İş Kazalarını Önlemede Erken Uyarıların Önemi: Öncü Göstergeler

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2 - Cilt 13, Sayı 2, 269 - 282, 28.12.2023

Rıdvan Mevsim Nuray Demirel

https://doi.org/10.32331/sgd.1408608

Öz

Bu çalışmada, günümüz güvenlik bilimi teori ve pratiğinde
git gide artan bir önem kazanan öncü göstergeler ele
alınmıştır. Öncü güvenlik göstergelerinin işyerlerinde
etkin kullanımının ve iş güvenliği performansının temel bir
unsuru olarak değerlendirilmesinin gerekliliği belirtilerek
iş kazalarını önlemedeki katkısının vurgulanması
amaçlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda makale üç ana bölümden
oluşmaktadır. İlk bölümde sistem yaklaşımı başta
olmak üzere iş güvenliğindeki güncel eğilimlere kısaca
değinilmiş, ardından gecikmeli ve öncü göstergeler
tanımlanarak aralarındaki farklar incelenmiştir. Devam
eden bölümlerde ise uluslararası iş sağlığı ve güvenliği
otoritelerinden öncü gösterge önerilerine ve literatürde
farklı sektörler için yapılan saha çalışmalarından örneklere
yer verilmiştir. En fazla atıf yapılan öncü göstergelerden
iş güvenliği liderliği, çalışan katılımı, güvenlik iletişimi,
risk kontrol yöntemlerinin izlenmesi, ekipman bakım ve
onarımları, çalışanların yaptıkları işe uygunluğu, eğitimler
ve iş güvenliği bilinci gibi başlıkların altı çizilmiştir.
Modern güvenlik biliminin başlıca yaklaşımlarından biri
görünümündeki “işler yolunda giderken” de iş güvenliği
performansının ölçülmesi ve bu doğrultuda önleyici
tedbirlerin belirlenmesi çalışmalarına, etkin kullanılan öncü
göstergelerin önemli katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öncü gösterge, iş güvenliği performansı, iş kazası, sistem güvenliği, iş sağlığı ve güvenliği

The Importance of Early Warnings in Occupational Accident Prevention: Leading Indicators

Öz

In this study, leading indicators that are gained
increasing importance in today’s safety science theory
and practice are discussed. It is aimed to emphasize the
contribution of leading safety indicators in preventing
occupational accidents if they are used effectively
and regarded as a core element of safety performance
in workplaces. Accordingly, the study consists of
three main parts. In the first part, current trends in
occupational safety, especially the system approach,
are briefly mentioned. Then, lagging and leading
indicators are defined and in between differences are
examined. In the following sections, suggested leading
indicators of international occupational safety and
health authorities and field examples from different
sectors in the literature are given. Among the most
cited leading indicators, safety leadership, employee
participation, safety communication, monitoring of risk
control strategies, equipment maintenance, employee
competence, trainings and safety awareness are
underlined. Monitoring occupational safety performance
and determinig the relevant preventive measures “when
everything is going well” is one of the main approaches
of modern safety science and it is believed that effective
leading indicators will contribute in this direction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leading indicator, occupational safety performance, occupational accident, system safety, occupational health and safety

