Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Democracy and Fake News in the Age of Cyberspace

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 13, 1 - 38, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.25306/skad.840453

Öz

This article attempts to evaluate the negative effects of fake news in cyberspace on democracy in today's societies, and to develop measures and suggestions for its negative consequences. For this purpose, we first discussed the social contract theory, which deals with the peaceful and secure coexistence of societies. Then, the relationship between the spread of fake news in cyberspace and the cyber security system that needs to be created against it and the social contract that needs to be rebuilt in today's societies are mentioned. It has been concluded that phenomena such as fake news, misinformation and disinformation which are increasingly common in cyberspace today, have an effect peculiar to the post-truth society and negatively affect the functioning of democracy. It can be claimed that fake news is spreading much faster and more effectively in today's societies thanks to cyber space and it misleads many people. As a result, democratic processes such as elections and election campaigns are also adversely affected. In order to combat fake news in cyber space more effectively, measures such as increasing individual responsibility awareness and cyber literacy among citizens on this issue, establishment of fact-checking programs by governments and social media platforms should be taken. Both public authorities and social media companies should fulfill their responsibilities in this regard.

Kaynakça

  • ALCOTT, H. and GENTZKOW, M. (2017). “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236.
  • BARTH, T. D. (2011). The idea of a green new deal in a quintuple helix model of knowledge, know-how and innovation. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 2(1).
  • BAYUK, J. (2010). Enterprise Security for the Executive: Setting the Tone at the Top. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
  • BAYUK, J., D. BARNABE, et al. (2010). Systems security engineering, a research roadmap, final technical report, Systems Engineering Research Center. 12.11. 2020 tarihinde http://www.sercuarc.org adresinden alındı.
  • BAYUK, J., HEALEY, J., ROHMEYER P., SACHS, M. H., SCHMIDT, J., WEISS J., (2012). Cyber security policy guide book. Canada. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • BREWER, Paul R., YOUNG, D. G, and MORREALE, M. (2013). “The Impact of Real News About Fake News: Intertextual Processes and Political Satire” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), pp. 323–343.
  • BROWN, B. (2011) ‘Revealed: US program to spy on Arab social media and mobile users’ Crikey, 23 June. 12.12.2020 tarihinde https://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/23/revealed-us-program-to-spy-on-arab-social-media-and-mobile-users/ adresinden alındı.
  • BROWN, W. (2010). Walled States Waning Sovereignty. Princeton University Press.
  • BURNAP P., et al. (2019). The cyber security body of knowledge, KA. UK. 12.11.2020 tarihinde https://www.cybok.org/media/downloads/cybok_version_1.0.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • CARAVELLI, J. and JONES, N., (2019) “Cyber Security: Threats And Responses For Government And Business. California: Praeger Security International.
  • CARAYANNIS, E. G., BARTH, T. D., CAMPBELL, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12.
  • DAHL, R. A. (1963). Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • FERDINAND, P. (2003). “Cyber-democracy” in Understanding Democratic Politics: An Introduction. R. Axtmann (Ed.), London: Sage.
  • FOUCAULT, M. (1977). Discipline and Punishment. New York: Vintage Books.
  • FROOMKIN, M. (2003) ‘Habermas@Discourse.Net: Towards a critical theory of cyberspace’ Harvard Law Review, 116/3, pp. 751–873.
  • GIBSON, W. (1984). Neuromancer. London: Harper Collins.
  • GIENGER, V. (2011). “Cyberattack threats added to US, Australia defense treaty” Bloomberg, 11.11.2020 tarihinde www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0915/cyber-threats-added-to-u-s-australia-treaty.html adresinden alındı.
  • GOLDMAN, R. (2016). “Reading Fake News, Pakistani Minister Directs Nuclear Threat At Israel” Asia Pacific: The New York Times. 18.04.2020 tarihinde https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/24/world/asia/pakista-israel-khawaja-asif-fake-news-nuclear.html adresinden alındı.
  • GOTTFRIED, J. and SHEARER, E. (2016). “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016.” Journalism & Media: Pew Research Center. 20.04.2019 tarihinde https://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/ adresinden alındı.
  • HABERMAS, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. (trans. T. Burger), Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • HOBBES, T. (1968 [1651]) Leviathan or The Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
  • HORKHEIMER, M., ADORNO, T. W. (2001). Dialectic of Enlightenment. (trans. J. Cumming), New York: Continuum.
  • JEFFERSON, T. (1944 [1807]). Letter to John Norvell, 1807. in The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Adrienne Koch and William Peden, (eds.), New York: Modern Library, 581.
  • LESSIG, L. (2006) Code, Version 2.0. New York: Perseus Books.
  • LESSNOFF, M. (1990). Social Contract Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • LOPEZ, G. (2016). “Pizzagate, the Fake News Conspiracy Theory that Led a Gunman to DC’s Comet Ping Pong, Explained.” Policy and Politics Vox. 25.04.2020 tarihinde https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/5/13842258/pizzagate-comet-ping-pong-fake-news adresinden alındı.
  • MARX, K. (1978 [1844]). The German Ideology: Part-1 in R. Tucker (ed.) The Marx·-Engels Reader (146-200), New York: Norton.
  • MARX, K. (1965 (1867]). Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
  • MCCLELLAND, R. (2011). ‘Cyber law casts the proper net’ The Age, 30 August.
  • MCNEIL, J. (1978). “The Consultant, Coward” McCann, and Geoghegan, Inc., also a BBC television series.
  • ONUF, N. G. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
  • POPPER, K. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • POSTER, M. (1997). ‘CyberDemocracy: Internet and the public sphere’, in Internet Culture. D. Porter (ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 201–218.
  • RILEY, P. (1982). The Worlds of Liberalism: Religion and Politics in Hobbes, Locke and Mill. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1994). Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract. Oxford University Press.
  • SARTORI, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • SCHACHT, J. M. (1975). Job stream Separator System Design. NIST History of Computer Security. McLean, VA: MITRE.
  • SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • SPENCER, H. (1969[1844]). Man versus the State. Penguin Edition.
  • STAUDT, K. (1991). Managing Development: State, Society, and International Contexts. London: Sage Publications.
  • VAN DYKE, Vernon (1960). Political Science: A Philosophical Analysis. Stanford University Press.
  • WALL, M. (2015). “Citizen Journalism: A Retrospective on What We Know, An Agenda for What We Don’t.” Digital Journalism 3 (6): 797–813.
  • WARDLE, Claire. (2017). “Fake News.” It’s complicated”. First Draft. 12.12.2020 tarihinde https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79 adresinden alındı.
  • WEBER, M. (1978[1922]). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology (Ed). Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, (trans. Ephraim Fischoff et al). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • WOLFF, J. (1994). “Hobbes and the Motivations of Social Contract Theory”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2, 271-286.
  • ZELIZER, B. (2004). When facts, truth, and reality are God‐terms: On journalism’s uneasy place in cultural studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(1), 100–119.

