Genetic Variation Analysis of Selected Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Accessions Through SCoT Markers

Öz

Molecular techniques such as ISSR, RAPD, SCoT, and SSR are widely used to identify genetic polymorphism, reveal genetic structures, and analyze inter-varietal relationships in grape cultivars. In this context, the aim of our study was to reveal the genetic diversity of some local grape (Vitis vinifera) genotypes cultivated or naturally found in the Divriği district of Sivas province, contribute to the sustainable conservation of natural genetic resources, and determine the agricultural production potential of these genotypes. Additionally, the potential use of Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers in evaluating the diversity among different grape genotypes was investigated. Plant materials were collected from vineyards, and DNA was isolated from fresh leaves using the CTAB method. A total of 36 SCoT markers were screened in the samples, and 12 markers with the highest polymorphism rate were selected for analysis. In this study, a total of 119 bands were obtained from the 12 SCoT primers used to determine the genetic relationships among the grape genotypes. Among these, 83 bands were polymorphic, resulting in a polymorphism rate of 69.74%. The molecular data obtained allowed for the construction of a dendrogram (phylogenetic tree) grouping the analyzed grape genotypes according to their similarity indices. According to the UPGMA dendrogram and the correlation matrix generated from the SCoT molecular data, the lowest genetic similarity (0.382) was observed between genotypes G6 and G38, while the highest similarity (0.786) was found between genotypes G37 and G39. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that SCoT markers can be effectively used to assess genetic variation and establish similarity indices among grape genotypes. This molecular approach provides a robust basis for advanced genetic research and future breeding programs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Grape
• SCOT
• variation

Genetic Variation Analysis of Selected Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Accessions Through SCOT Markers

Öz

Molecular techniques such as ISSR, RAPD, SCoT, and SSR are widely used to identify genetic polymorphism, reveal genetic structures, and analyze inter-varietal relationships in grape cultivars. In this context, the aim of our study was to reveal the genetic diversity of some local grape (Vitis vinifera) genotypes cultivated or naturally found in the Divriği district of Sivas province, contribute to the sustainable conservation of natural genetic resources, and determine the agricultural production potential of these genotypes. Additionally, the potential use of Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers in evaluating the diversity among different grape genotypes was investigated. Plant materials were collected from vineyards, and DNA was isolated from fresh leaves using the CTAB method. A total of 36 SCoT markers were screened in the samples, and 12 markers with the highest polymorphism rate were selected for analysis. In this study, a total of 119 bands were obtained from the 12 SCoT primers used to determine the genetic relationships among the grape genotypes. Among these, 83 bands were polymorphic, resulting in a polymorphism rate of 69.74%. The molecular data obtained allowed for the construction of a dendrogram (phylogenetic tree) grouping the analyzed grape genotypes according to their similarity indices. According to the UPGMA dendrogram and the correlation matrix generated from the SCoT molecular data, the lowest genetic similarity (0.382) was observed between genotypes G6 and G38, while the highest similarity (0.786) was found between genotypes G37 and G39. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that SCoT markers can be effectively used to assess genetic variation and establish similarity indices among grape genotypes. This molecular approach provides a robust basis for advanced genetic research and future breeding programs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Grape
• SCOT
• variation

Kaynakça

1. Almadanim MC, Baleiras-Couto MM, Pereira HS, Carneiro LC, Fevereiro P, Eiras-Dias JE, Veloso MM (2007). Genetic diversity of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars most utilized for wine production in Portugal. Vıtıs-Geılweılerhof 46(3), 116.
2. Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH, Boursiquot JM, Walker MA, Meredith CP, Simon CJ (2003). Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape. Vitis vinifera L. Genetics Research 81(3), 179-192.
3. Aradhya M, Wang Y, Walker MA, Prins BH, Koehmstedt AM, Velasco D, ... Preece JE (2013). Genetic diversity, structure, and patterns of differentiation in the genus Vitis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 299, 317-330.
4. Bashandy T, Kamel S, Ferweez H (2020). Evaluation of yield, fruit quality and molecular diversity for three grape cultivars under new valley conditions. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology 11(7), 229-233.
5. Braidot E, Zancani M, Petrussa E, Peresson C, Bertolini A, Patui S, Vianello A (2008). Transport and accumulation of flavonoids in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Signaling & Behavior 3(9), 626-632.
6. Collard BC, Mackill DJ (2009). Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 27, 86-93.
7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12, 13-15.
8. Ekhvaia J, Gurushidze M, Blattner FR, Akhalkatsi M (2014). Genetic diversity of Vitis vinifera in Georgia: relationships between local cultivars and wild grapevine, V. vinifera L. subsp. sylvestris. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 61, 1507-1521.

