A Study on Smartness and Sustainability of Global Cities: New York and Istanbul

Öz

Cities are not only places where problems such as migration, unemployment, air pollu-tion, crime, and climate change arise, but also where many problems find solutions. After a literature review on the global city, smart sustainable city, and smart sustainab-le city indicators, this research examined and compared New York and Istanbul based on certain indicators. The study aims to identify the strengths, weaknesses, commona-lities, and differences between cities. The performance of cities can be compared by ranking them according to different indicators. Ranking the cities can also enable them to monitor their development in different areas over the years. However, a rank-based performance comparison alone may limit a deeper view of cities' commonalities, diffe-rences, opportunities, and weaknesses. Therefore, this study examines the areas of development of New York and Istanbul from a smart sustainable city perspective, taking into account eleven different indicators including population, economy, educa-tion, energy, health, security, internet, job opportunities, transportation, water, and waste management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Global cities
• Smart sustainable cities
• New York
• Istanbul

Küresel Şehirlerin Akıllılığı ve Sürdürülebilirliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma: New York ve İstanbul

Öz

Şehirler yalnızca göç, işsizlik, hava kirliliği, suç ve iklim değişikliği gibi sorunların ortaya çıktığı yerler değil, aynı zamanda birçok problemin çözüm bulduğu yerlerdir. Bu araştırma, küresel şehir, akıllı sürdürülebilir şehir ve akıllı sürdürülebilir şehir göstergelerine ilişkin bir literatür taramasının ardından New York ve İstanbul'u belirli göstergelere dayalı olarak incelemiş ve karşılaştırmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı şehirlerin güçlü, zayıf yanlarını, ortak yönlerini ve farklılıklarını tespit etmektir. Şehirlerin per-formansı, farklı göstergelere göre sıralanarak karşılaştırılabilir. Şehirlerin sıralanması, yıllar içinde farklı alanlardaki gelişimlerinin de izlenmesini sağlayabilir. Ancak, yal-nızca sıralamaya dayalı bir performans karşılaştırması, şehirlerin ortak yanlarını, fark-lılıklarını, fırsatlarını ve zayıflıklarını daha derinlemesine görmeyi sınırlandırabilir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma -nüfus, ekonomi, eğitim, enerji, sağlık, güvenlik, internet, iş imkânları, ulaşım, su ve atık yönetimini içeren- on bir farklı göstergeyi dikkate alarak New York ve İstanbul’un akıllı sürdürülebilir şehir perspektifinden geliştirilebilir alanlarını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küresel şehirler
• Akıllı sürdürülebilir şehirler
• New York
• İstanbul

Kaynakça

1. Ahvenniemi, H.,Huovila,A., Pinto-Seppä, I.,Airaksinen,M. (2017). What are the diffe-rences between sustainable and smart cities?. Cities, 60, 234-245.
2. Akçura, M. T., & Avci, S. B. (2014). How to make global cities: Information communi-cation technologies and macro-level variables. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 68–79.
3. Alagöz, A. Z., & Kocasoy, G. (2008). Improvement and modification of the routing system for the health-care waste collection and transportation in Istanbul. Waste Management, 28(8), 1461–1471.
4. Arcadis. (2016). Sustainable cities index 2016. https://tinyurl.com/bdhuht6d
5. ARUP. (2017). Smart city strategies: A global review. https://tinyurl.com/4hsutnsw
6. A.T.Kearney (2016). Global cities 2016: Which global cities are performing best to-day, which have the best long-tern potential, and what makes a “smart city”? https://tinyurl.com/4utxx75u
7. Bai,X., Surveyer, A., Elmqvist, T., Gatzweiler,W.F., Güneralp, B., Parnell, S., Prieur-Richard, A. H., Shrivastava,P., Siri, G.J., Stafford-Smith,M., Toussaint, J-P., Webb, R. (2016). Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 23, 69-78.
8. Batur, İ., & Koç, M. (2017). Travel Demand Management (TDM) case study for social behavioral change towards sustainable urban transportation in Istanbul. Cities, 69, 20–35.

