BİLİMSEL YAYINLARDA KULLANILAN GÖRSEL ÖZETLERİN TASARIM İLKELERİ VE GÖRSEL ALGI KURAMLARI BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Görsel özet (GÖ) özellikle akademik yayınlarda kullanılan özet metnin görselleştirilmiş halidir. Yapılan bilimsel çalışmaların problem, amaç, metot ve temel bulgularını görselleştiren GÖ’ler bilgiyi anlatmada ve aktarmada etkili araçlardan biridir. Ayrıca, bilimsel tanımlarda zihinsel anlamayı kolaylaştıran ve öğrenmeyi hızlandıran görsel materyallerdir. Çalışmada özellikle uygulamalı eğitimlerde görseller yardımı ile bilgiyi aktaran GÖ’lerin tanımı yapılmıştır. Bilimsel yayınlarda da sıkça kullanılmaya başlayan GÖ’lerin görsel algı kuramları bağlamında değerlendirilmesi ve öneminin vurgulanması amaçlanan bu çalışmada WOS’da yayınlanan ve yayınlarında kullandığı 5 adet görsel özet (GÖ) nitel veri araçlarından biri olan olasılıksız örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilmiştir. Seçilen GÖ’ler 8 maddelik görsel özet tasarlama kriteri ve 6 adet görsel algı kuramı çerçevesinde işlevsellikleri açısından değerlendirilerek bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Gestalt Algı Kuramı, Olasılıksal İşlevselcilik Kuramı, Nörofizyolojik Algı Kuramı, Deneyci-Yapılandırmacı Algı Kuramı, Bilişimsel Algı Kuramı, Doğrudan Algı kuramı olarak belirlenen görsel algı kuramlarına göre görsel özetler analiz edilmiştir. Bilim eğitiminin kolaylaştırılması ve bilimsel yayınların yaygınlaştırılması için kullanılan GÖ’lerin algı kuramları ve GÖ tasarım ilkeleri bakımından nasıl tasarlandığının ortaya çıkarıldığı çalışmanın ders kitapları, çalışma kitapları ya da akademik yayınlara kaynak olacağı beklenmektedir. Ayrıca akademik yayınlar, eğitim kitapları ve yardımcı eğitim materyalleri için kullanılası düşünülen GÖ’ler için örnek teşkil etmesi ön görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Görsel özet
• görsel algı kuramları
• görsel özet tasarım ilkeleri
• bilim iletişimi

Examination of Visual Abstracts Used in Scientific Publications Within the Context of Design Principles and Visual Perception Theory

Öz

Visual abstract (VA) is the visualized form of the summary text used especially in academic publications. VAs that visualize the problem, purpose, method and basic findings of scientific studies are one of the effective tools in explaining and transferring information. In addition, they are visual materials that facilitate mental understanding and accelerate learning in scientific definitions. The definition of VAs that transfer information with the help of visuals, especially in applied trainings, was made in the study. In this study, which aims to evaluate VAs, which have started to be used frequently in scientific publications, in the context of visual perception theories and to emphasize their importance, 5 VAs published in Web of Science and used in its publications were selected with the non-probability sampling method, one of the qualitative data tools. The selected VAs were evaluated in terms of their functionality within the framework of the 8-item VA design criterion and 6 visual perception theories, and the findings were reached. VAs were analyzed according to visual perception theories determined as Gestalt Perception Theory, Probabilistic Functionalism Theory, Neurophysiological Perception Theory, Empiricist-Constructivist Perception Theory, Computational Perception Theory, Direct Perception Theory. It is expected that the study, which reveals how VAs used to facilitate science education and disseminate scientific publications are designed in terms of perception theories and VA design principles, will be a source for textbooks, workbooks or academic publications. It is also expected to be an example for VAs considered to be used for academic publications, educational books and supplementary educational materials.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Visual abstract
• visual perception theories
• visual abstract design principles
• science communication

Kaynakça

1. AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, (2024, 28 February), Guidelines for Table of Contents/Abstract Graphics, ACS.ORG chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://pubsapp.acs.org/paragonplus/submission/toc_abstract_graphics_guidelines.pdf
2. ARNHEIM, R., & ÖĞDÜL, R. (2009). Görsel Düşünme. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları
3. BERTSCHI, S., BRESCIANI, S., CRAWFORD, T., GOEBEL, R., KIENREICH, W., LINDNER, M., ... & MOERE, A. V. (2011, July). What is Knowledge Visualization? Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. 2011 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2011.58
4. BOTTENHORN, K. L., SUKUMARAN, K., CARDENAS-INIGUEZ, C., HABRE, R., SCHWARTZ, J., CHEN, J. C., & HERTING, M. M. (2024). Air Pollution From Biomass burning Disrupts Early Adolescent Cortical Microarchitecture Development. Environment International, 108769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108769
5. BROOK, O. R., VERNUCCIO, F., NICOLA, R., CANNELLA, R., & ALTINMAKAS, E. (2021). Visual Abstract for Abdominal Radiology: What It is, Why We Need It and How to Make It. Abdominal Radiology, 46 (1), 2403-2406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02941-5
6. BRUNSWIK, E. (1952). The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press COX, L. (2015). Are Graphical Abstracts Changing The Way We Publish? Retrieved From. www.wiley.com/network/researchers/promotingyour- article/are-graphical-abstracts-changing-the-way-we-publish.
7. ELSEVIER, (2024, 24 Ekim), Graphical Abstract https://www.elsevier.com/researcher/author/tools-and-resources/graphical-abstract
8. ERİŞTİ, S., İZMİRLİ, Ş., FIRAT, M. (2010). An Evaluation of Educational Web Sites From The Perspective of Perception Oriented Design Principles. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(10). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/252142