Democracy and Fake News in the Age of Cyberspace

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 13, 1 - 38, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.25306/skad.840453

Öz

This article attempts to evaluate the negative effects of fake news in cyberspace on democracy in today's societies, and to develop measures and suggestions for its negative consequences. For this purpose, we first discussed the social contract theory, which deals with the peaceful and secure coexistence of societies. Then, the relationship between the spread of fake news in cyberspace and the cyber security system that needs to be created against it and the social contract that needs to be rebuilt in today's societies are mentioned. It has been concluded that phenomena such as fake news, misinformation and disinformation which are increasingly common in cyberspace today, have an effect peculiar to the post-truth society and negatively affect the functioning of democracy. It can be claimed that fake news is spreading much faster and more effectively in today's societies thanks to cyber space and it misleads many people. As a result, democratic processes such as elections and election campaigns are also adversely affected. In order to combat fake news in cyber space more effectively, measures such as increasing individual responsibility awareness and cyber literacy among citizens on this issue, establishment of fact-checking programs by governments and social media platforms should be taken. Both public authorities and social media companies should fulfill their responsibilities in this regard.

Kaynakça

  • ALCOTT, H. and GENTZKOW, M. (2017). “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236.
  • BARTH, T. D. (2011). The idea of a green new deal in a quintuple helix model of knowledge, know-how and innovation. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 2(1).
  • BAYUK, J. (2010). Enterprise Security for the Executive: Setting the Tone at the Top. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
  • BAYUK, J., D. BARNABE, et al. (2010). Systems security engineering, a research roadmap, final technical report, Systems Engineering Research Center. 12.11. 2020 tarihinde http://www.sercuarc.org adresinden alındı.
  • BAYUK, J., HEALEY, J., ROHMEYER P., SACHS, M. H., SCHMIDT, J., WEISS J., (2012). Cyber security policy guide book. Canada. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • BREWER, Paul R., YOUNG, D. G, and MORREALE, M. (2013). “The Impact of Real News About Fake News: Intertextual Processes and Political Satire” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), pp. 323–343.
  • BROWN, B. (2011) ‘Revealed: US program to spy on Arab social media and mobile users’ Crikey, 23 June. 12.12.2020 tarihinde https://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/23/revealed-us-program-to-spy-on-arab-social-media-and-mobile-users/ adresinden alındı.
  • BROWN, W. (2010). Walled States Waning Sovereignty. Princeton University Press.
  • BURNAP P., et al. (2019). The cyber security body of knowledge, KA. UK. 12.11.2020 tarihinde https://www.cybok.org/media/downloads/cybok_version_1.0.pdf adresinden alındı.
  • CARAVELLI, J. and JONES, N., (2019) “Cyber Security: Threats And Responses For Government And Business. California: Praeger Security International.
  • CARAYANNIS, E. G., BARTH, T. D., CAMPBELL, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12.
  • DAHL, R. A. (1963). Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • FERDINAND, P. (2003). “Cyber-democracy” in Understanding Democratic Politics: An Introduction. R. Axtmann (Ed.), London: Sage.
  • FOUCAULT, M. (1977). Discipline and Punishment. New York: Vintage Books.
  • FROOMKIN, M. (2003) ‘Habermas@Discourse.Net: Towards a critical theory of cyberspace’ Harvard Law Review, 116/3, pp. 751–873.
  • GIBSON, W. (1984). Neuromancer. London: Harper Collins.
  • GIENGER, V. (2011). “Cyberattack threats added to US, Australia defense treaty” Bloomberg, 11.11.2020 tarihinde www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0915/cyber-threats-added-to-u-s-australia-treaty.html adresinden alındı.
  • GOLDMAN, R. (2016). “Reading Fake News, Pakistani Minister Directs Nuclear Threat At Israel” Asia Pacific: The New York Times. 18.04.2020 tarihinde https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/24/world/asia/pakista-israel-khawaja-asif-fake-news-nuclear.html adresinden alındı.
