FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Zehra Karaca; Aylin Akbay Oba; Nurhan Özalp; Tuğçe Özmen Derkuş; Mustafa Taştekin

doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.727483

FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı florid içerikli farklı restoratif materyallerin (Geleneksel cam iyonomer siman, İonofil U; Rezin modifiye cam iyonomer siman, Photac Fil Quick Aplicap; Cam hibrit restoratif materyal, Equia Forte; Cam karbomer, Glass Fil ve Giomer, Beautifil II) in vitro koşullarda florid salım özelliklerini ve floridle yeniden yüklenebilme kapasitelerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Restoratif materyallerinin her birinden 16 adet disk şeklinde örnekler hazırlanmış, örnekler, deney periyodu boyunca 5 ml deiyonize su içeren polietilen tüplerde, 37°C’de bekletilmiştir. Örneklerin florid salım konsantrasyonları 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21 ve 28. günlerde ölçülmüş, 28. günde örneklere 4 dakika boyunca 2 ml % 1,23’lük Asidüle fosfat florid jel (İonite) uygulanmıştır. Daha sonra, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21 ve 28. günlerde materyallerin florid salım konsantrasyonları ölçülerek, floridle yeniden yüklenebilme kapasiteleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: İonofil U’nun ilk iki gün boyunca istatistiksel olarak diğer materyallerden daha fazla miktarda florid salımı ve floridle yeniden yüklenebilme kapasitesi gösterdiği belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Takip eden 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21 ve 28. günlerde ise Equia Forte’un istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde diğer materyallerden daha yüksek konsantrasyonda florid salımı ve floridle yeniden yüklenebilme kapasitesi gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Tüm deney periyodu boyunca, florid salım konsantrasyonu ve floridle yeniden yüklenebilme kapasitesi en düşük olan materyalin ise Beautifil II olduğu saptanmıştır (p<0,05). Sonuç: İonofil U ilk iki gün maksimum düzeyde florid iyonu salmasına rağmen, daha sonraki günlerde deney periyodu boyunca Equia Forte’un diğer materyallerden daha yüksek oranda florid salımı ve floridle yeniden yüklenebilme kapasitesi gösterdiği saptanmıştır.

Keywords

References

1. Kang Sw, Yoon I, Lee Hw, Cho J. Association Between Amelx Polymorphisms And Dental Caries In Koreans. Oral Diseases. 2011;17: 399-406.
2. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review On Flouride-Releasing Restorative Materials-Flouride Release And Uptake Characteristics, Antibacterial Activity And İnfluence On Caries Formation. Dental Materials. 2007;23(3): 343-362.
3. Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N. Fluoride Release And Recharge Abilities Of Contemporary Fluoride-Containing Restorative Materials And Dental Adhesives. Dent Mater. 2013;32:296-304.
4. Farrugıa C, Camıllerı J. Antimicrobial Properties Of Conventional Restorative Filling Materials And Advances In Antimicrobial Properties Of Composite Resins And Glass İonomer Cements-A Literature Review. Dent Mater. 2015;31:89-99.
5. Nıcholson JW. Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins (Compomers) And Their Use In Clinical Dentistry. Dent Mater. 2007;23: 615-22.
6. Trachtenberg F, Maserejian NN, Soncini JA, Hayes C, Tavares M. Does fluoride in compomers prevent future caries in children? J Dent Res. 2009;88(3):276-9.
7. Ylı-Urpo H, Närhı M, Närhı T. Compound Changes And Tooth Mineralization Effects Of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Bioactive Glass (S53p4), An In Vivo Study. Biomaterials. 2005a;26:5934-41.
8. Kumar T, Bhargava K, Sanap A, Aggarwal S. Advances In Reinforced Restorations: A Review. International Journal Of Dental Health Concerns. 2015;1:1-5.

