Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TÜRKİYE'DE SİBER SUÇ ORANLARININ NÜFUSA GÖRE DEĞELENDİRMESİ: 81 İL İÇİN DEĞERLENDİRME

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 27 - 54, 31.05.2025
https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.1624223

Öz

Dijitalleşmenin ve teknolojinin ulaşılabilirliğinin hızla artması, toplumların yaşam biçimini önemli derecede değiştirmiştir. Bu değişim, siber suçlar gibi yeni tehditlerin de ortaya çıkmasına yol açmıştır. Siber suçlar, yalnızca bireylerin değil, kurumların ve devletlerin güvenliğini de etkileyen karmaşık bir sorun haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de 2014-2024 yılları arasında yabancı uyruklular tarafından işlenen siber suçların dinamiklerini incelemiştir. Araştırma, Jandarma Genel Komutanlığı Olaylar Bilgi Sisteminde kayıtlı, Türkiye'nin 81 ilindeki toplam 54.842 siber suç kaydını ele alarak, suç oranlarının nüfus yoğunluğu, göç ve bölgesel farklılıklarla nasıl ilişkilendiğini analiz etmektedir. İstatistiksel analizler, toplam nüfus ile siber suç oranları arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koyarken, göçmen nüfusu ile suç oranları arasında zayıf bir pozitif korelasyon tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, siber suç oranlarının bölgesel farklılıklar gösterdiği ve özellikle turizm bölgelerinde yoğunlaştığı belirlemiştir. Bu durum, ekonomik ve sosyal faktörlerin siber suç eğilimleri üzerindeki etkisini gözler önüne sermektedir. Sonuç olarak, çalışma, siber suçlarla mücadelede ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde iş birliğinin önemini vurgulamakta ve dijital güvenlik farkındalığının artırılması gerektiğini önermektedir. Ayrıca, göçmenlerin ekonomik ve sosyal entegrasyonunun desteklenmesi, suç oranlarını azaltmada etkili bir araç olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bu araştırma, Türkiye’nin dijital güvenlik stratejilerinin geliştirilmesine katkı sağlamayı hedeflemektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Arslan, T., & Taş, B. (2022). Türkiye'de uluslararası göç-suç ilişkileri. [International migration-crime relations in Turkey. ] Çankırı Karatekin University Karatekin Faculty of Letters Journal, 10(1), 1-28.
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), “Cybercrime Legislation Worldwide”, https://unctad.org/page/cybercrime-legislation-worldwide Access date: 18.12.2024.
  • Borwell, J., Jansen, J., & Stol, W. (2021). Comparing the victimization impact of cybercrime and traditional crime: Literature review and future research directions. Journal of Digital Social Research, 3(3), 85-110.
  • Buoncompagni, G. (2020). Cyber-risk, cyber-migration. For a new human geography and security. SICUREZZA, TERRORISMO E SOCIETÀ, 11, 157-177.
  • Council of Europe, Convetion on Cybercrime, https://www.coe.int/tr/web/impact-convention-human-rights/convention-on-cybercrime#/ Access date:16.12.2024)
  • Das, S., & Nayak, T. (2013). Impact of cybercrime: Issues and challenges. International journal of engineering sciences & Emerging Technologies, 6(2), 142-153.
  • Drent, M., Dinnissen, R., van Ginkel, B., Hogeboom, H., Homan, K., Zandee, D., & Meijnders, M. (2022). Relationship between external and internal security. Clingendael Institute.
  • Goni, O., Ali, M. H., Showrov, M. M. A., & Shameem, M. A. (2022). The basic concept of cybercrime. Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy, 1(2), 16-24.
  • Gordon, S., & Ford, R. (2006). On the definition and classification of cybercrime. Journal in computer virology, 2, 13-20.
  • Jahankhani, H., Al-Nemrat, A., & Hosseinian-Far, A. (2014). Cybercrime classification and characteristics. In Cyber crime and cyber terrorism investigator's handbook (pp. 149-164). Syngress.
  • Karakaya, H. (2020). Göç ve Türkiye'deki etkileri. [Migration and its effects in Turkey. ] Fırat University International Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(2), 93-130.
  • Näsi, M., Oksanen, A., Keipi, T., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Cybercrime victimization among young people: a multi-nation study. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 16(2), 203-210.
  • Montoya, L., Junger, M., & Hartel, P. (2013, August). How" Digital" is Traditional Crime? In 2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (pp. 31-37). IEEE.
  • Özel, N. (2016). Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin Etkisiyle Değişen Bilgi Kaynakları, Hizmetleri ve Öğrenme Ortamları [Changing Information Resources, Services and Learning Environments with the Impact of
  • Information and Communication Technologies.] National Education Journal, 45(209), 270-294.
  • Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018). Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17, 361-390.
  • Saini, H., Rao, Y. S., & Panda, T. C. (2012). Cyber-crimes and their impacts: A review. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(2), 202-209.
  • Schiks, J. A., van de Weijer, S. G., & Leukfeldt, E. R. (2022). High-tech crime, high intellectual crime? Comparing the intellectual capabilities of cybercriminals, traditional criminals, and non-criminals. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106985.
  • Tourist Business Association (2025), https://www.altid.org.tr/bilgi-hizmetleri/antalya-ziyaretci-sayilari-2024-2/ Access date:27.03.2025.
  • TÜİK, International Migration Statistics, (2023), https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Uluslararasi-Goc-Istatistikleri-2023-53544 Access date:30.12.2024.
  • Wall, D. (2004). What are cybercrimes? Criminal Justice Matters, 58(1), 20-21.

