Examinatıon of Generation Z Pre-Service Teachers' Global Literacy Levels in Terms of Different Variables

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 28 - 49, 15.06.2025

Adem Karaca

https://doi.org/10.31798/ses.1702564

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the global literacy skills of Generation Z pre-service teachers in the context of a globalizing world, considering various variables. The research was designed using a quantitative research model, and the impact of independent variables on global literacy skills was analyzed through various statistical tests.Data were collected from 388 pre-service teachers, selected through convenience sampling, using the Global Literacy Scale. The collected data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and ANOVA. The analysis revealed a significant difference in global literacy levels between pre-service teachers of Turkish Language Teaching and Primary School Teaching, with the former demonstrating higher levels of global literacy. Other notable findings indicate that pre-service teachers who wish to live abroad for an extended period, follow global news on social media, and track multiple global news websites tend to have higher global literacy levels. Based on these results, it is recommended that global awareness, global citizenship, and world citizenship be incorporated more extensively into curricula. Additionally, considering that Generation Z pre-service teachers possess advanced digital skills, providing them with diverse digital experiences is suggested to further enhance their global literacy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Generation Z , global literacy , global awareness , pre-service teachers

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted in accordance with academic ethical standards. During the research process, unethical practices such as plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, duplicate publication, salami slicing, and unfair authorship were strictly avoided. All sources were properly cited, and quotations were presented in line with scientific guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institution for the data collection process, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was conducted by a single author and does not involve any conflict of interest.

Z Kuşağı Öğretmen Adaylarının Küresel Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı küreselleşen dünya koşullarında Z kuşağında yer alan öğretmen adaylarının küresel okuryazarlık becerilerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesidir. Araştırma nicel araştırma modeline göre tasarlanmış ve bağımsız değişkenlerin etkisi küresel okuryazarlık becerisi üzerindeki etkisi çeşitli analizler gerçekleştirilerek incelenmiştir. Araştırmada amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden kolay ulaşılabilir örneklemeyle belirlenen 388 öğretmen adayından “Küresel Okuryazarlık” ölçeği ile veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, bağımsız örneklemler için t-testi ve ANOVA ile analiz edilmiştir. Veriler analiz edildiğinde öğretmen adayları bölümlerine göre Türkçe öğretmenliği ile sınıf öğretmenliği arasında küresel okuryazarlık düzeyinin Türkçe Öğretmenliği bölümü lehine anlamlı farklılık oluşturduğu Tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmanın dikkat çeken diğer sonuçları ise yurtdışında uzun süreli yaşama isteği bulunan, sosyal medyada küresel haberleri takip etme alışkanlıkları kazanan ve fazla sayıda küresel haber sitesi takip eden öğretmen adaylarının küresel okuryazarlık düzeylerinin daha yüksek olduğudur. Öğretmen adaylarının daha küresel okuryazarlık düzeylerini artırabilmek için küresel farkındalık, küresel vatandaşlık ve dünya vatandaşlığı gibi konuların müfredatta daha fazla yer alması gerektiği ve teknolojiyi etkin derecede kullanma becerisine sahip Z kuşağı öğretmen adayları için farklı dijital deneyim imkânlarının tanınması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Z kuşağı , küresel okuryazarlık , küresel farkındalık , öğretmen adayları

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, akademik etik kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanmıştır. Araştırma sürecinde intihal, sahtecilik, çarpıtma, tekrar yayın, dilimleme, haksız yazarlık gibi etik dışı uygulamalardan kaçınılmıştır. Tüm kaynaklara uygun şekilde atıfta bulunulmuş ve alıntılar bilimsel kurallara göre belirtilmiştir.Çalışma kapsamında veri toplama sürecinde ilgili kurumdan etik kurul onayı alınmış ve katılımcıların gönüllü rızası sağlanmıştır. Çalışma tek yazarlı yürütülmüş olup; herhangi bir çıkar çatışması içermemektedir.