9. Najma Hajıra NSW, Meena N. Giomer-The Intelligent Particle (New Generation Glass Ionomer Cement) Int J Dent Oral Health. 2015;2(4)
10. Çapan BŞ, Akyüz S. Current Floride-Releasing Restorative Materials Used In Pediatric Dentistry. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2016;6(3):129-34.
11. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Kouro Y, Endo T, Yoshıyama M. Optimizing Filler Content In An Adhesive System Containing Pre-Reacted Glass-Ionomer Fillers. Dent Mater, 2003;19: 137-46.
12. Itota T, Carrıck Te, Yoshıyama M, Mccabe JP. Fluoride Release And Recharge İn Giomer, Compomer And Resin Composite. Dent Mater. 2004a;20:789-95.
13. Dasgupta S, Saraswathi MV, Somayaji K, Pentapati KC, Shetty P. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(6):622-6.
14. Okuyama K, Murata Y, Pereira PN, Miguez PA, Komatsu H. Fluoride Release And Uptake By Various Dental Materials After Fluoride Application. Am J Dent. 2006;19: 123-7.
15. Gorseta K, Glavına D. Thermo-Cured Glass-Ionomer Cements In Restorative Dentistry. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3): 122-7.
16. Botsalı MS, Tokay U, Özmen B, Çortcu M, Koyutürk AE, Kahvecioğlu F. Effect Of New Innovative Restorative Carbomised Glass Cement On İntrapulpal Temperature Rise: An Ex-vivo Study. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:1-7.
17. Menne-Happ U, Ilıe N. Effect Of Gloss And Heat On The Mechanical Behaviour Of A Glass Carbomer Cement. Journal Of Dentistry. 2013;41: 223-30.
18. Zainuddin N, Karpukhina N, Law RV, Hill RG. Characterisation of a remineralising Glass Carbomer ionomer cement by MAS-NMR spectroscopy. Dent Mater. 2012;28(10):1051-8.
19. Hasan AMHR, Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement ("glass carbomer™") compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;21:27:e20180230.
20. Koenraads H, Van der Kroon G, Frencken JE. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):551-6.
21. Brzović-Rajić V, Miletić I, Gurgan S, Peroš K, Verzak Ž, Ivanišević-Malčić A. Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer with Nano Filled Coat and Varnish. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018;52(4):307-13.
22. Moshaverinia M, Navas A, Jahedmanesh N, Shah KC, Moshaverinia A, Ansari S. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(2):154-9.
23. Equia Forte Fil. 2016 http://Downloads/ Equia® Forte.pdf Erişim tarihi: 05.03.2018.
24. Schwendicke F, Kniess J, Paris S, Blunck U. Margin integrity and secondary caries of lined or non-lined composite and glass hybrid restorations after selective excavation in vitro. Oper Dent 2017;42(2):155-64.
25. Collado-González M, Pecci-Lloret MR, Tomás-Catalá CJ, García-Bernal D, Oñate-Sánchez RE, Llena C, et al. Thermo-setting glass ionomer cements promote variable biological responses of human dental pulp stem cells. Dent Mater. 2018;34(6):932-43.
26. Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride Release And Uptake Capacities Of Floride-Releasing Restorative Materials. Oper Dent 2003;28(4):395-402.
27. Badr SBY, Ibrahim MA, Banna ME. Compressive Strength and Compressive Fatigue Limit behavior of Two Fluoride releasing materials. Advances in Medical Sciences 2013;2(3):30-6.
28. Delbem AC, Pedrını D, Franca JG, Machado TM. Floride release/recharge from restorative materials-effect of floride gels and time. Operative Dentistry. 2005;30(6):690-5.
29. Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK Short-term floride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Operative Dentistry. 2002b;27(3):259-65.
30. Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Vreven J. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2001;28(1):26-32.
31. Elıades G, Kkaboura A, Palaghıas G. Acid base reaction and floride release profiles in visible light cured polyacid modified composite restoratives (compomers). Dental Materials. 1998;14(1):57-63.
32. Kanık Ö, Türkün S. Restoratif Cam İyonomer Simanlarda Güncel Yaklaşımlar. EÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg, 2016;37(2):54-65. 33. Dayangaç B. Kompozit Rezin Restorasyonlar, Güneş Kitabevi Ltd. Şti, Ankara: 2000. p:1-20
34. Tjandrawınata R, Irıe M, Suzukı K. Marginal gap formation and floride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement: effect of silanized spherical silica filler addition. Dent Mater J. 2004:23:305-13.
35. Momoı Y, Mccabe JF. Floride release from light-activated glass–ionomer restorative cements. Dental Materials, 1993;9:151.
36. Khoroushı M, Keshanı F. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 2013;10(4),411-20.
37. Bertacchını SM, Abate PF, Blank A, Baglıeto MF, Macchı RL. Solubility and floride release in ionomers and compomers. Quintessence Int, 1999;30:193-7.
38. De Maeyer EAP, Verbeeck RMH, Vercruysse CWJ. Reactivity of floride-containing calcium aluminosilicate glasses used in dental glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res, 1998;77(12):2005-11.
39. Bayrak GD, Sandalli N, Selvi Kuvvetli S, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G. Effect Of Two Different Polishing Systems On Fluoride Release, Surface Roughness And Bacterial Adhesion Of Newly Developed Restorative Materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6): 424-34.
40. Küçükyılmaz E, Savas S, Kavrık F, Yasa B, Botsalı MS. Fluoride Release/Recharging Ability And Bond Strength Of Glass İonomer Cements To Sound And Caries‑Affected Dentin. Nigerian Journal Of Clinical Practice. 2017;20(2):226-34.
41. Mousavınasab SM, Meyers L. Floride Release by Glass Ionomer Cements, Compomer and Giomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009;6(2):75-81.
42. Al-Abdi A, Paris S, Schwendicke F. Glass Hybrid, But Not Calcium Hydroxide, Remineralized Artificial Residual Caries Lesions In Vitro. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21:389-96.
43. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J Funct Biomater 2016;28;7(3):16.
44. Choudhary HV, Tandon S, Rathore M, Gopal K, Tiwari N. Fluoride Release And Uptake By Glass Ionomer Cements, Polyacis Modified Composite Resin And Giomer - An In Vitro Assessment. IJOCR. 2015;3(1):68-74.
45. Gavic L, Gorseta K, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Tadin A, Glavina D, van Duinen RN et al. Influence of Thermo-Light Curing with Dental Light-Curing Units on the Microhardness of Glass-Ionomer Cements. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36(3):425-30.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Dentistry

