Pediatric Burn Management: A Qualitative Study on Nursing Perspectives and Professional Needs

Öz

Objective This study aims to explore the perceptions, experiences, and professional needs of pediatric nurses involved in caring for burn-injured children. By examining their emotional responses, clinical challenges, and training gaps, this research aims to provide insights that can inform future improvements in pediatric burn care practices, enhance nurse wellbeing, and contribute to the development of more comprehensive, patient- and family-centered care models in clinical settings. Material and Method This study employed a qualitative descriptive design to explore the perceptions and experiences of 21 pediatric nurses working in various hospitals in two cities in Turkey. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, ensuring they had at least five years of experience in pediatric nursing. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted, and all interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis approach was applied to identify key themes, which were cross-validated by two independent researchers to ensure reliability. Results Three major themes and eight subthemes emerged from the data: (1) Emotional and Psychological Impact (including emotional distress and coping mechanisms), (2) Clinical Challenges in Burn Care (including pain management, wound care, infection control, and communication with families), and (3) Professional and Training Needs (including lack of specialized training and the need for psychological support for nurses). Nurses reported high levels of stress and burnout due to the severity of injuries and emotional burden, inadequate pain management strategies, and difficulties in communicating with distressed families. Additionally, participants emphasized the urgent need for specialized burn care training and mental health support for healthcare providers. Conclusion This study highlights the emotional, clinical, and professional challenges that pediatric nurses face in burn care. Findings underscore the need for comprehensive training programs, advanced pain management strategies, and psychological support services to enhance nurse well-being and improve patient care. Addressing these challenges through policy and education reforms will help create a more effective and supportive environment for both nurses and pediatric burn patients.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Emotional impact
• Nursing perspectives
• Pain management
• Pediatric burn care
• Pediatric surgery
• Qualitative study

Kaynakça

1. 1. Patel KF, Rodríguez-Mercedes SL, Grant GG, Rencken CA, Kinney EM, Austen A, et al. Physical, psychological, and social outcomes in pediatric burn survivors ages 5 to 18 years: A systematic review. J Burn Care Res. 2022;43(2):343-52. doi:10.1093/jbcr/irab225
2. 2. Bayat A, Ramaiah R, Bhananker SM. Analgesia and sedation for children undergoing burn wound care. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;10(11):1747-59. doi:10.1586/ern.10.158
3. 3. Forjuoh SN. Burns in low- and middle-income countries: A review of available literature on descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and prevention. Burns. 2006;32(5):529-37. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2006.04.002
4. 4. Nassar JY, Al Qurashi AA, Albalawi IA, Nukaly HY, Halawani IR, Abumelha AF, et al. Pediatric burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis on epidemiology, gender distribution, risk factors, management, and outcomes in emergency departments. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49012. doi:10.7759/cureus.49012
5. 5. Mehta K, Arega H, Smith NL, Li K, Gause E, Lee J, Stewart B. Gender-based disparities in burn injuries, care, and outcomes: A World Health Organization (WHO) Global Burn Registry cohort study. Am J Surg. 2022;223(1):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.041
6. 6. Zhu H, Wang K, Liu X, Ji J, Yang P, Xu F. Global burden of burns among children and adolescents: A trend analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1505023. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1505023
7. 7. Gonzalez R, Shanti CM. Overview of current pediatric burn care. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015;24(1):47-9. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2014.11.008
8. 8. Stoddard FJ, Saxe G, Ronfeldt H, Drake JE, Burns J, Edgren C, Sheridan R. Acute stress symptoms in young children with burns. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45(1):87-93. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000184934.71917.3a

