DİJİTAL BAĞLAM TEMELLİ ÖĞRENME YAKLAŞIMININ ÖĞRENMEYE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ: SOSYAL BİLGİLER DERSİ ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 1218 - 1240

Zekeriya Fatih İneç , Elanur İstek

https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.1773283

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, dijital bağlam temelli öğrenme yaklaşımının 5. sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler dersi “Hayatımızdaki Ekonomi” öğrenme alanında kavratılması hedeflenen öğrenme çıktıları ile bu kapsamda belirlenen alan, kavramsal, sosyal-duygusal öğrenme becerileri, eğilimler ve değer-eylem çerçevesinin öğrenmeye etkisini incelemektir. Bu doğrultuda dijital bağlam temelli öğrenme yaklaşımı ilk kez bu çalışma için tasarlanmıştır. Bağlamların dijitalleştirilmesi yoluyla yürütülen öğrenme süreci popüler sosyal medya araçları aracılığıyla yapılandırılmıştır.
Araştırmada nicel yöntem kullanılmış; nicel yöntem, ön test-son test eşleştirilmiş kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desenle tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2024-2025 akademik yılında Erzincan il merkezinde basit seçkisiz örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen iki farklı okuldaki 102 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama sürecinde ilgili öğrenme alanına yönelik öngörülen içeriğin belirlenen alt boyutları araştırmacı tarafından kontrol formlarına dönüştürülmüştür. Bu doğrultuda elde edilen nicel verilerin analizinde deney ve kontrol gruplarının ön test-son test puanlarını karşılaştırmak amacıyla bağımlı örneklem t-testi; ön test ve son test puanları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek içinse bağımsız örneklem t-testi kullanılmıştır.
Sonuçlar, deney grubunun ön ve son test puanları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğunu; deney ve kontrol grupları puan ortalamalarının ise son test ve deney grubu lehine olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, dijital bağlam temelli öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrenmeyi olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hayatımızdaki ekonomi öğrenme alanı , dijital bağlam temelli öğrenme , sosyal medya , sosyal bilgiler eğitimi

Etik Beyan

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Etik Kurulu'nun 01/11/2024 Tarihli, 15/12 Protokol No'lu Kararı.

An Examination of the Effect of the Digital Context-Based Learning Approach on Learning: the Case of the Social Studies Course

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of the digital context-based learning approach on achieving the intended learning outcomes of the fifth-grade Social Studies course, specifically within the learning domain “Economy in Our Lives.” In this context, the study also investigates its effect on domain-specific, conceptual, and socio-emotional learning skills, as well as on learners’ tendencies and the value–action framework defined for this domain. For this purpose, the digital context-based learning approach was designed for the first time within the scope of this research. The learning process, conducted through the digitalization of contexts, was structured using widely used social media platforms.
A quantitative research design was employed, specifically a quasi-experimental model with a pre-test–post-test paired control group. The study group consisted of 102 students selected through simple random sampling from two schools in Erzincan city center during the 2024–2025 academic year. During data collection, the sub-dimensions of the targeted instructional content were transformed into control forms by the researcher.
For data analysis, paired-samples t-tests were used to compare the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental and control groups, while independent-samples t-tests were conducted to examine the relationship between pre-test and post-test scores. The results revealed a statistically significant difference between the experimental group’s pre-test and post-test scores, and the comparison of group means indicated that the post-test results were in favor of the experimental group. These findings demonstrate that the digital context-based learning approach has a positive effect on student learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economy in our lives learning field , digital context-based learning , social media , social studies education

Etik Beyan

Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University Education Sciences Ethics Committee Decision dated 01/11/2024, Protocol No. 15/12.

