Avrupa Birliği Dijital Tek Pazar Direktifi Madde 17'nin Uygulanması

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 77 - 88

Muhammed Furkan Akıncı

https://doi.org/10.56701/shd.1407721

Öz

Bu makale, Avrupa Birliği'nin Dijital Tek Pazar Direktifi'nin, özellikle Madde 17 üzerine odaklanarak, detaylı bir incelemesini sunmaktadır. Direktifin ana amacı, telif hakkı sahiplerinin hakları ile internet kullanıcılarının özgürlükleri arasında bir denge kurmak iken, aynı zamanda Avrupa Birliği genelinde telif hakkı düzenlemelerini uyumlu hale getirmektir. Makale, Madde 17'nin uygulanmasındaki karmaşıklıkları, getirilen yükümlülüklerin temel haklar, özellikle ifade özgürlüğü hakkı, üzerindeki etkilerini ve Avrupa'nın dijital ekonomisi üzerindeki rolünü derinlemesine analiz etmektedir. Ayrıca, Avrupa Birliği üye devletlerinde Direktifin yerel hukuklarına geçiş sürecindeki çeşitliliği ve ortaya çıkan hukuki tartışmaları da ele alarak, Avrupa Birliği içindeki dijital telif hakları çerçevesine dair geniş bir anlayış sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Birliği, Dijital Tek Pazar, İçerik Filtreleme, Telif Hukuku, Dijital Telif Hakları

The Implementation of European Union Digital Single Market Directive Article 17

Öz

The article offers a comprehensive analysis of the Digital Single Market Directive of the European Union, with a specific emphasis on Article 17. The Directive aims to achieve the objectives of unifying copyright laws throughout the European Union while striking a balance between the interests of copyright owners and the rights of internet users. An in-depth analysis is conducted on the intricacies of implementing Article 17, its ramifications on fundamental rights, and its influence on the digital economy in Europe. The study also examines the various approaches used to implement the Directive in European Union member states and the legal debates it has sparked, therefore enhancing the comprehension of the digital copyright framework in the European Union.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Union, Digital Single Market, Content Filtering, Copyright Law, Digital Rights

Kaynakça

• References Angelopoulos, Christina - Senftleben, Martin. “An Endless Odyssey? Content Moderation Without General Content Monitoring Obligations.” Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871916
• Bensamoun, Alexandra. “The Value Gap: An Adaptation of Copyright for the Digital Single Market.” RIDA 254/10/2017 (2017), 7.
• Bridy, Annemarie. “The Price of Closing the ‘Value Gap’: How the Music Industry Hacked EU Copyright Reform.” https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3412249
• Gerald Spindler - Spindler, Gerald. “The Liability System of Art. 17 DSMD and National Implementation – Contravening Prohibition of General Monitoring Duties?” JIPITEC 10/3 (February 21, 2020), 344–374.
• Metzger, Axel et al. “Selected Aspects of Implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market into National Law – Comment of the European Copyright Society.” JIPITEC 11/2 (April 27, 2020).
• Quintais, João Pedro et al. “Safeguarding User Freedoms in Implementing Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: Recommendations from European Academics.” JIPITEC 10/3 (February 21, 2020). https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-10-3-2019/5042
• Rosa, Victor Castro. “How Article 17 of the Digital Single Market Directive Should Be Implemented: A Personal View.” EU Internet Law in the Digital Single Market, 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69583-5_3
• Rosati, Eleonora. Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Article-by-Article Commentary to the Provisions of Directive 2019/790. Oxford University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858591.001.0001
• Rosati, Eleonora. “Five Considerations for the Transposition and Application of Article 17 of the DSM Directive.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 16/3 (March 3, 2021), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab051
• Rosati, Eleonora. “The Legal Nature of Article 17 of the Copyright DSM Directive, the (Lack of) Freedom of Member States and Why the German Implementation Proposal Is Not Compatible with EU Law.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 15/11 (December 25, 2020), 874–878. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa163
• Sanmark, Wilhelm. The Intermediary Liability Conundrum: Are Safe Harbors Useful? University of Helsinki, 2021.
• Sayegh, David El. “Article 17 of Directive 2019/790: A Practitioner’s Perspective.” RIDA 264 (April 1, 2020), 31.
• Spoerri, Thomas. “On Upload-Filters and Other Competitive Advantages for Big Tech Companies under Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market” 10/2 (August 10, 2019), 173–186.
• Visser, Dirk J.G. “Trying to Understand Article 13.” https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3354494