Effect of Education for The Disabled Children’s Mothers on The Reproductive Health Protective Knowledge and Attitude of Mothers

Öz

Objective This study is carried out to measure the effect of the education given to the mothers of disabled children studying in an educational institution that educates mentally disabled children on reproductive health protective knowledge and attitude of mothers and also to guide similar educational practices. Material and Method The mothers of students studying in an educational institution that provides education to mentally disabled children were included in the study (N=191). Before and 8 weeks after the training on improving reproductive health, a questionnaire including the Descriptive Information Form and the "Reproductive Health Protective Attitudes Determination Scale of Married Women" (RHPAS) was applied to the mothers. The reproductive health protective knowledge and attitudes of mothers were evaluated, and training was provided on "reproductive health protective behaviors," and the effectiveness of the training was evaluated. Results As a result of the statistical analysis, it was determined that the total RHPAS score increased significantly (p˂0.001) after the training. Sub-dimension scores of the scale (Cancer Prevention, General Health Behavior, and Protection from Infections) increased significantly. Conclusion According to these findings, it was determined that the intervention by training mothers of children with disabilities on reproductive health protective behaviors positively increased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Education of disabilities’ mothers
• Health education
• Mothers of disabled children
• Reproductive health
• Reproductive health training

Destekleyen Kurum

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-forprofit sectors.

Etik Beyan

Ethical Approval This study adhered to the principles outlined in the "Helsinki Declaration". Ethics committee approval of the study was obtained from Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee on 14.01.2015 with decision number 143. Consent to Participate and Publish The mothers participating in the study were informed about the purpose, process, and questionnaire of the study, and their informed consent to Participate and Publish was obtained.

Teşekkür

We are grateful for the interest and support of all mothers of children with disabilities in this study. We would like to thank Hülya Demirci for allowing us to use the scale they developed. The study was presented as an oral presentation at the 3th International Health Science and Life Congress, 4-6 June 2020, Burdur, Turkey.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Zurayk H, Myntti C, Salem MT, Kaddour A, El-Kak F, Jabbour S. Beyond reproductive health: listening to women about their health in disadvantaged Beirut neighborhoods. Health Care for Women International 2007;28(7):614-637. https://doi. org/10.1080/07399330701462017
2. 2. Bradfield Z, Officer K, Barnes C, Mignacca E, Butt J, Hauck Y. Sexual and reproductive health education: Midwives' confidence and practices. Women Birth 2022;35(4):360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 15. PMID: 34535424.
3. 3. Seidu AA, Ameyaw EK, Ahinkorah BO, Baatiema L, Dery S, Ankomah A, Ganle JK. Sexual and reproductive health education and its association with ever use of contraception: a cross-sectional study among women in urban slums, Accra. Reprod Health 2022;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01322-5. PMID: 35033115; PMCID: PMC8760577.
4. 4. Demirci H. Çalışan evli kadınlarda üreme sağlığını koruyucu davranışların geliştirilmesi. Sağlik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Anabilim Dali PhD diss. İstanbul: İstanbul University. 2004.
5. 5. Zincir H, Başer M, Mucuk S. Investigation of reproductive health protective behaviors of married women aged 15 - 49 in Argıncık health center region [Argıncık sağlık ocağı bölgesindeki 15 – 49 yaş evli kadınların üreme sağlığını koruyucu davranışlarının incelenmesi]. Uluslararası Üreme Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Kongresi. Ankara; 2005:183–184.
6. 6. Er S, Şen S, Taşpınar A, Şirin A. Reproductive health problems of married women continuining post-graduate education and the effecting factors [Lisansüstü eğitime devam eden evli kadınların üreme sağlığı sorunları ve etkileyen faktörler]. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2008;7(3):231-236.
7. 7. Koştu N, Taşçı KD. Determination of 15-49 year old married women's protecting attitude their reproductive health [15-49 yaş evli kadınların üreme sağlığını koruyucu tutumlarının belirlenmesi]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2009; 12(1):91-97.
8. 8. Solanke BL, Salau OR, Rahman S A, Popoola OE. Do the prevalence and correlates of adverse reproductive health outcomes differ by marriage cohorts? Evidence from a study of two marriage cohorts in Nigeria. Health Care for Women International 2021;42(4-6):462-484 https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2020.1803874

