bastos MF. Microbial profile of ligature–induced periodontitis in rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2010; 55 (2): 142–147.
25. Nakasone N, Yoshie H, Ohshima H. An immunohistohemical study of the expression of heat– shock protein–25 and cell proliferation in the dental pulp and enamel organ during odontogenesis in rat molars. Arch Oral Biol 2006; 51 (5): 378–386.
26. Thibodeau B, Teixeira F, Yamauchi M, Caplan DJ, Trope M. Pulp revascularization of immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2007; 33 (6): 680–689.
27. da Silva LA, Nelson–Filho P, da Silva RA. Revascularization and periapical repair after endodontic treatment using apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing in dogs teeth with apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109 (5): 779–787.
28. Wang X, Thibodeau B, Trope M, Lin L, Huang GT. Histologic characterization of regenerated tissues in canal space after the revitalization/revascularization procedure of immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2010; 36 (1): 56–63.
29. Metzger Z, Klein H, Klein A, Tagger M. Periapical lesion development in rats inhibited by dexamethasone. J Endod 2002; 28 (9): 643–645.
30. Nakamura K, Yamasaki M, Nishigaki N, Iwama A, Imaizumi I, Nakamura H, Kameyama Y. Effect of methotrexate–induced neutropenia on pulpal inflammation in rats. J Endod 2002; 28 (4): 287–290.
31. Johnson RB. Effects of multiple dentinal lesions on the rat pulp. J Endod 2004; 30 (12): 868–871.
32. Xiong H, Peng B, Wei L, Zhang X, Wang L. Effect of an estrogen–deficient state and alendronate therapy on bone loss resulting from experimental periapical lesions in rats. J Endod 2007; 33 (11): 1304–1308.
33. Morimoto T, Yamasaki M, Nakata K, Tsuji M, Nakamura H. The expression of macrophage and neutrophil elastases in rat periradicular lesions. J Endod 2008; 34 (9): 1072–1076.
34. Garber SE, Shabahang S, Escher AP, Torabinejad M. The effect of hyperglycemia on pulpal healing in rats. J Endod 2009; 35 (1): 60–62.
35. Lee YL, Hong CY, Kok SH, Hou KL, Lin YT, Chen MH, Wang CC, Lin SK. An extract of green tea, epigallocatechin–3–gallate, reduces periapical lesions by inhibiting cysteine–rich 61 expression in osteoblasts. J Endod 2009; 35 (2): 206–211.
36. Garcia Lda F, Marques AA, Roselino Lde M, Pires– de–Souza Fde C, Consani S. Biocompatibility evaluation of Epiphany/Resilon root canal filling system in subcutaneous tissue of rats. J Endod 2010; 36 (1): 110–114.
37. Gomes–Filho JE, de Moraes Costa MM, Cintra LT, Duarte PC, Takamiya AS, Lodi CS, Bernabé PF. Evaluation of rat alveolar bone response to Angelus MTA or experimental light–cured mineral trioxide aggregate using fluorochromes. J Endod 2011; 37 (2): 250–254.
38. Scarparo RK, Dondoni L, Böttcher DE, Grecca FS, Rockenbach MI, Batista EL Jr. Response to intracanal medication in immature teeth with pulp necrosis: an experimental model in rat molars. J Endod 2011; 37 (8): 1069–1073.
39. Fouad AF, Walton RE, Rittman BR. Healing of induced periapical lesions in ferret canines. J Endod 1993; 19 (3): 123–129.
40. Torabinejad M, Corr R, Buhrley M, Wright K, Shabahang S. An animal model to study regenerative endodontics. J Endod 2011; 37 (2): 197–202.
41. Holland GR. Periapical response to apical plugs of dentin and calcium hydroxide in ferret canines. J Endod 1984; 10 (2): 71–74.
42. Holland GR. Periapical innervation of the ferret canine one year after pulpectomy. J Dent Res 1992; 71 (3): 470–474.
43. Mah R, Holland GR, Pehowich E. Periapical changes after orthodontic movement of root–filled ferret canines. J Endod 1996; 22 (6): 298–303.
44. Rutherford RB, Gu K. Treatment of inflamed ferret dental pulps with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein–7. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108 (3): 202–206.
45. Pileggi R, Holland GR. The expression of heat shock protein 70 in the dental pulp following trauma. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25 (4): 426–428.
46. Kline LW, Yu DC. Effects of calcitonin, calcitonin gene–related peptide, human recombinant bone morphogenetic protein–2, and parathyroid hormone– related protein on endodontically treated ferret canines. J Endod 2009; 35 (6): 866–869.
47. Dickens SH, Flaim GM, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Schafer DR, Rutherford RB. Preclinical effectiveness of a novel pulp capping material. J Endod 2010; 36 (7): 1222–1225.