9. Benites, A. J., & Simões, A. F. (2021). Assessing the urban sustainable development strategy: An application of a smart city services sustainability taxonomy. Eco-logical Indicators, 127.
10. Berkun, M., Aras, E., & Nemlioglu, S. (2005). Disposal of solid waste in Istanbul and along the Black Sea coast of Turkey. Waste Management, 25(8), 847–855.
11. Bhattacharya, T. R., Bhattacharya, A., Mclellan, B., & Tezuka, T. (2020). Sustainable smart city development framework for developing countries. Urban Research and Practice, 13(2), 180–212.
12. Bilen, Ö., Aşkın, Ö. E., Büyüklü, A. H., Ökten, A., & Gür, M. (2013). How the fear of crime spatially differs among the districts of Istanbul. E-Journal of New World Science Academy, 8(4), 153–164.
13. Bower, L. L. (2018). The development impact of smart city programs. 2018 IEEE In-ternational Symposium on Technology and Society, 20–25.
14. Boz,C. (2010). Job satisfaction index for Istanbul labor market. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2 (2), 9-15.
15. Bulu, M., Önder, M. A. and Aksakalli, V. (2014). Algortihm-embedded IT applications for an emerging knowledge city: Istanbul, Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 5625-5635.
16. Burdett, R. (2009). Istanbul: City of intersections. Urban Age. https://tinyurl.com/ykvn7kxw
17. Canitez, F., Alpkokin, P., & Kiremitci, S. T. (2020). Sustainable urban mobility in Is-tanbul: Challenges and prospects. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(4), 1148–1157.
18. Ceccato, V., Kahn, T., Herrmann, C., & Östlund, A. (2022). Pandemic restrictions and spatiotemporal crime patterns in New York, São Paulo, and Stockholm. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 38(1), 120–149.
19. Chalfin, A., Hansen, B., Lerner, J., & Parker, L. (2022). Reducing crime through envi-ronmental design: Evidence from a randomized experiment of street lighting in New York City. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38, 127-157.
20. Csukás, M. S., & Szabó, R. Z. (2021). The many faces of the smart city: Differing value propositions in the activity portfolios of nine cities. Cities, 112, 103116.
21. Çelikyay, H.H. (2017). The studies through smart cities model: The case of Istanbul. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 6(1), 149-163.
22. Derudder, B., De Vos, A., & Witlox, F. (2011). Global city/world city. In International handbook of globalization and world cities. Edward Elgar Publishing.
23. Dincer, I., Javani, N., Karayel, G.K. (2022). Sustainable city concept based on green hydrogen energy. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104154.
24. Doğan,B.Ö., Williams, A. & Williams, A. (2023).Economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy-is there a relation? Case study G7. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 823-843.
25. Ercoşkun, Y.Ö. (2016). Ultimate ICT network in Turkey for smart cities. Planlama, 26(2):130-146.
26. Erçetin, C. (2014). Planning and management of bike sharing system for sustainable urban transport: Konya, Kayseri and Istanbul cases. [Master’s Thesis,Middle East Technical University].METU Open.https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/23648
27. Eren, F. & Şimşek, B. (2016). How Istanbul could be at the top in global city indices? IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21 (10), 41-69.
28. Ergun, N., & Yirmibeşoğlu, F. (2007). Distribution of crime rates in different districts in Istanbul. Turkish Studies, 8(3), 435–455.
29. Fortuna, L. M., & Castaldi, M. J. (2018). New York City’s reuse impact calculator: Quantifying the zero waste impact of materials reuse. Waste Management and Research, 36(12), 1190–1200.
30. Global EDGE (2020). New York: Trade statistics. https://tinyurl.com/44jrvxah
31. Goel, S. (2017). Solid and hazardous waste management: An introduction. In: Goel, S. (Eds), Advances in Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. Springer.
32. Grossi,G., Pianezzi, D. (2017). Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities, 69, 79-85.
