27 Mayıs 1960 Darbesi Öncesi Tahkikat Komisyonu ve Basın: CHP'liler ile Basın Mensupları Arasındaki Telefon Görüşmeleri Bağlamında Basın-Siyaset İlişkileri

Öz

Bu makale, 27 Mayıs 1960 askeri darbesi öncesindeki dönemde Demokrat Parti’nin (DP) muhalefet ve basınla olan ilişkilerini ele almaktadır. DP, özellikle 1957 seçimlerinden sonra, Tahkikat Komisyonu aracılığıyla basın ve muhalefet arasındaki etkileşimleri daha sıkı bir şekilde kontrol etmeye çalışmıştır. Makalenin odak noktası, Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (CHP) üyeleri ile basın mensupları arasındaki telefon görüşmelerinin DP hükümeti tarafından izlenmesi ve bu izlemelerin muhalefet üzerindeki denetim politikalarının bir unsuru olarak nasıl kullanıldığıdır. Telefon dinlemeleri, siyasi faaliyetlerin izlenmesinin ötesine geçerek basının bağımsızlığı üzerinde de etkili olmuş ve kamuoyunun bilgiye erişiminde kısıtlamalar yaratmıştır. DP'nin muhalefet ve basın üzerindeki bu kontrol çabaları, Türkiye'de demokrasinin işleyişini zayıflatmış ve basın özgürlüğünü sınırlandırmıştır. Bu makale, söz konusu uygulamaların etkilerini, telefon dinlemelerinin basın-siyaset ilişkilerine olan yansımalarını ve bu sürecin demokrasi üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Telefon dinlemeleri
• Tahkikat Komisyonu
• Basın özgürlüğü
• Demokrat Parti
• 27 Mayıs 1960 Darbesi

The Investigation Committee And The Press Before The May 27, 1960 Coup: Press-Politics Relations In The Context Of Telephone Conversations Between CHP Members And Journalists

Öz

This article examines the relationship between the Democrat Party (DP) and the opposition press in the period leading up to the 27 May 1960 military coup. Following the 1957 elections, the DP sought to exert greater control over interactions between the press and the opposition by establishing the Investigation Commission. The focus of the article is on the surveillance of telephone conversations between members of the Republican People's Party (CHP) and journalists by the DP government, and how this surveillance was utilised as a tool to tighten control over the opposition. The wiretapping not only monitored political activities but also impacted the independence of the press, limiting the public’s access to accurate information. The DP's attempts to regulate the opposition and the media weakened the functioning of democracy and restricted press freedom in Turkey. This article analyses the effects of these measures, how wiretapping harmed press-politics relations, and the broader implications for democracy during this period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Wiretapping
• Investigation Committee
• Press freedom
• Democrat Party
• May 27
• 1960 Coup

Kaynakça

1. Acar, M. (2022). The establishment and powers of the investigation committee (1960). Constitutional Developments and Their Effects on Press Freedom, 28(2), 77–82.
2. Ahmad, F. (1977). The Turkish experiment in democracy 1950–1975. C. Hurst & Company.
3. Ahmad, F. (1993). The making of modern Turkey. Routledge.
4. Akis Magazine. (1960, May 4). DP’s pressure on CHP. pp. 5–10.
5. Akşam Newspaper. (1960, April 19). Attacks on journalists. p. 1.
6. Altun, D. (2020). Press censorship in Turkey during April–May 1960. Studies in Turkish Political and Media History, 19(1), 90–95.
7. Arslan, H. (2021). The Democrat Party’s policies towards the press after the 1954 elections. Political History Studies, 5(3), 105–112.
8. Birand, M. A. (1984). 12 Eylül Saat: 04.00. Milliyet Publishing.

