TUBERCULOSIS IN CINEMATIC NARRATIVES: ARCHITECTURAL SPACES AND SOCIO-SPATIAL CONSTRUCTS

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 7 - 56, 09.08.2024

Deniz Avcı

https://doi.org/10.32001/sinecine.1424279

Öz

Pulmonary tuberculosis has been prominent in representations of illness in theater and cinema since the beginning of the nineteenth century. Tuberculosis has served as a convenient vehicle for “romantic storytelling,” and the sanatorium as an ideal film set, one whose bucolic setting evokes in the audience a sense of escaping into nature. Focusing on three films—Una Breve Vacanza (A Brief Vacation, Vittorio De Sica, 1973), Učitel Tance (The Dance Teacher, Jaromil Jireš, 1995), and Kelebeğin Rüyası (A Butterfly’s Dream, Yılmaz Erdoğan, 2013)—this study explores the medico-social reflections of tuberculosis and those aspects of the disease that make it such a favorite of cinema, including “easy acting,” “romantic storytelling,” and “visual and spatial aesthetics.” The three films examined here utilize sanatorium facilities’ venues, spaces, and architecture to create visually appealing and spatially engaging aesthetics. These films, all of which take place in the mid-twentieth century, are selected to include a diverse range of sanatorium venues and different typologies of sanatorium architecture. These films not only convey information about tuberculosis and three different global sanatorium cases but also serve as valuable archival documents that offer insights into the socio-spatiality of the disease in architecture and cinema.

Anahtar Kelimeler

tuberculosis, sanatoria, socio-spatiality of disease, mid-20th century, architecture/space/cinema.

SİNEMATİK ANLATILARDA TÜBERKÜLOZ: MİMARİ MEKÂNLAR VE SOSYO-MEKÂNSAL İNŞALAR

Öz

Verem, 19. yüzyılın başlarından beri hem tiyatroda hem de sinemada hastalığın öne çıkan bir temsili olmuştur. Bakteriyolojik çağda tüberkülozun bulaşıcı bir hastalık olduğu konusunda artan anlayışa rağmen, tiyatro ve sinema öncelikle veremin temsili niteliklerini ve avantajlarını fark etmiş; propaganda ve belgesel filmlerdeki temsilinin aksine, dramatik tasvire uygunluğu nedeniyle verem “romantik hikâye anlatımı” için uygun bir unsur olarak kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, verem hastalarının iyileşmesi için kurulan başlıca mimari tipolojisi olan sanatoryumlar, aynı zamanda “tatil” hissini uyandıran kent karşıtı özellikleri nedeniyle seyirciler için sıra dışı film setleri olarak cevap vermektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, veremin 20. yüzyılın ortalarındaki sağlık mimarisi üzerindeki mediko-sosyal yansımalarını araştıran ve veremin “kolay oyunculuk”, “romantik hikâye anlatımı” ve “görsel ve mekânsal estetik” gibi sinematik faydalarına odaklanan üç filmi incelemektedir. Bu filmler aynı zamanda görsel ve mekânsal açıdan ilgi çekici bir estetik yaratmak için sanatoryum tesislerinin mekânlarından ve mimarisinden de yararlanmaktadır. Filmler kronolojik olarak, Una Breve Vacanza (Kısa Bir Tatil, Vittorio De Sica, 1973), Učitel Tance (Dans Öğretmeni, Jaromil Jireš, 1995) ve Kelebeğin Rüyası (Yılmaz Erdoğan, 2013) şeklinde sıralanabilir. Bu çalışma, filmlerin sadece hastalığın ve iyileşme mekânlarının doğası hakkında bilgi vermekle kalmamıştır; aynı zamanda üç farklı küresel sanatoryum örneğiyle, sinemanın mekânı ve mimariyi belgeleyerek ve hastalığın sosyo-mekânsal yansımalarını da sunarak değerli arşiv belgesi olduğunu kanıtlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

tüberküloz, sanatoryum, hastalığın sosyo-mekansallığı, 20.yüzyıl ortası, mimarlık/mekân/sinema.

