Gömülü 3. Molar Dişlerin Cerrahi Çekimi Sonrası Yaşam Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2018, , 475 - 480, 30.09.2018

Nesrin Saruhan , Görkem Tekin

https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.418896

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın
amacı gömülü 3. molar diş çekimi sonrası hastaların yaşam kalitelerini OHIP-14 ölçeğiyle
değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler:
Çalışmaya gömülü 3. molar dişleri bulanan toplam 100 hasta dahil edildi.
Hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, 3. molar dişlerin pozisyonları ve OHIP-14 ölçeğindeki
cevaplara verilen skorlar değerlendirildi. Bulgular:
Çalışmamıza 64’ü kadın (%64), 36’sı erkek (%36) toplam 100 hasta dahil
edildi. Hastaların OHIP-14 ölçeğine verdiği cevapların Simple Count değerleri
minimum 0 maksimum 44 (ortalama 11.64±9.8) olarak bulundu. OHIP-14 ölçeğine
verilen cevaplar cinsiyet ve Simple Count açısından değerlendirildiğinde; kadınlarda
minimum 0 maksimum 44 (ortalama 11.83±9.8), erkeklerde ise minimum 0 maksimum
36 (ortalama 11.31±9.8) olduğu ve aralarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir
fark olmadığı görüldü (p>0.05). OHIP-14 ölçeğindeki sorulara verilen
cevaplar toplam olarak değerlendirildiğinde; hastaların en çok 6. sorudan sonrasında
sırasıyla 9, 4, 5, 8, 7, 3, 12, 1, 11, 2, 13, 14 ve 10. sorulardan rahatsızlık
duyduğu görüldü. Sonuç: Hastaların
en çok 6. sorudan en az ise 10. sorudan rahatsızlık duyduğu görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gömülü diş; diş çekimi; yaşam kalitesi

Evaluation of The Quality of Life After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Third Molars

Öz

Objective: The
purpose of this study was to assess the quality of life of patients after the
impacted third molar extraction with the OHIP-14 scale. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients with impacted third
molars were included in this study. Patients' age, gender, position of third
molar teeth and scores given to OHIP-14 scale were evaluated. Results: A total of 100 patients were
included in this study, 64 of whom were female (64%) and 36 of whom were male
(36%). The Simple Count values of the patients' responses to the OHIP-14 scale
were found as minimum 0 maximum 44 (mean 11.64±9.8). When the responses' to the
OHIP-14 scale were evaluated in terms of gender and Simple Count; count as minimum
0 maximum 44 (mean 11.83±9.8) in the female patients and minimum 0 maximum 36
(mean of 11.31±9.8) in the male patients and there was no statistically
significant difference between male and female patients (p> 0.05). When the
responses given to the questions on the OHIP-14 scale were evaluated as a
total; it was seen that the patients describes most complaints with question 6,
followed by 9, 4, 5, 8, 7, 3, 12, 1, 11, 2, 13, 14 and 10 questions
respectively. Conclusion: It was
seen that the patients were most uncomfortable with the 6th question and least
comfortable with 10th question.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Impacted tooth; tooth extraction; quality of life

