Evaluation of the Radiographic Characteristics of the Stafne Bone Cavity in a Group of Patient Populations

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 15 - 20, 30.04.2021

Şehrazat Evirgen , Halil Tolga Yüksel , Ayşegül Türkmenoğlu

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.532231

Cited By: 1

Öz

Background:Stafne’s
bone cavity (SBC) was first used by Edward C. Stafne in 1942 to describe the
asymptomatic unilateral radiolucent space in the posterior mandible. Typically,
SBC is localized under the mandibular nerve in the distal part of the
mandibular corpus. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and
possible characteristics of CCT in all patients who presented to Uşak
University Faculty of Dentistry and compare these results to published reports.

Methods:A
total of 33708 panoramic radiograph were examined retrospectively. The
radiological and clinical data of SBC were evaluated according to age, gender,
medical history, incidence, location and shape.

Results:As
a result of 33708 radiological examinations, SBC was detected in 39 patients (%0.11).
The mean age was 50 years (range 22-75 years). The male / female ratio is 33/6.
All SBC were unilateral. In three cases, SBC was found in the anterior mandible
and in 36 cases in the posterior mandible. 
Twenty two patients had SBC on the rihgt side, 17 patients on the left
side. SBC was 21 round, 17 oval, 1 irregular shaped. Twenty two patients had no
systemic disease. 

Conclusions:This
study is a widely retrospective study that evaluated over 30,000 panoramic radiographs.According
to our results, SBC is an uncommon anomaly. Panoramic radiographs are usually
sufficient for the diagnosis of SBC. In doubtful cases, multislice CT (MSCT)
and cone beam CT (CBCT) or surgical procedures might be necessary to verify the
diagnosis.

Keywords:Panoramic
radiography, Prevalence, Stafne's Bone Cavity

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Panoramic radiography, Prevalence, Stafne Bone Cavity

Bir Grup Hasta Popülasyonunda Görülen Stafne Kemik Kavitesinin Radyografik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Stafne’nin
kemik kavitesi(SKK) ilk kez Edward C. Stafne tarafından 1942 yılında posterior
mandibulada asemptomatik unilateral radyolusent boşluğu tarif etmek için
kullanılmıştır. Tipik olarak mandibuler corpusun  distal parçasında, mandibuler sinirin altında
lokalizedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Uşak Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine
başvuran hastalarda  SKK’nın görülme
sıklığını ve olası karakteristik özelliklerini 
belirlemek, sonuçları 
literatürdeki son çalışmalarla karşılaştırmaktır

Gereç ve Yöntemler:Toplam
33708 panoramik radyografi retrospektif olarak incelendi. SKK'nın radyolojik ve
klinik verileri yaş, cinsiyet, medikal anamnez, insidans, lokasyon ve şekline
göre değerlendirildi.

Bulgular:İncelenen
33708 radyolojik tetkik sonucunda toplam 39 hastada SKK tespit edildi (% 0.11).
Ortalama yaş 50, yaş aralığı ise 22-75 idi. Erkek/kadın oranı 33/6 dır. Tüm SKK
unilateraldi ve 36 bireyde posterior mandibulada, 3 bireyde anterior
mandibulada tespit edildi. 22 hastanın sağ tarafında lokalize iken, 17 hastanın
sol tarafında lokalize ve 21 yuvarlak,17 oval, 1 irregüler şekilli idi. 22
hastanın sistemik herhangi bir hastalığı bulunmadı.

Sonuçlar:Bu
çalışma 30.000'in üzerinde panoramik radyografinin değerlendirildiği geniş
çaplı retrospektif bir çalışmadır. Sonuçlarımıza göre, SKK nadir görülen bir
anomalidir. Panoramik radyografiler SKK tanısı için genellikle yeterlidir.
Şüpheli durumlarda, teşhisi doğrulamak için çok kesitli bilgisayarlı tomografi
ve konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi veya cerrahi prosedürler gerekebilir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler:Panoramik Radyografi, Prevalans, Stafne kemik
kavitesi