9. 9. Bilge A, Çeber E, Demirelöz M, Akmeşe ZB. Effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health education for the parents of individuals with developmental disability [Zihinsel engellilerin ebeveynlerine verilen cinsel sağlık ve üreme sağlığı eğitiminin zihinsel engelliler için etkinliğinin belirlenmesi]. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2013; 33(3):648-55. DOI: 10.5336/medsci.2012-30037
10. 10. Kang S, Rákosy Z, Park SE, Nguyen TAP. Editorial: Women in science: public health education and promotion 2023. Front Public Health 2024;12:1368704. doi: 10.3389/fpubh. 2024.1368704. PMID: 38410672; PMCID: PMC10895030.
11. 11. Baheiraei A, Mirghafourvand M, Mohammadi E, Nedjat S, Charandabi SM, Rajabi F, Majdzadeh R. Health-promoting behaviors and social support of women of reproductive age and strategies for advancing their health: protocol for a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health 2011;11:191 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-191
12. 12. Republic of Türkiye Prime Ministry General Directorate on the Status of Women. Kadının Statüsü ve Sağlığı ile İlgili Gerçekler. Ankara (Türkiye): Afşaroğlu Matbaası; 2008.
13. 13. Taşkın L.. Doğum ve Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği [Obstetrics and Women's Health Nursing] (6th ed.). Ankara (Türkiye): Sistem Ofset Matbaacılık; 2003.
14. 14. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health General Directorate of Health Research. Türkiye Kadın Sağlığı Araştırması. Ankara (Türkiye): Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health Yayın No:943; 2014.
15. 15. Coşkun A, Şahin NH, Kızılkaya N, Yıldız A. An epidemiological study determining the demographic characteristics and reproductive health problems of Kuştepe district women [Kuştepe mahallesi kadınlarının demografik özellikleri ile üreme sağlığı sorunlarını belirleyen epidemiyolojik bir çalışma]. Sağlık ve Toplum Dergisi 2000; 10(3): 22-30.
16. 16. Turan S, Özvarış SB, Üner S. Bir fabrika çalışanlarına yönelik su ve besinlerle bulaşan hastalıklar eğitim programı geliştirme çabası [Efforts to develop a water and foodborne diseases training program for factory employees]. Hacettepe Toplum Hekimliği Bülteni 2002; 21(2):1-6.
17. 17. Norton L. Health promotion and health education: what role should the nurse adopt in practise. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1998;28(6):1269-1275.
18. 18. Özvarış ŞB. Sağlık eğitimi ve sağlığı geliştirme [Health education and health promotion.] Ankara (Türkiye): Hacettepe Halk Sağlığı Vakfı Yayın No:01/18; 2001.
19. 19. Uğuz Ş, Toros F, İnanç BY, Çolakkadıoğlu O. Assessment of anxiety, depression and stres levels of mothers of handicapped children [Zihinsel ve/veya bedensel engelli çocukların annelerinin anksiyete, depresyon ve stres düzeylerinin belirlenmesi]. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 2004;7:42-47.
20. 20. Özşenol F, Işıkhan V, Ünay B, Aydın Hİ, Akı R, Gökçay E. The evaluation of family functions of families with handicapped children [Engelli çocuğa sahip ailelerin aile işlevlerinin değerlendirilmesi]. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi 2003;45(2):156–164.
21. 21. Yıldırım F, Conk Z. Effects of planned education on coping ways of stress and depression level of mothers/fathers’who have mentally retarded child [Zihinsel yetersizliği olan çocuğa sahip anne/babaların stresle başa çıkma tarzlarına ve depresyon düzeylerine planlı eğitimin etkisi]. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2005;9(2):1-10.
22. 22. Ryan S, Runswick‐Cole K. Repositioning mothers: mothers, disabled children and disability studies. Disability & Society 2008;23,3:199-210, Doi: 10.1080/09687590801953937
23. 23. Uskun E, Gündoğar D. The levels of stress, depression and anxiety of parents of disabled children in Türkiye. Disability and Rehabilitation 2010;32(23):1917-27. doi: 10.3109/09638281003763804.
