G-20 Üyesi Ülkelerde Finansal Gelişme, Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketimi ve Turizmin İklim Değişikliği ile İlişkisi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 413 - 421, 30.11.2020

Mehmet Altuntaş Buket Altınöz

https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.648633

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışmanın
amacı Türkiye’nin de dâhil olduğu G-20 ülke grubu için karbondioksit salınımını
finansal gelişme, turizm ve enerji tüketimi göstergeleri ile açıklamaktır. Bu
amaçla çalışmada G-20 üyesi 19 ülkeye ait 1995-2017 dönemi yıllık verileri
kullanılarak bir panel veri analizi yapılmıştır. Öncelikle değişkenlere ait
uzun dönemli eşbütünleşme ilişkisi olup olmadığı Pedroni ve Kao eşbütünleşme
testleri ile sınanmış ve uzun dönemde değişkenler arasında güçlü eşbütünleşme
ilişkisine rastlanmıştır. Ardından FMOLS ve DOLS yöntemleri ile yapılan uzun
dönem katsayı tahmin sonuçları ise enerji tüketiminin uzun dönemde karbondioksit
emisyonunu artırdığını gösterirken, FMOLS test sonuçları yenilenebilir enerji
tüketimi ve turizm gelirlerindeki artışın emisyon üzerinde azaltıcı bir etkiye
sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Dolayısıyla elde edilen sonuçlar G-20 ülkelerinin
iklim değişikliği ile mücadeledeki önemini bir kez daha vurgularken, bu ülkelerde
çevre-dostu politikaların turizm bağlamında bir öncelik olduğunu
göstermektedir. Öte yandan her iki modelde de finansal gelişmenin karbon
emisyonu üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı sonucuna
varılmıştır. 

de yer alan yazıların dil ve içerik açısından sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Finansal gelişme, çevre, turizm, panel veri, OLS

Kaynakça

• Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I. ve Lean, H. H. (2015). “The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade opennes, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe”. Natural Hazards, 79(1), 621-644.
• Apergis, N. et. al. (2010). On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth, Ecological Economics, 69, 2255-2260.
• Azam, M., ve Khan, A. Q. (2016). “Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A conparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries”. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 63, 556-567.
• Ben Jebli, M. et. al. (2016). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries, Ecological Indicators, 60, 824-831.
• Bölük, G. and Mert, M. (2014). “Fossils & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries”. Energy, 74, 439-446.
• Bölük, G. and Mert, M. (2015). “The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587-595.
• Doğan, E. and Aslan, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship among CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption and tourism in the EU and candidate countries: Evidence from panel models robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 239-245.
• Hossain, M. S. (2011). “Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries”. Energy Policy, 39, 6991-6999.
• Jalil, A. ve Feridun, M. (2011). “The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis”. Energy Economics, 33, 284-291.
• Kao, C. (1999). Supirious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data, Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1-44.
• Khan, M. T. I., Yaseen, M. R. ve Ali, Q. (2017). “Dynamic relationship between financial development, energy consumption, trade and greenhouse gas: Comparison of upper middle income countries from Asia, Europe, Africa, and America”. J. Clean. Prod. 161, 567-580.
• Khan, M. T. I., Yaseen, M. R. ve Ali, Q. (2019). “Nexus between financial development, tourism, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: A continent-wise analysis”. Energy Economics, 83, 293-310.
• Levin, A. et. al. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymtotic and finite-sample properties, Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
• Mark, N. and Sul, D. (2003). Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long-run money demand, Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat., 65, 655-680.
• Menyah, K. and Wolde-Rufuel, Y. (2010). CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US, Energy Policy, 38, 2911-2915.
• Ng, T. H., Lye, C. T. ve Lim, Y. S. (2016). “A decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions: Evidence from Malaysia’s tourism industry”. Internatiınal Journal of Sustainable Developmenr&World Ecology, 23(3), 266-277.
• Öztürk, İ. ve Acaravcı, A. (2013). “The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey”. Energy Economics, 36, 262-267.
• Paramati, S. R., Alami S. ve Chen, C. F. (2016). “The effects of tourism on economic growth and CO2 emissions: A comparison between developed and developing economies”. Journal of Tourism Research, 56(6), 712-724.
• Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors, Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat., 61, 653-670.
• Pedroni, P. (2000). “Fully-modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels”. Department of Economics Working Papers 2000-03, Department of Economics, Williams College.
• Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Econometric Theory, 20 (3), 597-625.
• Rafindadi, A. A. (2016). “Revisiting the concept of environmental Kuznets curve in period of energy disaster and deteriorating income: Empirical evidence from Japan”. Energy Policy, 94, 274-284.
• Sadorsky, P. (2009). Renewable energy, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries, Energy Economics, 31, 456-462.
• Sadorsky, P. (2010). “The impact of financial development and energy consumption in Central and Eastern European frontier economies”. Energy Policy, 39, 999-1006.
• Shahbaz, M. et. al. (2014). “Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 325-336.
• Shahbaz, M., Khan, S. ve Tahir, M. I. (2013). “The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: Fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis”. Energy Economics, 40, 8-21.
• Shahzad, S. J. H., Kumar, R. R., Zakaria, M., ve Hurr, M. (2017). “Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: A revisit”. Ren. Sust. Energ. Rev., 70, 185-192.
• Sharif, A., Afshan, S. ve Nisha, N. (2017). “Impact o tourism on CO2 emission: Evidence from Pakistan”. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(4), 408-421.
• Tamazian, A. ve Rao, B. B. (2010). “Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degredation? Evidence from transitional economies”. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137-145.
• Thang, C. F. ve Tan, B. W. (2014). “The linkages among energy consumption, economic growth, relative price, foreign direct investment and financial development in Malaysia”. Quality & Quantity, 48, 781-797.
• Tiwari, A. K. et. al. (2013). Tourism, energy consumption and climate change in OECD countries, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 3 (3), 247-261.
• Zhang, Y. J. (2011). “The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: A empirical analysis in China”. Energy Policy, 39(4), 2197-2203.