The Effect of Different Rootstocks and Berry Heterogeneity on Phytochemical Properties in Vitis vinifera Papazkarası Grape Variety

Öz

There are differences in development and composition between the clusters on the vines and the grape berries on the clusters. Therefore, grouping berries by size in wine grape varieties can help better manage the composition of the wine to be produced. The aim of this research is to reveal the effect of berry heterogeneity on primary and secondary metabolites in the cv. Papazkarası. The Papazkarası vines are grafted onto the rootstocks 1103P, 110R, and 420A and are trained in the double Cordon Royat system. The clusters harvested from each rootstock were separated into individual berries. These berries were then grouped by size using sieves. The size groups were: ≤12.00mm; 12.01-14.00mm; 14.01-16.00mm; 16.01-18.00mm; and ≥18.00mm, forming five groups. A control group was created by taking berries from each size group. In terms of primary metabolites in the must, the Papazkarası/1103P combination and the ≥18.00 mm size group stood out. However, the maturity indices, °Brix, and % alcohol criteria were found to be insufficient for all rootstocks and berry sizes. Regarding secondary metabolites, it was found that the ≤12.00mm and 12.01-14.00mm size groups had high values in all graft combinations. The size group with the highest total anthocyanin and total phenolic content was the ≤12.00mm group. Based on these results, berry size reduction practices will improve quality. The quality of the wines obtained from different size groups should also be supported by sensory analyses. Sorting the berries by size will positively impact grape and thus wine quality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Berry size
• wine grape
• Papazkarası
• Autochtonous variety
• Secondary metabolites

Kaynakça

1. Arozarena I, Ayestarán B, Cantalejo M, Navarro M, Vera M, Abril I, Casp A (2002). Anthocyanin composition of Tempranillo, Garnacha and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes from high and low-quality vineyards over two years. European Food Research and Technology, 214(4): 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00217-001-0471-0
2. Ausari PK, Gurjar PKS, Somkuwar RG, Naruka IS, Sharma AK, Gharate PS (2024). Effect of rootstocks on yield and wine quality of Sauvignon Blanc variety. Plant Archives, 24(1): 1477-1482. https://doi.org/10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2024.v24.no.1.207
3. Bahar E, Kurt C (2015). Farklı toprak işleme ve yaprak alanı/ ürün miktarının Syrah üzüm çeşidinin fizyolojisi, morfolojisi ve üzüm bileşimi üzerine etkileri: II. Şıra özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi-A, 27(Özel Sayı): 316-332.
4. Bahar E, Korkutal I, Uzun M (2024). Effects of different water stress levels, heterogeneity, and location on berry phytochemical properties in an organic and conventional vineyard (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon). KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 27(5): 1042-1054. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.1333996
5. Barbagallo MG, Guidoni S, Hunter JJ (2011). Berry size qualitative characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Syrah. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 32(1): 129-136. https://doi.org/10.21548/32-1-1372
6. Blank M, Samer S, Stoll M (2022). Grapevine rootstock genotypes influences berry and wine phenolic composition (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir). OENO One 56(1): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.1.4459
7. Blouin J, Guimberteau G (2000). Maturation et Maturite des Raisins. Feret, Bordeaux, France. p.168.
8. Cantürk S, Kunter B (2019). Üzümlerde aroma bileşikleri. In: Cantürk S, Kunter B (Eds), Current Research and Assesments for Agricultural Sciences. 1st Edition, IVPE, Cetinje-Montenegro. pp.19-28.

