FILM LITERACY: CONTINUITY CINEMA AS A VISUAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 57 - 89, 15.03.2015

Sermin Ildırar

https://doi.org/10.32001/sinecine.540272

Öz

Making sense of films is an amazing mental and cognitive activity that requires the viewer
to maintain a sense of continuity despite fragmentations in time and space and thus induces
activation of several areas of the cerebral cortex. The continuity editing rules that emerged
through trial and error by 1910 are the most dominant and common conventions that allowed
viewers to e ortlessly integrate the fragmented parts of a film. This achievement of continuity
in cinema has been explained by its ability to mimic the course of natural active perception.
From that perspective, films su ciently resemble natural ways of viewing and therefore should
be understood almost instantly without any film-specific literacy. Contrary to this perspective,
films have also been considered as highly stylized and conventionalized ways of depicting scenes
and events. From that perspective, in order to comprehend a movie, viewers would have to
acquire some knowledge about the set of filmic rules and conventions beforehand, namely, to
gain film literacy. This article will discuss the contributions of “natural perception” and “gained
film literacy” to film comprehension, tracing the theoretical arguments and empirical studies
on the subject from the fields of film studies, anthropology, and psychology. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Film literacy, film perception, continuity cinema, film language, film grammar

FİLM OKURYAZARLIĞI: BİR GÖRSEL İLETİŞİM SİSTEMİ OLARAK DEVAMLILIK SİNEMASI

Öz

Filmleri anlamlandırmak, filmlerdeki zamansal ve mekânsal parçalanmaya rağmen bir devamlılık
duygusu oluşturmayı gerektiren, beynin korteksinde birçok bölgenin aktive olmasına neden
olan, müthiş bir zihinsel ve bilişsel aktivitedir. Henüz 1910’lu yıllarda deneme yanılma yöntemiyle
keşfedilmiş olan devamlılık sinemasının kuralları, seyircilerin filmleri bu parçalı yapılarına rağmen
anlamlı bir bütün olarak algılamalarını sağlayan en baskın ve yaygın film yapma tarzının temelini
oluşturmaktadır. Devamlılık sinemasının bu başarısını onun doğal aktif algının işleyişini taklit
etmesi ile açıklayan bakış açısına göre filmler onlara özgü bir okuryazarlık gerektirmeden anında
anlaşılırlar. Başka bir bakış açısına göre ise filmler, gerçeği betimlemenin oldukça biçimlendirilmiş
bir halidir ve filmleri anlamlandırmak için seyircilerin birtakım kod ve kuralları öğrenmesi; yani
filmlere özgü görsel bir okuryazarlık kazanması gerekir. Bu makale, doğal algı ile kazanılan film
okuryazarlığının filmleri anlamlandırmak üzerindeki katkılarını, film çalışmaları, antropoloji ve
psikoloji alanlarında bu konuda ortaya konulmuş kuramlar ile yapılmış deneysel çalışmalar
ışığında tartışacaktır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Film okuryazarlığı, film algısı, devamlılık sineması, film dili, film grameri

