Kaninlerin Transpozisyon ve Transmigrasyon Sıklığının Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 395 - 401, 25.12.2021

Özlem Görmez M.fatih Şentürk

https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.973978

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk popülasyonunun bir alt grubunda kanin transpozisyonu ve transmigrasyonu sıklığının araştırılmasıdır.
Materyal - Metot: 2017 Ocak- 2017 Aralık ayları arasında Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi kliniğinde çeşitli sebeplerle panoramik radyograf [PR] alınmış 18-35 yaş aralığındaki hastaların PR’leri kanin transpozisyonu ve transmigrasyonu açısından geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, sendrom varlığı bilgilerini içeren demografik verileri ile, transpozisyon ve transmigrasyon gösteren kanin dişlerinin varlığı, sayıları, konumları, tek ya da çift taraflı oluşu, bu dişler ile ilişkili patolojiler ve literatürde tanımlanmış sınıflamadaki pozisyonları açısından değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: 15511 hastaya ait olan PR’ler incelendi ve 24 [% 0.15] hastada 26 transpoze kanin ve 31 [% 0.19] hastada 32 transmigre kanin dişi tespit edildi. Her iki anomali de genellikle tek taraflı görüldü. Kanin transpozisyonu en çok üst çenede[% 76.98] ve kadınlarda [% 65.38] görülürken kanin transmigrasyonu ise en çok alt çenede [% 59.38] ve erkeklerde [% 53.12]olacak şekilde görülmüştür. Üst çene kanin-lateral transpozisyonu[% 42.31] en çok görülen transpozisyon tipiydi. % 31,57’lik eşit oranlarla Tip 1 ve Tip 2 transmigrasyon en çok görülen tiplerdi.
Sonuçlar: Kanin transpozisyonu ve transmigrasyonu nadir görülen bir durumdur.Bu dişler kaynaklı oluşabilecek sorunların önlenebilmesi adına detaylı PR incelemesi ve hastaların takibi çok önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kanin, transpozisyon, transmigrasyon, sıklık, PR

Determination of Canine Transposition and Transmigration Frequency

Öz

Objective:To investigate the frequency of canine transmigration and transpositon in a subgroup of Turkish population.

Material - Method: The panoramic radiograph [PR] of patients, aged 18-35 years ,who received a PR for various reasons at the Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Dentistry Dentomaxillofacial Radiology clinic between January 2017 and December 2017 were retrospectively examined in terms of canine transposition and transmigration. Patients’ demographic data including age, gender, presence of the syndrome, the presence of transposed and transmigrant canine teeth, their number, location, unilateral or bilateral status, related pathologies and the positions in defined classifications were evaluated.
Results: PR of 15511 patients were examined and 26 transposed canine in 24 [% 0.15] patients and 32 transmigrant canine in 31 [% 0.19] patients were detected. Both anomalies were generally seen unilaterally. Canine transposition were mostly observed in maxilla [%76.98] and females[% 65.38] whereas transmigration in mandible [% 59.38] and males[%53.12]. Maxillary canine- lateral transposition[ % 42.31] was the most seen transposition type. With the equal percentage of % 31.57 type 1 and 2 transmigration were the most seen types.
Conclusion: Canine transposition and transmigration are a rare entity. In order to prevent the symptoms that may arise from these teeth, detailed clinical and specially radiographic examination and patient follow up is so important.