48. Goto T, Mamiya H, Ichinohe T, Kaneko Y. Localization of 14C–labeled 2% lidocaine hydrochloride after intraosseous anesthesia in the rabbit. J Endod 2011; 37 (10): 1376–1379.
49. Kopaladze RA. The experiments with laboratory animals from a bioethical point of view––history, modern time, perspectives. Usp Fiziol Nauk 2004; 35 (2): 92–109.
50. Azargoon H, Williams BJ, Solomon ES, Kessler HP, He J, Spears R. Assessment of hemostatic efficacy and osseous wound healing using HemCon dental dressing. J Endod 2011; 37 (6): 807–811.
51. Tassery H, Pertot WJ, Camps J, Proust JP, Déjou J. Comparison of two implantation sites for testing intraosseous biocompatibility. J Endod 1999; 25 (9): 615–618.
52. El–Backly RM, Massoud AG, El–Badry AM, Sherif RA, Marei MK. Regeneration of dentine/pulp–like tissue using a dental pulp stem cell/poly(lactic–co– glycolic) acid scaffold construct in New Zealand white rabbits. Aust Endod J 2008; 34 (2): 52–67.
53. Azargoon H, Williams BJ, Solomon ES, Kessler HP, He J, Spears R. Assessment of hemostatic efficacy and osseous wound healing using HemCon dental dressing. J Endod. 2011; 37 (6): 807–811.
54. Citrome GP, Kaminski EJ, Heuer MA. A comparative study of tooth apexification in the dog. J Endod 1979; 5 (10): 290–297.
55. Uysal T, Ustdal A, Sonmez MF, Ozturk F. Stimulation of bone formation by dietary boron in an orthopedically expanded suture in rabbits. Angle Orthod 2009; 79 (5): 984–990.
56. Holland R, de Souza V. Ability of a new calcium hydroxide root canal filling material to induce hard tissue formation. J Endod 1985; 11 (12): 535–543.
57. Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Utrilla LS, Assed S, Ether SS. Calcium hydroxide root canal sealers–– histopathologic evaluation of apical and periapical repair after endodontic treatment. J Endod 1997; 23 (7): 428–432.
58. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Faccioli LH, Figueiredo F. Inflammatory response to calcium hydroxide based root canal sealers. J Endod 1997; 23 (2): 86–90.
59. Holland R, Sant’Anna Jşnior A, Souza V, Dezan Junior E, Otoboni Filho JA, Bernabé PF, Nery MJ, Murata SS. Influence of apical patency and filling material on healing process of dogs’ teeth with vital pulp after root canal therapy. Braz Dent J 2005, 16 (1): 9–16.
60. Dissanayaka WL, Zhu X, Zhang C, Jin L. Characterization of dental pulp stem cells isolated from canine premolars. J Endod 2011, 37 (8): 1074– 1080.
61. Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Fang D, Yamaza T, Seo BM, Zhang C, Liu H, Gronthos S, Wang CY, Wang S, Shi S. Mesenchymal stem cell–mediated functional tooth regeneration in swine. PLoS One 2006, 20 (1): e79.
62. Balic A, Mina M. Characterization of progenitor cells in pulps of murine incisors. J Dent Res 2010, 89 (11): 1287–1292.
63. Cheng PH, Snyder B, Fillos D, Ibegbu CC, Huang AH, Chan AW. Postnatal stem/progenitor cells derived from the dental pulp of adult chimpanzee. BMC Cell Biol 2008; (9): 20.
64. Wang S, Liu Y, Fang D, Shi S. The miniature pig: a useful large animal model for dental and orofacial research. Oral Dis 2007; 13 (6): 530–537.
65. Yamada Y, Nakamura S, Ito K, Sugito T, Yoshimi R, Nagasaka T, Ueda M. A feasibility of useful cell– based therapy by bone regeneration with deciduous tooth stem cells, dental pulp stem cells, or bone– marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells for clinical study using tissue engineering technology. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16 (6): 1891–1900.
66. Park JY, Jeon SH, Choung PH. Efficacy of periodontal stem cell transplantation in the treatment of advanced periodontitis. Cell Transplant 2011; 20 (2): 271–285.
67. Ji YM, Jeon SH, Park JY, Chung JH, Choung YH, Choung PH. Dental stem cell therapy with calcium hydroxide in dental pulp capping. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16 (6): 1823–1833.
68. Iohara K, Zheng L, Ito M, Tomokiyo A, Matsushita K, Nakashima M. Side population cells isolated from porcine dental pulp tissue with self–renewal and multipotency for dentinogenesis, chondrogenesis, adipogenesis, and neurogenesis. Stem Cells 2006; 24 (11): 2493–2503.