9. Casassa LF, Harbertson JF (2014). Extraction, evolution, and sensory impact of phenolic compounds during red wine maceration. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 5: 83-109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-030713-092438
10. Casassa LF, Keller M, Harbertson JF (2015). Regulated deficit irrigation alters anthocyanins, tannins and sensory properties of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wines. Molecules, 20(5): 7820-7844. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20057820
11. Cemeroğlu B (2015). Gıda Analizleri. Bizim Büro Basımevi, Ankara, Türkiye. p.480.
12. Champagnol F (1998). Critéres de Qualitié de la Vendange. in: Flanzy, C. (Ed) Oenologie, Fondements Scientifiques et Technologiques. Lavoisier Tec & Doc, Paris, France. p.1311.
13. Chen KW, He F, Wang XY, Liu X, Duan QC, Wang J (2018) Influences of berry size on fruit composition and wine quality of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapes, South African Society for Enology and Viticulture, 39(1): 67-76. https://doi.org/10.21548/39-1-2439
14. Chen Y, Liang Z, Krstic M, Clingeleffer P, Howell K, Chen D, Zhang P (2024) The influences of rootstock on the performance of Pinot Noir (Vitis vinifera L.): Berry and wine composition. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 7586202: 19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7586202
15. Conde C, Silva P, Fontes N, Dias ACP, Tavares RM, Sousa MJ, Agasse A, Delrot S, Gerós H (2007). Biochemical changes throughout grape berry development and fruit and wine quality. Food, 1(1): 1-22.
16. Cox J (2015). From Vines to Wines, 5th Edition: The Complete Guide to Growing Grapes and Making Your Own Wine. Storey Publishing, North Adams, Massachusetts, USA, p.264.
17. Dardeniz A, Kısmalı İ (2002). Amasya ve Cardinal üzüm çeşitlerinde farklı ürün yüklerinin üzüm ve çubuk verimi ile kalitesine etkileri üzerine araştırmalar. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1): 9-16.
18. Erseç Ç, Demirci AŞ (2023). Isolation, identification and determination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast species from the wines made by spontaneous fermentation using Papazkarası grapes from Thrace Region. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 20(1): 155-165. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1124694
19. Faikoğlu F (2014). Adakarası, Papazkarası, Kalecik karası üzüm çeşitleri kullanılarak üretilen hardaliyelerin kalitesinin ve duyusal özelliklerinin araştırılması. MSc Thesis, Uludağ University (Unpublished), Türkiye.
20. Feifel S, Weilack I, Markusevics E, Zimmermann D, Wegmann-Herr P, Weber F, Richling E, Durner D (2024). Influence of potential alcohol in grapes on phenolic and sensory characteristics of red wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72(22): 12725-12737. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c01035
21. Flamini R (2013). Mass spectrometry in grape and wine chemistry. Part I: Polyphenols. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 22: 218-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.10052
22. Foroni F, Vignando M, Aiello M, Parma V, Paoletti MG, Squartini A, Rumiati RI (2017). The smell of terroir! Olfactory discrimination between wines of different grape variety and different terroir. Food Quality and Preference, 58: 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.012
23. Gambetta G, Manuck C, Drucker S, Shaghasi T, Fort K, Matthews M, Walker MA, McElrone AJ, McElrone A (2012). The relationship between root hydraulics and scion vigour across Vitis rootstocks: what role do root aquaporins play? Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(18): 6445-6455. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers312, 2-s2.0-84869987523
24. Gil M, Pascual O, Gómez-Alonso S, García-Romero E, Hermosín-Gutiérrez I, Zamora F, Canals JM (2015). Influence of berry size on red wine colour and composition. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 21(2): 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12123
25. Gouthu S, O'Neil ST, Di Y, Ansarolia M, Megraw M, Deluc LG (2014). A comparative study of ripening among berries of the grape cluster reveals an altered transcriptional programme and enhanced ripening rate in delayed berries. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(20): 5889-902. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru329
26. Harbertson JF, Keller M (2012). Rootstock effects on deficit-irrigated winegrapes in a dry climate: grape and wine composition, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63(1): 40-48. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2011.11079
27. He J, Giusti MM (2010). Anthocyanins: Natural colorants with health-promoting properties. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 1: 163-187. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.food.080708.100754
28. INRA (2007). Determination d’Anthocyanes En Echantillons De Raisin. Mode Operatiore. Ref: MO-LAB-23. Version: 1, Septembre 2007. UE Pech Rouge, France. p.2.
29. Kennedy AJ (2008) Grape and wine phenolics: Observations and recent findings. Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria, 35(2): 107-120. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202008000200001
30. Kizildeniz T, Mekni I, Santesteban H, Pascual I, Morales F, Irigoyen JJ (2015). Effects of climate change including elevated CO2 concentration, temperature and water deficit on growth, water status, and yield quality of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars. Agricultural Water Management, 159: 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.015
31. Korkutal İ, Bahar E, Güvemli Dündar D (2019) Edirne ili Uzunköprü ilçesi bağcılık yapısının incelenmesi. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1): 127-136. https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.457451
32. Korkutal İ, Bahar E, Koskosoğlu B (2023). Cabernet Franc üzüm çeşidinin fitokimyasal özelliklerine eğimdeki konumun, anacın ve salkım seyreltmenin etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(3): 536-556. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1231642
33. Koundouras S, Hatzidimitriou E, Karamolegkou M, Dimopoulou E, Kallithraka S, Tsialtas JT, Zioziou E, Nikolaou N, Kotseridis Y (2009). Irrigation and rootstock effects on the phenolic concentration and aroma potential of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57(17): 7805-7813. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901063a