Kaynakça

• Adams, A., & Burke, S. (2006). “Not a Shack in the Woods”: Architecture for Tuberculosis in Muskoka and Toronto. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 23(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.23.2.429
• Adams, A., & Schwartzman, K. (2005). Pneumothorax Then and Now. Space and Culture, 8(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331205280158
• Avci-Hosanli, D., & Degirmencioglu, C. (2024). From “prototype” to “model”: Architectural and spatial development of Block A (1924–1945) of Istanbul’s Heybeliada Sanatorium. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.006
• Avcı Hosanlı, D., Değirmencioğlu, C., & Kepez, O. (2022). Architecture of Convalescence: Mapping the Sanatorium Heritage of Turkey [Modern Mimarlık Araştırma Ödülü [Modern Architecture Research Award]]. Mimarlar Derneği 1927 [Turkish Architects’ Association 1927].
• Barker, R. (2022). Symptoms of the self: Tuberculosis and the making of the modern stage. University of Iowa Press.
• Bates, B. (1992). Bargaining for Life: A Social History of Tuberculosis, 1876-1938. University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Brandt, L. (1903). Social aspects of tuberculosis. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 21(Problems in Charities and Corrections), 65–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1010293
• Bryder, L. (1988). Below the Magic Mountain: A Social History of Tuberculosis in Twentieth-Century Britain. Clarendon Press.
• Campbell, M. (2005). What tuberculosis did for modernism: The influence of a curative environment on modernist design and architecture. Medical History, 49(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300009169
• Carr, J. C. (2023). The social construction of airborne infections. In A. Bliss & D. Kopec (Eds.), Architectural factors for infection and disease control (pp. 30–42). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003214502-3
• Cartwright, V. (2023). Pine forest and sunlight: Alvar Aalto’s paimio sanitorium. In A. Bliss & D. Kopec (Eds.), Architectural factors for infection and disease control (pp. 57–64). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003214502-3
• Ceuterick, M. (2020). Affirmative Aesthetics and Wilful Women: Gender, Space and Mobility in Contemporary Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37039-8
• Chalke, H. D. (1962). H.D. Chalke. The impact of tuberculosis on history, literature and art. Med Hist, 6 (1962), pp. 301-318; Medical History, 6(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300027642
• Colomina, B. (2019). X-Ray architecture. Lars Müller Publishers.
• Daniel, T. M. (2011). Hermann Brehmer and the origins of tuberculosis sanatoria. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 15(2), Article 2.
• Day, C. A. (2017). Consumptive chic: A history of beauty, fashion, and disease. Bloomsbury Academic.
• De Sica, V. (Director). (1973). Una Breve Vacanza [A Brief Vacation]. Verona Produzione, Azor Films, Cinema International Corporation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w24rOr94toA
• Degirmencioglu, C., & Avci Hosanli, D. (2023). Transient yet settled: The rooms for tuberculosis patients in Turkish sanatoria. Res Mobilis, 12(16), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.17811/rm.13.16.2023.58-83
• Del Curto, D. (2013). The disenchanted mountain’s heritage. Protection and reuse of sanatoriums in the Alps. In D. Del Curto, R. Dini, & G. Menini (Eds.), Architecture in the Alps. Heritage and design (pp. 139–164). Mimesis Edizioni.
• Edgar, B. L. (2022). The efficacy of Arcadia: Constructing emotions of nature in the pained body through landscape imagery, c.1945–present. In R. Boddice & B. Hitzer (Eds.), Feeling Dis-ease in Modern History Experiencing Medicine and Illness (pp. 195–214). Bloomsbury Academic.
• Erdoğan, Y. (Director). (2013). Kelebeğin Rüyası [The Butterfly’s Dream]. BKM Film, Böcek Yapım, UIP. https://www.hdfilmizle.site/film/kelebegin-ruyasi-2013-izle/
• Gökçe, T. İ. (1957). Heybeliada Sanatoryumu Kuruluş ve Gelişimi 1924-1955. İsmail Akgün Matbaası.
• Gourgoulianni, S. (2019). The portrayal of tuberculosis in cinema. American International Journal of Social Science, 8(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.30845/aijss.v8n1p9
• Halidi, G., Bulut, A., Yıldız, A., Kurtoğlu, A., Genç Kuzuca, İ., Bice, H., Akın, Ş. H., & Şahinoğlu, S. (2019). Kelebeğin Rüyası Filmi Üzerinden Tüberküloz ve Heybeliada Sanatoryumu. Lokman Hekim Dergisi, 9(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/doi:10.31020/mutftd.609599
• Han, Q., & Curtis, D. R. (2021). The female burden visualized: Cinematic representation of women during epidemics. The Journal of Popular Culture, 54(5), 1116–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.13070
• Hays, J. N. (2009). The burdens of disease: Epidemics and human response in western history (2nd edition). Rutgers University Press.
• Heikinheimo, M. (2016). Architecture and technology: Alvar Aalto’s Paimio Sanatorium. Aalto University.
• Jireš, J. (Director). (1995). Učitel Tance [The Dance Teacher]. Celý Film. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLghoPVKFUw
• Kaplan, E. A. (1983). Women and film: Both sides of the camera. Methuen.
• Koskela, H. (1999). “Gendered Exclusions”: Women’s Fear of Violence and Changing Relations to Space. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 81(2), 111–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/491020
• Mann, T. (1971). The Magic Mountain (Der Zauberberg) (H. T. Lowe-Porter, Trans.). Secker & Warburg.
• Overy, P. (2007). Light, Air & Openness: Modern Architecture Between the Wars. Thames & Hudson.
• Pappas, G., Seitaridis, S., Akritidis, N., & Tsianos, E. (2023). Infectious diseases in cinema: Virus hunters and killer microbes. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 37(1), 939–942. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/37/7/939/422604
• Pernick, M. S. (1978). Thomas Edison’s tuberculosis films: Mass media and health propaganda. The Hastings Center Report, 8(3), 21–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3560425
• Polianski, I. J., & Kosenko, O. (2021). The “proletarian disease” on stage. Theatrical anti-tuberculosis propaganda in the early Soviet Union. Microbes and Infection, 23(8), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2021.104838.
• Sandell, J. (2008). Politics, architecture and the migration of meaning: The sanatorium village at Sondalo, Italy, for the treatment of tuberculosis (1930-1940). In D. Froehlich & M. Pride (Eds.), 96th ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings, Seeking the City (pp. 794–801).
• Sontag, S. (1978). Illness as Metaphor. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Tomes, N. (1998). The gospel of germs: Men, women, and the microbe in American life. Harvard University Press.