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Zehra Karaca
Türkiye

Aylin Akbay Oba ^*
Türkiye

Nurhan Özalp
Türkiye

Tuğçe Özmen Derkuş
Türkiye

Mustafa Taştekin
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 1, 2020

Submission Date

April 30, 2020

Acceptance Date

June 24, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 7 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.727483

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA69EH76HJ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Karaca, Z., Akbay Oba, A., Özalp, N., Özmen Derkuş, T., & Taştekin, M. (2020). FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Selcuk Dental Journal, 7(2), 310-317. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.727483

AMA

1.Karaca Z, Akbay Oba A, Özalp N, Özmen Derkuş T, Taştekin M. FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Selcuk Dent J. 2020;7(2):310-317. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.727483

Chicago

Karaca, Zehra, Aylin Akbay Oba, Nurhan Özalp, Tuğçe Özmen Derkuş, and Mustafa Taştekin. 2020. “FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Selcuk Dental Journal 7 (2): 310-17. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.727483.

EndNote

Karaca Z, Akbay Oba A, Özalp N, Özmen Derkuş T, Taştekin M (August 1, 2020) FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Selcuk Dental Journal 7 2 310–317.

IEEE

[1]Z. Karaca, A. Akbay Oba, N. Özalp, T. Özmen Derkuş, and M. Taştekin, “FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”, Selcuk Dent J, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 310–317, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.15311/selcukdentj.727483.

ISNAD

Karaca, Zehra - Akbay Oba, Aylin - Özalp, Nurhan - Özmen Derkuş, Tuğçe - Taştekin, Mustafa. “FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Selcuk Dental Journal 7/2 (August 1, 2020): 310-317. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.727483.

JAMA

1.Karaca Z, Akbay Oba A, Özalp N, Özmen Derkuş T, Taştekin M. FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Selcuk Dent J. 2020;7:310–317.

MLA

Karaca, Zehra, et al. “FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, Aug. 2020, pp. 310-7, doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.727483.

Vancouver

1.Zehra Karaca, Aylin Akbay Oba, Nurhan Özalp, Tuğçe Özmen Derkuş, Mustafa Taştekin. FLORİD İÇERİKLİ RESTORATİF MATERYALLERİN FLORİD SALIMI VE FLORİDLE YENİDEN YÜKLENEBİLME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Selcuk Dent J. 2020 Aug. 1;7(2):310-7. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.727483