İKYD Eğitim Programlarının Etkinliği: Sağlık Profesyonelleri Grupları Arasında Ön Test ve Son Test Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışması

Abstract

Giriş ve amaç: Çalışmamız da temel hedefler, değişik meslek gruplarının TYD ve IKYD’ye ilişkin temel bilgi ve becerilerin ankete dayalı bir değerlendirmesi ve teorik eğitimler ile birlikte simülasyona dayalı eğitimden sonra ön test ve son test anketlerini karşılaştırarak bilgideki iyileşmenin değerlendirilmesidir. Materyal metod: Çalışmamız 01.04.2024- 01.06.2024 tarihleri arasında retrospektif olarak yapıldı. Çalışma grubunun tamamı sağlık profesyonellerinden oluşturulmuştur. Çalışma için daha önce en az 5 yıllık IKYD eğitimciliği tecrübesi olan 12 acil tıp uzmanı tarafından verilmiş IKYD kurslarının kurs öncesi ve sonrası sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir. değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmamızda verilerin istatistiksel analizleri IBM SPSS 25.0 paket programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplamda 456 katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmaya alınan katılımcıların %48.5 (n=221)’i erkektir. Katılımcılardan %35.5 (n=162) acil tıp aistanı olarak görev yapmaktadır. Katılımcıların görevlerine göre yapılan incelemede ön test ve son test arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlılık mevcut idi (p=0.010). Post-Hoc analizinde pratisyen hekimler ile hemşireler ve pratisyen hekimler ile paramedikler arasında istatistiksel anlamlılık mevcuttu (sırasıyla p=0.012 ve p=0.029). Sonuç: Çalışmamız sonucunda standart didaktik, pratik uygulama ve simülasyon yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı rehberli bir ACLS eğitiminin tüm sağlık profesyonellerinde ACLS bilgi düzeyini arttırdığı gözlenmiştir. Ancak hiçbir meslek grubunda kurs sonrası başarı düzeyi diğer gruplardan daha belirgin artmamıştır.

Keywords

• İleri kardiyak yaşam desteği
• Eğitim
• Meslekler arası eğitim
• Kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon

Effectiveness of ACLS Training Programs: A Comparative Study of Pre- and Post-Test Results Across Health Professional Groups

Abstract

Objective: The primary aims of our study were to evaluate the fundamental knowledge and skills related to advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) and basic life support (BLS) across different professional groups through a survey-based assessment and to compare pre-test and post-test surveys following theoretical and simulation-based training to assess improvements in knowledge. Materials and methods: This study was conducted retrospectively between April 1, 2024, and May 15, 2024. The study group consisted entirely of healthcare professionals. The pre-and post-course results of ACLS training provided by 12 emergency medicine specialists with at least five years of experience in ACLS instruction were evaluated. The statistical analyses of the data were performed using the IBM SPSS 25.0 software package. Results: The study included a total of 456 participants, of whom 48.5% (n=221) were male. Among the participants, 35.5% (n=162) were emergency medicine residents. Analysis based on the participants’ roles revealed a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test results (p=0.010). Post-hoc analysis indicated statistically significant differences between general practitioners and nurses, as well as between general practitioners and paramedics (p=0.012 and p=0.029, respectively). Conclusion: The study found that a guided ACLS training program, which included standard didactic, practical, and simulation methods, resulted in improved ACLS and increased ACLS knowledge levels among all healthcare professionals. However, no single professional group exhibited a more pronounced increase in post-course success levels compared to others.