33. Gülseçen, S. (2020) Smart people: Smart cities capacity building and guidance pro-ject.Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. https://tinyurl.com/2t5w8rsw
34. Gülseçen, S., Gezer, M., Çelik, S., & Koçoğlu, F. Ö. (2021). Future needs from the smart mega city (SMC) plans-smart green city-the case of Istanbul.In book: Sus-tainable Mega City Communities (pp.109–118). Butterworth-Heinemann.
35. Hara, M., Nagao, T., Hannoe, S., & Nakamura, J. (2016). New key performance indica-tors for a smart sustainable city. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(3).
36. Hillard,T., González-Rivera,C., Sharp,N. (2018,March). Opportunity knocks: Boosting state investment in New York’s worforce development system. Center for an Ur-ban Future. https://tinyurl.com/5d9ayme3
37. Huovila, A., Bosch, P., & Airaksinen, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when? Cities, 89, 141–153.
38. Hurriyet Daily News. (2018,September 24). Istanbul has highest income inequality in Turkey. https://tinyurl.com/4ttweckn
39. İlkkaracan, İ. (2016). Analysis of Istanbul labour market from a gender equality per-spective. International Labour Organization. https://tinyurl.com/2dh74vbz
40. Janik, A., Ryszko, A., & Szafraniec, M. (2020). Scientific landscape of smart and sus-tainable cities literature: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(3).
41. Kanat, G. (2010). Municipal solid-waste management in Istanbul. Waste Management, 30(8–9), 1737–1745.
42. Keskin, B. (2008). Hedonic analysis of price in the Istanbul housing market. Interna-tional Journal of Strategic Property Management, 12(2), 125–138.
43. Kontokosta,C.E., Hong,B., Johnson,N.E., Starobin, D.(2018). Using machine learning and small area estimation to predict building-level municipal solid waste gene-ration in cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 70, 151-162.
44. Krueger, E. H., McPhearson, T., & Levin, S. A. (2022). Integrated assessment of urban water supply security and resilience: Towards a streamlined approach. Envi-ronmental Research Letters, 17(7).
45. Kubina, M., Šulyová, D., & Vodák, J. (2021). Managing global smart cities in an era of 21st century challenges. Sustainability, 13(5), 1–13.
46. Kummitha, K.R., Crutzen, N. (2017). How do we understand smart cities? An evolutio-nary perspective. Cities, 67, 43-52.
47. KWR Water Research Institute. (2023). City blueprint. https://tinyurl.com/5n8rhvr5
48. Lai, C. S., Jia, Y., Dong, Z., Wang, D., Tao, Y., Lai, Q. H., … Lai, L. L. (2020). A review of technical standards for smart cities. Clean Technologies, 2(3), 290–310.
49. Longworth, R.C. (2015). On global cities. The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. https://tinyurl.com/nhd5cvkd
50. Mcdonogh, G., Isenhour, C., & Checker, M. (2011). Introduction: Sustainability in the city: Ethnographic approaches. City and Society, 23(2), 113–116.
51. Milošević, M. R., Milošević, D. M., Stević, D. M., & Stanojević, A. D. (2019). Smart city: Modeling key indicators in Serbia using IT2FS. Sustainability, 11(13).
52. Moe, A.& Turner, S.(2022). Clean energy education and training resources and op-portunities in New York’s Southern Tier Region. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://tinyurl.com/3h93ujb7
53. Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-minute city”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111.
54. Nelson, G. (2012). Beyond the Global City : Understanding and planning for the di-versity of Ontario. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
55. New York City Department of Education. (2023). DOE data at a glance. https://tinyurl.com/5b2zyapw
56. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. (2007). Health care access among adults in New York City: The importance of having insurance and a reg-ular care provider. https://tinyurl.com/2uckyren
57. New York Smart Schools Commission Report. (2014). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3yrydvzd
58. New York State. (2022). DEC announces draft regulations to reduce waste sent to landfills, improve waste management, and reduce solid waste's climate change impacts. https://tinyurl.com/2m78kykf
