BULK-FİLL KOMPOZİTLERDE KALINLIĞIN ARTIŞININ MİKROSERTLİK ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 141 - 147, 01.08.2020

Evrim Eligüzeloğlu Dalkılıç Fehime Alkan Hacer Deniz Arısu

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.427203

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üç farklı ışık cihazı ile
polimerize edilen bulk-fill kompozitlerde, kalınlığın artışının mikrosertlik
üzerine etkisinin incelenmesidir. 

Gereç ve Yöntemler:İki farklı bulk-fill kompozit (Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk
Fill, X-trafil) ve bir adet akışkan bulk-fill kompozit (SDR) kullanıldı.
Kompozitler 1mm derinliğinde 5 mm çapında, dört metal kalıba yerleştirilerek
iki farklı LED ışık cihazı (Blue Phase
and Valo) ve bir adet
halojen ışık cihazı (Hilux) ile polimerize
edildi. Örnekler 24 saat 37°C’de  %100 nemli ortamda bekletildi. Vickers sertlik
ölçümleri 5 saniye 100 gr kuvvet uygulanarak yapıldı. Her örneğin hem üst hem
de alt yüzeyinden 3 ölçüm yapıldı. Elde edilen veriler 0.05 istatistik seviyede
analiz edildi. 

Bulgular:Hem üst hemde alt yüzeylerde bütün ışık cihazları ile
polimerize edilen X-tra fill diğer gruplara göre belirgin düzeyde yüksek
sertlik değerleri göstermiştir (p<0.05). SDR dışında ışık cihazlarındaki
farklılık kompozit gruplarının sertliğini değiştirmemiştir (p>0.05). Sadece
SDR, Blue phase ile polimerize edildiğinde diğer ışık cihazlarına göre daha
düşük sertik değerleri göstermiştir (p<0.05). Kompozit tabakaları ile
sertlik arasındaki ilişki incelendiğinde, halojen ile polimerize edilen Tetric
Evo Ceram ve X-trafill kompozitlerin 1. ve 4. mm’de sertlikte belirgin düzeyde fark
gözlenmiştir (p<0.05). Halojen ile polimerize edilen SDR kompozit örneklerinde
fark tespit edilmemiştir (p>0.05).

Sonuçlar: Kompozitlerin sertlikleri materyal, ışık cihazı ve
derinliğe bağlı olarak değişmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler: kompozit rezin,
dental ışık cihazları, sertlik testi

Anahtar Kelimeler

kompozit rezin, dental ışık cihazları, mikrosertlik testi

Kaynakça

• 1- Sunnegardh-Grönberg K, van Dijken JWV, Funegardh U, Lindberg A, Nisson M. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent 2009; 37: 673-8
• 2- Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress decreaseing resin technology. Dent Mater 2014; 30: e246-e251.
• 3- Sakaguchi RI, Douglas WH, Peters MC. Curing light performance and polymerization of composite restorative materials. J Dent 1992; 20: 183-8.
• 4- Pilo R, Celgiesser D, Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent 1999; 27: 235-41.
• 5- Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
• 6- SDR. Instructions for use. Dentsply Caulk; 2012, Available from, http://dentsply.com.tr/ürünler/restoratif/kompozitler/sdrTM-0
• 7- Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk Fill Instructions for use. Ivoclar Vivadent; 2011. Available from, http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/en/p/all/products/restorative materials/composites/tetric-evoceram-bulk-fill
• 8- X-tra fill. Instructions for use. Voco; 2010. Available from, http://www.voco.com/tr/product/x_tra_fil/index.html
• 9- Tomaszewska IM, Kearns JO, Ilie N, Fleming GJP. Bulk fill restoratives: To cap or not to cap- That is the question? J Dent 2015; 43: 309-16.
• 10- Al-Ahdal K, Ilie N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization kinetics and impzct of post polymerization on the degree of conversion of bulk- fill resin-composite at clinically relevant depth. Dent Mater 2015; 31(10): 1207-13.
• 11- Eliades GC, Vougiouklakis GJ, Caputo AA. Degree of double bond conversion in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 19-25.
• 12- Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 121-31.
• 13- Martin FE. A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent 1998; 26: 239-43
• 14- Miyazaki M, Hattori T, Ichiishi Y, Kondo M, Onose H, Moore BK. Evaluation of curing units used in private dental offices. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 50-4.
• 15- Stahl F, Ashworth SH, Jandt KD, Millis RW. Light-emitting diode (LED) polymerization of kental composites: Flexural properties and polymerization potential. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1379-85.
• 16- Schattenberg A, Lichtenberg D, Stender E, Willershausen B, Ernst CP. Minimal exposure time of different LED-curing devices. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1043-9.
• 17- Tarle Z, Attin T, Marovic D, Andermatt L, Ristic M, Tauböck TT. Influence of irradiation time on subsurface degree of conversion and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 831-40.
• 18- Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 993-1000.
• 19- Flury S, Peutzfeld A, Lussi A. Influence of increment thickness on microhardness and dentin bond strength of bulk fill resin composite. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 1104-12.
• 20- Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1411-8.
• 21- Leprince JG, Palin WM, Mullier T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 364-76.
• 22- Hahnel S, Dowling AH, El-Safty S, Fleming GJP. The influence of monomeric resin and filler characteristics on the performance of experimental resin-based composites (RBCs) derived from a commertial formulation. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 416-23.
• 23- Ilie N, Stark K. Curing behavior of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 977-85.
• 24- Goracci C, Cadenaro M, Fontanive L, Giangrosso G, Juloski J, Vichi A. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 688-94.
• 25- Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR, Mogilevych B, Soares ES, Martin AA, et al. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 1542-51.
• 26- Abouelleil H, Pradelle N, Villat C, Attik N, Colon P, Grosgogeat B. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composite. Restor Dent Endod 2015; 40: 262-70.
• 27- Sideriou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacylate-based dental resins. Biomater 2002; 23: 1819-29.
• 28- Stransbury JW, Dickens SH. Network formation and compositional drift during photo-initiated copolymerization of dimethacrylate monomers. Polymer 2001; 42: 6363-9.
• 29- Li X, Pongprueksa P, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Curing profile of bulk-fill resin based composites. J Dent 2015; 43: 664-72.
• 30- Topçu FT, Erdemir U, Şahinkesen G, Yıldız E, Uslan İ, Acıkel C. Evaluation of microhardness surface roughness, and wear behaviour of different types of resin composites polymerized with two different light sources. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010; 92: 470-8.
• 31- Schattenberg A, Lichtenberg D, Stender E, Willershausen B, Ernst CP. Minimal exposure time of different LED curing devices. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1043-9.
• 32- Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Wilson BM. Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions Oper Dent 2004; 29: 698-704.
• 33- Zorzin J, Maier E, Harre S, Fey T, Belli R, Lohbaouer U, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: Polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 293-301.
• 34- Price RB, Murphy DG, Derand T. Light energy transmission through cured resin composite and human dentin. Quint Int 2000; 31: 659-67.
• 35- Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeld A, Hüsler J, Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: Is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater 2012, 28: 521-8.