Farklı Primerlerin ve Universal Adezivin, Zirkonya ve Self Adeziv Rezin Siman Arasındaki Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Etkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, alüminyum oksit partikülleriyle kumlama sonrası kullanılan farklı primerlerin ve universal adezivin, termal yaşlandırma sonrasında zirkonya ile self adeziv rezin siman arasındaki makaslama bağlanma dayanımı üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda CAD/CAM zirkonya bloklardan boyutları 2 mm x 11 mm x 11 mm olacak şekilde 20 adet dörtgen örnek hazırlanmıştır. Tüm örneklerin yüzeyine 50 µm Al2O3 partikülleri yüzey pürüzlendirme işlemi uygulanmıştır. Hazırlanan örnekler farklı primer ve adeziv uygulamalarına göre 4 alt gruba ayrılmıştır (n=5). Kontrol: Herhangi bir primer veya universal adeziv uygulanmamıştır. Kerr Silane Primer (Negatif Kontrol): MDP içeriği bulunmayan seramik primeri uygulanmıştır. Ceramica-S ve Nova Compo-B Plus: Ceramica-S primer ve Nova Compo-B Plus universal adeziv karıştırılarak uygulanmıştır. Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus: Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus uygulanmıştır. Yüzey uygulamalarını takiben self adeziv rezin siman seramik yüzeylerine polimerize edilmiştir. Ardından örnekler 5000 devir termal döngü işlemine tabi tutulmuştur. Örneklere universal test cihazında makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi uygulanmıştır. Yüzey işlemlerine göre Fmax (N) ve Mpa değerlerinin karşılaştırılmasında Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Farklı primer ve adeziv kullanımına göre Fmax (N) ortalama değerleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık göstermiştir (p<0,001. Ceramica S ve Nova Compo-B Plus ile elde edilen değer diğer tüm primer gruplarından farklılık göstermiştir ve daha yüksektir (p<0,001). Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus ile elde edilen değer de diğer gruplardan farklılık göstermiştir (p<0,001). Kontrol grubu ve Kerr Silane Primer gruplarında elde edilen Fmax (N) değerleri benzerlik göstermektedir (p>0,001). Sonuç: Mevcut limitasyonlar dahilinde, self adeziv rezin simanın herhangi bir primer uygulaması olmaksızın veya MDP içermeyen bir primer uygulanmasının, zirkonya seramik yüzeyine bağlanma gücünü artırmak için yeterli olmadığı sonucuna varılabilir. MDP içeren ve kumlama sonrası uygulanan primerler veya adezivler, zirkonyaya bağlanma için ideal bir seçenek olarak görünmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Primer, Universal adeziv, Zirkonya

Keywords

• primer
• universal adeziv
• zirkonya

The Effect of Dıfferent Prımer and Unıversal Adhesıve on Shear Bond Strength Between Zırconıa and Self Adhesıve Resın Cement

Abstract

Background:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different primers and universal adhesive used after sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles on the shear bond strength between zirconia and self-adhesive resin cement after thermal aging. Material and Methods:Twenty rectangular samples were prepared from CAD/CAM zirconia blocks with dimensions of 2 mm x 11 mm x 11 mm. Surface roughening of 50 µm Al2O3 particles was applied to the surface of all samples. Prepared samples were divided into 4 subgroups according to different primer and adhesive applications (n=5). Control: No primer or universal adhesive was applied. Kerr Silane Primer (Negative Control): Ceramic primer without MDP content was applied. Ceramica-S and Nova Compo-B Plus: Ceramica-S primer and Nova Compo-B Plus universal adhesive were mixed and applied. Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus: Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus has been applied. Following the surface treatments, the self-adhesive resin cement was polymerized on the ceramic surfaces. Then, the samples were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal cycling. Shear bond strength test was applied to the samples in a universal testing device. One-Way Analysis of Variance was used to compare the Fmax (N) and Mpa values according to the surface treatments. Results:According to the use of different primers and adhesives, the mean Fmax (N) values showed a statistically significant difference (p<0,001). The value obtained with Ceramica S and Nova Compo-B Plus differed from all other primer groups and was higher (p<0,001). The value obtained with Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus also differed from the other groups (p<0,001). The Fmax (N) values obtained in the control group and Kerr Silane Primer groups were similar (p<0,001). Conclusions: Within the current limitations, it can be concluded that the application of self-adhesive resin cement without any primer or a primer without MDP is not sufficient to improve the bond strength to the zirconia ceramic surface. Primers or adhesives containing MDP and applied after sandblasting appear to be an ideal option for bonding to zirconia. Keywords: Primer, Universal Adhesive, Zirconia