Kaynakça

• 1. Adeyemo WL, Taiwo OA, Oderinu OH, Adeyemi MF, Ladeinde AL, Ogunlewe MO. Oral health-related quality of life following non-surgical (routine) tooth extraction: a pilot study. Contemporary clinical dentistry 2012;3(4):427.
• 2. Sancho-Puchades M, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Quality of life following third molar removal under conscious sedation. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 2012;17(6):e994.
• 3. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile. Community dental health 1994;11(1):3-11.
• 4. Qiao F, Fu Q-B, Guo Y-X, Zhang J. Risk factors for the deterioration of oral health-related quality of life after mandibular third molar removal. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017;10(2):3281-88.
• 5. Osborn TP, Frederickson G, Jr., Small IA, Torgerson TS. A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 1985;43(10):767-9.
• 6. John MT, Patrick DL, Slade GD. The German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile–translation and psychometric properties. European journal of oral sciences 2002;110(6):425-33.
• 7. van Wijk A, Kieffer JM, Lindeboom JH. Effect of third molar surgery on oral health-related quality of life in the first postoperative week using Dutch version of Oral Health Impact Profile-14. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2009;67(5):1026-31.
• 8. Oliveira BH, Nadanovsky P. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-short form. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 2005;33(4):307-14.
• 9. Andersen RM, Davidson PL. Ethnicity, aging, and oral health outcomes: a conceptual framework. Advances in dental research 1997;11(2):203-9.
• 10. Üstün Y, Erdoǧan Ö, Esen E, Karsli ED. Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 2003;96(5):535-39.
• 11. Warraich R, Faisal M, Rana M, Shaheen A, Gellrich N-C, Rana M. Evaluation of postoperative discomfort following third molar surgery using submucosal dexamethasone–a randomized observer blind prospective study. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2013;116(1):16-22.
• 12. Chuang SK, Perrott DH, Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Age as a risk factor for third molar surgery complications. Journal of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2007;65(9):1685-92.
• 13. Lyons CJ, Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. The Journal of the American Dental Association 1980;101(2):240-45.
• 14. Ventä I, Ylipaavalniemi P, Turtola L. Clinical outcome of third molars in adults followed during 18 years 1. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2004;62(2):182-85.
• 15. McGrath C, Comfort M, Lo E, Luo Y. Changes in life quality following third molar surgery–the immediate postoperative period. British dental journal 2003;194(5):265.
• 16. McGrath C, Comfort MB, Lo EC, Luo Y. Changes in life quality following third molar surgery--the immediate postoperative period. British dental journal 2003;194(5):265-8; discussion 61.
• 17. Ozcelik O, Haytac MC, Seydaoglu G. Immediate post-operative effects of different periodontal treatment modalities on oral health-related quality of life: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology 2007;34(9):788-96.
• 18. Mulligan R, Seirawan H, Alves ME, Navazesh M, Phelan JA, Greenspan D, et al. Oral health-related quality of life among HIV-infected and at-risk women. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 2008;36(6):549-57.
• 19. Lopez R, Baelum V. Oral health impact of periodontal diseases in adolescents. Journal of dental research 2007;86(11):1105-9.
• 20. Alpkilic Baskirt E, Ak G, Zulfikar B. Oral and general health-related quality of life among young patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia 2009;15(1):193-8.
• 21. Jowett AK, Orr MT, Rawlinson A, Robinson PG. Psychosocial impact of periodontal disease and its treatment with 24-h root surface debridement. Journal of clinical periodontology 2009;36(5):413-8.
• 22. Acharya S, Bhat PV. Oral-health-related quality of life during pregnancy. Journal of public health dentistry 2009;69(2):74-7.
• 23. Araujo AC, Gusmao ES, Batista JE, Cimoes R. Impact of periodontal disease on quality of life. Quintessence international 2010;41(6):e111-8.
• 24. Bernabe E, Marcenes W. Periodontal disease and quality of life in British adults. Journal of clinical periodontology 2010;37(11):968-72.
• 25. Daly B, Newton T, Batchelor P, Jones K. Oral health care needs and oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14) in homeless people. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 2010;38(2):136-44.
• 26. Smith B, Baysan A, Fenlon M. Association between Oral Health Impact Profile and General Health scores for patients seeking dental implants. Journal of dentistry 2009;37(5):357-9.
• 27. Behravan H. Generalize Kronik Periodontitis Hastalarında Cerrahi Olmayan Periodontal Tedavinin Yaşam Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversiesi; 2013.
• 28. Coulthard P, Pleuvry B, Dobson M, Price M. Behavioural measurement of postoperative pain after oral surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2000;38(2):127-31.