Olgu Sunumu
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Human in Positivist-Empirical Research: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow of the Illusion - 2

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 156 - 167, 25.04.2020

Atila Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.24010/soid.720112
Cited By: 1

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Al, U. ve Soydal, İ. (2015). Bilimsel iletişimin farklı bir yüzü: Geri çekilen makaleler [The other face of scholarly communication: Retracted articles]. Içinde Prof. Dr. İrfan Çakın’a Armağan (Umut Al & Zehra Taşkın Eds.) (ss. 22-37). Ankara: Hacettepe University, Department of Information Management.
  • Alrawadieh, Z. ve Zareer, A. (2019) Exploring Retraction in Tourism and Hospitality Journals. European Journal of Tourism Research 22, pp. 20-30
  • Archambault, É., ve Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 639-653
  • Ayres, I. ve Vars, F. E. (2000). Determinants of citations to articles in elite law reviews. Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 427-450.
  • Bakker, M. ve Wichrts, J.M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behav Res Methods. 43(3):666-78.
  • Bar-Ilan, J. ve Halevi, G. (2017). Post retraction citations in context: a case study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629243/
  • Beaver DB (2004) Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics 60:399–408
  • Bornemann-Cimenti H, Szilagyi IS, Sandner-Kiesling A. (2015). Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben case: Incidences, reasons and possible improvements. Science Engineering Ethics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150092
  • Bornmann, L. ve Daniel, D. H. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal OF documentation, 64(1):45-80
  • Bornmann, L. ve Daniel, D. H. (2005). Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Analysis of reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions. Scientometrics, 63, 297-320.
  • Brainard, J. ve You, J. (2018). What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty
  • Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR, Scoville C. (1999). Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 87(4):437
  • Butler, W. R. (1980). The concept of a tourıst area cycle of evolutıon: ımplıcatıons for management of resources. Canadian Geographer., 24: 5-12.
  • Craig, R., Cox, A., Tourish, D. ve Thorpe, A. (2020). Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is it to be done?. Research policy. 49: 1-9.
  • Cronin, B. (2005a) The hand of science. Academic writing and its rewards, Lanham, MD, USA, Scarecrow Press.

  • Cronin, B. (2005b) A hundred million acts of whimsy? Current Science, 89, 1505-1509. Dora Decleration. https://sfdora.org
  • Eichorn, P. ve Yankauer, A. (1987). Do authors check their references - a survey of accuracy of references in 3 public-health journals. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 1011-1012.
  • Evans, J. T., Nadjarı, H. I. ve Burchell, S. A. (1990) Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals - a continuing peer-review problem. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1353-1354.
  • Fiedler, K., ve Schwarz, N. (2015). Questionable Research Practices Revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52.
  • Fire, M. ve Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action . Giga science. 8; 1-20.
  • Fister I Jr., Fister I ve Perc M (2016)Toward the Discovery of CitationCartels in Citation Networks. Front. Phys. 4:49.
  • Fodness, D. ve Murray, B. (1999). A Model of Tourist Information Search Behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 37(3): 220-230
  • Fong EA ve Wilhite AW (2017) Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0187394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187394
  • Gross, P. L. K. ve Gross, E. M. (1927) College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.

  • Halevi, G. ve Bar-Ilan, J. (2016). Post retraction citations in context. In BIRNDL 2016 Bibliometric- enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries (p. 23-29). Newark: CEUR
  • Hesselmann, F., Graf, V. Schmidt, M., ve , Reinhart. M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600261/
  • John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., ve Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the pre- valence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532. doi:10.1177/ 0956797611430953
  • Kochan CA, ve Budd JM. The persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee case. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1992;43(7):488–493.
  • Laurence, J. P. ve Hull, R. (1971) The Peter Principle. Londra. Pan Books Ltd.
  • Letrud K. ve Hernes S (2019) Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three- in-one case study. PLoS ONE 14(9): e0222213.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1967) A Theory of Metamotivation : the Biological Rooting of the Value-Life First Published October 1, Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
  • Munafo, M. R., Hollands, J. G. & Marteau, M. T. (2018). Open science prevents mindless science. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193470/
  • Parkinson, C. N. (1957). Parkinson’s Law and other studies in administration. Cambridge Mass. Hougton Miffi Co.
  • Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL. (1990). The continued use of retracted, invalid literature. JAMA. 263(10):1420–1423. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100140020.
  • Robinson-Garcia, N. , Jiménez-Contreras, E., ve Torres-Salinas, D (2015). Analyzing data citation practices using the Data Citation Index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(12): 1-20.
  • Simkin M.V. ve Roychowdhur, V.P. (2002). Read before you cite! https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0212043.pdf
  • Taşkın, Z. ve Al, U. (2017). A content-based citation analysis study based on text categorisation. Scientometric.114 (1): 335-357.
  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005a) Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62, 133-143.
  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005b) For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3, 50-62.