Keywords

• primer
• universal adhesive
• zirconia

References

1. 1. Özcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dental materials journal. 2008;27(1):99-104.
2. 2. Yun J-y, Ha S-r, Lee J-b, Kim S-h. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dental Materials. 2010;26(7):650-8.
3. 3. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2006;95(6):430-6.
4. 4. Phark J-H, Duarte Jr S, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2009;101(1):29-38.
5. 5. Hjerppe J, Vallittu PK, Fröberg K, Lassila LV. Effect of sintering time on biaxial strength of zirconium dioxide. Dental materials. 2009;25(2):166-71.
6. 6. Kim M-J, Ahn J-S, Kim J-H, Kim H-Y, Kim W-C. Effects of the sintering conditions of dental zirconia ceramics on the grain size and translucency. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2013;5(2):161-6.
7. 7. Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):7-26.
8. 8. Chen L, Suh BI, Kim J, Tay FR. Evaluation of silica-coating techniques for zirconia bonding. American journal of dentistry. 2011;24(2):79-84.

9. 9. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dental materials. 1998;14(1):64-71.
10. 10. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dental Materials. 2011;27(1):71-82.
11. 11. Foxton RM, Cavalcanti AN, Nakajima M, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, Melo L, et al. Durability of resin cement bond to aluminium oxide and zirconia ceramics after air abrasion and laser treatment. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2011;20(2):84-92.
12. 12. Zandparsa R, Talua NA, Finkelman MD, Schaus SE. An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments. Journal of prosthodontics. 2014;23(2):117-23.
13. 13. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2004;91(4):356-62.
14. 14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2003;89(3):268-74.
15. 15. El-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems. Journal-Canadian Dental Association. 2001;67(2):97-102.
16. 16. Kern M, Strub J. Bonding to alumina ceramic in restorative dentistry: clinical results over up to 5 years. Journal of dentistry. 1998;26(3):245-9.
17. 17. Azimian F, Klosa K, Kern M. Evaluation of a new universal primer for ceramics and alloys. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2012;14(3):275.
18. 18. Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Effect of incorporating BisGMA resin on the bonding properties of silane and zirconia primers. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2013;110(5):402-7.
19. 19. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1995;73(3):240-9.
20. 20. Palmer D, Barco M, Billy E. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1992;67(3):325-7.
21. 21. Passia N, Lehmann F, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Tensile bond strength of different universal adhesive systems to lithium disilicate ceramic. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2015;146(10):729-34.
22. 22. Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dental Materials. 2015;31(1):8-14.
23. 23. Braden M, Causton E, Clarke R. Diffusion of water in composite filling materials. Journal of Dental Research. 1976;55(5):730-2.
24. 24. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dental Materials. 2015;31(6):603-23.
25. 25. Amaral M, Belli R, Cesar PF, Valandro LF, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia. Journal of dentistry. 2014;42(1):90-8.
26. 26. Yi YA, Ahn JS, Park YJ, Jun SH, Lee IB, Cho BH, et al. The effect of sandblasting and different primers on shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic and a self-adhesive resin cement. Operative dentistry. 2015;40(1):63-71.
27. 27. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dental Materials. 2007;23(1):45-50.
28. 28. Awliya W, Odén A, Yaman P, B. Dennison J, E. Razzoog M. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1998;56(1):9-13.
29. 29. Ozcan M, Alkumru O, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001:335-9.
30. 30. Jennings C. Surface roughness and bond strength of adhesives. The Journal of Adhesion. 1972;4(1):25-38.
31. 31. Orm F. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14(4):335-9.
32. 32. Comba A, Baldi A, Tempesta RM, Carossa M, Perrone L, Saratti CM, et al. Do Chemical-Based Bonding Techniques Affect the Bond Strength Stability to Cubic Zirconia? Materials. 2021;14(14):3920.
