15-35 YAŞ ARASI GÜNEY TÜRK POPÜLASYONUNDA GÖMÜLÜ DİŞ SIKLIĞININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: EPİDEMİYOLOJİK ÇALIŞMA

Öz

Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmada üçüncü molar dişler hariç diğer dişlerin gömülü kalma sıklığının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç & Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya 2674 erişkin birey (Erkek/Kadın:1146/1528) (% 42.8/ %57.2) dahil edildi. Hastaların panoramik radyogramları gömülü dişlerin varlığı açısında üç oral ve maksillofasiyal radyoloji uzmanı tarafından değerlendirildi. Gömülü dişlerin; cinsiyet ve çenelerdeki dağılımlarını karşılaştırmak için ki-kare testi kullanıldı. P <0.05 istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edildi.
Bulgular: 135 hastada toplam 167 gömülü diş saptandı. Bunların 74’ü kadınlarda, 61’i erkeklerde idi. Gömülü dişlerin büyük kısmı maksiller kaninlerden oluşmaktaydı.
Sonuç: Bu epidemiyolojik çalışma önceki çalışmalarla büyük benzerlikler göstermektedir ve aynı toplumda daha fazla sayıda birey üzerinde incelenmesi uygundur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gömülü dişler,Radyogram

EVALUATION OF THE INCIDENCE OF IMPACTED TOOTH IN SOUTHERN TURKISH POPULATION AGED BETWEEN 15 AND 35 YEARS: AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY

Öz

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of teeth other than the third molar teeth to remain impacted.

Material & Methods: A total of 2674 adult persons (Male/Female: 1146/1528; 42.8%/57.2%) were included in this study. Panoramic radiograms of the patients were evaluated by three oral and maxillofacial radiology specialists for the presence of implanted teeth. Chi-square test was used to compared the distribution of the impacted teeth to genders and localization in the maxilla and mandible. P <0.05 values were considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 167 impacted teeth were found in 135 patients. Of these, 74 were in females and 61 in males. Majority of the impacted teeth consisted of maxillary canines.

Conclusion: This epidemiological study showed close similarities with the previous studies, and we recommend examination on a larger number of individuals in the same population.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Impacted teeth,Radiogram

Kaynakça

1. 1. Alling CC, Helfrick JF, Alling RD. Impacted Teeth. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company. 1993.
2. 2. Alling CC, Catone GA. Management of impacted teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51:3-6.
3. 3. Maaita J, Alwrikat A. Is the mandibular third molar a risk factor for mandibular angle fracture? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89:143-6.
4. 4. Singh H, Lee K, Ayoub AF. Management of Asymptomatic Impacted Wisdom Teeth: A Multicenter Comparison. Br J Oral and Maxillofac. Surg 1996; 34:389-93. 5. Lima CJ, Silva LC, Melo MR, Santos JA, Santos TS. Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17:281-6.
5. 6. Brown LH, Berkman S, Cohen D, Kaplan AL, Rosenberg M. A radiological study of the frequency and distribution of impacted teeth. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1982; 37:627-30.
6. 7. Schersten E, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Prevalence of impaced thırd molars in dental students. Swed Dent J 1989; 13:7-13.
7. 8. Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies-a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 2003; 9:158-63.
8. 9. Shah RM, Boyd MA, Vakil TF. Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7,886 Canadian individuals I: impacted teeth. Dent J 1978; 44:262-4.

9. 10. Stanley HR, Alattar M, Collett WK, Stringfellow HR Jr, Spiegel EH. Pathological sequelae of "neglected" impacted third molars. J Oral Pathol 1988; 17:113-7.
10. 11. Kramer RM, Williams AC. The incidence of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970; 237-41.
11. 12. Rozsa N, Fabian G, Szadeczky B, Kaan M, Gabris K, Tarján I. Prevalence of impacted permanent upper canine and its treatment in 11-18-year-old orthodontic patients. Fogorv Sz 2003; 96:65-9.
12. 13. Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health 2007; 24:140-4.
13. 14. Yavuz MS, Aras MH, Büyükkurt MC, Tozoglu S. Impacted mandibular canines. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8:78-85.
14. 15. Grover PS, Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 59:420-5.
15. 16. Sanu OO, Adeyemi TA, Isiekwe MC. Incidence of impacted mandibular canine and associated pathologies in an orthodontic patient population in Lagos, Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2012; 22(4):291-5.
16. 17. Dural S, Avcı N, Karabıyıkoğlu T. Gömük dişlerin görülme sıklığı, çenelere göre dağılımları ve gömülü kalma nedenleri. Sağ Bil Arş Derg 1996; 7:127-33.