Thematic Review of Studies on Distance Education Conducted Between 2020 and 2023

Yıl 2024, , 280 - 317, 15.07.2024

Betül Özaydın Özkara

https://doi.org/10.29250/sead.1434121

Öz

This study aims to examine the articles published in the journals "Distance Education", "American Journal of Distance Education", and "The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning" between March 2020 and March 2023 within the field of distance education. Thus, an analysis of the primary topics and methodological trends in distance education during the intense period of the pandemic has been conducted. Thematic analyses previously conducted in this field were reviewed to create a data collection form, which was then used to evaluate 285 studies. The study revealed that the majority of articles were authored by two or three individuals, focusing predominantly on micro-level topics, with instructional design being the most studied area. Quantitative methods were predominantly favored as the primary research approach, and studies involving undergraduate students were the most prevalent. In terms of data collection methods, studies using existing scales/surveys alongside system records, grades, or other developed instruments ranked the highest. Descriptive and inferential analyses were identified as the most frequently used data analysis methods. The majority of articles examined had between 41 and 60 references. The study highlighted a concentration of research at the higher education level, suggesting the need for increased research at other educational levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Thematic analysis, Distance education, Pandemic, Online learning, Trend

2020-2023 Yılında Uzaktan Eğitim ile İlgili Yapılan Çalışmalara Yönelik Tematik İnceleme

Öz

Bu çalışmada uzaktan eğitim alanındaki dergiler arasında bulunan “Distance Education”, “American Journal of Distance Education” ve “The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning” dergilerinde 2020 Mart-2023 Mart aralığında yayımlanmış olan çalışmaların incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Böylece pandeminin yoğun olduğu süreçte uzaktan eğitim alanında çalışılan öncelikli konuların ve yöntemsel durumun analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Daha önce bu alanda yapılan tematik analizler incelenerek araştırmacı tarafından veri toplama formu oluşturulmuş ve 285 çalışma bu form kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda makale yazar sayısının daha çok 2 ve 3 olduğu, makale konusunun mikro düzeyde yoğunlaştığı, en fazla öğretim tasarımı konusunda çalışmanın bulunduğu görülmüştür. Yöntem olarak ilk sırada nicel yöntemin tercih edildiği ve lisans öğrencileri ile yapılan çalışmaların ilk sırada olduğu görülmüştür. Veri toplama aracı olarak mevcut ölçeğin/anketin yanı sıra sistem kaydı, başarı notu ya da çalışmada geliştirilen bir başka ölçeğinde kullanıldığı çalışmalar ilk sırada yer almıştır. Veri analiz yöntemi olarak betimsel ve kestirimsel analizlerin daha fazla olduğu belirlenmiştir. Referans sayısının 41-60 arasında daha fazla olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışmada incelenen makalelerin yükseköğretim düzeyinde yoğunlaştığı belirlenmiş ve bu nedenle diğer düzeylerdeki çalışma sayısının arttırılabileceği önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tematik inceleme, Uzaktan eğitim, Pandemi, Online öğrenme, Eğilim

Kaynakça

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital Compass Learning: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson survey research group.
• Aruğaslan, E. & Çivril, H. (2023). Türkiye’de covid-19 pandemisi sürecinde uzaktan eğitim ile ilgili yapılan akademik çalışmalar üzerine bir analiz. Ş., Koca, E., Bay (Eds.) Eğitim Bilimlerinde Uluslararası Araştırma ve Derlemeler içinde (315-333). Serüven Yayınevi.
• Babur, A., Kiper, A., Çukurbaşı, B., Özer, E. A., Tonbuloğlu, İ., Küçük, Ş., Canan-Güngören, Ö., Demirhan, E., Kıyıcı,M., & Horzum, M. B. (2016). 2009-2013 yılları arasında uzaktan eğitim dergilerinde yayınlanan makalelerin yöntemsel açıdan incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.70220
• Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527090
• Bond, M. (2020). Schools and emergency remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A living rapid systematic review. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 191-247. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4425683 Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
• Bozkurt, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). Trends and patterns in distance education (2014–2019): A synthesis of scholarly publications and a visualization of the intellectual landscape. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5381
• Brika, S. K. M., Chergui, K., Algamdi, A., Musa, A. A., & Zouaghi, R. (2022). E-learning research trends in higher education in light of COVID-19: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(2),1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762819
• Bunker, E. L. (2003). The history of distance education through the eyes of the International Council for Distance Education. Handbook of distance education, 49-66.
• Butler-Henderson, K., Crawford, J., Rudolph, J., Lalani, K., & Sabu, K. M. (2020). COVID-19 in higher education literature database (CHELD V1): An open access systematic literature review database with coding rules. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.2.11
• Davies, R. S., Howell, S. L., & Petrie, J. A. (2010). A review of trends in distance education scholarship at research universities in North America, 1998-2007. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.876
• Doo, M. Y., Zhu, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2023). A systematic review of the research topics in online learning during covıd-19: documenting the sudden shift. Online Learning, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3405
• Farliana, N., Hardianto, H., & Oktarina, N. (2023). Hybrid learning trends in higher education post pandemic Covid 19: Scientometric mapping. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 17(01), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.1.0039
• Gürcan, F., & Çağiltay, N. E. (2023). Research trends on distance learning: A text mining-based literature review from 2008 to 2018. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1007-1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815795
• Hauser, L. (2013). Qualitative research in distance education: an analysis of journal literature 2005–2012. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(3), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.805641
• Johnston, J. P. (2020). Creating better definitions of distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 23(2), 1-6. https://ojdla.com/assets/pdf/johnston232.pdf
• Miles B.M., &Huberman A.M. (2016). Nitel Veri Analizi 2.Baskı (S. Akbaba Altun and A.Ersoy) Sage Publication.
• Mishra, S., Sahoo, S., & Pandey, S. (2021). Research trends in online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Distance Education, 42(4), 494-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1986373
• Ozdamli, F. ve Karagozlu, D. (2022). Online education during the pandemic: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(16), 167-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i16.32287
• Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International journal of educational telecommunications, 1(4), 337-365. Retrived 13.02.2023, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8937/
• Şiraz, F. (2021). The literature review on changes in research trends regarding distance education before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2017-2020). Pegem journal of education and instruction, 11(4), 82-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.09
• Tavşancıl, E. ve Aslan, E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. Epsilon Yayınları.
• Tonbuloğlu, B., & Akbel, B. (2023). Research trends in the field of emergency remote teaching: a bibliometric analysis of open access literature. Online Learning Journal, 27(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3241
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Backer, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 21-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741