Cybercrime Rates Assessment in Türkiye by Population Evaluation for 81 Provinces

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 27 - 54, 31.05.2025
https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.1624223

Öz

The rapid increase in digitalization and accessibility of technology has significantly changed the way of life in societies. This change has led to the emergence of new threats such as cybercrime. Cybercrime has become a complex problem that affects the security of not only individuals but also institutions and states. This study examined the dynamics of cyber crimes committed by foreign nationals in Türkiye between 2014 and 2024. The research analyzes how crime rates are related to population density, migration, and regional differences by considering a total of 54.842 cybercrime records in 81 provinces of Türkiye, registered in the Gendarmerie General Command Incidents Information System. Statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation between the total population and cybercrime rates, while a weak positive correlation was identified between the immigrant population and crime rates. Additionally, it has been determined that cybercrime rates show regional differences and are especially concentrated in tourism regions. This situation reveals the impact of economic and social factors on cybercrime trends. As a result, the study emphasizes the importance of cooperation at national and international levels in the fight against cybercrime and suggests that digital security awareness should be increased. Additionally, supporting the economic and social integration of immigrants has been considered an effective tool in reducing crime rates. This research aims to contribute to the development of Türkiye's digital security strategies.

Kaynakça

  • Arslan, T., & Taş, B. (2022). Türkiye'de uluslararası göç-suç ilişkileri. [International migration-crime relations in Turkey. ] Çankırı Karatekin University Karatekin Faculty of Letters Journal, 10(1), 1-28.
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), “Cybercrime Legislation Worldwide”, https://unctad.org/page/cybercrime-legislation-worldwide Access date: 18.12.2024.
  • Borwell, J., Jansen, J., & Stol, W. (2021). Comparing the victimization impact of cybercrime and traditional crime: Literature review and future research directions. Journal of Digital Social Research, 3(3), 85-110.
  • Buoncompagni, G. (2020). Cyber-risk, cyber-migration. For a new human geography and security. SICUREZZA, TERRORISMO E SOCIETÀ, 11, 157-177.
  • Council of Europe, Convetion on Cybercrime, https://www.coe.int/tr/web/impact-convention-human-rights/convention-on-cybercrime#/ Access date:16.12.2024)
  • Das, S., & Nayak, T. (2013). Impact of cybercrime: Issues and challenges. International journal of engineering sciences & Emerging Technologies, 6(2), 142-153.
  • Drent, M., Dinnissen, R., van Ginkel, B., Hogeboom, H., Homan, K., Zandee, D., & Meijnders, M. (2022). Relationship between external and internal security. Clingendael Institute.
  • Goni, O., Ali, M. H., Showrov, M. M. A., & Shameem, M. A. (2022). The basic concept of cybercrime. Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy, 1(2), 16-24.
  • Gordon, S., & Ford, R. (2006). On the definition and classification of cybercrime. Journal in computer virology, 2, 13-20.
  • Jahankhani, H., Al-Nemrat, A., & Hosseinian-Far, A. (2014). Cybercrime classification and characteristics. In Cyber crime and cyber terrorism investigator's handbook (pp. 149-164). Syngress.
  • Karakaya, H. (2020). Göç ve Türkiye'deki etkileri. [Migration and its effects in Turkey. ] Fırat University International Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(2), 93-130.
  • Näsi, M., Oksanen, A., Keipi, T., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Cybercrime victimization among young people: a multi-nation study. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 16(2), 203-210.
  • Montoya, L., Junger, M., & Hartel, P. (2013, August). How" Digital" is Traditional Crime? In 2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (pp. 31-37). IEEE.
  • Özel, N. (2016). Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin Etkisiyle Değişen Bilgi Kaynakları, Hizmetleri ve Öğrenme Ortamları [Changing Information Resources, Services and Learning Environments with the Impact of
  • Information and Communication Technologies.] National Education Journal, 45(209), 270-294.
  • Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018). Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17, 361-390.
  • Saini, H., Rao, Y. S., & Panda, T. C. (2012). Cyber-crimes and their impacts: A review. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(2), 202-209.
  • Schiks, J. A., van de Weijer, S. G., & Leukfeldt, E. R. (2022). High-tech crime, high intellectual crime? Comparing the intellectual capabilities of cybercriminals, traditional criminals, and non-criminals. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106985.
  • Tourist Business Association (2025), https://www.altid.org.tr/bilgi-hizmetleri/antalya-ziyaretci-sayilari-2024-2/ Access date:27.03.2025.
  • TÜİK, International Migration Statistics, (2023), https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Uluslararasi-Goc-Istatistikleri-2023-53544 Access date:30.12.2024.
  • Wall, D. (2004). What are cybercrimes? Criminal Justice Matters, 58(1), 20-21.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Bilim, Teknoloji ve Mühendislik Eğitimi ve Programlarının Geliştirilmesi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Vedat Yılmaz 0000-0002-3112-9371

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mayıs 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 21 Ocak 2025
Kabul Tarihi 15 Nisan 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yılmaz, V. (2025). Cybercrime Rates Assessment in Türkiye by Population Evaluation for 81 Provinces. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.1624223