24. 24. Hauck Y, Nguyen T, Frayne J, Garefalakis M, Rock D. Sexual and reproductive health trends among women with enduring mental illness: a survey of Western Australian Community Mental Health Services. Health Care for Women International 2015;36(4):499- 510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.973957
25. 25. Sullivan R, Magarick R, Bergthold G, Blouse A, McIntosh N. Tıp Eğitmenleri için Eğitim Becerileri Rehberi [Educational Skills Guide for Medical Educators]. Translated and edited by Şahin NN, Özvarış ŞB. Ankara (Türkiye): JHPIEGO Corporation Training Office Pub., Hacettepe Halk Sağlığı Vakfı Yayın No.99/14;1999(13-17).
26. 26. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health General Directorate of Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning. Aile Planlaması Danışmanlığı için Resimli Rehber. Ankara (Türkiye): Damla Matbaacılık; 2010.
27. 27. Van der Mark EJ, Conradie I, Dedding CWM, Broerse JEW. ‘We create our own small world’: daily realities of mothers of disabled children in a South African urban settlement. Disability & Society 2019;34:1:95-120, Doi: 10.1080/09687599.2018.1511415
28. 28. Kılıçarslan S. Edirne şehir merkezinde’ki son trimester gebelerin sosyodemografik özellikleri, yaşam kaliteleri, kaygı düzeyleri. Tıp Fakültesi Aile Hekimliği Ana Bilim Dalı Uzmanlık Tezi. Edirne: Trakya University; 2008.
29. 29. Efe H. Gebeliğin kadın cinselliği üzerindeki etkileri. Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği Uzmanlık Tezi. Türkiye's Health Ministry Haseki Education and Research Hospital; 2006.
30. 30. Uskun E, Çelik A, Doğan PA, Sönmez Y, Kişioğlu AN. The status of women in Isparta [Isparta’da il genelinde kadının statüsü]. Poster presentation (p:520). 16. Ulusal Halk Sağlığı Kongresi. Antalya, Türkiye; 2013(27-31). doi: 10.17343/sdutfd.317833
31. 31. EUROSTAT. Births and fertility: Over 5 million births in EU in 2017. Women in the EU have their first child on average at 29. EUROSTAT Newsrelease, 44/2019. [Cited 2019]. Available from: http://www.europeanmigrationlaw.eu/documents/ EUROSTAT-Births&fertility2017.pdf
32. 32. Anonymous. 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Ankara (Türkiye): Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü; 2014. ISBN 978-975-491-389-7
33. 33. Sönmez Y, Nayır T, Köse S, Gökçe B, Kişioğlu AN. The behaviors regarding early diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer of women aged 20 and over at a health center [Bir sağlık ocağı bölgesinde 20 yaş ve üzeri kadınların meme ve serviks kanseri erken tanısına ilişkin davranışları]. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fak. Dergisi 2012;19(4):124-130.
34. 34. Albayrak S, Çatıker A. Evaluation of sexual behaviours of married women aged 15-49 in Karaköy region [Karaköy bölgesindeki 15-49 yaş arasındaki evli kadınların cinsel sağlık davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi]. Kırıkkale Üniveritesi Tıp Fak Dergisi 2011;13(1):30-34. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.124787 ISSN 1302-3314.
35. 35. Erbil N, Göktaşlar Z. Determination of affecting factors and the reproductive health protective attitudes of married women [Evli kadınların üreme sağlığını koruyucu tutumları ve etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi]. Türkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik Dergisi 2010; 20(5):295-303.
36. 36. Kara H. Evli Kadınların üreme sağlığı ve üreme hakları konusunda bilgi tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. Sağlik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Anabilim Dali PhD diss. İstanbul: Haliç University; 2013
37. 37. Açıkgöz A, Çehreli R, Ellidokuz H. Women's knowledge and attitude about cancer and the behaviour for early diagnosis procedures [Kadınların kanser konusunda bilgi ve tutumları ile erken tanı yöntemlerine yönelik davranışları]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2011; 25(3):145 – 154.