MAKSİLLER DEFEKTLERDE DENTAL İMPLANT UYGULAMALARI VE YAŞAM KALİTESİNE OLAN ETKİSİ : LİTERATÜR DERLEMESİ

Yıl 2022, , 315 - 325, 27.04.2022

Nurcan Kaya , Serdar Kılıç

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.928026

Öz

Maksillektomi uygulanan hastalar estetik, fonksiyonel, psikolojik ve sosyal açıdan birçok sorunla karşı karşıya kalırlar ve bu hastaların tedavisi oldukça zor ve zahmetlidir. Karşılaşılan problemlerin çok faktörlü olmasına bağlı olarak defekt bölgesinin rehabilitasyonu için çeşitli tedavi alternatifleri mevcuttur. Son yıllarda standart, zigomatik ve mini dental implantların kullanımı geniş maksiller defekte sahip hastalarda giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Defekt bölgesindeki kemik dokuya uygulanan dental implantlar ile destek dişlere gelen yükler azaltılıp karşıt ark stabilizasyonu sağlanarak yer değiştirici kuvvetlere karşı etkili bir direnç elde edilebildiği ve bu tip protetik rehabilitasyonun sağladığı retansiyon ve stabilite ile hastalarda psikososyal hayatın olumlu etkilenmesiyle birlikte yaşam kalitesinin arttığı bilinmektedir. Bununla beraber maksiller defektlerin çeşitliliğine bağlı olarak hastaların öznel faktörler doğrultusunda kişisel talep ve beklentileri de farklılık göstermektedir. Dolayısıyla maksiller defekt hastalarının karşılaştıkları problemlerin önem derecesi, tercih edilecek tedavi yöntemine yön verebilmektedir. Bu doğrultuda maksiller defektin rekonstrüksiyon ve/veya rehabilitasyonu sonrasında uygulanan protetik tedavinin başarısı hasta memnuniyetini ve dolayısıyla yaşam kalitesini doğrudan etkilemektedir. Bu literatür derlemesinde maksiller defekte sahip hastalarda dental implant destekli protezlerin yaşam kalitesine olan etkisi incelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maksiller Defekt, İmplant Destekli Protez, Obturatör, Yaşam Kalitesi

DENTAL IMPLANT APPLICATIONS IN MAXILLARY DEFECTS AND ITS EFFECT OF QUALITY OF LIFE : LITERATURE COMPILATION

Öz

Patients with maxillary defect have many aesthetic, functional, psychological and social problems, and the treatment of these patients is very difficult and demanding. Depending on the multifactorial problems encountered, various treatment alternatives are available for the rehabilitation of the defect area. In recent years, the use of standard, zygomatic and mini dental implants have become increasingly common in patients with large maxillary defects. With dental implants applied to the bone tissue in the defect area, it is known that an effective resistance against displacement forces can be achieved by reducing the loads on the supporting teeth and providing counter arc stabilization, and with the retention and stability provided by this type of prosthetic rehabilitation, the quality of life increases with the positive effect of psychosocial life in patients. However, depending on the many types of maxillary defects, the personal demands and expectations of the patients in line with subjective factors also differ. Therefore, the importance of the problems of patients with maxillary defect can direct the treatment method to be preferred. In this direction, the success of the prosthetic treatment applied after the reconstruction and / or rehabilitation of the maxillary defect directly affects the patient satisfaction and thus the quality of life. In this review of the literature, the effect of dental implant-supported prostheses on quality of life in patients with maxillary defects is examined.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Obturator, Implant Supported Prosthesis, Quality of Life, Maxillary Defect

