The comparison of the metaphorical process of comprehension in the context of Freud's “Dreamwork”, compared with Quintilian, Davidson, Chomsky and Jakobson

Abstract

The metaphorical structure gives the text the atmosphere of a dream. This becomes clearer with the analysis of certain stages of the process of understanding: (1) The work of “condensation” is the first of these. The use of the symbols (2) equals the “displacement” work. The system has to do with (3) the “consideration of representation”. The last part, so the context is like explaining the text with things that do not belong to the text. Especially the “interpretation” goes into the scope of (4) “secondary revision”. In this regard, Freud’s “dream system” is very appropriate for the metaphorical explanation. Undoubtedly, the analysis of the process with the help of Quintilian, Davidson, Chomsky and Jakobson will be much more stable. With examples of Sabahattin Ali, who
could transform this process into a literary attitude, we will reinforce the theoretical information.

Keywords

• Freud
• Dream Work
• Quintilian
• Davidson
• Chomsky
• Jakobson
• Metaphor
• Sabahattin Ali

Freud’un “Rüya İşi” Kapsamındaki Metaforik İdrak Sürecinin Quintilian, Davidson, Chomsky ve Jakobson ile Bağlantılı Olarak Mukayesesi

Öz

Metaforik yapının metne bir rüya havası katması idrak sürecindeki belli aşamaların tetkiki ile sarahat kazanır: (1) sıkıştırma/ yoğunlaştırma işi (Verdichtungsarbeit) bunlardan ilkidir. Sembollerin kullanımı ise (2) yer değiştirme işi’ne (Verschiebungsarbeit) karşılık gelir. Sistem ise (3) tasavvur olunabilirliğin değerlendirilmesi/ dikkate alınması (Rücksicht auf Darstellbarbeit) ile alakalıdır. Son kısım ise yani “bağlam”; bilhassa metni, metne ait olmayanlarla izah gibidir. Özellikle “yorum” (4) ikincil işlemler (secundäre Bearbeitung) kapsamına girer. Freud’un “rüya sistem”i bu bakımdan metaforik izaha gayet uygundur. Şüphesiz Quintilian, Davidson, Chomsky ve Jakobson yardımı ile sürecin analizi çok daha sağlam olacaktır. Bu idrak sürecini edebi tavra dönüştürebilmiş Sabahattin Ali’den misaller ile de nazari bilgiler pekiştirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Freud
• Rüya İşi
• Quintilian
• Davidson
• Chomsky
• Jakobson
• metafor
• Sabahattin Ali

Kaynakça

1. Ali, Sabahattin (1947). Sırça Köşk- Masallar, Hikâyeler. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
2. Cavell, Marcia (1986). “Metaphor, Dreamwork and Irrationality”. In: LePore, Ernest (ed.) (1986): Truth and Interpretation. Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Oxford: Blackwell, 495-507.
3. Chomsky, Noam (1969). Aspekte der Syntax-Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
4. Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.
5. Duman, Mehmet Akif (2018a). Von der Rhetorik zum belâgat, vom mecâz zur Metapher (Die Suche nach einer terminologischen Äquivalenz zum Begriff Der Metapher im Türkischen durch Vergleich von Rhetorik und belâgat). Berlin: Logos Verlag.
6. Duman, Mehmet Akif (2018b). Lacan’ın Metafor Anlayışı. İstanbul: Gece.
7. Freud, Sigmund (1999). Gesammelte Werke. 2. Band, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch-Verlag (Erstauflage 1942, zugrunde liegt die 8. veränderte Auflage von 1930)
8. Freud, Sigmund (1900). Die Traumdeutung. Wien: Deuticke.

9. Holenstein, Elmar (1975). Roman Jakobsons phänomenologischer Strukturalismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
10. Jaffe, Samuel (1980/1990). “Freud als Rhetoriker. ,Elocutio' und die Traumarbeit”. In: Kopperschmidt, Josef (ed.) (1990). Rhetorik. Zwei Bände. Erster Band: Rhetorik als Texttheorie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 363-384.
11. Jakobson, Roman (1956/ 1996). “Der Doppelcharakter der Sprache und die Polarität zwischen Metaphorik und Metonymik”, in Haverkamp, S.163-174. (1956/ 1980). “Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances”. In: Ders. (1971). 239-259.(Deutsch:) (1979). “Zwei Seiten der Sprache und zwei Typen aphatischer Störungen”. In: Aufsätze zur Linguistik und Poetik, Frankfurt a.M: Ullstein, S.117-141. (1980). “Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances”, Fundamentals of Language, Mounton Publishers. Jakobson, Roman (1957): “Shifters, verbal categories, and the russian verb”. In: Ders. (1971). 130-147. (1974). “Verschieber, Verbkategorien und das russische Verb”, in: Form und Sinn. Sprachwissenschaftliche Betrachtungen. München: Fink, S.35-54.
12. Jakobson, Roman (1971). Selected Writings II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton.
13. Jakobson, Roman und Pomorska, Krystyna (1982). Poesie und Grammatik. Dialoge. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
14. Kittay, Eva Feder (1987). Metaphor. Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Lausberg, Heinrich (1960/l991). Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. München: Max Hueber.
16. Peters, Uwe Henrik (1984). Wörterbuch der Psychiatrie und medizinischen Psychologie. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
17. Quintilian (2011). Institute Oratore / Ausbildung des Redners, Zwölf Bücher. Hg und Üb. H. Rahn, Lat./ Deut., 5. Aufl, Darmstadt: WGB.
18. Rolf, Eckard (2005). Metaphertheorien. Typologie. Darstellung. Bibliographie. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.