Anahtar Kelimeler

Panoramik radyografi, Prevalans, Stafne Kemik Kavitesi

Kaynakça

• 1. Assaf ATH. Solaty M, Zrcn TA, Fuhrmann AW, Scheuer H, Heiland M, Friedrich RE. Prevalence of Stafne’s Bone Cavity In vivo2014;28: 1159-1164
• 2. Philipsen HP, Takata T, Reichart PA, Sato S, Suei Y. Lingual and buccal mandibuler bone depressions: a review based on 583 cases from a world wide literature survey, including 69 new cases from Japan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31:281-290
• 3. More CB, Das S, Gupta S, Patel P, Saha N. Stafne’ bone cavity: a diagnostic challenge. Journal of Clinical and diagnostic Research.2015; 9(11): 10-19
• 4. Branstetter B.F, Weissman J.L, Kaplan Sb. Imagining os Stafne bone cavity:What MR adds and why a new name is needed. Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:587-589
• 5. Damante JH, Camarini ET, Silver MA. Lingual mandibuler bone defect: a developmental entity. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2006; 47: 706-709
• 6. Minowa K, Kobayashi I, Matsuda A, Ohmori K, Kurukowa Y, Inoue N, Totsuka Y, Nakamura M. Static bone cavity in the condylar neck and mandibular notch of the mandible.Australian Dental J 2009;54:49-53
• 7. Shimizu M, Osa N, Okamura K, Yoshiura K. CT analysis of the Stafne’s bone defects of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 95-102 8. Minowa K, Inoue N, İzumiyama Y, Ashıkaga Y, Chu B, Maravılla KR, Totsuka Y, Nakamura M. Static bone cavity of the mandible: Computed tomography findings with histopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol 2006; 13: 172-176
• 9. Minowa K, Inoue N, Sawamura T, Matsuda A, Totsuka T, Nakamura M. Evaluation of static bone cavities with CT and MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32:2-7
• 10. Ariji E, Fujiwara N, Tabata O, Nakayama E, Kanda S, Shiratsuchi Y,Oka M. Stafne’s bone cavity classification based on outline and content determined by computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 375-80
• 11. Regezi JA, Sciubba J, Jordan RCK. Oral pathology clinical pathologic correlations. Philadelphia. WB Saunders Co 2003; 259-260
• 12. Azaz B, Lustmann J. Anatomical configurations in dry mandibles Br J Oral Surgery 1973; 11:1-9
• 13. Langlais RP, Cottone J, Kasle MJ. Anterior and posterior lingual depressions mandible. J Oral Surgery 1976; 34: 502-509
• 14. Gaughran GRL. Mylohyoid boutonniere and sublingual bouton J Anat 1963; 97:565-568
• 15. Bender IB. Factors influencing radiographic appearance of bony lesions J Endod 1982;8:161-170
• 16. Mann RW. Three dimensional represantations of lingual defects(Stafne’s) using slicon impressions.J Oral Pathol Med 1992; 21:381-384
• 17. Gomez CQ, Castellon EV, Aytes LB, Escoda CG. Stafne bone cavity: a retrospective study of 11 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: 277-80
• 18. Venkatesh E. Stafne bone cavity and cone beam computed tomography: a report of two cases. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 41: 145-148
• 19. Schneider T, filo K, Locher MC, Gander T, Meltzer P, Grätz KW, Kruse AL, Lübbers HT.Stafne Bone cavities: systematic algorithm for diagnosis derived from retrospective data over a 5 year period. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 52(4): 369-74
• 20. Ozaki H, Ishikawa S; Kitabatake K, Yusa K, Tachibana H, Iino M. A case of simultaneous unilateral anterior and posterior Stafne bone defects. Case Reports in Dentistry 2015; Article ID 983956
• 21. Buchner A, carpenter WM, Merrell PW, Leider AS. Anterior lingual mandibular salivary gland defect. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71: 131-6
• 22. Türkoğlu K, Çelebioğlu BG, Karadeniz SN. Stafne kemik kavitesi: 3 olgu sunumu Cumhuriyet Dent J 2012;15(1):43-47
• 23. Şişman Y, Miloğlu O, Şekerci AE, Yılmaz AB, Demirtaş O, Tokmk TT. Radiographic evaluation on prevalence of Stafne bone defect: a study from two centres in Turkey. Dentomaxfac Radiol 2012; 41:152-8
• 24. Hansen LG. Developmental of a lingual mandibular bone cavity in an 11- year old boy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.1980; 49: 376-378