Kaynakça

• Mani UM, Mohamed K, Krishna Kumar A, Inbarajan A. A modified technique to fabricate a complete hollow obturator for bilateral maxillectomy in a patient with mucormycosis:A technical case report. Spec Care Dent. 2019;39(6):610-616.
• Özdemir H, Aladağ Lİ. Prosthetic obturation of an acquired maxillary defect: a case report. Dent J Atatürk University. 2011:67(2);122-127.
• Çötert S. Çene Yüz Protezleri (Ed 3). İzmir,Bornova, Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, 2003.
• Sipahi C. Retention Principles in Implant Supported of Maxillofacial Prothesis. Gulhane Med J. 2006;48(2):119-124.
• Jain AR. Guide flange prosthesis after mandibular resection : A case report. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10(1):2646-2649.
• Yazicioglu H, Yalug S. An alternative method for fabricating a closed hollow obturator: a clinical report. J Oral Sci. 2002;44(4):161-164.
• Akay C, Yaluğ S. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with partial maxillectomy with a buccal extension obturator: a case report. Dent J Atatürk University. 2014;24(2):278-282.
• Schmidt BL, Pogrel MA, Young CW, Sharma A. Reconstruction of extensive maxillary defects using zygomaticus implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(2):82-89. Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: A classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(4):352-363.
• Örtorp A. Three Tumor Patients with Total Maxillectomy Rehabilitated with Implant-Supported Frameworks and Maxillary Obturators: A Follow-Up Report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(4):315-323.
• Uǧurlu K, Sacak B, Hüthüt I, Karsidag S, Sakiz D, Baş L. Reconstructing Wide Palatomaxillary Defects Using Free Flaps Combining Bare Serratus Anterior Muscle Fascia and Scapular Bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(4):621-629.
• Landes CA. Zygoma implant-supported midfacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A 4-year follow-up study including assessment of quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(3):313-325.
• Keskin H, Özdemir T. Çene-Yüz Protezleri.(Ed. 2). İstanbul, İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları, 1995.
• Parel SM, Brånemark PI, Ohrnell LO, Svensson B. Remote implant anchorage for the rehabilitation of maxillary defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(4):377-381.
• Etienne OMG, Taddei CAMI. Use of bar-clip attachments to enhance the retention of a maxillofacial prosthetic obturator: A clinical report. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(6):618-621.
• Çetiner S, Zor F. Factors Affecting The Success of Dental Implantology.Dent J of Gülhane. 2005;24(1):51-56.
• Ali D, Özdem K, Ak İRD, et al. Protethic obturation of maxillary resection. Dent J of Cumhuriyet University. 1998;1(2):73-77
• Ozaki H, Sakurai H, Yoshida Y, Yamanouchi H, Iino M. Oral rehabilitation of oral cancer patients using zygomatic implant-supported maxillary prostheses with magnetic attachment: Three case reports. Case Rep Dent. 2018;1-5 Esposito M, Worthington H V. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):1-14
• Garrett N, Roumanas ED, Blackwell KE, et al. Efficacy of conventional and implant-supported mandibular resection prostheses: Study overview and treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(1):13-24.
• Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, Daelemans P. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: A 6-48 months follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(1):18-22.
• Korkmaz FM, Korkmaz T. Maksiller obturatörlerde dental ve zigomatik implant seçimi. ADO Klin Bilim Derg. 2009;3(1):295-299.
• Cotic J, Jamsek J, Kuhar M, et al. Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation after radiation treatment in head and neck cancer patients: A case-series report of outcome. Radiol Oncol. 2017;51(1):94-100.
• Taylor TD. Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics. 1st Edn. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2000.
• Mericske-Stern R. Treatment outcomes with implant-supported overdentures: Clinical considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(1):66-73.
• Şeker E, Kayış M. Rehabilitation of partial maxillectomy cases with implanted bar and buccal flange obturators with natural tooth support: two case reports. Dent J of Atatürk University. 2016;43(3):179-185.
• Galán Gil S, Peñarrocha Diago M, Balaguer Martínez J, Marti Bowen E. Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: An update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(3):184-188.
• Parel SM, Branemark PI, Jansson T. Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics. Part I: Intraoral applications. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(4):490-494.
• Takahashi T, Fukuda M, Funaki K, Tanaka K. Magnet-retained facial prosthesis combined with an implant-supported edentulous maxillary obturator: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(5):805-807.
• Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Brånemark I, McAlpine JA. A protocol for maxillary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(5):521-531.
• Huang W, Wu Y, Zou D, et al. Long-term results for maxillary rehabilitation with dental implants after tumor resection. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(2):282-291.
• Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Akiyoshi T. Measurement of the maxilla and zygoma as an aid in installing zygomatic implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(10):1193-1198.
• Oelgiesser D, Levin L, Barak S, Schwartz-Arad D. Rehabilitation of an irradiated mandible after mandibular resection using implant/tooth-supported fixed prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(4):310-314.
• D’Agostino A, Procacci P, Francesca F, Trevisiol L, Nocini Pier F. Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient after subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(2):159-162.
• Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, et al. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck. 1996;18(4):323-334.
• Assunção WG, Zardo GG, Delben JA, Barão VAR. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life. Gerodontology. 2007;24(4):235-238.
• Preciado A, Del Río J, Lynch CD, Castillo-Oyagüe R. A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers. J Dent. 2013;41(9):753-763.
• Altintas SH, Kilic S, Yilmaz Altintas N, Cizmeci Senel F. Is a Fixed Hybrid Prosthesis with Distal Cantilever Appropriate for Maxillofacial Defects? A Report of Two Patients. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(1):82-87.
• Gonzalez J. The Evolution of Dental Materials for Hybrid Prosthesis. Open Dent J. 2014;8(1):85-94.
• Nguyen CT, Driscoll CF, Coletti DP. Reconstruction of a maxillectomy patient with an osteocutaneous flap and implant-retained fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(5):292-295.
• Lazzara RJ, Celletti R, Etienne D, Jansen C, Donath K. Clinical Manual of Implant Dentistry. New York: Quintessence Pub Co; 2003.
• Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler Moncler S, Belser JS. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2006;21(6):19-28.
• Shugaa-Addin B, Al-Shamiri HM, Al-Maweri S, Tarakji B. The effect of radiotherapy on survival of dental implants in head and neck cancer patients. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(2):e194-e200.
• Anderson JD. The need for criteria on reporting treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(1):49-55.
• Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11-25.
• Ten Bruggenkate CM, van der Kwast WA, Oosterbeek HS. Success criteria in oral implantology. A review of the literature. Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;7(1):45-51.
• Albrektsson T, Jansson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants. Dent Clin North Am. 1986;30(1):151-174.
• Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-170.
• Carlsson L, Röstlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI. Osseointegration of titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57(4):285-289.
• Irish J, Sandhu N, Simpson C, et al. Quality of life in patients with maxillectomy prostheses. Head Neck. 2009;31(6):813-821.
• Wang F, Huang W, Zhang C, Sun J, Qu X, Wu Y. Functional outcome and quality of life after a maxillectomy: a comparison between an implant supported obturator and implant supported fixed prostheses in a free vascularized flap. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(2):137-143.
• Haughey BH, Fredrickson JM, Lerrick AJ, Sclaroff A, Gay WD. Fibular and Iliac Crest Osteomuscular Free Flap Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity. Laryngoscope. 1994;104(11):1305-1313.
• Leles CR, Leles JLR, Souza C de P, Martins RR, Mendonça EF. Implant-supported obturator overdenture for extensive maxillary resection patient: A clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(3):240-244.
• Depprich R, Naujoks C, Lind D, et al. Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after prosthodontic therapy with obturator prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(1):71-79.
• Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil. 1995;16(1):51-74.
• D’Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, Cella DF, Long SA. Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(5):482-487.
• Leoncini E, Ricciardi W, Cadoni G, et al. Adult height and head and neck cancer: A pooled analysis within the INHANCE Consortium. Head Neck. 2014; 29(1): 35–48.
• Al-Salehi SK, Calder ID, Lamb DJ. Magnetic Retention for Obturators. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(3):214-218.
• Riaz N, Warriach RA. Quality of life in patients with obturator prostheses. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(2):121-125.
• Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993;15(6):485-496.
• Matsuyama M, Tsukiyama Y, Tomioka M, Koyano K. Clinical assessment of chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by objective measurement of masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(3):253-257.
• Veit CT, Ware JE. The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(5):730-742.
• Deleyiannis FWB, Weymuller EA, Coltrera MD. Quality of life of disease-free survivors of advanced (stage III or IV) oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 1997;19(6):466-473.
• Rogers SN, Laher SH, Overend L, Lowe D. Importance-rating using the University of Washington quality of life questionaire in patients treated by primary surgery for oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2002;30(2):125-132.
• Rogers SN, Lowe D, McNally D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. Health-related quality of life after maxillectomy: A comparison between prosthetic obturation and free flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(2):174-181.
• Narita N, Ito R, Mimura M, et al. Comparative study for closure methods of maxillary defects after maxillectomy, a free flap versus a maxillary obturator. J Oral Maxillofac Surgery, Med Pathol. 2021;33(1):39-42.
• Brown JS, Rogers SN, McNally DN, Boyle M. A modified classification for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck. 2000;22(1):17-26.
• Fayers P. Interpreting quality of life data. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(11):1331-1334.
• Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Seikaly H, Jha N. Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: a prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(2):139-44.
• Weischer T, Schettler D, Mohr C. Titanium implants in the zygoma as retaining elements after hemimaxillectomy. Int J oral & Maxillofac Implant. 1997;12(2):211—214.
• Hu YJ, Hardianto A, Li SY, Zhang ZY, Zhang CP. Reconstruction of a palatomaxillary defect with vascularized iliac bone combined with a superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and zygomatic implants as anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(9):854-857.