Kaynakça

• Alruqi, W. M. ve Hallowell, M. R. (2019). Critical Success Factors For Construction Safety: Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety Leading Indicators. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 145(3).
• Arstad, I. ve Aven, T. (2017). Managing Major Accident Risk: Concerns About Complacency and Complexity in Practice. Safety Science. 91. 114-121.
• Baker, J., Bowman, F., Erwin, G., Gorton, S., Hendershot, D., Leveson, N., Priest, S., Rosenthal, I., Tebo, P. ve Wiegmann, D. (2007). The Report of the BP US Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel. 2007.
• Campbell Institute (2015). Practical Guide to Leading Indicators: Metrics. Case Studies and Strategies.
• Chen, L., Zhao, Y. ve Zhao, T. (2014). An AcciMap Analysis on the China-Yongwen Railway Accident. Engineering Asset Management – Systems, Professional Practices and Certification. Springer International Publishing. 1247-1253.
• Dougall, A. W. ve Mmola, T. M. (2015). Identification of Key Performance Areas in the Southern African Surface Mining Delivery Environment. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 115. 1001–1006.
• Dyreborg, J. (2009). The Causal Relation Between Lead and Lag Indicators. Safety Science. 47(4). 474-475. Gackowiec, P., Podobinska-Staniec, M., Brzychczy, E. ve Kühlbach, C. (2020). Review of KPIs for Process Monitoring in the Mining Industry. Energies. 13. 19.
• Hinze, J. W., Hallowell, M. R., Baud, K. C. ve Wehle, A. (2013). Proactive Construction Safety Control: Measuring, Monitoring and Responding to Safety Leading Indicators. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 139(10).
• Hashem, A., Omar, R. ve Yahya, M. Y. (2013). The Factors Affecting the Implementation of Safety and Health Practices in the Libyan Construction Sites. Proceedings of the 1st FPTP Postgraduate Seminar. Batu Pahat. Malaysia.
• Heinrich, H.W. (1931). Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach (Second Edition). Londra: McGraw Hill.
• Hollnagel, E. (2011). Prologue: The Scope of Resilience Engineering. Farnham: Ashgate.
• Igene, O. O., Johnson, C., Long, J. ve Liu, Y. (2017). Is the AcciMap Method an Effective Approach for Analyzing Adverse Events in the National Health Service, Scotland? 12th International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management. Canada. 447-457.
• ILO (2019). Safety and Health at the Heart of the Future of Work. Switzerland: ILO. Ismail, Z., Doostdar, S. ve Harun, Z. (2012). Factors Influencing the Implementation of a Safety Management System for Construction Sites. Safety Science. 50. 418–423.
• ISSA (2020). Proactive Leading Indicators. A Guide to Measure and Manage Safety, Health and Wellbeing at Work. ISBN 978-92-843-2212-1.
• Jain, A., Leka, S. ve Zwetsloot, G. (2018). Managing Health, Safety and Wellbeing: Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability. Dordrecht: Springer Science.
• Le Coze, J. C. (2019). Safety Science Research Evolution, Challenges and New Directions. Boca Raton. CRC Press.
• Lee, S., Moh, Y. B., Tabibzadeh, M. ve Meshkati, N. (2016). Applying the AcciMap Methodology to Investigate the Tragic Sewol Ferry Accident in South Korea. Applied Ergonomics. 59. 517-525.
• Leveson, N. G. (2004). A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems. Safety Science. 42. 237-270.
• Nuwayhid, I. A. (2004). Occupational Health Research in Developing Countries: A Partner for Social Justice. American Journal of Public Health. 94 (11). 1916-1921.
• OSHA (2016). Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs. OSHA 3885. October 2016.
• OSHA (2019). Using Leading Indicators to Improve Safety and Health Outcomes. OSHA 3970. June 2019.
• Pecillo, M. (2020). Identification of Ggaps in Safety Management Systems from the Resilience Engineering Perspective in Upper and Lower-Tier Enterprises. Safety Science. 130. 104851.
• Øien, K. (2001). Risk Control of Offshore Installations. A Framework for the Establishment of Risk Indicators. Department of Production and Quality Engineering. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Trondheim. Norveç.
• Øien, K., Utne, I. B. ve Herrerra, I. A. (2011). Building Safety Indicators: Part 1 – Theoretical Foundation. Safety Science. 49. 148-161.
• Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modeling Problem. Safety Science. 27. 183-213.
• Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Reniers, G., Schmitz, P., Swuste, P. ve van Nunen, K. (2021). Predicting Major Hazard Accidents in the Process Industry Based on Organizational Factors: A Practical, Qualitative Approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 148. 1268-1278.
• Salas, R. ve Hallowell, M. (2016). Predictive Validity of Safety Leading Indicators: Empirical Assessment in the Oil and Gas Sector. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 142(10).
• SGK (Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu) (2023). Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu İstatistik Yıllıkları. [https://www.sgk. gov.tr/Istatistik/Yillik/fcd5e59b-6af9-4d90-a451-ee7500eb1cb4/]. (Erişim: 07 Haziran 2023).
• Sheehan, C., Donohue, R., Shea, T., Cooper, B. ve De Cieri, H. (2016). Leading and Lagging Indicators of Occupational Health and Safety: The Moderating Role of Safety Leadership. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 92. 130-138.
• Shen, L. J. ve Shi, S. (2013). Analysis of Factors Affecting Safety Management of Construction Site Based on Fuzzy Factor Analysis Model. Advanced Materials Research. 753. 1862-1867.
• Sinelnikov, S., Kerper, S. ve Inouye, J. (2015). Using Leading Indicators to Measure Occupational Health and Safety Performance. Safety Science. 72. 240-248.
• Thoroman, B., Salmon, P. ve Goode, N. (2020). Applying AcciMap to Test the Common Cause Hypothesis Using Aviation Near Misses. Applied Ergonomics. 87. 103-110.
• Turner, B. A. ve Pidgeon, N. E. (1978). Man-Made Disasters. Butterworth- Heinemann. Oxford. 73-75.
• Underwood, P. ve Waterson, P. (2014). Systems Thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and Accident Analysis: A Comparative Systemic Analysis of the Grayrigg Train Derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 68. 75–94.
• Uslu, V. (2014). İşletmelerde İş Güvenliği Performansı ve İş Güvenliği Kültürü Algılamaları Arasındaki İlişki: Eskişehir İli Metal Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Osmangazi Üniversitesi. Eskişehir.
• Yu, Q. Z., Ding, L. Y., Luo, H. ve Zhou, C. (2013). Analysis of Factors Influencing Safety Management for Metro Construction in China. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 68. 131-138.
• Zhang, Y., Dong, C., Guo, W., Dai, J. ve Zhao, Z. (2021). Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP): A Literature Review. Safety Science. 152. 4.
• Zwesloot, G., Leka, S., Kines, P. ve Jain, A. (2020). Vision Zero: Developing Proactive Leading Indicators for Safety, Health and Wellbeing at Work. Safety Science. 130. 2-10.