9. Bora, T. (2002). Official sources of Turkey’s political culture. İletişim Publishing.
10. Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (1960, April 19–20). Decisions of the Investigation Committee. p. 1.
11. Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (1960, May 23). Censorship of correspondence in Ankara. p. 1.
12. Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (1960, April 26).
13. Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (1960, April 26). Decisions of the Investigation Committee. p. 1.
14. Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (1960, April 28). Declaration of martial law. p. 1.
15. Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (1960, May 8).
16. Çavdar, T. (1992). Turkey’s history of democracy 1950–1990. İmge Publishing.
17. Çelik, A. (2020). The 1950 elections and the press’s support for the Democrat Party. Election and Political Communication Studies, 13(2), 78–81.
18. Çetin, B. (2021). Press censorship and the Investigation Committee before the 1960 military coup. Media and Democracy Research, 15(3), 104–109.
19. Demir, M. (2019). Press policies of the Republican era (1923–1950). Turkish Journalism History Publications, 22(3), 112–115.
20. Directorate of State Archives, Republican Archive. (1960a). Constitution violation case: Transcripts of phone conversations between CHP members and certain journalists, monitored by the Investigation Committee [Archive document].
21. Directorate of State Archives, Republican Archive. (1960b). Constitution violation case: Documents from the Office of the Prime Minister regarding the wiretapping of CHP members [Archive document].
22. Directorate of State Archives, Republican Archive. (1960c). Constitution violation case: Transcript of a phone conversation of Gaziantep Deputy Bahadır Dülger [Archive document].
23. Directorate of State Archives, Republican Archive. (1960d). Constitution violation case: Tape recordings of phone conversations monitored by the Investigation Committee [Archive document].
24. Dodd, C. H. (1969). Politics and government in Turkey. University of California Press.
25. Dünya Newspaper. (1960, May 23). Censorship of correspondence in Ankara. p. 1.
26. Ergüder, U. (1979). Political development in Turkey: The role of the opposition. Sage Publications.
27. Freely, J. (1998). The Bosphorus: A history. Viking Press.
28. Giritlioğlu, E. (1997). The 1960 military coup and the press in Turkey. Bağlam Publishing.
29. Gökçe, M. (2018). The Democrat Party’s press law and its effects on press freedom. Press History Research, 25(1), 23–28.
30. Gözübüyük, A. Ş. (1967). The Turkish War of Independence in the National Struggle. Turkish Historical Society Publishing.
31. Hale, W. (2013). Turkish politics and the military. Routledge.
32. Harris, G. (1975). Turkey: Coping with crisis. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
33. Heper, M. (1985). The state tradition in Turkey. Eothen Press.
34. Hürriyet Newspaper. (1960, May 26). Completion of the Investigation Committee’s duties. p. 1.
35. Jenkins, G. (2001). Context and circumstance: The Turkish military and politics. Oxford University Press.
36. Karaosmanoğlu, A. (1967). The political structure of Turkey and the process of democratization. Turkish Historical Society Publishing.
37. Karpat, K. H. (1959). Turkey’s politics: The transition to a multi-party system. Princeton University Press.
38. Karpat, K. H. (1975). Turkey’s politics: The transition to a multi-party system. Princeton University Press.
39. Kasapsaraçoğlu, M. (2020). Reflections of Turkey’s Middle East policy on the press in the 1950s. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(4), 1091–1107. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.695241
40. Kaya, E. (2017). The CHP’s influence on the press and press freedom. Journal of Press and Broadcasting Studies, 18(4), 45–52.
41. Kırlı, C. (2002). The state and the politics of language in Turkey. In Turkey: Modernity and national identity (pp. 45–58). Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Korkmaz, A. (2019). Martial law and its effects on press freedom (1958–1960). Press Repression During Martial Law Periods, 9(1), 83–88.
43. Kuyucu, A. T. (1969). The military and politics in Turkey. Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences Publishing.
44. Landau, J. M. (1984). Radical politics in modern Turkey. Brill.
45. Lewis, B. (1970). The emergence of modern Turkey. Oxford University Press.
46. Mango, A. (1999). Atatürk: The biography of the founder of modern Turkey. Overlook Press.
47. Mardin, Ş. (1971). The genesis of Young Ottoman thought. Syracuse University Press.
48. Milliyet Newspaper. (1960, April 19). Approval of the Investigation Committee. p. 1.
49. Milliyet Newspaper. (1960, May 5).
50. Milliyet Newspaper. (1960, April 8).
51. Prime Ministry Republican Archive (BCA). (1959, August 11). Prime Ministry Private Secretariat (30-1-0-0/1-9-8).
52. Rustow, D. A. (1956). Politics and the military in Turkey: A study of the relations between the military and government in Turkey from 1908 to 1954. Princeton University Press.
53. Sander, O. (1998). Turkish-American relations 1947–1964. Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences Publishing.
54. Shaw, S. J., & Shaw, E. K. (1977). History of the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey. Cambridge University Press.
55. Şimşek, O. (2015). The 1952 press labour law and the socioeconomic rights of journalists. Labour Studies Review, 9(2), 33–37.
56. Şimşir, B. N. (1991). İnönü and the Turkish Revolution. Bilgi Publishing. Turkish Grand National Assembly Proceedings. (1960). Turkish Grand National Assembly Printing House (Vol. 13, p. 213).
57. Turkish Grand National Assembly Records. (1960). Turkish Grand National Assembly Printing Office (Vol. 13, pp. 189–190).
58. Ulus Newspaper. (1960, April 18). İnönü’s reaction to the Investigation Committee. p. 1.
59. Yeni Sabah Newspaper. (1960, May 2). Menderes’ reaction to the 1 May events. p. 1.
60. Yılmaz, F. (2016). The Democrat Party’s rise to power and its relationship with the press. Turkish Political History Research, 11(1), 55–60.
61. Zürcher, E. J. (2004). Turkey: A modern history. I.B. Tauris.