69. Iohara K, Zheng L, Ito M, Ishizaka R, Nakamura H, Into T, Matsushita K, Nakashima M. Regeneration of dental pulp after pulpotomy by transplantation of CD31(–)/CD146(–) side population cells from a canine tooth. Regen Med. 2009; 4 (3): 377–385.
70. Yamada Y, Ito K, Nakamura S, Ueda M, Nagasaka T. Promising cell–based therapy for bone regeneration using stem cells from deciduous teeth, dental pulp, and bone marrow. Cell Transplant 2011; 20 (7): 1003–1013.
71. Apaydin ES, Torabinejad M. The effect of calcium sulfate on hard–tissue healing after periradicular surgery. J Endod 2004; 30 (1): 17–20.
72. Lin LM, Di Fiore PM, Lin J, Rosenberg PA. Histological study of periradicular tissue responses to uninfected and infected devitalized pulps in dogs. J Endod 2006; 32 (1): 34–38.
73. Holland R, Bisco Ferreira L, de Souza V, Otoboni Filho JA, Murata SS, Dezan E Jr. Reaction of the lateral periodontium of dogs’ teeth to contaminated and noncontaminated perforations filled with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2007; 33 (10): 1192– 1197.
74. Leonardo MR, Barnett F, Debelian GJ, de Pontes Lima RK, Bezerra da Silva LA. Root canal adhesive filling in dogs’ teeth with or without coronal restoration: a histopathological evaluation. J Endod 2007; 33 (11): 1299–1303.
75. Thibodeau B, Teixeira F, Yamauchi M, Caplan DJ, Trope M. Pulp revascularization of immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2007; 33 (6): 680–689.
76. Leonardo MR, Flores DS, de Paula E Silva FW, de Toledo Leonardo R, da Silva LA. A comparison study of periapical repair in dogs’ teeth using RoekoSeal and AH plus root canal sealers: a histopathological evaluation. J Endod 2008; 34 (7): 822–825.
77. Wang X, Thibodeau B, Trope M, Lin LM, Huang GT. Histologic characterization of regenerated tissues in canal space after the revitalization/revascularization procedure of immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2010; 36 (1): 56–63.
78. Tawil PZ, Trope M, Curran AE, Caplan DJ, Kirakozova A, Duggan DJ, Teixeira FB. Periapical microsurgery: an in vivo evaluation of endodontic root–end filling materials. J Endod 2009; 35 (3): 357–362.
79. Dickens SH, Flaim GM, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Schafer DR, Rutherford RB. Preclinical effectiveness of a novel pulp capping material. J Endod 2010; 36 (7): 1222–1225.
80. Dissanayaka WL, Zhu X, Zhang C, Jin L. Characterization of dental pulp stem cells isolated from canine premolars. J Endod 2011; 37 (8): 1074– 1080.
81. Marcotte LR, Dowson J, Rowe NH. Apical healing with retrofilling materials amalgam and gutta–percha. J Endod 1975; 1 (2): 63–65.
82. Donlon WC. Immune neutrality of calf skin collagen gel used to stimulate revitalization in pulpless open apex teeth of rhesus monkeys. J Dent Res 1977; 56 (6): 670–673.
83. Nevins A, Finkelstein F, Laporta R, Borden BG. Induction of hard tissue into pulpless open–apex teeth using collagen–calcium phosphate gel. J Endod 1978; 4 (3): 76–81.
84. Palmer GR, Weine FS, Palmer MJ, Healey HJ. A study of the tissue reaction to silver cones and Ti– 6Al––4V in the rhesus monkey. J Endod 1979; 5 (4): 116–120.
85. Chiniwalla NP, Rapp R. The effect of pulpotomy using Formocresol on blood vessel architecture in primary anterior teeth of Macaca rhesus monkeys. J Endod 1982; 8 (5): 205–207.
86. Tagger M, Tagger E. Pulp capping in monkeys with Reolit and Life, two calcium hydroxide bases with different pH. J Endod 1985; 11 (9): 394–400.
87. Berude JA, Hicks ML, Sauber JJ, Li SH. Resorption after physiological and rigid splinting of replanted permanent incisors in monkeys. J Endod 1988; 14 (12): 592–600.
88. Balla R, LoMonaco CJ, Skribner J, Lin LM. Histological study of furcation perforations treated with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxylapatite, amalgam, and Life. J Endod 1991; 17 (5): 234–238.
89. Hartwell GR, England MC. Healing of furcation perforations in primate teeth after repair with decalcified freeze–dried bone: a longitudinal study. J Endod 1993; 19 (7): 357–361.
90. Krell KV, McMurtrey LG, Walton RE. Vasculature of the dental pulp of atherosclerotic monkeys: light and electron microscopic findings. J Endod 1994; 20 (10): 469–473.