9. ERTAN, G., & SANSARCI, E. (2016). Görsel Sanatlarda Anlam ve Algı. İstanbul: Alternatif Yayıncılık.
10. FELTEN, P. (2008). Visual Literacy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40 (6), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.6.60-64
11. FEKETE, J. D. (2008). The Value of Information Visualization. Information Visualization, London: Springer.
12. FRASCARA, J. (2004). Communication Design: Principles, Methods and Practice. New York: Allworth Communications Press.
13. GAVAZZI, F., GONZALEZ, C. D., ARNOLD, K., SWANTKOWSKI, M., CHARLTON, L., MODESTI, N., ... & ADANG, L. A. (2024). Nucleotide Metabolism, Leukodystrophies, and CNS Pathology. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 47 (5), 860-875. https://doi.org/10.1002/jimd.12721.
14. GIBSON, J. J. (2002). A Theory of Direct Visual Perception. In A. Noë & E. Thompson (Eds.) Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception, (s.77–91). Cambridge: MIT Press
15. GOLDSTEIN, E. B. (2008). Blackwell Handbook of Sensation and Perception. England: John Wiley & Sons.
16. GORDON, I. E. (2004). Theories of Visual Perception. London: Psychology Press.
17. JAMBOR, H. K., & BORNHAUSER, M. (2024). Ten simple rules for designing graphical abstracts. PLOS Computational Biology, 20 (2), e1011789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011789
18. HATTIE, J., & TIMPERLEY, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654302984
19. HEINDEL, P., YU, P., FELIZ, J. D., HENTSCHEL, D. M., BURKE, S. K., AL-OMRAN, M., ... & HUSSAIN, M. A. (2022). Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula Patency and Use: A Post Hoc Analysis of Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials. Annals of Surgery Open, 3 (3), 199. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000199
20. HEERSPINK, H. J., JARDINE, M., KOHAN, D. E., LAFAYETTE, R. A., LEVIN, A., LIEW, A., ... & BARRATT, J. (2024). Study Design and Baseline Characteristics of ALIGN, A Randomized Controlled Study of Atrasentan in Patients with IgA Nephropathy. Kidney International Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.004
21. HULLMAN, J., & BACH, B. (2018). Picturing science: Design patterns in graphical abstracts. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference: 10th International Conference, Diagrams 2018, Edinburgh, UK, June 18-22, 2018, Proceedings, Springer International Publishing, 10, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91376-6_19
22. IBRAHIM, A. M. (2018a). Seeing is Believing: Using Visual Abstracts to Disseminate Scientific Research. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG, 113 (4), 459-461. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.268
23. IBRAHIM, A. M. (2018b). Use of a Visual Abstract to Disseminate Scientific Research. A Surgeon’s Journey Through Research and Design. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5854aaa044024321a353bb0d/t/5a527aa89140b76bbfb2028a/1515354827682/VisualAbstract_Primer_v4_1.pdf
24. KHAN, M. R., XIONG, Y., MICHNIEWICZ, M., & LESIOW, T. (2021). Graphic Abstract as a Required Element in Manuscript Submission and Acceptance. Nauki Inżynierskie i Technologie. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 1 (37), 113-122. https://doi.org/ 10.15611/nit.2020.37.06
25. KIM, Y., LEE, J., YOO, J. J., JUNG, E. A., KIM, S. G., & KIM, Y. S. (2022). Seeing is Believing: the Effect of Graphical Abstracts on Citations and Social Media Exposure in Gastroenterology & Hepatology Journals. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37 (45), 321. https://doi.org/ 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e321
26. KOÇYİĞİT, A., & DARI, A. B. (2023). Yapay Zekâ İletişiminde Chatgpt: İnsanlaşan Dijitalleşmenin Geleceği. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7 (2), 427-438. https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1311336
27. KUMAR, S. S., ARVIND, S., & UMPIERREZ, A. P. (2023). Things We Do for No Reason™: Routine Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer Prophylaxis in Adults on High‐Dose Corticosteroids. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 18 (7), 630-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13095.
28. LANDA, R. (1998). Thinking Creatively: New Ways to Unlock Your Visual Imagination. Cincinnati, Ohio: North Light Books.
29. LARSON, K., CHENG, K., CHEN, Y., & ROLANDI, M. (2017). Proving the Value of Visual Design in Scientific Communication. Information Design Journal, 23 (1), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.1.09che
30. LEE, J., & YOO, J. J. (2023). The Current State of Graphical Abstracts and How to Create Good Graphical Abstracts. Science Editing, 10 (1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.293
31. MARTIN, K. (2020). A Picture is Worth A Thousand Words. Medical Writing, 29 (1), 28-34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341293384_A_picture_is_worth_a_thousand_words
