Assessment of Water Usage and Consumption of Livestock Enterprises in Bursa Region

Yıl 2018, 1. Uluslararası Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Kongresi Özel Sayısı, 290 - 294, 31.12.2018

Seyit Uğuz Ercan Şimşek

Öz

Today, it is necessary to be more careful in water usage due to increased pollution in ground water and negative effects of climatic conditions on water resources. Farmers engaged in animal husbandry should enable to obtain drinking and utility water for animals by easily, in a healthy and economical way, and farmer’s awareness of water consumption should be increased.

In this study, the annual water consumption of the animal barns was determined according to the animal existence in the Bursa region. According to TUIK 2017 data, there are 201 288 head cattle, 472467 head small sheep and approximately 1.3 million head poultry in Bursa province, and their total annual water requirement is 8.65 million m3. There is 44% increased on water consumption from animal production compared to 2007.

In this study, the amounts of annual water demand of 4 different dairy cattle operations with 20, 50, 100 and 200 head capacities have been calculated because water has an important effect on milk yield especially in dairy cattle. The water consumption of these enterprises was respectively 648 m3, 1620 m3, 3240 m3 and 6480 m3 per year. The annual drinking and utility water costs of the enterprises are calculated as 2 722 ₺, 6 804 ₺, 13 608 ₺ and 27 216 ₺. In addition, drinking water samples were taken from 15 dairy cattle barns in Nilüfer district of Bursa province and were analysed for water quality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dairy cattle, Water consumption, Bursa, Water quality

Kaynakça

• Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes and M. Smith, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome.
• Anonymous, 2014, Hayvan Yetiştiriciliği, Hayvan Sulama, T. C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara
• Cemek, B., Çetin, S., Yıldırım, D. 2011, “Çiftlik ve Kümes Hayvanlarının Su Tüketimi ve Su Kalite Özellikleri”, Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 4 (1): 57-67, 2011, ISSN: 1308-3945.
• Christiansen, J. E., 1968. Pan evaporation and evapotranspiration from climatic data. Journal of the Irrıgation and Drainage Division. 94 (2): 243-266.
• Korukçu, A., Arıcı, İ., 1986, “Bursa Yöresinde Kültürteknik Sorunlarının Çözümüne İlişkin Yapılan Çalışmalar ve sonuçları”, II. Ulusalkültürteknik Kongresi, Adana. S.132-152.
• Ozdogan M., Ustundag, A. Ö., Demirel, H. Aydın ili yeraltı sularının hayvancılık için içme suyu kalitesi bakımından değerlendirilmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 2016; 13(2) : 113 – 121.
• Shamsi, K, 2009. Effect of planting date and density on the yield and yield components of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L.). Journal of Applied Bioscience, 16: 862-863.
• Socha MT, Ensley SM, Tomlinson DJ, Johnson AB. 2003. Variability of water composition and potential impact on animal performance. Proceedings of Intermountain Nutrition Conference. Salt Lake C, UT., Utah State Universty, Logan, pp.85-96.
• Yaylak, E., Yavuz, M. 2016. Sığırlarda İçme Suyu Kalitesi ve Suluk Yönetimi. Hayvansal Üretim 57(2): 57-67.