Kaynakça

• Abelman, R. (1990). You Can’t Get There From Here: Children’s Un- derstanding of Time Leaps On Television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34(4), 469-476.
• Adams, B., Dorai, C. & Venkatesh, S. (2000). Novel Approach to De- termining Tempo and Dramatic Story Sections in Motion Pictures. In Piscataway, N. J (Ed.) Paper presented at 17th International Conferen- ce on Image Processing . Hong Kong, 26-29 September (ss. 283-286). New York: Curran Associates, Inc.
• Anderson, D. R. & Levin, S. R. (1976). Young Children’s Attention to “Sesame Street”. Child Development, 47(1), 806-811.
• Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., Field, D. E. & Sanders, J. (1981). The Ef- fects of TV Program Comprehensibility on Preschool Children’s Visual Attention to Television. Child Development, 52(1), 151-157.
• Anderson, J.D. (1996). The Reality of Illusion An Ecological Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
• Anderson, D. R., Fite, K. V., Petrovich, N. & Hirsch, J. (2006). Corti- cal Activation While Watching Video Montage: An fMRI Study. Media Psychology, 8(1), 7-24.
• Anderson, D. R. & Hanson, K. G. (2010). From Blooming, Buzzing Confusion to Media Literacy: The Early Development of Television Viewing. Developmental Review, 30(2), 239-255.
• Antionioni, M. (Yönetmen/Senarist) (1972). Chung Kuo [Film].İtalya: RAI Radiotelevisione Italiana.
• Arjon, D. (1976). Grammar of the Film Language. Los Angeles: Sil- man-James.
• Aronofsky, D. (Yönetmen) (2000). Bir Rüya İçin Ağıt [Film]. ABD: Artisan Entertainment
• Aslin, R.N. (1988). Anatomical Constraints on Oculomotor Develop- ment: Implications for Infant Perception. A. Yonas (Ed.), The Minneso- ta Symposium on Child Psychology: Perceptual Development in Infan- cy, (ss. 67-104). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
• Baggett, P. (1979). Structurally Equivalent Stories in Movie and Text and the Effect of the Medium on Recall, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 333-356
• Baudry, J. L. & Williams, A. (1974). Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus. Film Quarterly, 28(2), 39-47.
• Beentjes, J. W., de Koning, E. & Huysmans, F. (2001). Children’s Com- prehension of Visual Formal Features in Television Programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 623-638.
• Bellour, R. (1975). The Unattainable Text. Screen, 16(3), 19-28.
• Berliner, T. & Cohen, D. J. (2011). The Illusion of Continuity: Active Perception and the Classical Editing System. Journal of Film and Vi- deo, 631, 44-63.
• Berman, R. A. (1988). On the Ability to Relate Events in Narrative. Discourse Processes, 11(4), 469-497.
• Bigelow, A. E. & DeCoste, C. (2003). Sensitivity to Social Contingency from Mothers and Strangers in 2-, 4-, and 6-month-old Infants. Infancy, 4(1), 111-140.
• Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in The Fiction Film. Oxon: Routledge. Bordwell, D. (2006). The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Los Angeles: University of California.
• Bordwell, D. (1997). On the History of Film Style. Cambridge: Harvard University.
• Bordwell, D. (2013). The Viewer’s Share: Models of Mind in Explai- ning Film, Shimamura, A.P. (Ed.). Psychocinematics: Exploring Cog- nition At The Movies.(ss. 29-53).New York: Oxford University.
• Bordwell, D., Staiger, J. & Thompson, K. (1985). The Classical Holl- ywood Cinema: Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960. New York: Columbia University.
• Bordwell, D., Thompson, K. & Ashton, J. (1997). Film Art: An Introdu- ction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Bottomore, S. (1990). Shots in The Dark: The Real Origins of Film Editing. T. Alsaesser & A. Barker (Ed.), Early Cinema: Space, Frame, Narrative(ss. 104-113). London: British Film Institute.
• Branigan, E. (1984). Point of View in the Cinema: A Theory of Narrati- on and Subjectivity in Classical Film. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Brown, W. (2013). Supercinema: Film-Philosophy for the Digital Age. Oxford: Berghahn.
• Burch, N. (1979a). Film’s Institutional Mode of Representation and the Soviet Response.,October: Essays in Honor of Jay Leyda. 11, 77-96.
• Burch, N. (1979b). To the Distant Observer: Form and Meaning in the Japanese Cinema. Oakland: University of California Press.
• Burch, N. (1990). Life To Those Shadows. Oakland: University of Ca- lifornia.
• Carroll, N. (1996). Theorizing The Moving Image. Cambridge: Camb- ridge University.
• Carroll, J.M. & Bever, T.G. (1976). Segmentation in Cinema Percepti- on. Science, 191(4231), 1053-1055.