Kaynakça

• Acar, B., & Yaman, M. (2011). The effect of context-based learning on students’ interest and knowledge levels. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 40(40), 1-10.
• Adalar, H. (2019). Financial literacy and its teaching in social studies teacher education: A model proposal. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 32, 1-29.
• Akın Yanmaz, E. (2021). The effect of guiding materials developed according to the context-based learning approach on 7th grade middle school students’ conceptual understanding: The case of “Mirrors and Light Absorption” (Unpublished master’s thesis). Giresun University, Institute of Science.
• Aktemur, A. (2022). The effect of digital games on learning within the framework of context-based learning strategy (Unpublished master’s thesis). Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University.
• Ayas, A., Çepni, S., Akdeniz, A. R., Özmen, H., Yiğit, N., & Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2007). Science and technology teaching from theory to practice. In S. Çepni (Ed.), Science and Technology Teaching (6th ed., pp. 122–130). Pegem.
• Ayra, S., & Şahin, F. (2024). The relationship between creative thinking tendencies and lifelong learning tendencies of science high school students. International Düzce Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.62195/ijdes.1488698
• Başol, G. (2008). The scientific research process and method. In O. Kılıç & M. Cinoğlu (Eds.), Scientific Research Methods (pp. 113–143). Lisans.
• Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement, and statistics. Sage.
• Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Parchmann, I. (2018). Using Model-Based Scaffolds to Support Students Solving Context-Based Chemistry Problems. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1176-1197.
• Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1993). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, utilization (2nd ed.). Elsevier Science Health Science.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Scientific research methods. Pegem.
• Çelik, B. (2021). Views of prospective science teachers on the effects of context-based learning prepared for the “Matter and Heat” unit (Unpublished master’s thesis). Erciyes University, Institute of Science.
• Çiğdemoğlu, C. (2012). Investigating the effect of the 5E learning cycle model supported with context-based approach on students’ understanding of chemical reactions and energy topics and motivation towards learning chemistry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara University Institute of Science.
• Fowler, J., & Rodd, E. (2013). Web 4.0: The ultra-intelligent electronic agent is coming. Big Think.
• Glynn, S., & Koballa, T. R. (2005). The contextual teaching and learning instructional approach. In Exemplary Science: Best Practices in Professional Development (pp. 75–84).
• Gürkan, B. (2016). Interdisciplinary teaching applications based on contextual learning approach for developing conceptual understanding skills in fourth grade social studies: A case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences.
• Güneş Koç, R. S. (2013). The effect of the 5E model-supported context-based approach on seventh-grade students’ achievements, knowledge retention, and attitudes towards science in the unit of light (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University.
• Güneş, A. M., & Bulut, B. (2017). The relationship between classroom teachers’ technology use and self-efficacy beliefs. TÜBAV Science Journal, 10(1), 94–113.
• Ingram, S. J. (2003). The effects of contextual learning instruction on science achievement of male and female tenth grade students. University of South Alabama.
• İneç, Z. F. (2012). Internet-based GIS application in social studies education (Master’s thesis). Erzincan University Institute of Social Sciences.
• İneç, Z. F. (2017). The effect of geo-media-supported authentic learning environments in social studies courses on learning (Doctoral dissertation). Erzincan University.
• İneç, Z. F., & Akpınar, E. (2017). New approaches in authentic teaching of social studies. International Journal of Social Science Research, 6(2), 46–65.
• İneç, Z. F., & Akpınar, E. (2018). Authentic social studies teaching: The effect of semantic geo-media material on learning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(2), 273–310.
• Kabapınar, Y. (2014). Contemporary learning and teaching approaches in social studies education: From theory to practice. Pegem.
• Karabacak, H. (2011). Critical thinking skills of primary school students and fifth-grade students’ critical thinking levels (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences.
• Keleş, H. İ. (2019). Teaching "Pure Substances, Mixtures, and Separation of Mixtures" topics in the 7th-grade science course using the REACT strategy (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kilis Institute of Science.
• Kızıltaş, Y. (2011). Investigation of pre-service and in-service classroom teachers’ critical thinking tendencies in terms of various variables (Unpublished master’s thesis). YYÜ Institute of Social Sciences.
• King, D., Winner, E., & Ginns, I. (2011). Outcomes and implications of one teacher’s approach to context-based science in the middle years. Teaching Science, 57(2), 26–34.
• Kocabaş, H. (2021). Investigating the effect of context-based learning in 8th-grade energy transformations and environmental science units on students’ analytical thinking skills and environmental attitudes (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kocaeli University Institute of Science.
• Maulana, Y., Wijayanti, I. E., & Solfarina, S. (2021). Development of electronic student worksheet based on relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating, and transferring (REACT) in introduction to chemistry and laboratory. Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 6(2), 213–222.
• Ocak, G., & Serin, G. K. (2024). The effect of teachers’ individual innovativeness and digital literacy levels on their use of information technologies. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 14(1), 147–169.
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
• Özmen, H. (2014). Quantitative research approach-based methods. In M. Metin (Ed.), Scientific Research Methods in Education. Pegem.
• Solmaz, B., Tekin, G., Herzem, Z., & Demir, M. (2013). An application on internet and social media usage. Journal of Selcuk Communication, 7(4), 23–32.
• Songül, Ö. (2019). The effect of attachment styles on social-emotional learning skills during adolescence (Unpublished master’s thesis). Selçuk University Institute of Social Sciences.
• Talas, M. F., & Öztürk, M. (2015). Interaction of social media and education. Journal of World of Turks, 7(1), 101–120.
• Yıldırım, T., & Öztürk, D. (2023). A mixed-method research on digital literacy of middle school students. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(2), 70–86.
• Yıldız, N. (2011). Investigation of sixth-grade students’ critical thinking levels in science and technology courses in terms of various variables. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Selçuk University.
• Yu, K. C., Fan, S. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2015). Enhancing students’ problem-solving skills through context-based learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 1377–1401.