9. Franks T, Gang He D, Thomas M (1998). Regeneration of transgenic shape Vitis vinifera L. Sultana plants: genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Molecular Breeding 4, 321-333.
10. Goufo P, Singh RK, Cortez I (2020). A reference list of phenolic compounds (including stilbenes) in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) roots, woods, canes, stems, and leaves. Antioxidants 9(5), 398.
11. Guo DL, Zhang JY, Liu CH (2012). Genetic diversity in some grape varieties revealed by SCoT analyses. Molecular Biology Reports 39, 5307-5313.
12. Hameed, UKA, Abdelaziz K, El Sherif N (2020). Genetic diversity of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars in Al-Madinah Al-Munawara based on molecular markers and morphological traits. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 27(1), 113-127.
13. Ibrahim SD, Adawy SS, Atia MAM, Alsamman AM, Mokhtar MM (2016). Genetic diversity, variety identification and gene detection in some Egyptian grape varieties by SSR and SCoT markers. Plant Omics 9(5).
14. Igwe DO, Ihearahu OC, Osano AA, Acquaah G, Ude GN (2022). Assessment of genetic diversity of Musa species accessions with variable genomes using ISSR and SCoT markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 69(1), 49-70.
15. Kajkolah M, Sheidai M, Koohdar F (2023). Population and landscape genetic studies of indigenous table grapes (Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera Hegi). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 70(8), 2533-2553.
16. Kaya HB, Dilli Y, Oncu-Oner T, Ünal A (2023). Exploring genetic diversity and population structure of a large grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) germplasm collection in Türkiye. Frontiers in Plant Science 14, 1121811.
17. Korbin M, Kuras A, Zurawicz E (2002). Fruit plant germplasm characterisation using molecular markers generated in RAPD and ISSR-PCR. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters 7(2B), 785-794.
18. Kovach WL (2007). MVSP-A MultiVariate Statistical Package for Windows, ver. 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth Wales, UK.
19. Lebon G, Wojnarowiez G, Holzapfel B, Fontaine F, Vaillant-Gaveau N, Clément C (2008). Sugars and flowering in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 59(10), 2565-2578.
20. Martínez LE, Cavagnaro PF, Masuelli RW, Zuniga M (2006). SSR-based assessment of genetic diversity in South American Vitis vinifera varieties. Plant Science 170(6), 1036-1044.
21. Mishra SP, Sarkar U, Taraphder S, Datta S, Swain D, Saikhom R, Laishram M (2017). Multivariate statistical data analysis—principal component analysis (PCA). International Journal of Livestock Research (7), 60–78.
22. Nicolas SD, Péros JP, Lacombe T, Launay A, Le Paslier MC, Bérard A, ... Doligez A (2016). Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and power of a large grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) diversity panel newly designed for association studies. BMC Plant Biology 16, 1-19.
23. Pan H, Deng L, Zhu K, Shi D, Wang F, Cui G (2024). Evaluation of genetic diversity and population structure of Annamocarya sinensis using SCoT markers. PloS One 19(9), e0309283.
24. Pellegrino A, Lebon E, Voltz M, Wery J (2005). Relationships between plant and soil water status in vine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant and Soil 266, 129-142.
25. Poyraz I (2016). Comparison of ITS, RAPD and ISSR from DNA-based genetic diversity techniques. Comptes Rendus. Biologies 339(5-6), 171-178.
26. Riaz S, De Lorenzis G, Velasco D, Koehmstedt A, Maghradze D, Bobokashvili Z, ... Arroyo-Garcia R (2018). Genetic diversity analysis of cultivated and wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) accessions around the Mediterranean basin and Central Asia. BMC Plant Biology 18, 1-14.
27. Souframanien J, Gopalakrishna T (2004). A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in blackgram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 1687-1693.
28. Tamimi Z, Noormohammadi Z, Farahani F (2023). Genetic structure and SCoT marker-based differentiation of indigenous grape, Vitis venifera L. cultivars of Iran. The Nucleus 66(1), 95-101.
29. This P, Lacombe T, Thomas MR (2006). Historical origins and genetic diversity of wine grapes. Trends in Genetics 22(9), 511-519.
30. Trouillas FP, Pitt WM, Sosnowski MR, Huang R, Peduto F, Loschiavo A, ... Gubler WD (2011). Taxonomy and DNA phylogeny of Diatrypaceae associated with Vitis vinifera and other woody plants in Australia. Fungal Diversity 49, 203-223.
31. Yue Q, Zhang C, Wang Q, Wang W, Wang J, Wu Y (2019). Analysis on genetic diversity of 51 Grape germplasm resources. Ciência Rural 49(11), e20190247.
32. Zdunić G, Preece JE, Aradhya M, Velasco D, Koehmstedt A, Dangl GS (2013). Genetic diversity and differentiation within and between cultivated (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa) and wild (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sylvestris) grapes. Vitis 52(1), 29-32.