Anahtar Kelimeler

canine, transposition, transmigration, frequency, PR

Kaynakça

• [1] Peck L, Peck S, Attia Y. Maxillary canine-first premolar transposition, associated dental anomalies and genetic basis. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:99-109.
• [2] Lagana G, Venza N, Borzabadi-Farahini A, Fabi F, Danesi C, Cozza P. Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:62-8.
• [3] Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Oztek O. Investigation of tooth transposition in a non-syndromic Turkish anatolian population: Characteristic features and associated dental anomalies. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15 (5):e716-20.
• [4] Alves-Pereira D, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Ellis-van Creveld syndrome. Case report and literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E340-3.
• [5] Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Maxillary tooth transpositions: characteristic features and accompanying dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:127-34.
• [6] Yılmaz A, Şahinoğlu Z.Orthodontic treatment of a bilateral mandibular lateral incisor-canine transposition.Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 2012;25:67-75.
• [7] Lorente T, Lorente C, Murray PG, Lorente P. Surgical and orthodontic management of maxillary canine-lateral incisor transpositions Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:876-85.
• [8] Peck S, Peck L. Classification of maxillary tooth transpositions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:505-17.
• [9] Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Intraosseous transmigration of mandibular canines-review of theliterature and treatment options.Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16:1014-7.
• [10] Özveri Koyuncu B, Çetingül E. Transmigration of impacted canines. Six case reports. J Hacettepe Uni Dent Fac 2010;34:23-9.
• [11] Şentürk MF, Yazıcı T, İnceoğlu B, Öztaş B. Gömülü kaninlerin transmigrasyon insidansının belirlenmesi. Selcuk Dent J 2018;5[2]:123-7.
• [12] Dalessandri D, Parrini S, Rubiano R, Gallone D, Migliorati M. Impacted and transmigrant mandibular canines incidence, aetiology, and treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39[2]:161–169.
• [13] Koç A, Kaya S, Abdulsalam WA, Three-Dimensional Analysis of Impacted Maxillary and Mandibular Canines and Evaluation of Factors Associated with Transmigration on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images, J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020, doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.002.
• [14] Mupparapu M. Patterns of intra-osseous transmigration and ectopic eruption of mandibular canines: review of literature and report of nine additional cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:355–60.
• [15] Plakwicz P, Abramczyk J, Wojtaszek-Lis J, Sajkowska J, Warych B, Gawron K, et al. The retrospective study of 93 patients with transmigration of mandibular canine and a comparative analysis with a control group. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41[4]:390-396.
• [16] Azeem M, Afzal A, Ahmed Z, Ali MM, Haq AU, Hamid WU. Investigation of transmigrated mandibular canines. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019;24[6]:65-8.
• [17] Başaran M, Bozdemir E. Gömülü Üçüncü Molar ve Kanin Dişlerin Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile Değerlendirilmesi. European Journal of Research in Dentistry 2018;2:47-52.
• [18] da Silva Santos LM, Bastos LC, Oliveira-Santos C, da Silva SJ, Neves FS, Campos PS. Cone-beam computed tomography findings of impacted upper canines. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:287-92.
• [19] Hatzoudi M. Papadopoulos MA. Prevalence of tooth transposition in Greek population, Hell OrthodRev 2006;9:11-22.
• [20] Onyeaso CO, Onyeaso AO.Occlusal/dental anomalies found in a random sample of Nigerian schoolchildren. Oral Health Prev Dent 2006;4:181-6.
• [21] Danielsen JC, Karimian K, Ciarlantini R, Melsen B, Kjaer I. Unilateral and bilateral dental transpositions in the maxilla—dental and skeletal findings in 63 individuals. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2015 16:467–76.
• [22] Papadopoulos MA, Chatzoudi M, Kaklamanos EG. Prevalence of tooth transposition. A meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:275–85.
• [23] Finkelstein T, Shapira Y, Pavlidi AM, Davidovitch M, Blumer S, Schonberger S, Shpack N. Canine Transposition - Prevalence, Distribution and Treatment Considerations among Orthodontic Patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;44[4]:268-73.
• [24] Kamiloglu B, Kelahmet U. Prevalence of impacted and transmigrated canine teeth in a Cypriote orthodontic population in the Northern Cyprus area BMC Research Notes 2014, 7:346-351.
• [25] Aktan AM, Kara S, Akgünlü F, Malkoç S. The incidence of canine transmigration and tooth impaction in a Turkish subpopulation. Eur J Orthod 2010;32[5]:575–581.
• [26] Maria Diaz-Sanchez R, Castillo de Oyagüe R, Angeles Serrera Figalho M, Hita Iglesias P, Louis Gutierrez Perez J, Torres Lagares D. Transmigration of mandibular cuspids: review of published reports and description of nine new cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:241–7.