32. MILLAR, B. C., & LIM, M. (2022). The Role of Visual Abstracts in The Dissemination of Medical Research. The Ulster medical journal, 91(2), 67-78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361471457_The_Role_of_Visual_Abstracts_in_the_Dissemination_of_Medical_Research
33. MOURA-NETO, J. A., & RIELLA, M. C. (2020). Visual Abstracts: An Innovative Way to Disseminate Scientific Information. Brazilian Journal of Nephrology, 42, 357-360. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0213
34. NAYAK, S., & IWASA, J. H. (2019). Preparing Scientists for A Visual Future: Visualization is A Powerful Tool for Research and Communication But Requires Training and Support. EMBO reports, 20 (11), 49347. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201949347
35. OSKA, S., LERMA, E., & TOPF, J. (2020). A Picture is Worth A Thousand Views: A Triple Crossover Trial of Visual Abstracts to Examine Their Impact on Research Dissemination. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e22327. https://doi.org/10.2196/22327
36. PRESSMAN, A. (2018). Design Thinking: A Guide to Creative Problem Solving for Everyone. London: Routledge.
37. RAMOS, E., & CONCEPCION, B. P. (2020). Visual Abstracts: Redesigning The Landscape of Research Dissemination. In Seminars in nephrology. 40 (3), 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2020.04.008
38. RODRIGUES, J. (2021). Get More Eyes on Your Work: Visual Approaches for Dissemination and Translation of Education Research. Educational Researcher, 50 (9), 657-663. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211035351
39. ROUGIER, N. P., DROETTBOOM, M., & BOURNE, P. E. (2014). Ten Simple Rules for Better Figures. Plos Computational Biology, 10 (9), e10038. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003833
40. SAMARA, T. (2007). Design Elements: A Graphic Style Manual. Gloucester: Rockport publishers.
41. SCHOLZ, R. W. (2017). Managing Complexity: From Visual Perception to Sustainable Transitions-Contributions of Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism. Environment Systems and Decisions, 37, 381-409. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10669-017-9655-4
42. SPICER, J. O., & COLEMAN, C. G. (2022). Creating Effective Infographics and Visual Abstracts to Disseminate Research and Facilitate Medical Education on Social Media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 74 (3), 14-22. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/cid/ciac058
43. NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP (NPG), (2024, 24 Ekim), Graphical Abstract https://solutions.springernature.com/products/graphical-abstract?srsltid=AfmBOoqIuFtN4PMbgvues4SEhUOAHcO3bmlYyDJ-ZsW3ciubtpeKO46y.
44. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (THE BJM), (24 Ekim 2024), (https://www.bmj.com/content/386/bmj-2024-080107). TOPF, J., RHEAULT, M., CONCEPCION, B., GARCIA, P., & LERMA, E. (2017, 12 Nisan). CJASN visual abstract primer. https://www.academia.edu/75340193/CJASN_Visual_Abstract_Primer
45. TVERSKY, B., ZACKS, J., LEE, P., & HEISER, J. (2000). Lines, Blobs, Crosses And Arrows: Diagrammatic Communication with Schematic Figures. Michael Anderson, Peter Cheng, Volker Haarslev (Eds.) Theory and Application of Diagrams: First International Conference, Diagrams. 1(3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/3-540-44590-0_21
46. UÇAN, A. (2002). Türkiye’de Çağdaş Sanat Eğitiminde Ŏğretmen Yetiştirme Süreci ve Başlıca Yapılanmalar, 1. Sanat Eğitimi Sempozyumu (s. 1-23). Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi.
47. YILMAZ, A., & KAYA, A. (2023). Görsel İletişim Tasarımında Görsel Algı Kuramlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 3009-3032. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1214136
48. YOON, J., & CHUNG, E. (2017). An Investigation on Graphical Abstracts Use In Scholarly Articles. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1371-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.09.005
49. VERSTEGEN, I. (2006). Arnheim, Gestalt and Art: A psychological Theory, London: Springer Science & Business Media.
50. VICKERS, D. (2014). Decision Processes in Visual Perception, Cambridge: Academic Press.
51. WARE, C. (2010). Visual Thinking for Design. Brazil: Elsevier.
52. WEST, C. C., LINDSAY, K. J., & HART, A. (2020). Promoting Your Research Using Infographics and Visual Abstracts. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 73 (12), 2103-2105. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.054
53. WINN, B. (1987). Charts, Graphs, And Diagrams in Educational Materials. The psychology of illustration, 152-198. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4612-4674-9_5
54. WONG, B. (2010). Points of Wiew: Color Coding. Nature methods, 7 (8), 573. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth0810-573.