• Carroll, N. & Seeley, W. P. (2013). Cognitivism, Psychology, and Neuroscience: Movies as Attentional Engines. Shimamura, A. P. (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition At The Movies. (ss.53-76). New York: Oxford University.
• Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The M.I.T.
• Clark, R. E. & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in Teaching. M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (Third Edition). New York: Macmillan.
• Collins, W. A., Sobol, B. L., & Westby, S. (1981). Effects of Adult Commentary On Children’s Comprehension and Inferences About A Televised Aggressive Portrayal. Child Development. 52, 158-163
• Cutting, J. E., DeLong, J. E. & Brunick, K. L. (2011). Visual Activity in Hollywood Film: 1935 to 2005 and Beyond. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 115-125.
• Cutting, J. E., DeLong, J. E. & Nothelfer, C. E. (2010). Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film. Psychological Science. 21, 440-447
• Crawley, A. M., Anderson, D. R., Wilder, A., Williams, M. & Santome- ro, A. (1999). Effects of Repeated Exposures to a Single Episode of the Television Program Blue’s Clues on the Viewing Behaviors and Com- prehension of Preschool Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 630.
• D’Ydewalle, G. & Vanderbeeken, M. (1990). Perceptual and Cognitive Processing of Editing Rules in Film. R. Groner, G. d’Ydewalle & R. Parnham (Ed.), From Eye to Mind: Information Acquisition in Percep- tion, Search, and Reading . (s. 129–139). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Dmytryk, E. & Dmytryk, J. P. (1986). On Filmmaking. Boston: Focal Press.
• Eco, U. (1976). Articulations of the Cinematic Code. Movies and Met- hods, 1, 590-607.
• Eco, U. (1977). On the Contribution of Film to Semiotics. Quarterly Review of Film Studies, 2(1), 1-14.
• Eisenstein, S. (Yönetmen) (1928). Ekim [Film]. Sovyetler Birliği: So- vkino
• Eisenstein, S. (1985). Film Biçimi (N. Özön, Çev.). İstanbul: Payel. Erdoğan, N. (1993). Seyirci ve Sinema. Ankara: Med Campus.
• Forsdale, J. R. & Forsdale, L. (1966). Film Literacy. Journal of the University Film Producers Association, 18(3), 9-27.
• Frank, M. C., Vul, E. & Johnson, S. P. (2009). Development of Infants’ Attention to Faces during the First Year. Cognition, 110(2), 160-170.
• Friedlander, B. Z., Wetstone, H. S. & Scott, C. S. (1974). Suburban Preschool Children’s Comprehension of An Age-Appropriate Informa- tional Television Program. Child Development, 45(2), 561-565.
• Frith, U. & Robson, J. E. (1975). Perceiving the Language of Films. Perception, 41, 97-103.
• Garsoffky, B., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2007). Changing Viewpoints During Dynamic Events. Perception, 36(3), 366- 374.
• Geiger, S.& Reeves, B. (1993). The Effects of Scene Changes and Se- mantic Relatedness on Attention to Television. Communication Resear- ch, 20 (2), 155–175.
• Gernsbacher, M.A., Varner, K. & Faust, M.E. (1990). Investigating Dif- ferences in General Comprehension Skill. Journal of Experimental Ps- ychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430 445.
• Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mif in.
• Goldstein, R. B. Woods, R. L. & Peli, E. (2007). Where People Look When Watching Movies: Do All Viewers Look at the Same Place, Com- puters in Biology and Medicine, 37 (7), 957–964.
• Haffenden, A. M. & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Independent Effects of Pictorial Displays on Perception and Action. Vision Research, 40(10), 1597-1607.
• Harrington, J. (1973). The Rhetoric of Film. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Hasson, U. Malach, R. & Heeger, D. J. (2010). Reliability of Corti- cal Activity During Natural Stimulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 40-48.
• Hasson, U. Yang, E. Vallines, I. Heeger, D. J. & Rubin, N. (2008). A Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows in Human Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(10), 2539-2550.
• Hobbs, R. Frost, R. Davis, A. & Stauffer, J. (1988). How First Time Viewers Comprehend Editing Conventions. Journal of Communication 38(4), 50-60.
• Hochberg, J. & Brooks, V (1962). Pictorial Recognition as an Unlear- ned Ability: A Study of One Child’s Performance. The American Jour- nal of Psychology, 75(4), 624-628.
• Hochberg, J.& Brooks, V. (1978). The Perception of Motion Pictures. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Ed.), Handbook of Perception.10, 259-304. New York: Academic.
