Radiographic Evaluation of Nasopalatine and Infraorbital Canals in Geriatric Patients

Öz

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the morphologies of the nasopalatine canal (NPC) and infraorbital canal (IOC) in elderly patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to analyze their relationships with aging, gender, dental status, and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening. Material and Method CBCT data from 250 geriatric patients over 65 years of age were retrospectively analyzed. NPC was examined in the sagittal plane, and IOC in the coronal plane. Patients with a history of trauma, pathology, or surgery in the maxillary bone were excluded from the study. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the distribution of categorical differences between groups, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Based on their position on the maxillary sinus wall in the coronal plane, IOCs were observed as 47.2 % (right and left) type 1, 48.4 % type 2, and 4.4 % type 3. NPC morphology evaluated in the sagittal plane was found to be 54% cylindrical, 23.2 % conical, 8.4 % hourglass-shaped, 6.4 % tree branch-shaped, 6 % banana-shaped, and 5.6 % funnel-shaped. A significant correlation was observed between NPC morphology and gender, and between IOC type and age (p < 0.05). Conclusion Age-related osteoporosis, progressive alveolar bone resorption, and edentulism can alter maxillary morphology and size. Clinicians should be aware of and consider these variations to prevent potential complications during anesthesia and surgical procedures in geriatric patients.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CBCT
• Infraorbital canals
• Geriatric patients
• Nasopalatine canals

Destekleyen Kurum

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-forprofit sectors.

Etik Beyan

Ethical Approval The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the University of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam (Approval number: 2025/05). The study was conducted in line with the principles of the "Helsinki Declaration" Consent to Participate and Publish This retrospective observational study involved no human participation and was based solely on radiographic evaluations.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Beğer T, Yavuzer H. Yaşlılık ve yaşlılık epidemiyolojisi. Klinik gelişim. 2012;25(3):1-3.
2. 2. Radlanski R, Emmerich S, Renz H. Prenatal morphogenesis of the human incisive canal. Anatomy and embryology. 2004;208(4):265-71.
3. 3. Acar B, Kamburoğlu K. Morphological and volumetric evaluation of the nasopalatinal canal in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2015;37:259-65.
4. 4. Ćetković D. Morphological characteristics of the nutrient canals of the maxillary alveolar and palatine process and their anatomic relationship with the greater palatine artery and nerve. University of Belgrade Faculty of Dental Medicine Thesis. Belgrade: 2018.
5. 5. Hwang SH, Kim SW, Park CS, Kim SW, Cho JH, Kang JM. Morphometric analysis of the infraorbital groove, canal, and foramen on three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scans. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2013;35:565-71.
6. 6. Lee UY, Nam SH, Han SH, Choi KN, Kim TJ. Morphological characteristics of the infraorbital foramen and infraorbital canal using three-dimensional models. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2006;28:115-20.
7. 7. Elnil H, Al-Tubaikh JA, El Beltagi AH. Into the septum I go, a case of bilateral ectopic infraorbital nerves: a not-to-miss preoperative sinonasal CT variant. The neuroradiology journal. 2014;27(2):146-9.
8. 8. Mardinger O, Namani‐Sadan N, Chaushu G, Schwartz‐Arad D. Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation: a radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae. Journal of Periodontology. 2008;79(9):1659-62.

9. 9. Cavalcanti MGP, Yang J, Ruprecht A, Vannier M. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1999;28(3):137-40.
10. 10. Fontolliet M, Bornstein MM, von Arx T. Characteristics and dimensions of the infraorbital canal: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2019;41:169-79.
11. 11. Ference EH, Smith SS, Conley D, Chandra RK. Surgical anatomy and variations of the infraorbital nerve. The Laryngoscope. 2015;125(6):1296-300.
12. 12. Güncü GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo‐Moreno P, Velasco‐ Torres M, Al‐Hezaimi K, et al. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2013;24(9):1023-6.
13. 13. Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, et al. EAO guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012;23(11):1243-53.
14. 14. Yenigun A, Gun C, Uysal II, Nayman A. Radiological classification of the infraorbital canal and correlation with variants of neighboring structures. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2016;273:139-44.
15. 15. Haghnegahdar A, Khojastepour L, Naderi A. Evaluation of infraorbital canal in cone beam computed tomography of maxillary sinus. Journal of Dentistry. 2018;19(1):41.
16. 16. Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancıoğlu P, Yalçın ED, Aktan AM. Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images. Folia morphologica. 2019;78(1):153-62.
17. 17. Fernández-Alonso A, Suárez-Quintanilla J, Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Bornstein M, Blanco-Carrión A, Suárez-Cunqueiro M. Three-dimensional study of nasopalatine canal morphology: a descriptive retrospective analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2014;36:895-905.
18. 18. Gönül Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, Beker-Acay M, Çalişkan A, Sakarya G, et al. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagnostic and interventional imaging. 2016;97(11):1165-72.
19. 19. Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, Hu Y, Adriaensens P, Quirynen M, et al. Macro‐and micro‐anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2009;36(7):598-603.
20. 20. Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2014;36:805-12.
21. 21. Hakbilen S, Magat G. Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a Turkish population by cone beam computed tomography. Folia morphologica. 2018;77(3):527-35.
22. 22. Lopez Jornet P, Boix P, Sanchez Perez A, Boracchia A. Morphological characterization of the anterior palatine region using cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015;17:e459-e64.
23. 23. Magat G, Akyuz M. Are morphological and morphometric characteristics of the maxillary anterior region and nasopalatine canal related to each other? Oral Radiology. 2023;39(2):372-85.