Audit Design: Know-how to Monitor Community Knowledge Transfer in World Heritage Management Systems

Öz

The contribution of local communities to the development of World Heritage Site (WHS) management systems has been ubiquitous in both the literature and practice. However, the effectiveness of these engagement initiatives has rarely been audited. The structure of WHS management plans is prescriptive and they are prone to automated scrutiny, so their development can be audited and exploited from the viewpoint of deploying community ideas. This paper proposes a semi-automated method named Audit Design by examining the preparation process of participative management plan for Diyarbakir Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape WHS to quantify knowledge transfer from consultations of communities to management plan actions of WHS. It illustrates the development and validation of Audit Design with Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Processing techniques, a reliable semi-automated tool, gauging five different levels of knowledge transfer and producing precise natural language representations for auditing knowledge transfer, aiding with monitoring inclusiveness in developing WHS management systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• mixed methods
• community knowledge transfer
• knowledge representation
• natural language processing
• world heritage management

Denetim Tasarımı: Dünya Mirası Yönetim Sistemlerinde Yerel Bilgi Aktarımını İzleme Yöntemi

Öz

Yerel toplulukların Dünya Mirası Alanı (DMA) yönetim sistemlerinin gelişimine katkısı hem literatürde hem de uygulamada yaygındır. Ancak, bu katılım girişimlerinin verimliliği nadiren denetlenmiştir. DMA yönetim planları yapısı gereği tanımlıdır ve otomatik incelemeye yatkındırlar, dolayısıyla bu planların gelişimi denetlenebilir ve yerel fikirlerin uygulanması açısından kullanılabilir. Bu makale, Diyarbakır Surları ve Hevsel Bahçeleri Kültürel Peyzajı DMA için katılımcı yönetim planının hazırlık sürecini inceleyerek, yerel paydaşlar ile yapılan görüşmelerden DMA'nın yönetim planı eylemlerine bilgi transferini ölçmek için Denetim Tasarımı adlı yarı otomatik bir yöntem önermektedir. Çalışma beş farklı bilgi aktarımı düzeyini ölçmek, bilgi aktarımını denetleyen tanımlanmış doğal dil temsilleri üretmek ve DMA yönetim sistemlerinin geliştirilmesinde kapsayıcılığın izlenmesine yardımcı olmak üzere güvenilir bir yarı-otomatik araç olan Denetim Tasarımı yönteminin Bilgi Temsili ve Doğal Dil İşleme araçlarıyla geliştirilmesini ve doğrulanmasını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• karma yöntemler
• yerel bilgi aktarımı
• doğal dil işleme
• dünya miras yönetimi
• bilgi temsili

Kaynakça

1. Blandford, C. (2006). Management Plans for UK World Heritage Sites: Evolution, lessons and good practice. Landscape Research, 31(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390601004293
2. Cho, M. A., Onisimo, M. & Mabhaudhi, T. (2022). Using participatory GIS and collaborative management approaches to enhance local actors’ participation in rangeland management: the case of Vulindlela, South Africa. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.2017269
3. Chowdhury, G. G. (2003). Natural language processing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370103
4. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V., Aswani, N., Roberts, I., Gorrell, G., Funk, A., Roberts, A., Damljanovic, D., Heitz, T., Greenwood, M. A., Saggion, H., Petrak, J., Li, Y., Peters, W., Derczynski, L. & Al., E. (2014). Developing Language Processing Components with GATE Version 9 (a User Guide). University of Sheffield Department of Computer Science.
5. Dale, R. (2010). Classical Approaches to Natural Language Processing. In N. Indurkhya, F. J. Damerau, T. Graepel & R. Herbrich (Eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing (pp. 3–8). CRC Press LLC. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiff/detail.action?docID=565922
6. Davis, E. (2015). Knowledge Representation. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 13, pp. 98–104). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.43048-5
7. Davis, R., Shrobe, H. & Szolovits, P. (1993). What is a knowledge representation? AI Magazine, 14(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4792-0_1
8. Gillespie, J. (2013). World Heritage management: boundary-making at Angkor Archaeological Park, Cambodia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.657868