  • GOTTFRIED, J. and SHEARER, E. (2016). “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016.” Journalism & Media: Pew Research Center. 20.04.2019 tarihinde https://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/ adresinden alındı.
  • HABERMAS, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. (trans. T. Burger), Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • HOBBES, T. (1968 [1651]) Leviathan or The Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
  • HORKHEIMER, M., ADORNO, T. W. (2001). Dialectic of Enlightenment. (trans. J. Cumming), New York: Continuum.
  • JEFFERSON, T. (1944 [1807]). Letter to John Norvell, 1807. in The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Adrienne Koch and William Peden, (eds.), New York: Modern Library, 581.
  • LESSIG, L. (2006) Code, Version 2.0. New York: Perseus Books.
  • LESSNOFF, M. (1990). Social Contract Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • LOPEZ, G. (2016). “Pizzagate, the Fake News Conspiracy Theory that Led a Gunman to DC’s Comet Ping Pong, Explained.” Policy and Politics Vox. 25.04.2020 tarihinde https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/5/13842258/pizzagate-comet-ping-pong-fake-news adresinden alındı.
  • MARX, K. (1978 [1844]). The German Ideology: Part-1 in R. Tucker (ed.) The Marx·-Engels Reader (146-200), New York: Norton.
  • MARX, K. (1965 (1867]). Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
  • MCCLELLAND, R. (2011). ‘Cyber law casts the proper net’ The Age, 30 August.
  • MCNEIL, J. (1978). “The Consultant, Coward” McCann, and Geoghegan, Inc., also a BBC television series.
  • ONUF, N. G. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
  • POPPER, K. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • POSTER, M. (1997). ‘CyberDemocracy: Internet and the public sphere’, in Internet Culture. D. Porter (ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 201–218.
  • RILEY, P. (1982). The Worlds of Liberalism: Religion and Politics in Hobbes, Locke and Mill. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1994). Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract. Oxford University Press.
  • SARTORI, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • SCHACHT, J. M. (1975). Job stream Separator System Design. NIST History of Computer Security. McLean, VA: MITRE.
  • SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • SPENCER, H. (1969[1844]). Man versus the State. Penguin Edition.
  • STAUDT, K. (1991). Managing Development: State, Society, and International Contexts. London: Sage Publications.
  • VAN DYKE, Vernon (1960). Political Science: A Philosophical Analysis. Stanford University Press.
  • WALL, M. (2015). “Citizen Journalism: A Retrospective on What We Know, An Agenda for What We Don’t.” Digital Journalism 3 (6): 797–813.
  • WARDLE, Claire. (2017). “Fake News.” It’s complicated”. First Draft. 12.12.2020 tarihinde https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79 adresinden alındı.
  • WEBER, M. (1978[1922]). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology (Ed). Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, (trans. Ephraim Fischoff et al). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • WOLFF, J. (1994). “Hobbes and the Motivations of Social Contract Theory”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2, 271-286.
  • ZELIZER, B. (2004). When facts, truth, and reality are God‐terms: On journalism’s uneasy place in cultural studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(1), 100–119.
Toplam 46 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Adem Bölükbaşı

Mariam Mohammed Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 13

Kaynak Göster

APA Bölükbaşı, A., & Mohammed, M. (2020). Democracy and Fake News in the Age of Cyberspace. Sosyal Ve Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi (SKAD), 6(13), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.25306/skad.840453

31040

Sosyal ve Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi (SKAD)'da yayınlanan makaleler Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. SKAD bilginin paylaşımı için Açık Erişim Politikasına uymaktadır.