The Effects of Varying Nitrogen Doses Some Yield Components of Nigella Sativa L.

Öz

This study was carried out to determine the effects of different Nitrogen doses (0, 40, 80 and 120 kg/da) on yield and some yield components of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) in Cumra/Konya ecological conditions in 2010 and 2011. Field trials were designed by Completely Randomized Block Design with four replications at the experimental fields of Cumra Vocational High School of Selcuk University. In the study, plant height (cm), the number of branch (branch/plant), the number of capsule (capsule/plant), the number of seeds in the capsule (seed/capsule), thousand-seed weight (g) and seed yield (kg/ha) were determined. According to statistical analysis, significant differences were determined among the nitrogen doses applications for the number of branch and thousand seed weight. The seed yield increased by increasing nitrogen doses then it decreased. According to the results, the highest seed yield (740 kg/ha) and thousand-seed weight (3.54 g) were obtained from 80 kg N/ha fertilizer application. The highest mean values for the number of capsule (8,58 capsule/plant) resulted in 80 kg N/ha application.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Black Cumin, Nitrogen Doses, Yield Components

Kaynakça

1. Ali BH, Blunden G (2003). Pharmacological and toxi-cological properties of Nigella Sativa. Phytothera-py Research 17: 299-305.
2. Arici M, Sagdic O, Gecgel U (2005). Antibacterial effect of Turkish black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) oils. Grasas y Aceites 56 (4): 259-262.
3. Atta MB (2003). Some characteristics of Nigella (Ni-gella sativa L.) seed cultivated in Egypt and its lipid profile. Food Chemistry 83 (1): 63–68.
4. Baytop T (1999). Curing with Plants in Turkey (In the past and today). Faculty of Pharmacy Istanbul University. Nobel Publishing Hause. Istanbul.
5. Ceylan A (1995). Medicinal Plants-I. Ege University Agricultural Faculty Press, Nr. 312, Izmir-Turkey.
6. Cheikh-Rouhou S, Besbes S, Hentati B, Blecker C, Deroanne C, Attia H (2007). Chemical composition and physicochemical characteristics of lipid frac-tion N. sativa L. Food Chemistry 101 (2): 673-681.
7. Das AK, Sadhu MK, Som MG, Bose TK (1992). Effect of Spacings on Growth and Yield of Blackcumin. Indian Cocoa, Arecanut and Spices Journal 16(1): 17-18.
8. Geren H, Bayram E, Ceylan A (1997). Effect of differ-ent sowing dates and phosphorus fertilizer applica-tion on the yield and quality characteristics of Blackcumin (Nigella sativa L.). Proceedings of the Second National Field Crops Congress, p: 376-380.

9. Kokdil G, Delialioglu N, Ozbilgin B, Emekdas G (2005). Antibacterial Activity Screening of Nigella L. Spe-cies Growing in Turkey. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy Ankara 34 (3) 183 -190.
10. Kokdil G, İlcim A, Ozbilgin B, Uygun C (2006). Mor-phology and stem anatomy of some species of ge-nus Nigella L. in Turkey. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy Ankara 35 (1): 19 – 41.
11. Ozguven M, Tansı S (1989). Research on determining optimum sowing time for blackcumin in Çukurova conditions. Proceedings of VIII. VOCMAP, 19-21 May 1989, Istanbul, 285-289.
12. Ozguven M, Kirpik M, Koller WD, Kerschbaum S, Range P, Schweiger P (2001). Ertrags-und Quali-tätseigenschaften von Schwarzkümmel (Nigella sativa L.) aus dem Çukurova-Gebiet der Süd-Turkei. Z.Arzn. Gew. Pfl., 6.Jg.: 20-24, Agrimedia GmbH, Bergen.
13. Ozguven M, Sekeroglu N (2007). Agricultural practices for high yield and quality of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) cultivated in Turkey. Acta Horticulturae 756: 329-337.
14. Sadegh S, Rahnavard A, Ashrafi Z (2009). Study im-portance of sowing date and plant density effect on black cumin (Cuminum carvi) yield. Botany Re-search International 2 (2): 94-98.
15. Telci I (1995). Effect of various plant densities on yield, yield components and some of herbal char-acteristics of black cumin. M. sc Thesis. Gazi-osmanpasa Univ. Inst. Sci., Tokat.
16. Tuncturk M, Tuncturk R, Yıldırım B (2011). The ef-fects of varying phosphorus doses on yield and some yield components of black cumin (Nigella Sativa L.). Advances in Environmental Biology 5(2): 371-374.