Kafka Beyond the Minor: Crisis Literature and the Limits of Representation

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 23, 226 - 239, 25.12.2025

Derya Oruç

https://doi.org/10.25306/skad.1813075

Abstract

This article critically reconsiders Franz Kafka’s position within the theory of minor literature as developed by Deleuze and Guattari, arguing that Kafka’s work resists the model’s core criteria that includes deterritorialized language, political immediacy, and collective enunciation. While Kafka is often celebrated as a typical ‘minor’ author writing from the margins of empire and language, this essay contends that his fiction reflects existential crisis instead of political resistance. Through a close reading of Kafka’s prose, supported by the theoretical interventions of Pascale Casanova, Milan Kundera, and Gayatri Spivak, the article challenges the theoretical overreach of applying collectivist frameworks to Kafka’s radically singular and metaphysically isolated protagonists. By examining Kafka’s position in the world literary canon, from Goethe’s concept of ‘Weltliteratur’ to Casanova’s ‘Greenwich meridian of literature’, the study reframes Kafka as a writer of crisis literature. Kafka’s bureaucratic absurdism, formal austerity, and existential alienation point toward the dissolution of meaning itself. The article argues that Kafka’s value in an age of global crisis lies in his ability to reveal the fractures within all systems of representation. Ultimately, this re-evaluation calls for a more nuanced and flexible understanding of marginality in world literature that may distinguish between visible aesthetic singularity and genuine subaltern silence. Kafka offers a model of metaphysical disorientation which is an essential position in literature shaped by crisis rather than certainty. Thus, this study aims to provide a new perspective on world literature discussions by considering Kafka’s writing as an existential breaking point.

Keywords

Franz Kafka , Minor Literature , World Literature , Crisis Literature , Representation

References

• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.; W. Hamacher & D. E. Wellbery, Eds.). Stanford University Press.
• Armstrong, C. I. (2024). Lines of exposure: Poetry and crisis. In S. Pellicer-Ortin, J. Kuznetski, & C. Battisti (Eds.). The Routledge companion to literatures and crisis, (pp. 95-103). Routledge.
• Auerbach, E. (1969). Philology and Weltliteratur. Weltliterature (M. Said & E. Said, Trans.). The Centennial Review, 13(1), 1-17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23738133.
• Broch, H. (1996). The sleepwalkers: A trilogy. (W. Muir & E. Muir, Trans.; 1st Vintage International ed.). Vintage International.
• Casanova, P. (2007). The world republic of letters. (M. B. DeBevoise, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
• Caselli, D. (Ed.). (2010). Beckett and nothing: Trying to understand Beckett. Manchester University Press. https://uplopen.com/books/e/10.7765/9781526146458
• Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
• Corngold, S. (2004). Lambent traces: Franz Kafka. Princeton University Press.
• Damrosch, D. (2003). What is world literature? Princeton University Press.
• Dargo, G. (2007). Reclaiming Franz Kafka, doctor of jurisprudence. Brandeis Law Journal, 45(3), 495-510.
• Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (2003). Kafka: Toward a minor literature. (D. Polan, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
• Derrida, J. (1992). Before the law. In D. Attridge (Ed.), Acts of literature, (pp. 181-220). Routledge.
• Dodd, B. (2002). The case for a political reading. In J. Preece (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kafka, (pp. 131-149). Cambridge University Press.
• Fleming, C. & O'Carroll, J. P. (2011). Delusions of agency: Kafka, imprisonment, and modern victimhood. In A. K. Kordela & D. Vardoulakis (Eds.), Freedom and confinement in modernity, (pp. 29-48). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Foucault, M. & Deleuze, G. (1990). Intellectuals and power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. In R. Ferguson (Ed.), Discourses: Conversations in postmodern art and culture, (pp. 205-217). New Museum of Contemporary Art.
• Hašek, J. (1939). The good soldier Švejk. Penguin Books. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.220415/page/n1/mode/2up.
• Kafka, F. (1945). The castle. (E. Muir & W. Muir, Trans.). Alfred A. Knopf.
• Kafka, F. (1948). The diaries of Franz Kafka, 1910-1913. (M. Brod, Ed.). Schocken Books. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.499492/page/n5/mode/2up.
• Kafka, F. (1995). The judgement and In the penal colony. colony (M. Pasley, Trans.). Penguin Books.
• Kafka, F. (2009). The metamorphosis and other stories. stories (J. Crick, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
• Kafka, F. (2009). The trial. (M. Mitchell, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
• Koloshuk, N. (2023). Existential problems as a philosophical conflict (reading of the play Waiting for Godot). Astraea, 4(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.34142/astraea.2023.4.1.02
• Kundera, M. (2023). A kidnapped West: The tragedy of Central Europe. (L. Asher & E. White, Trans.). Harper Collins.
• Löwy, M. (2004). Paper chains: Bureaucratic despotism and voluntary servitude in Franz Kafka’s The castle. Diogenes, 51(1), 49-58.
• Minar, K. S. & Sutandio, A. (2017). Shame and alienation in Kafka’s The metamorphosis. Journal Poetika, 5(1), 123-133.
• Musil, R. (1996). The man without qualities. Vintage International.
• Pizer, J. D. (2019). Goethe's world literature paradigm: From uneasy cosmopolitanism to literary modernism. In K. Seigneurie (Ed.), A companion to world literatüre (pp. 1-11). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118635193.ctwl0192
• Preece, J. (Ed.). (2002). The Cambridge companion to Kafka. Cambridge University Press. https://archive.org/details/cambridgecompani0000unse_i1y6/mode/2up
• Robertson, R. (2006). [Review of the book Franz Kafkas Sprachen: '... in einem Stockwerk des babylonischen Turmes...' by M. Nekula]. Modern Language Review, 101(1), 291-292. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2006.0267
• Shandilya, K. (2014). Writing/reading the subaltern woman: Narrative voice and subaltern agency in Upamanyu Chatterjee’s English, August. Postcolonial Text, 9(1).
• Skaria, A. (2009). The project of provincialising Europe: Reading Dipesh Chakrabarty. Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 52-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40278701
• Spivak, G. C. (2015). Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader, (pp. 66-111). Taylor and Francis.
• Urbaite, G. (2025). Power and oppression in Kafka’s The penal colony. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500105
• Wasihun, B. (2020). [Review of the book Kafka lesen: Zur Methode seiner Literatur, by P. Pfaff]. Austrian Studies 28, 200-202. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aus.2020.0013
• Weller, S. (2016). Performing the negative: Kafka and the origins of late modernism. Modern Language Review, 111(3), 775-794. https://doi.org/10.5699/modelangrevi.111.3.0775
• Zizek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.
• Zizek, S. (1991). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture. MIT Press. https://archive.org/details/lookingawryintro00zize/page/n5/mode/2up