9. 9. Marwa NP, Tarimo EA. Provision of care to hospitalized pediatric burn patients: a qualitative study among nurses at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Nurs. 2019;18(8):1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0335-1
10. 10. Hadoush H, Alruz S, Kassab M, Roy AN. Non-pharmacological management of burn-related pain and distress in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Syst Rev Pharm. 2021;12(3):376-92.
11. 11. Farzan R, Parvizi A, Haddadi S, Sadeh Tabarian M, Jamshidbeigi A, Samidoust P, et al. Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on pain intensity of children with burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2023;20(7):2898-913.
12. 12. Vinaik R, Barayan D, Shahrokhi S, Jeschke MG. Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019;17(8):607-19. doi:10.1080/14787210.2019.1648208
13. 13. Cartotto R, Johnson L, Rood JM, Lorello D, Matherly A, Parry I, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Early mobilization and rehabilitation of critically ill burn patients. J Burn Care Res. 2023;44(1):1-15. doi:10.1093/jbcr/irac008
14. 14. Zabihi MR, Bastani M, Rashtiani S, Yavari S, Akhoondian M, Farzan R. The role of nursing care during post-burn mood disorders: A narrative review. J Nurs Rep Clin Pract. 2024;3(3):279-89.
15. 15. Yadi DA, Purba CIH, Pahria T, Ropii B, Bethasari M, Prasetyo AT. Enhancing burn management outcomes through family support: A literature review of current evidence and best practices. Burns Open. 2024;8(4):100375. Doi: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100375
16. 16. Cioga E, Cruz D, Laranjeira C. A scoping review protocol: Parenting experiences and family dynamics in pediatric burn care settings from hospitalization to the return home. Nurs Rep. 2025;15:1-11. doi:10.3390/nursrep15020071
17. 17. Wang Y, Wong FKY, Bayuo J, Chung LYF, Zhang L, Wang T. Challenges of nurses and family members of burn patients: Integrative review. Nurs Open. 2023;10(6):3547-60.
18. 18. Cowley LE, Bennett CV, Quinn-Scoggins HD, Nuttall D, Wilkins D, Kemp AM. Factors influencing clinicians', health visitors' and social workers' professional judgements, decision-making and multidisciplinary collaboration when safeguarding children with burn injuries: A qualitative study. Child Abuse Rev. 2024;33(1):e2862. doi:10.1002/car.2862
19. 19. Kankaya EA, Özer Özlü NG, Vural F. Investigating compassion fatigue and predictive factors in paediatric surgery nurses. Nurs Ethics. 2024;31(5):845-58.
20. 20. Flaubert JL, Le Menestrel S, Williams DR, Wakefield MK, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Supporting the health and professional well-being of nurses. In: The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2021.
21. 21. Mlambo M, Silén C, McGrath C. Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development: A metasynthesis of the literature. BMC Nurs. 2021;20:1-13. doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2
22. 22. King R, Taylor B, Talpur A, Jackson C, Manley K, Ashby N, et al. Factors that optimise the impact of continuing professional development in nursing: A rapid evidence review. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;98:104652. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104652
23. 23. Karahan S, Erbas A, Tuncbilek Z. Experiences, difficulties, and coping methods of burn nurses: An exploratory-descriptive qualitative study. J Burn Care Res. 2022;43(6):1277-85.
24. 24. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2016.
25. 25. van Manen M. Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2023. doi:10.4324/9781003228073
26. 26. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533-44. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
27. 27. Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):291-5. doi:10.1038/bdj.2008.192
28. 28. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
29. 29. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1-13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
30. 30. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59-82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
31. 31. Preston D, Ambardekar A. The pediatric burn: Current trends and future directions. Anesthesiol Clin. 2020;38(3):517-30. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2020.05.003
32. 32. Bayuo J, Agbenorku P. Compassion fatigue in the burn unit: A review of quantitative evidence. J Burn Care Res. 2022;43(4):957-64. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab237
33. 33. Rajamohan S, Chalmers K, Bennett E. Fostering resilience in nursing through REST. J Christ Nurs. 2023;40(1):20-7. doi: 10.1097/CNJ.0000000000001016
34. 34. Xavier T, Hittle BM, Rojas-Guyler L, Lee RC. Resilience in intensive care unit nurses: An integrative review. Crit Care Nurse. 2024;44(6):52-63. doi:10.4037/ccn2024753
35. 35. Ciornei B, David VL, Popescu D, Boia ES, Santangelo OE. Pain management in pediatric burns: A review of the science behind it. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2023;1: 9950870. doi: 10.1155/2023/9950870
36. 36. Griggs C, Goverman J, Bittner E, Levi B. Sedation and pain management in burn patients. Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.02.026
37. 37. Meng F, Zuo KJ, Amar-Zifkin A, Baird R, Cugno S, Poenaru D. Pediatric burn contractures in low- and lower middle-income countries: A systematic review of causes and factors affecting outcome. Burns. 2020;46(5):993-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.06.001
38. 38. Saralegui-Gainza A, Escalada-Hernandez P, García-Vivar C, San Martín-Rodríguez L, Soto-Ruiz N. Impact of Individual and Job Characteristics on Nurses' Scope of Practice in Spanish Hospital Units. Journal of nursing management 2024;1:4796716. doi: 10.1155/2024/4796716
39. 39. Türk G, Oğurlu N. Perception of the Care Concept by Nurses and the Factors Influencing Their Perception: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2024;21(2): 161-166.
40. 40. Feng P, Hao J, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Yu T, Gu L. A cross-sectional survey on nurses in burn departments: Core competencies and influencing factors. Burns. 2023;49(5):1218-24. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2022.09.003
41. 41. Saniapon R, Putra KR, Ismail DDS, Lestari R. What factors influence clinical nurses' self-efficacy after wound care training? A scoping review. Healthc Low-Resour Settings. 2024;12(S1):13040. doi:10.4081/hls.2024.13040
42. 42. Lanham JS, Nelson NK, Hendren B, Jordan TS. Outpatient burn care: Prevention and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(8):463-70.
43. 43. Holbert MD, Duff J, Wood F, Holland AJ, Teague W, Frear C, et al. Barriers and co-designed strategies for the implementation of negative pressure wound therapy in acute pediatric burn care in Australia: A mixed method study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024;77:e520-e530. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.05.018