9. Grishman, R. (2019). Twenty-five years of information extraction. Natural Language Engineering, 25(6), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324919000512
10. Grosan, C. & Abraham, A. (2011). Rule-Based Expert Systems. In Intelligent Systems. Intelligent Systems Reference Library (Vol. 17, pp. 149–185). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21004-4_7
11. Hobbs, J. R. & Riloff, E. (2010). Information Extraction. In N. Indurkhya, F. J. Damerau, T. Graepel & R. Herbrich (Eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing (pp. 511–532). CRC Press LLC. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiff/detail.action?docID=565922
12. Hodges, A. & Watson, S. (2000). Community-based Heritage Management: a case study and agenda for research. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 6(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250050148214
13. ICOMOS. (2005). Xi’an Declaration on the Conservation of the Setting of Heritage Structures, Sites and Areas. 4. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/xian-declaration.pdf
14. ICOMOS Australia. (1999). The Burra Charter: the Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. 23.
15. Jackson, P. & Moulinier, I. (2007). Natural Language Processing for Online Applications : Text retrieval, extraction and categorization. (Second rev). John Benjamins Publishing Company. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiff/detail.action?docID=622897
16. Landorf, C. (2009). A framework for sustainable heritage management: A study of UK industrial heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 15(6), 494–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903210795
17. Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A. & van Wesemael, P. (2020). Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476
18. Musen, M. A. (2014). Knowledge Representation. In I. N. Sarkar (Ed.), Methods in Biomedical Informatics A Pragmatic Approach (pp. 49–79). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401678-1.00003-8
19. Olsson, K. (2008). Citizen input in urban heritage management and planning: A quantitative approach to citizen participation. Town Planning Review, 79(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.79.4.3
20. Parlak, G. (2021). Audit design: a semi-automated method to scrutinize community involvement in heritage management plans [PhD Thesis, Cardiff University]. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/143930
21. Parlak, G., Bleil de Souza, C. & Cerutti, F. (2022). Scrutinising community-held knowledge transfer into world heritage site management plans: a multidisciplinary method. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2021-0216
22. Regulation on the Substance and Procedures of the Establishment and Duties of the Site Management and the Monument Council and Identification of Management Sites, Pub. L. No. 26006, Official Gazzette (2005). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/11/20051127-2.htm
23. Rey-Pérez, J. & Pereira Roders, A. (2020). Historic urban landscape: A systematic review, eight years after the adoption of the HUL approach. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 10(3), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2018-0036
24. Ripp, M. (2018). Applying the Faro Convention Principles to deliver Heritage-based Urban Development: The COMUS-Project. Community-led Urban Strategies in Historic Towns (COMUS). February. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17517.28645
25. Ripp, M. & Rodwell, D. (2017). Governance in UNESCO World Heritage Sites: Reframing the Role of Management Plans as a Tool to Improve Community Engagement. In S. Makuvaza (Ed.), Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites: Principles, Approaches and Practices (pp. 1–261). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4
26. Singh, R. K., Pretty, J. & Pilgrim, S. (2010). Traditional knowledge and biocultural diversity: Learning from tribal communities for sustainable development in northeast India. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(4), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640561003722343
27. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Ormston, R., O’Connor, W. & Barnard, M. (2014). Analysis: Principles and Processes. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (Second, pp. 269–293). SAGE Publications.
28. UNESCO. (1972). Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. November, 135–154.
29. UNESCO. (2013). Managing Cultural World Heritage (World Heritage Resource Manual).
30. UNESCO. (2019). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention Ed. 2019. July, 167. https://whc.unesco.org/document/178167
31. UNESCO. (2021). World Heritage List. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/
32. UNESCO WHC. (2015). Decisions adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015).
33. Witten, I. H. & Frank, E. (2005). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.