Keywords

• Advanced cardiovascular life support
• Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
• Education
• Interprofessional education

References

1. Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG,et al. Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2): S366-S468. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916. PMID: 33081529.
2. Ghauri SK, Javaeed A, Shah F, Ghani MUH. Dismal situation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and skills among junior doctors in twin cities of Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Sep-Oct;35(5):1295-1300. doi: 10.12669/ pjms.35.5.785. PMID: 31488995; PMCID: PMC6717444.
3. Silverplats J, Södersved Källestedt ML, Wagner P, Ravn-Fischer A, Äng B, Strömsöe A. Theoretical knowledge and self-assessed ability to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A survey among 3044 healthcare professionals in Sweden. Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;27(5):368-372. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000692. PMID: 32852925; PMCID: PMC7448834.
4. Cheng A, Lockey A, Bhanji F, Lin Y, Hunt EA, Lang E. The use of high-fidelity manikins for advanced life support training--A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 Aug;93:142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation. 2015.04.004. PMID: 25888241.
5. Agarwal A, Baitha U, Ranjan P, Swarnkar NK, Singh GP, Baidya DK, et al. Knowledge and Skills in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Effect of Simulation Training on it among Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Care Center in India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr;28(4):336- 342. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24670. PMID: 38585308; PMCID: PMC10998517.
6. Passali C, Pantazopoulos I, Dontas I, Patsaki A, Barouxis D, Troupis G, et al. Evaluation of nurses’ and doctors’ knowledge of basic & advanced life support resuscitation guidelines. Nurse Educ Pract. 2011 Nov;11(6):365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.03.010. PMID: 21474382.
7. Mohammed Z, Arafa A, Saleh Y, Dardir M, Taha A, Shaban H et al. Knowledge of and attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation among junior doctors and medical students in Upper Egypt: Cross-sectional study. Int J Emerg Med 2020;13(19). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12245-020-00277-x
8. Madavan Kakkoprath T. Effectiveness and perception of demonstration-observation- assistance-performance (DOAP) versus video-assisted learning (VAL) in training advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) among medical interns – A comparative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2022;11(1):412. | DOI: 10.4103/jehp. jehp_1663_21

9. Young AK, Maniaci MJ, Simon LV, Lowman PE, McKenna RT, Thomas CS et al. Use of a simulation-based advanced resuscitation training curriculum: Impact on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and patient outcomes. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 2020;21(1):57-63. doi:10.1177/1751143719838209
10. Kim SH, Issenberg B, Roh YS. The Effects of Simulation- Based Advanced Life Support Education for Nursing Students. Comput Inform Nurs. 2020 May;38(5):240- 245. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000560.
11. Jeong HW, Ju D, Lee AK, Lee JA, Kang NR, Choi EJ, et al. Effect of a hybrid team-based advanced cardiopulmonary life support simulation program for clinical nurses. PLoS One. 2022 Dec 16;17(12):e0278512. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0278512.
12. Schmitz GR, McNeilly C, Hoebee S, Blutinger E, Fernandez J, Kang C, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and skill retention in emergency physicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.01.056.
13. Botes ML, Moepeng M. An investigation into specialist practice nurses’ knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in a tertiary hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa. South Afr J Crit Care. 2020 Dec 1;36(2):10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.397. doi: 10.7196/ SAJCC.2020.v36i2.397.
14. Rajeswaran L, Cox M, Moeng S, Tsima BM. Assessment of nurses’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and skills within three district hospitals in Botswana. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Apr 12;10(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1633.
15. Hemşirelik Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik, https://www.hemed.org.tr/dosyalar/pdf/ yasa-ve yonetmelikler/Hemsirelik_Yonetmeligi_19_ Nisan_2011.pdf. Erişim tarihi 22.05.2024.
16. Kartal H. Acil ve Yoğun Bakım Kliniğindeki Hemşirelerin Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyon Uygulamaya Yönelik Mevcut Durumlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Academic Research in Nursing (JAREN). 2021;7(1):1-9. doi:10.55646/jaren.2021.92905
17. Lee CC, Im M, Kim TM, Stapleton ER, Kim K, Suh GJ, et al. Comparison of traditional advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) course instruction vs. a scenario-based, performance oriented team instruction (SPOTI) method for Korean paramedic students. J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.078.
18. Kayadelen CL, Kayadelen AN & Durukan P. Factors influencing paramedics’ and emergency medical technicians’ level of knowledge about the 2015 basic life support guidelines. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21(82). https://doi. org/10.1186/s12873-021-00474-8