• Hoffman, D. D. (2000). Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See. New York: WW Norton & Company.
• Hortense, P. (1962). Copper Town: Changing Africa. New York: Harper and Row.
• Ildırar, S. (2014). Minik Seyirciler: Bebek ve Küçük Çocuklarda Hare- ketli Görüntü Algısının Gelişimi Üzerine Bir Derleme. Erciyes Üniver- sitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 4, 26-40.
• Ildırar, S. Levin, D. Smith, T.J. & Schwan, S. (2014). The Role of Audio on Perception of Continuity by First-Time Viewers. Society for Cogni- tive Studies of the Moving Image (SCSMI) Conference 2014, Pennsy- lvania.
• Ildırar, S. & Schwan, S. (2014). First-Time Viewers’ Comprehension of Films: Bridging Shot Transitions. 105(4). British Journal of Psycho- logy. doi: 10. 1111/bjop.12069
• Johnson, S. P. Davidow, J, Hall-Haro, C. & Frank, M. C. (2008). Deve- lopment of Perceptual Completion Originates in Information Acquisiti- on. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1214.
• Katz, S. D. (1991). Film Directing Shot by Shot: Visualizing from Con- cept to Screen. Boston: Focal Press.
• Kintsch, W. & Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a Model of Text Comprehen- sion and Production. Psychological Review. 85. 363-94
• Kirkorian, H. L. Anderson, D. R. & Keen, R. (2012). Age Differences in Online Processing of Video: An Eye Movement Study. Child Deve- lopment, 83, 497–507.
• Kraft, R. N. (1981). The Psychological Reality of Cinematographic Principles: Camera Angle and Cutting. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
• Kraft, R. N. (1986). The Role of Cutting in the Evaluation and Reten- tion of Film. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(1), 155-163.
• Land, M. F. & Hayhoe, M. (2001). In What Ways Do Eye Movements Contribute To Everyday Activities? Vision Research, 41(25), 3559- 3565.
• Lang, A, Geiger, S, Strickwerda, M. & Sumner, J. (1993). The Effects of Related and Unrelated Cuts on Viewers’ Memory for Television: A Limited Capacity Theory of Television Viewing. Communication Rese- arch, 20, 4–29.
• Leifer, A. D, Collins, W. A, Gross, B. M., Taylor, P. H., Andrews, L. & Blackmer, E. R. (1971). Developmental Aspects of Variables Relevant To Observational Learning. Child Development, 42, 1509-1516.
• Lemish, D. (1987). Viewers in Diapers: The Early Development of Television Viewing. T. Lindlof (Ed.), Natural Audiences: Qualitative Research of Media Uses and Effects(ss. 33-57). New Jersey: Norwood.
• Levin, D. & Wang, C. (2009). Spatial Representation in Film. Projecti- ons: The Journal for Movies and Mind, 3, 24-52.
• Levin, D. T. & Varakin, D. A. (2004). No Pause for a Brief Disruption: Failures of Visual Awareness during Ongoing Events. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(2), 363-372.
• Levin, D. & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to Detect Changes to Atten- ded Objects In Motion Pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
• Magliano, J. P. Miller, J. & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing Space and Time in Film Understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(5), 533-545.
• Mast, G. & Kawin, B.F. (1992). A Short History of the Movies (6. Bas- kı). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Messaris, P. (1981). The Film Audience’s Awareness of the Productionprocess. Journal of the University Film Association, 33(4). 53-56
• Metz, C. (1974). Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, (M. Taylor, Çev.). New York: Oxford University.
• Mital, P. K. Smith, T. J., Hill, R. L. & Henderson, J. M. (2011). Cluste- ring of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion. Cognitive Computation, 31, 5-24.
• Moore, D. S, & Johnson, S. P. (2011). Mental Rotation of Dynamic, Three Dimensional Stimuli by 3 Month Old Infants. Infancy, 16(4), 435-445.
• Montgomery, R. (Yönetmen) (1947). The Lady In The Lake [Film]. ABD: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
• Münsterberg, H. (1970). The Photoplay: A Psychological Study. New York: Dover (Özgün eser 1916 tarihlidir).
• Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Ohler, P. (1994). Kognitive Filmpsychologie, Verarbeitung und Mental Repräsentation Narrativer Filme. Münster: MakS.
• Pasolini, P. P. (1965). The Cinema of Poetry. L.K. Barnett (Ed). Hereti- cal Empiricism. (ss. 167-186). Indianapolis: Indiana University.
• Persson, P. (2003). Understanding Cinema: A Psychological Theory of Moving Imagery. New York: Cambridge University.
• Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive Developmenti Children: Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
• Pierroutsakos, S.L. & DeLoache, J.S. (2003). Infants’ Manual Investigation of Pictured Objects Varying in Realism. Infancy, 4, 141–156.
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372.
• Reisz, K. & Millar, G. (1953). Technique of Film Editing. London: Focal Press.
• Rice, M. (1983). The Role of Television in Language Acquisition. De- velopmental Review, 3(2), 211-224.
• Richards, J. E. & Gibson, T. L. (1997). Extended Visual Fixation in Young Infants: Look Distributions, Heart Rate Changes, and Attention. Child Development, 68(6), 1041-1056.
• Rideout, V.J. & Hamel, E. (2006). The Media Family: Electronic Media in the Lives of Infants, Toddlers, Preschoolers, and Their Parents. Men- lo Park, Calif: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
• Salt, B. (2009). Film Style and Technology: History and Analysis. Tot- ton, Hampshire: Starword.
• Sandys, J. (2005). Movie Mistakes: Take 4. London: Virgin Books.
• Schmitt, K. L. & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Television and Reality: Todd- lers’ Use of Visual Information from Video to Guide Behavior. Media Psychology, 4(1), 51–76.
• Schröder, J. (1990). Die Psychologische Realität Von Prinzipien Des Continuity Cinema. G Schumm & H. G. Wulff (Ed.) , Film und Psycho- logie I. Kognition-Rezeption-Perzeption(ss. 109-142). Münster: Maks.
• Schwan, S. (2005). Film Verstehen-Eine Kognitionpsychologische Perspektive, K.Sachs-Hombach(Ed.). Bildwissenschaft, Zwischen Ref- lexion und Anwendung, Köln: Herbert von Halem.
• Schwan, S. & Ildirar, S. (2010). Watching Film for the First Time How Adult Viewers Interpret Perceptual Discontinuities in Film. Psycho- logical Science, 21(7), 970-976.
• Shaviro, S. (2010). Post Cinematic Affect. UK: John Hunt.
• Smith, T. J. (2012). The Attentional Theory of Cinematic Continuity. Projections: The Journal of Mind and Movies, 6(1), 1-27.
• Smith, R. Anderson & D. R, Fischer, C. (1985). Young Children’s Com- prehension of Montage Child Development. Child Development, 56, 962-971
• Smith, T. J. & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Edit Blindness: The Relati- onship Between Attention and Global Change Blindness in Dynamic Scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2 (6), 1–17.
• Smith, T. J. & Henderson, J. M. (2010). The Causal İn uence of Visual Salience on Gaze Guidance During Scene Search and Memorisation. Object, Perception, Attention and Memory Conference, St. Louis, Mis- souri.
• Strickland, B. & Keil, F. (2011). Event Completion: Event Based Infe- rences Distort Memory in a Matter of Seconds. Cognition, 121, 409– 415.
• Takahashi, N. (1991). Developmental Changes of Interests to Anima- ted Stories in Toddlers Measured By Eye Movement While Watching Them. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 34(1), 63-68.
• Talu, E.E. (1943). İstanbul’da İlk Sinema ve İlk Gramofon, Perde-Sah- ne, Sayı: 7, 15 Teşrin (Ekim).
• Tibus, M, Heier, A. & Schwan, S. (2013). Do Films Make You Learn? Inference Processes in Expository Film Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 329–340.
• Tincoff, R. & Jusczyk, P. W. (1999). Some Beginnings of Word Com- prehension in 6-Month-Olds. Psychological Science, 10(2), 172-175.
• Welles. O. (Yönetmen/Senarist). (1941). Yurttaş Kane [Film]. ABD: RKO Radio Pictures.
• Wilson, J. (1961). Comments on Work with Film Pre Literates in Afri- ca. Paper presented in The Seminar on Communication and the Com- munication Arts, TeachersCollege, 2 Mayıs. New York: Columbia Uni- versity.
• Wollen, P. (1972). Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (Cilt 9). Bloomin- gton: Indiana University.
• Worth, S. & Adair, J. (1970). Navajo Filmmakers. American Anthropo- logist, 72(1), 9-34.
• Zacks, J. M. Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S. & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event Perception: A Mind-Brain Perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273.
• Zimmerman, F. J, Christakis, D. A. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2007). Associa- tions between Media Viewing and Language Development in Children Under Age 2 Years. The Journal of Pediatrics, 151(4), 364-368.
• Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation Models The Mental Leap Into Imagined Worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 15-18.
• Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation Models in Langu- age Comprehension and Memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162.