BoNT-A Treatment Continuity and Patient- or Caregiver-Reported Reasons for Discontinuation or Irregular Continuation in Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Öz

Objective This study aimed to evaluate botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment continuity in patients with post-stroke spasticity, to identify patient- or caregiver- reported reasons for treatment discontinuation or irregular continuation, and to examine the associations between available demographic/clinical variables and the number of injections. Material and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, medical records of patients who received at least one botulinum toxin injection for post-stroke spasticity between 2012 and 2024 were reviewed. A total of 81 patients included in the final analysis responded to questions regarding reasons for not maintaining regular BoNT-A treatment. Results A total of 157 injections were administered over the 12-year study period. The mean number of injections was 1.9 (range: 1–7), and the mean interval between consecutive injections was 13.3 months. Forty-seven patients (58%) received only one injection session. Reasons for treatment discontinuation or irregular continuation were analyzed among 74 patients after excluding 7 patients who continued treatment at another center. The most frequently reported reason was lack of awareness regarding the need for repeated BoNT-A injections (54.1%). Other reasons included perceived lack of benefit from the injection (24.3%), reduction in spasticity (10.8%), comorbidities or other health problems limiting follow-up (6.8%), fear of injections (4.1%), inability to take time off work (1.4%), and misconception regarding reimbursement coverage (1.4%). Conclusion BoNT-A treatment continuity was low among patients with post-stroke spasticity. The most frequently reported reason for treatment discontinuation or irregular continuation was patient- or caregiver-reported lack of awareness regarding the need for repeated treatment. These findings suggest that clearer and standardized patient/caregiver education, together with regular follow- up systems, may support treatment continuity in BoNT-A therapy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Botulinum toxin type A
• Post-stroke spasticity
• Treatment adherence
• Treatment discontinuation
• Patient education

Destekleyen Kurum

No funding source influenced the preparation or conduct of this study, the preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to submit it for publication.

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the Süleyman Demirel University Ethics Committee for Health Sciences (12.05.2025, approval no: 96/37). The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Teşekkür

We thank all patient participants who contributed to the conduct of this study.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Krishnamurthi RV, Ikeda T, Feigin VL. Global, Regional and Country-Specific Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):171-9.
2. 2. Watkins CL, Leathley MJ, Gregson JM, et al. Prevalence of spasticity post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(5):515-22.
3. 3. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1-2):2-6.
4. 4. Gillard PJ, Sucharew H, Kleindorfer D, et al. The negative impact of spasticity on the health-related quality of life of stroke survivors: a longitudinal cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:159.
5. 5. Wissel J, Manack A, Brainin M. Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013;80(3 Suppl 2):S13-9.
6. 6. Kaku M, Simpson DM. Spotlight on botulinum toxin and its potential in the treatment of stroke-related spasticity. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:1085-99.
7. 7. Li S, Winston P, Mas MF. Spasticity Treatment Beyond Botulinum Toxins. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2024;35(2):399-418.
8. 8. Bavikatte G, Francisco GE, Jost WH, Baricich A, et al. Pain, disability, and quality of life in participants after concurrent onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of upper and lower limb spasticity: Observational results from the ASPIRE study. PM R. 2024;16(11):1175-89.

9. 9. Cecchella E, Bragazzi NL, Cotellessa F, et al. Barriers to Long- Term Adherence in Botulinum Toxin Therapy for Post-Stroke Spasticity: Insights and Implications from a Single-Center Study in North Italy. Toxins (Basel). 2025;17(3):102.
10. 10. Falcone N, Leo F, Chisari C, et al. Long-Term Management of Post-Stroke Spasticity with Botulinum Toxin: A Retrospective Study. Toxins (Basel). 2024;16(9):383.
11. 11. Lee JI, Jansen A, Samadzadeh S, et al. Long-term adherence and response to botulinum toxin in different indications. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8(1):15-28.
12. 12. Esquenazi A, Francisco GE, Feng W, et al. Real-World Adherence to OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Spasticity: Insights From the ASPIRE Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(11):2172-84.e6.
13. 13. Francisco GE, Balbert A, Bavikatte G, et al. A practical guide to optimizing the benefits of post-stroke spasticity interventions with botulinum toxin A: An international group consensus. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(1):jrm00134.
14. 14. Levy J, Karam P, Forestier A, et al. Botulinum toxin use in patients with post-stroke spasticity: a nationwide retrospective study from France. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1245228.
15. 15. Turner-Stokes L, Baguley IJ, De Graaff S, et al. Goal attainment scaling in the evaluation of treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin: a secondary analysis from a double- blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(1):81-9.
16. 16. Bavikatte G, Subramanian G, Ashford S, et al. Early Identification, Intervention and Management of Post-stroke Spasticity: Expert Consensus Recommendations. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2021;13:11795735211036576.
17. 17. Francisco GE, Jost WH, Bavikatte G, et al. Individualized OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Upper Limb Spasticity Resulted in High Clinician- and Patient-Reported Satisfaction: Long- Term Observational Results from the ASPIRE Study. PM R. 2020;12(11):1120-33.
18. 18. Cinone N, Santoro L, Spina S, Facciorusso S, et al. Reasons and Determinants of BoNT-A Treatment Discontinuation in Patients Living with Spasticity: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis. Toxins (Basel). 2022;14(10):675.
19. 19. Baricich A, Bertoni M, Santamato A, et al. Adjunctive treatment and BoNT-A for post-stroke spasticity: Are we really focusing on the patient-centered goals? Front Neurol. 2023;14:1134691.
20. 20. Picelli A, Santamato A, Cosma M, et al. Early Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(6):374.
21. 21. van Tilborg NAW,de Groot V, Meskers CGM. The effectiveness of ear ly interventions for post-stroke spasticity: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2025;47(4):900-11.