34. Marguerit E, Brendel O, Lebon E, Van Leeuwen C, Ollat N (2012). Rootstock control of scion transpiration and its acclimation to water deficit are controlled by different genes. New Phytologist, 194(2): 416-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04059.x
35. Matthews MA, Nuzzo V (2007). Berry size and yield paradigms on grape and wine quality. Acta Horticulturae, 754: 423-436. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.754.56
36. Melo MS, Schultz HR, Volschenk CG, Hunter JJ (2015). Berry size variation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Syrah: Morphological dimensions, berry composition and wine quality. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 36(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21548/36-1-931
37. Miele A, Rizzon LA (2019). Rootstock-scion interaction: 3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine, Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 41(1): e-642. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452019642
38. Mohammed S, Manan AF (2015) Analysis of total phenolics, tannins and flavonoids from Moringa oleifera seed extract. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 7(1): 132-135.
39. Nicolle P, Barthe C, Dorais M, Dubé G, Angers P, Pedneault K (2023). Impact of cluster thinning and harvest date on berry volatile composition and sensory profile of Vitis sp. Seyval blanc and Vandal-Cliche. OENO One, 57(4). https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.4.7719
40. Özdemir S (2017). Farklı maya suşlarının Narince ve Papazkarası (Vitis vinifera) üzüm çeşitlerinden üretilen şarapların kaliteleri üzerine etkileri. MSc.Thesis, Tekirdag Namık Kemal University (Unpublished), Türkiye.
41. Pisciotta A, Abruzzo F, Barbagallo MG, Santangelo T, di Lorenzo R (2012). Ulteriori approfondimenti degli effetti della dimensione degli acini sulla qualità dell’uva nella cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Italus Hortus, 3(1): 82-88.
42. Plantgrape (2024). Rootstocks. https://www.plantgrape.fr/en/varieties/rootstock-varieties (access date: 26.09.2024)
43. Ramos MC, Jara, MAI, Rosillo L, Salinas MR (2024). Effect of temperature and water availability on grape phenolic compounds and their extractability in Merlot grown in a warm area. Scientia Horticulturae, 337: 113475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113475
44. Ribéreau-Gayon P, Glories Y, Maujean A, Dubourdieau D (2021). Handbook of Enology, Vol 2: The Chemistry of Wine and Stabilization and Treatments (3rd Edition). John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, England. p.441.
45. Roby G, Matthews MA (2004). Relative proportions of seed, skin and flesh, in ripe berries from Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines grown in a vineyard either well irrigated or under water deficit. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 10: 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00009.x
46. Sanyürek KN, Tahmaz H, Çakır A, Söylemezoğlu G (2018). Tunceli ilinde yetiştirilen bazı şaraplık üzüm çeşitlerinde antioksidan aktivitenin ve fenolik bileşiklerin belirlenmesi. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(4): 551–555. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.471340
47. Schwarz M, Picazo-Bacete JJ, Winterhalter P, Hermosín-Gutiérrez I (2005). Effect of copigments and grape cultivar on the color of red wines fermented after the addition of copigments. Journal of Agricultural Food and Chemistry, 53: 8372-8381. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051005o
48. Shi PB, Yue TX, Ai LL, Cheng YF, Meng JF, Li MH, Zhang ZW (2016). Phenolic compound profiles in grape skins of Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Syrah and Marselan cultivated in the Shacheng area (China). South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 37(2): 132-138. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2224-79042016000200008&lng=en&nrm=iso
49. Silva LR, Queiroz M (2016). Bioactive compounds of red grapes from Dão region (Portugal): evaluation of phenolic and organic profile. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 6(4): 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.12.015
50. Spayd SE, Tarara JM, Mee DL, Ferguson JC (2002). Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot berries. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 53: 171-182. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2002.53.3.171
51. Stevens RM, Pech JM, Gibberd MR, Walker RR, Jones JA, Taylor J, Nicholas PR (2008). The effect of reduced irrigation on growth, yield, ripening rates and water relations of Chardonnay vines grafted on five rootstocks. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 14: 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00018.x
52. Tarter ME, Keuter SE, (2005) Effect of rachis position on size and maturity of Cabernet Sauvignon berries. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 56(1): 86-89. Doi:10.5344/ajev.2005.56.1.86
53. Ulaş S, Güler A, Candemir A (2014). Effect of rootstocks on different physiological parameters in some grape cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 1(Special Issue-1): 1097-1100.
54. Ünlüsoy S (2019). Merlot üzüm çeşidinde farklı toprak işleme ve salkım seyreltme uygulamalarının tane heterojenitesi ve bileşimi üzerine etkileri. MSc Thesis, Tekirdag Namık Kemal University (Unpublished), Türkiye. VIVC (2024). Papazkarası üzüm çeşidi. https://www.vivc.de/index.php?r=passport%2Fview&id=8923 (acces date: 26.09.2024)
55. Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR, Holt H, Pearson W, Francis I (2019). Effect of rootstock on yield, grape composition and wine sensory attributes of Shiraz grown in a moderately saline environment. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 25(4): 414-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12409
56. Wang Y, Chen WK, Xiao-tong G, He L, Yang XH, He F, Duan, CQ, Wang J (2019). Rootstock-mediated effects on Cabernet-Sauvignon performance: Vine growth, berry ripening, flavonoids, and aromatic profiles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20: 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020401
57. Zhang K, Zhang ZZ, Yuan L, Gao XT, Li Q (2021). Difference and characteristics of anthocyanin from Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot cultivated at five regions in Xinjiang. Food Science and Technology, 41(1): 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.11020