Comprehensive Analysis of Flowering Patterns in One-Year-Old Long Shoots of Apple Cultivars with Contrasted Bearing Habits

Öz

Before developing orchard management strategies, it is crucial to conduct architectural analysis at the shoot level for the specific type of fruit to be grown. The objective of this study was to analyze flowering patterns in 1-year-old long shoots of three apple cultivars ('Amasya,' 'Braeburn,' and 'Granny Smith') with different bearing behaviors. This analysis aimed to gain a better understanding of their growth dynamics and reproductive activities. The shoot was divided into three consecutive zones (proximal, median, and distal) based on node number. When comparing the number of floral and vegetative buds in the three zones along the shoot, less contrast was observed between alternate-bearing ('Amasya') and regular-bearing cultivars ('Braeburn' and 'Granny Smith'). However, a notable difference in floral bud quality variables was evident in shoot zones between biennial-bearing and regular-bearing cultivars. In 'Braeburn' and 'Granny Smith' with a regular bearing habit, floral bud quality variables remained stable along the shoot. In contrast, 'Amasya' shoots exhibited a gradual increase in floral bud quality from the proximal zone towards the distal zone. This study underscores the significance of floral bud quality, especially the properties of spur leaves along the shoot, in ensuring optimal and consistent productivity. Finally, with the exception of internode length, morphometric traits did not significantly differ between cultivars when considering the entire shoot. However, these differences became apparent when examining successive zones along the shoot.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• branching
• floral quality
• tree architecture
• reproductive
• bearing behaviors

Kaynakça

1. Atay E, Koyuncu F (2012). Shoot architecture in apples. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22(3): 180-191, (in Turkish).
2. Atay AN, Atay E, Lauri PE, Kunter B, Kantoglu KY (2018). Phenotyping gamma-ray-induced mutant population of 'Amasya' apple for architectural traits, precocity, floral phenology and fruit characteristics. Scientia Horticulturae, 233: 195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.003.
3. Atay AN, Atay E (2022). Flowering and non-flowering spur leaf characteristics of 'Amasya' apple and its comparison with other cultivars. Horticultural Studies, 39, 008-014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.16882/HortiS.1067242.
4. Bangerth F (2006). Flower induction in perennial fruit trees: Still an enigma? Acta Horticulturae, 727, 177-195.
5. Barritt BH, Rom CR, Konishi BJ, Dilley MA (1991). Light level influences spur quality and canopy development and light interception influence fruit production in apple, HortScience, 26(8): 993-999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.8.993.
6. Cochard H, Coste S, Chanson B, Guehl JM, Nicolini E (2005). Hydraulic architecture correlates with bud organogenesis and primary shoot growth in beech (Fagussyl vatica). Tree Physiology, 25:15451552.
7. Costes E, Guédon Y (1997). Modelling the sylleptic branching on one year‐old trunks of apple cultivars. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 122: 53–62.
8. Costes E, Guédon Y (2002). Modelling branching patterns on 1-year-old trunks of six apple cultivars. Annals of Botany, 2002, 89: 513-524.

