A Study of Co-Movements Between Borsa İstanbul and Developed Stock Markets

Öz

This paper aims to examine the co-movement between Turkish stock markets and USA, United Kingdom, Germany and Japan stock markets. We used GO-GARCH models in order to capture time-varying correlations during the 1995-2015 period by using monthly data. Empirical results show that Japanese stock market is the least correlated with Turkish stock market. While UK and Turkey exhibits higher degree co-movement before global financial crisis, Germany stock market became most correlated with Turkish stock market after global financial crisis. All these results imply that investors benefits from diversification based on conditional correlations within the scope of portfolio theory. In the pre-crisis period, while Japan is the most unsuitable country, England is the most suitable country for portfolio divesification. In the post-crisis period, while England is the most suitable country, Germany is the most unsuitable country for portfolio divesification

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Co-movement, Global Crisis, Portfolio Theory, GO-GARCH

Borsa İstanbul ve Gelişmiş Ülke Borsalarının Ortak Hareketi Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Öz

Bu çalışma Türkiye borsası ile Amerika, İngiltere, Almanya ve Japonya borsaları arasındaki ortak hareketi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada zamana bağlı değişen korelasyonu hesaplamak için 1995-2015 dönemini kapsayan aylık frekanslı veriler, GO-GARCH yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgular en az korelasyonun Borsa İstanbul ile Japonya borsası arasında var olduğunu göstermektedir. Küresel finansal kriz öncesi Türkiye borsası en fazla İngiltere borsası ile ortak hareket ederken, kriz sonrasında ise Almanya Borsası, Borsa İstanbul ile en fazla korelasyona sahip ülke olmuştur. Genel sonuçlar yatırımcıların koşullu korelasyonları dikkate alarak portföy teorisi kapsamında çeşitlendirme yapabileceklerini göstermektedir. Çalışmanın örneklemi kapsamında küresel kriz öncesi dönemde portföy çeşitlendirmesi için en uygun ülke Japonya olurken en elverişsiz ülke ise İngiltere olmaktadır. Küresel kriz sonrasında ise İngiltere portföy çeşitlendirmesi için en uygun ülke olurken Almanya en elverişsiz ülke olmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ortak Hareket,Küresel Kriz,Portföy Teorisi,GO-GARCH

Kaynakça

1. Alexander, C.. (2000), “A primer on the orthogonal GARCH model”, Manuscript ISMA Centre, University of Reading, UK.
2. Alexander, C.. (2002), “Principal component models for generating large GARCH covariance matrices”, Economic Notes, 31(2): 337-359.
3. Alexander, C.O. ve Chibumba, A.. (1996), “Multivariate orthogonal factor GARCH”, University of Sussex Discussion Paper in Mathematics.
4. Bekaert, G. ve Harvey, C. R.. (1997), “Emerging equity market volatility”, Journal of Financial Economics, 43(1): 29-77.
5. Bollerslev, T.. (1990), “Modelling the Coherence in Short-Run Nominal Exchange Rate: A Multivariate Generalized ARCH Approach”, Review of Economics and Statistic, 72: 498–505.
6. Boswijk, H. P. ve Van der Weide, R.. (2006), “Wake me up before you GOGARCH”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. No: 06-079/4.
7. Caporale, G. M., Pittis, N. ve Spagnolo, N.. (2006), “Volatility transmission and financial crises”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 30(3): 376-390.
8. Dajcman, S., Festic, M. ve Kavkler, A.. (2012a), “Comovement Dynamics between Central and Eastern European and Developed European Stock Markets during European Integration and Amid Financial Crises–A Wavelet Analysis”, Engineering Economics, 23(1): 22-32.

9. Dajcman, S., Festic, M. ve Kavkler, A.. (2012b), “European stock market comovement dynamics during some major financial market turmoils in the period 1997 to 2010: a comparative DCC-GARCH and wavelet correlation analysis”, Applied Economics Letters, 19(13): 1249-1256.
10. Darbar, S. M. ve Deb, P.. (1997), “Co‐Movements In Internatıonal Equıty Markets”, Journal of Financial Research, 20(3): 305-322.
11. Engle, R. F. ve Susmel, R.. (1993), “Common volatility in international equity markets”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 11(2): 167-176.
12. Engle, R. ve Kroner, F.. (1995), “Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH”, Econometric Theory, 11(1): 122-150.
13. Engle, R.. (2002), “Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3): 339-350.
14. Fayyad, A. ve Daly, K.. (2010), “The Volatility of Market Returns: A Comparative Study of Emerging versus Mature Markets”, International Journal of Business and Management, 5(7): 24-36.
15. Gilmore, C. G., McManus, G. M. ve Tezel, A.. (2005), “Portfolio allocations and the emerging equity markets of Central Europe”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 15(3): 287-300.
16. Grubel, H. G.. (1968), “Internationally diversified portfolios: welfare gains and capital flows”, The American Economic Review, 58(5): 1299- 1314.
17. Karolyi, G. A. ve Stulz, R. M.. (1996), “Why do markets move together? An investigation of US‐Japan stock return comovements”, The Journal of Finance, 51(3): 951-986.
18. Kiviaho, J., Nikkinen, J., Piljak, V. ve Rothovius, T.. (2014), “The Co‐ movement Dynamics of European Frontier Stock Markets”, European Financial Management, 20(3): 574-595.
19. Kotkatvuori-Örnberg, J., Nikkinen, J. ve Äijö, J.. (2013), “Stock market correlations during the financial crisis of 2008–2009: Evidence from 50 equity markets”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 28: 70-78.
20. Kumar, S. S. S.. (2011), “Are Emerging Markets Relevant for Portfolio Diversification?”, Review of Market Integration, 3(2): 103-119.
21. Longin, F. ve Solnik, B.. (1995), “Is the correlation in international equity returns constant: 1960–1990?”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 14(1): 3-26.
22. Meric, I., Nygren, L. M., Bentley, J. T. ve McCall, C. W.. (2015), “CoMovements Of US And European Stock Markets Before And After The 2008 Gloal Stock Market Crash”, Studies in Business and Economics, 10(2): 83-98.
23. Mighri, Z. ve Mansouri, F.. (2013), “Dynamic conditional correlation analysis of stock market contagion: evidence from the 2007-2010 financial crises”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(3): 637-661.
24. Modi, A. G., Patel, B. K. ve Patel, N. R.. (2010), “The study on comovement of selected stock markets”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 47: 170-185.
25. Mun, M. ve Brooks, R.. (2012), “The roles of news and volatility in stock market correlations during the global financial crisis”, Emerging Markets Review, 13(1): 1-7.
26. Nikkinen, J., Piljak, V. ve Äijö, J.. (2012), “Baltic stock markets and the financial crisis of 2008–2009”, Research in International Business and Finance, 26(3): 398-409.
27. Płuciennik, P.. (2012), “Influence of the American financial market on other markets during the subprime crisis”, Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 12(2): 19-30.
28. Thao, T. P., Daly, K. ve Ellis, C.. (2013), “Transmission of the global financial crisis to the East Asian equity markets”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(5): 171-183.
29. Van der Weide, R.. (2002), “GO‐GARCH: A multivariate generalized orthogonal GARCH model”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17(5): 549-564.
30. Zivot, E. ve Andrews, D. W.. (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3): 251-270.