Kaynakça

• Babeľova, Z. G., Koltnerova, K., & Caganova, D. (2022). Personality traits and motivation of Generation Z students in management study programs in higher education. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i1.1102
• Baykara, S. T., & Kuzulu, E. (2021). A brief research on cultural intelligence levels and program experiences of erasmus study mobility students. International Journal of Euroasian Research, 9(26), 110-126.
• Bender-Slack, D. (2002). Using literature to teach global education: A humanist approach. The English Journal, 91(5), 70. https://doi.org/10.2307/821401
• Bhola, H. (2009). Reconstructing literacy as an innovation for sustainable development: A policy advocacy for Bangladesh. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(3), 371–382.
• Boztilki, M. (2023). Why do they want to go? A study on the immigration willingness of generation z women. The Journal of Pamukkale University Social Sciences Institute, 55, 157-172.
• Brown, T. (2011). Are you a digital native or a digital immigrant? Being client centred in the digital era. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(7), 313-314.
• Bulut, B., & Öksüzoğlu, M. K. (2023). The development of global literacy scale: A validity and reliability study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 24(1), 710-729. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1274203
• Delacruz, S. (2018). Building digital literacy bridges: Connecting cultures and promoting global citizenship in elementary classrooms through school-based virtual field trips. TechTrends, 63(4), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0350-1
• Dolot, A. (2018). The characteristics of Generation Z. E-mentor, 74, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.15219/em74.1351
• Dombrosky, K., Templeton, B., Fong, J., & Director, F. (2018). An insider’s guide to Generation Z and higher education 2018. Retrieved February 2, 2025, from https://upcea.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/An-Insiders-Guide-to-Generation-Z-and-Higher-Education-eBook.pdf
• Dwyer, B. (2016). Teaching and learning in the global village: Connect, create, collaborate, and communicate. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1500
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. Golmohamad, M. (2009). Education for world citizenship: Beyond national allegiance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(4), 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00535.x
• Hill, D. J. (1991). Global education and the study abroad program. Ohio: Renaissance Publications.
• Howe, N. (2014). Introducing the Homeland Generation (Part 1 & 2). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilhowe/2014/10/27/introducing-the-homeland-generation-part-1-of-2/#7bce43102bd6 & https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilhowe/2014/10/31/introducing-the-homeland-generation-part-2-of-2/#1d6cfcbccbb6
• Johnson, S. A., & Romanello, M. L. (2005). Generational diversity: Teaching and learning approaches. Nurse Educator, 30(5), 212-216.
• Kaya, E. (2019). A field research on the factors that affecting youth emigration trends in Turkey. Journal of Social Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 2(9), 657-676.
• Lev, T. A. (2021). Generation Z: Characteristics and challenges to entering the world of work. Cross Cultural Management Journal, 23(1), 107–115.
• Magnan, S. S. (2008). What is needed for global literacy to become an educational reality? Summary of a discussion group. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 628–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00790_5.x
• Mansilla, V. B., & Jackson, A. (2013). Educating for global competence: Learning redefined for an interconnected world. In H. Jacobs (Ed.), Mastering global literacy, contemporary perspectives (pp. 1-24). New York: Solution Tree.
• Merryfield, M. M. (2008). Scaffolding social studies for global awareness. Social Education, 72(7), 363–366. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ817697
• Morais, D. B., & Ogden, A. C. (2010). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310375308
• Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. Sage: London.
• Noh, M. H. (2004). The EU inter-cultural education and training programmes for enhancing of European awareness towards European citizenship: Centered on ERASMUS, LINGUA, PETRA, COMENIUS. International Area Review, 7(2), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386590400700210
• Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.798393
• Öztay, O. H., & Öztay, E. S. (2021). Examination of media literacy and critical thinking levels of teacher candidates in the age of global communication. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 11(3), 600-612. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2021.479
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6.
• Reysen, S., & Katzarska‐Miller, I. (2012). A model of global citizenship: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.701749
• Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Damiani, V., & Friedman, T. (2022). Education for citizenship in times of global challenge. IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study.
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2019). Generation Z: A century in the making. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Sew, J. W. (2012). Malay and global literacy. Akademika, 82(2).
• Şahin, İ., Zoraloğlu, Y. R., & Fırat, N. Ş. (2010). University students' opinions about factors affecting their achievement of educational goals. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education (INUJFE), 11(2). 133-154.
• Sigauke, A., & Gwirayi, P. (2021). Global education at the teacher education level: A comparative study of views of pre-service teachers in Australia and Zimbabwe. Education in the North, 28(2) pp. 80-99. https://doi.org/10.26203/kef0-4s20
• Sirin, S. R., & Rogers-Sirin, L. (2015). The educational and mental health needs of Syrian refugee children. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved February 10, 2025, from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/educational-and-mental-health-needs-syrian-refugee-children
• Starecek, A., Babeľova, Z. G., Koltnerova, K., & Caganova, D. (2022). Personality traits and motivation of Generation Z students in management study programs in higher education. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(1), 89–101.
• Swanzen, R. (2018). Facing the generation chasm: The parenting and teaching of generations Y and Z. International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies, 9(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs92201818216
• Tsang, K. K., To, H. K. A., & Chan, R. K. H. (2020). Nurturing the global competence of high school students in Shenzhen: The impact of school-based global learning education, knowledge, and family income. Journal of Educational Policy, 17(2), 199–219.
• Yang, Y., & Kuo, N. (2021). Blended learning to foster EFL college students’ global literacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1–2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1900874