EN
TR
The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses
Öz
Abstract
Objective: Ultrasonography (US) is a widely used modality in practice in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Physiological follicles and corpus luteum cysts in premenopausal woman is the most common benign adnexal masses. Therefore; it is important that diagnosis of masses and pre-treatment determination of the physiological follicular cysts do not require operation among benign masses.
Materials and Methods: One hundred and nine patients underwent US and coloured Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in view of benign adnexal mass were investigated in our hospital, retrospectively. In the study, to be able to distinguish physiological follicular cysts of the other benign adnexal masses, the findings of patients's US and CDU, clinical data, and value of CA125 were examined and investigated whether diagnostic contrubituon is. Parametric variables were compared by independent sample t test, nonparametric ones were compared chi-square test. When p < 0.05 is it was accepted that difference between variables was significant.
Results: Seventy three patients (67%) whose mass is evaluated as follicular cyst named as group 1, whereas 36 patients (33%) whose mass is evaluated as the other benign adnexal masses named as group 2. Between groups mean age and mean mass's diamater were different (34 vs 42; p = 0.003, 5 vs 7 cm; p = 0.001, respectively). Additionally, mass contour feature, the internal structure of the mass and intramass vascularization were statistically different between groups, while RI value, pathological vascularization increase and CA-125 values were not different.
Conclusion: In premenopausal period, cystic lesion with small-sized, regular contour, homogeneous echo without heterogeneous solid component is likely to be physiological follicle cyst. In assessment of physiological follicular cysts, we could consider that US findings is more valuable than CDU findings and CA-125 value.
Key words; Ultrasonography, coloroud Doppler Ultrasonography, Benign adnexal mass.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Piras B, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Ultrasonography and color Doppler-based triage for adnexalmasses to provide the most appropriate surgical approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 401-406.
- Drake J. Diagnosis and management of the adnexial mass. Am Fam Physician 1998; 15: 2471-2476.
- Bayer AI, Wiskind AK. Adnexial torsion:can the adnexa be saved?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1506-1510.
- Hall DA, Hann LE, Ferrucci JT Jr, Black EB, Braitman BS, Crowley WF, Nikrul N, Kelley JA. Sonographic morphologyof the normal menstrual cycle. Radiology 1989; 133: 185.
- Dökmeci F, Söylemez F. Adneksiyel kitlelerin tanısında ultrasonografinin değeri. Türkiye Klinikleri Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 1990; 10: 57-62.
- Noor N, Sadeque AS, Kundu SS. Diagnostic accuracy of
- transabdominal sonography in the evaluation of pelvic mass of gynecological origin. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2003; 29: 86-91.
- Kupesic S, Aksamija A, Vucic N, Tripalo A, Kurjak A. Ultrasonography in acute pelvic pain. Acta Med Croatica 2002; 56: 171-180.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
27 Nisan 2014
Gönderilme Tarihi
23 Temmuz 2013
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2014 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1
APA
Altunkeser, A., Sevgili, M., & Soysal, S. (2014). The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 1-4. https://izlik.org/JA55HZ27GC
AMA
1.Altunkeser A, Sevgili M, Soysal S. The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014;5(1):1-4. https://izlik.org/JA55HZ27GC
Chicago
Altunkeser, Ayşegül, Mehmet Sevgili, ve Sema Soysal. 2014. “The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 5 (1): 1-4. https://izlik.org/JA55HZ27GC.
EndNote
Altunkeser A, Sevgili M, Soysal S (01 Nisan 2014) The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 5 1 1–4.
IEEE
[1]A. Altunkeser, M. Sevgili, ve S. Soysal, “The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 1–4, Nis. 2014, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55HZ27GC
ISNAD
Altunkeser, Ayşegül - Sevgili, Mehmet - Soysal, Sema. “The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 5/1 (01 Nisan 2014): 1-4. https://izlik.org/JA55HZ27GC.
JAMA
1.Altunkeser A, Sevgili M, Soysal S. The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014;5:1–4.
MLA
Altunkeser, Ayşegül, vd. “The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 5, sy 1, Nisan 2014, ss. 1-4, https://izlik.org/JA55HZ27GC.
Vancouver
1.Ayşegül Altunkeser, Mehmet Sevgili, Sema Soysal. The contribution of ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2014;5(1):1-4. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55HZ27GC