59. New York State. (2023). Clean energy standard. https://tinyurl.com/498m6bym
60. NYC. (2022). Efforts to reduce air pollution should focus on neighborhoods with the worst health impacts. https://tinyurl.com/3j5wznmd
61. NYC. (2023a). Population. https://tinyurl.com/5ehpbwj7
62. NYC. (2023b). An economic profile of immigrants in New York City. https://tinyurl.com/ary8ppdf
63. NYCDOT. (n.d). Transportation. https://tinyurl.com/bdesm8xt
64. OEC. (2023). Turkey. https://tinyurl.com/2j7y458x
65. Pira, M. (2021). A novel taxonomy of smart sustainable city indicators. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–10.
66. Portes, A., & Martínez, B. (2019). Emerging global cities: Structural similarities and historical differences. Revista Espanola de Sociologia, 28(3), 9–21.
67. Rahm, B. G., Morse, N., Bowen, M., Choi, J., Mehta, D., & Vedachalam, S. (2018). Is bigger better? Driving factors of POTW performance in New York. Water Re-search, 135, 134–143.
68. Razmjoo, A., Gandomi, A. H., Pazhoohesh, M., Mirjalili, S., & Rezaei, M. (2022). The key role of clean energy and technology in smart cities development. Energy Strategy Reviews, 44, 100943.
69. Sassen,S. (2012). Cities in a world economy. Sage.
70. Shah, J., Kothari, J., & Doshi, N. (2019). A survey of smart city infrastructure via case study on New York. Procedia Computer Science, 160, 702–705.
71. Shatkin, G. (2007). Global cities of the South: Emerging perspectives on growth and inequality. Cities, 24(1), 1–15.
72. Shittu, O.S., Williams,I.D.,Shaw,P.J.(2021).Global E-waste management: Can WEEE make a difference? A review of e-waste trends, legislation, contemporary issues and future challenges.Waste Management, 120, 549-563.
73. Sufiyan,A. M. (2013). Initiatives of global cities in environmental sustainability: A Case of London and New York City. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(3), 1–15.
74. Šulyová, D., & Vodák, J. (2020). The impact of cultural aspects on building the smart city approach: Managing diversity in Europe (London), North America (New York) and Asia (Singapore). Sustainability, 12(22), 1–11.
75. Statista. (2023,May). Number of hospitals in New York 2021 by ownership. https://tinyurl.com/3nsdw6td
76. Taş, B. (2022). The effect of human capital on income equality : Cross-sectional analysis. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1),823-843.
77. T.C. Istanbul Valiliği. (2019, June 14). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Istanbul Eğitim İstatis-tikleri. https://tinyurl.com/5n6n5ecf
78. The Mori Memorial Foundation. (2022). Global Power City Index 2022. https://tinyurl.com/3tyxhyav
79. The Ministry of Health. (2021). Health Statistics Yearbook. https://tinyurl.com/2bep6b3b
80. TUIK(2021a, April 06). International migration statistics. https://tinyurl.com/bd9f7apn
81. TUIK (2021b, August 26). Survey on information and communication technology (ICT) usage in households and by individuals. https://tinyurl.com/mtn9mf5a
82. TUIK (2022a, May 12). Income and living conditions survey regional results. https://tinyurl.com/249hj9xx
83. TUIK (2022b, December 7). Health expenditure statistics. https://tinyurl.com/yc533h8w
84. TUIK (2023,February 06). The results of address based population registration sys-tem. https://tinyurl.com/4xwj7bab
85. Urban Green Council. (2020). New York City’s Energy and Water Use Report. https://tinyurl.com/4vpb4kuz
86. U.S.Census Bureau. (2022, July 1). Quick facts. https://tinyurl.com/3xpm6sz6
87. Van Leeuwen, K. & Sjerps, R. (2015). Istanbul: the challenges of integrated water re-sources management in Europa’s megacity. Environment, Development and Sus-tainability, 18, 1-17.
88. Wang,D.D. (2019).Performance assessment of major global cities by DEA and Malmquist index analysis. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 77(4): 101365.
89. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Foth, M., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E., & Iop-polo, G. (2019). Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A system-atic review of the literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 45, 348–365.