33. 33. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2000;2(2).
34. 34. Takeuchi K, Fujishima A, Manabe A, Kuriyama S, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, et al. Combination treatment of tribochemical treatment and phosphoric acid ester monomer of zirconia ceramics enhances the bonding durability of resin-based luting cements. Dental materials journal. 2010;29(3):316-23.
35. 35. Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. American journal of dentistry. 2012;25(2):103-8.
36. 36. Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydin M. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2008;99(5):388-99.
37. 37. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. Journal of dental research. 2014;93(4):329-34.
38. 38. Chen L, Suh BI. Bonding of resin materials to all-ceramics: a review. Curr Res Dent. 2012;3(1):7-17. 39. Kim J, Chae S, Lee Y, Han G, Cho B. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Operative dentistry. 2015;40(1):55-62.
39. 40. Klaisiri A, Krajangta N, Thamrongananskul N. The durability of zirconia/resin composite shear bond strength using different functional monomer of universal adhesives. European Journal of Dentistry. 2022;16(04):756-60.
40. 41. Attia A, Kern M. Long-term resin bonding to zirconia ceramic with a new universal primer. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2011;106(5):319-27.
41. 42. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. Journal of dental research. 2012;91(4):376-81.
42. 43. Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. American journal of dentistry. 2012;25(3):153.
43. 44. Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2014;112(2):182-7.
44. 45. Ural Ç, Külünk T, Külünk Ş, Kurt M, Baba S. Determination of resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic surface using different primers. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2011;69(1):48-53.
45. 46. Omidi BR, Yeganeh PK, Oveisi S, Farahmandpour N, Nouri F. Comparison of micro-shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia with different surface treatments using universal adhesive and zirconia primer. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2018;9(3):200.
46. 47. Celik G, Ismatullaev A, Sari T, Usumez A. Comparison of the effectiveness of bonding composite to zirconia as a repair method. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 2016;13(2):405-11.
47. 48. Lima RBW, Silva AF, da Rosa WLdO, Piva E, Duarte RM, De Souza GM. Bonding Efficacy of Universal Resin Adhesives to Zirconia Substrates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2023;25(1):51-62.
48. 49. Dos Santos RA, de Lima EA, Mendonça LS, de Oliveira JE, Rizuto AV, de Araújo Silva Tavares ÁF, et al. Can universal adhesive systems bond to zirconia? Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2019;31(6):589-94.
49. 50. Hajjaj MS, Barboud HM, Almashabi HK, Alzahrani SJ, Abu Haimed TS, Alnoury AS, et al. Evaluation of Different Priming Agents with Conventional and Bioactive Self-Adhesive Resin Cements on Shear Bond Strength to Zirconia. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(14):8369.
50. 51. Şahan MH, Peşkersoy C, Kümbüloğlu Ö, Türkün M. Effect of different adhesive systems and silane application on shear bond strength of resin cement to indirect restorations. Journal of Dental Materials & Techniques. 2023;12(2):104-10.
51. 52. Moradi Z, Akbari F, Valizadeh S. Effects of universal adhesive on shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments. International Journal of Dentistry. 2021;2021.
52. 53. Lung CYK, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dental materials. 2012;28(5):467-77.
53. 54. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV. Experimental novel silane system in adhesion promotion between dental resin and pretreated titanium. Part II: Effect of long-term water storage: Rapid communication. Silicon. 2010;2:79-85.
54. 55. Valandro LF, Özcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dental materials journal. 2008;27(6):849-55.
55. 56. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett Jr LH. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dental materials. 2010;26(4):345-52.
56. 57. Piascik JR, Swift EJ, Braswell K, Stoner BR. Surface fluorination of zirconia: adhesive bond strength comparison to commercial primers. Dental Materials. 2012;28(6):604-8.