9. Costes E (2003). Winter bud content according to position in 3-year-old branching systems of ‘Granny Smith’ apple. Annals of Botany, 92 (4): 581–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg178.
10. Costes E, Sinoquet H, Kelner JJ, Godin C (2003). Exploring within-tree architectural development of two apple tree cultivars over 6 years. Annals of Botany, 91(1):91-104. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcg010.
11. Costes E, Lauri PE, Regnard JL (2006). Analysing fruit tree architecture-consequences for tree management and fruit production. Horticultural Reviews, 32, ISBN 0-471-73216-8.
12. DaSilva D,Han L, Faivre R, Costes E (2014). Influence of the variation of geometrical and topological traits on light interception efficiency of apple trees: sensitivity analysis and metamodeling for ideotype definition. Annals of Botany, DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcu034.
13. Dennis FG, Masabni JG, Ketchie DO (1996). Evaluating twenty‐eight strains of ‘Delicious’ apple in Michigan. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 121: 988–995.
14. Elsysy MA, Hirst PM (2017). The role of spur leaves, bourse leaves, and fruit on local flower formation in apple: An approach to understanding biennial bearing, HortScience 52(9), 1229-1232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12136-17.
15. Ferree DC (1989). Influence of orchard management system on spur quality, light, and fruit within the canopy of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:869-875.
16. Ferree D, Bishop B, Schupp J, Tustin D, Cashmore W (2001). Influence of flower type, position in the cluster and spur characteristics on fruit set and growth of apple cultivars. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 76: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2001.11511318.
17. Ferree, DC, Schmid JC (2004). Spur leaf and flower characteristics of apple cultivars in the 1995 NE-183 trial. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 58, 2: 90-97.
18. Fumey D, Lauri PÉ, Guédon Y, Godin C, Costes E (2011). How young trees cope with removal of whole or parts of shoots: an analysis of local and distant responses to pruning in 1-year-old apple (Malus xdomestica; Rosaceae) trees. Am J Bot. 98(11):1737-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000231.
19. Gottschalk C, van Nocker S (2013). Diversity in seasonal bloom time and floral development among apple species and hybrids. J Am Soc Hortic Sci., 138(5):367–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.138.5.367.
20. Gordón D, Damiano C, Dejong T (2006). Preformation in vegetative buds of Prunus persica: factors influencing number of leaf primordia in overwintering buds. Tree Physiology, 26 4, 537-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/TREEPHYS/26.4.537.
21. Guedon Y, Barthelemy D, Caraglio Y, Costes E (2001). Pattern analysis in branching and axillary flowering sequences. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 212: 481–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2392.
22. Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB (1978). Tropical trees and forests. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Hanke MV, Flachowsky H, Peil A, Hattasch C (2007). No flower no fruit – Genetic potentials to trigger flowering in fruit trees. Genes, Genomes and Genomics 1(1), 1-20.
23. Jackson JE (2003). The biology of apples and pears; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511542657.004.
24. Lane WD, MacDonalds Ketchie DO (1996). Evaluation of quality traits and yield of 28 strains of ‘Delicious’ apple. Fruit Varieties Journal, 50: 167–174.
25. Lauri PE, Lespinasse JM (1993). The relationship between cultivar fruiting-type and fruiting branch characteristics in apple trees. Acta Hort. 349: 259-263.
26. Lauri PÉ, Térouanne É, Lespınasse JM (1996). Quantitative analysis of relationships between inflorescence size, bearing-axis size and fruit-set—An Apple tree case study. Annals of Botany, 77(3), 277–286. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42759124.
27. Lauri PÉ, Térouanne É, Lespinasse JM (1997). Relationship between the early development of apple fruiting branches and the regularity of bearing: An approach to the strategies of various cultivars. Journal of Horticultural Science, 72: 519-530.
28. Lauri PE (2007). Differentiation and growth traits associated with acrotony in the apple tree (Malus x domestica, Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 1273-1281.
29. Lauri PE, Corelli-Grappadelli L (2014). Tree architecture, flowering and fruiting – Thoughts on training, pruning and ecophysiology. Acta Horticulturae. 1058. 291-298. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1058.34.
30. Lespinasse JM (1977(. La conduite du pommier I. Types de fructification. Incidence sur la conduite de l’arbre. Paris: INVUFLEC.
31. Madail RH, Herter FG, Leite GB (2012). Influence of floral structure and flower bud quality on productivity and fruit shape in different apple cultivars. Rev. Bras. Frutic., 34 (3): 686-694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452012000300006.
32. McCulloh KA, Sperry JS (2005). Patterns in hydraulic architecture and their implications for transport efficiency. Tree Physiology, 25:257–267.
33. Meszaros M, Guedon Y, Krska B, Costes E (2020). Modelling the bearing and branching behaviors of 1-year-old shoots in apricot genotypes. PLoS ONE 15(7): e0235347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235347.
34. Pallas B, Bluy S, Ngao J, Martinez S, Clément-Vidal A, Kelner JJ, Costes E (2018). Growth and carbon balance are differently regulated by tree and shoot fruiting contexts: an integrative study on apple genotypes with contrasted bearing patterns. Tree Physiology, 38 (9): 1395–1408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx166
35. R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.
36. Renton M, Guedon Y, Godin Ch, Costes E (2006). Similarities and gradients in growth unit branching patterns during ontogeny in ‘Fuji’ apple trees: a stochastic approach. Journal of experimental Botany, 57: 3131–3143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl075.
37. Sadok IB, Moutier N, Dosba F, Rebai A, Grati-Kamoun N, Khadari B, Costes E (2013). Genetic determinism of the vegetative and reproductive traits in a F1 olive tree Progeny: evidence of tree ontogeny effect. Tree Genetics and Genome, 9:205–221.
38. Sadok IB, Martinez S, Moutier N, Garcia G, Leon L, Belaj A, DeLaRosa R, Khadari B, Costes E (2015). Plasticity in vegetative growth over contrasted growing sites of an F1 olive tree progeny during its juvenile phase. PLoSONE, 10(6): e0127539. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0127539.
39. Solar A, Solar M, Stampar F (2005). Growth dynamics and reproductive activity of annual shoots in the walnut cultivar 'Elit'. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 85 (2): 169-178.
40. Stanley J (2016). Factors affecting fruit set and fruit quality along branch units of different apricot cultivars, New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 44:3,171-191, DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2016.1161652.
41. Tromp J (2005). Flower bud formation. In: Tromp J, Webster AD, Wertheim SJ (eds.). Fundamentals of temperate zone tree fruit production. Leiden, The Netherlands, p. 204–215.
42. UPOV (1982). Apple descriptors. In: Watkins, Smith. Rome: IBPGR.
43. Verheij FA (1996). Morphological and physiological aspects of the early phases of flower bud formation of apple. PhD Thesis, University of Wageningen.
44. Wang YT, Pallas B, Salazar-Gutierrez MR, Costes E, Hoogenboom G (2020). A comparative study on the branching pattern of monocyclic and bicyclic shoots of apple cv. “Fuji”. Front. Plant Sci., 11:571918. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.571918.
45. Wertheim SJ, Schmidt H (2005). Flowering, pollination and fruit set. In: Tromp J, Webster AD, Wertheim SJ (eds.), Fundamentals of Temperate Zone Tree Fruit Production. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 216–239.