  • Wang, X., Weaver, D., Li, X., ve Zhang, Y. (2016) In Butler (1980) we trust? Typology of citer motivations. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305698277_In_Butler_1980_we_trust_Typology_of_citer_motivations[accessed Feb 10 2020].
  • Wilhite AW ve Fong EA. (2012). Coercive Citations in Academic Publishing. Science 2012; 3 Feb:542–543. pmid:22301307
  • Zarezadeh, Z., Benckendorff, P. ve Gretzel, U. (2018). Lack of progress in tourist information search research: a critique of citation behaviour and knowledge development, Current Issues in Tourism, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2018.1459511

Pozitivist-Ampirik Araştırmalarda İnsan: Yanıltmacanın Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını - 2

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 156 - 167, 25.04.2020

Atila Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.24010/soid.720112
Cited By: 1

Öz

Bilimsel araştırmalarda geçmişten geleceğe köprü kurmanın, çalışmanın niteliğini ve katkısını artırmanın anahtarı olan atıf geleneği son zamanlarda harareti giderek yükselen tartışmaların odağında. Atıf-bilimsel bilginin ilerleme rotasında öncü kaşiflerin bıraktıkları ayak izleri - malumatın nasıl keşfedildiğinin, nereden geldiğinin, test edildiğinin, yeniden değerlendirmelere tabi tutularak nasıl bilgiye dönüşerek perçinlendiğinin sağlam ve güvenilir göstergesiyken nasıl oldu da böylesine ateşli tartışmaların hedefi oldu? İçerdiği kavramsal, tasarımsal, yöntemsel, ölçümsel hatalardan dolayı prestijli dergilerde (SSCİ), hem de sözde yüksek güvenlikli hakem değerlendirmesinden geçerek yayımlanmış çok sayıda makale yayından/dergiden geri çekilmekteyken, SSCİ dergilerinden seçilen bazı yayınların replikasyon (yineleme) denemelerinde çalışma sonuçlarının yüzde yüz replike edilemediği ortadayken, sosyal bilimlerde üretilmiş bilginin %95’inin geçerliliği sorgulanırken, yayından kaldırılmış makalelerin hem de katlanan hızla hala olumlu alıntılanmaya devam etmesi atıf geleneği ve uygulamalarının geçerliliğiyle ilgili şüphe uyandırmakta. Atıf neyin göstergesi? Çalışmanın kalitesinin ve bilime katkısının mı? Atıf alan çalışmayı yapan bilim insanının araştırma ve yayın eylemiyle ne kadar meşgul olduğunun mu? Yoksa hiçbiri mi? Dayatılan genel başarı ölçütü konumundaki atıf geleneğinin çöküşte olduğundan hareketle bu çalışma akademik alanda varsa başarının yeniden tanımlanması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pozitivist Ampirik Araştırmalar

Kaynakça

  • Al, U. ve Soydal, İ. (2015). Bilimsel iletişimin farklı bir yüzü: Geri çekilen makaleler [The other face of scholarly communication: Retracted articles]. Içinde Prof. Dr. İrfan Çakın’a Armağan (Umut Al & Zehra Taşkın Eds.) (ss. 22-37). Ankara: Hacettepe University, Department of Information Management.
  • Alrawadieh, Z. ve Zareer, A. (2019) Exploring Retraction in Tourism and Hospitality Journals. European Journal of Tourism Research 22, pp. 20-30
  • Archambault, É., ve Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 639-653
  • Ayres, I. ve Vars, F. E. (2000). Determinants of citations to articles in elite law reviews. Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 427-450.
  • Bakker, M. ve Wichrts, J.M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behav Res Methods. 43(3):666-78.
  • Bar-Ilan, J. ve Halevi, G. (2017). Post retraction citations in context: a case study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629243/
  • Beaver DB (2004) Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics 60:399–408
  • Bornemann-Cimenti H, Szilagyi IS, Sandner-Kiesling A. (2015). Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben case: Incidences, reasons and possible improvements. Science Engineering Ethics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150092
  • Bornmann, L. ve Daniel, D. H. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal OF documentation, 64(1):45-80
  • Bornmann, L. ve Daniel, D. H. (2005). Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Analysis of reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions. Scientometrics, 63, 297-320.
  • Brainard, J. ve You, J. (2018). What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty
  • Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR, Scoville C. (1999). Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 87(4):437
  • Butler, W. R. (1980). The concept of a tourıst area cycle of evolutıon: ımplıcatıons for management of resources. Canadian Geographer., 24: 5-12.
  • Craig, R., Cox, A., Tourish, D. ve Thorpe, A. (2020). Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is it to be done?. Research policy. 49: 1-9.
  • Cronin, B. (2005a) The hand of science. Academic writing and its rewards, Lanham, MD, USA, Scarecrow Press.

  • Cronin, B. (2005b) A hundred million acts of whimsy? Current Science, 89, 1505-1509. Dora Decleration. https://sfdora.org
  • Eichorn, P. ve Yankauer, A. (1987). Do authors check their references - a survey of accuracy of references in 3 public-health journals. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 1011-1012.
  • Evans, J. T., Nadjarı, H. I. ve Burchell, S. A. (1990) Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals - a continuing peer-review problem. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1353-1354.
  • Fiedler, K., ve Schwarz, N. (2015). Questionable Research Practices Revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52.
  • Fire, M. ve Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action . Giga science. 8; 1-20.
  • Fister I Jr., Fister I ve Perc M (2016)Toward the Discovery of CitationCartels in Citation Networks. Front. Phys. 4:49.
  • Fodness, D. ve Murray, B. (1999). A Model of Tourist Information Search Behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 37(3): 220-230
  • Fong EA ve Wilhite AW (2017) Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0187394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187394
  • Gross, P. L. K. ve Gross, E. M. (1927) College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.

  • Halevi, G. ve Bar-Ilan, J. (2016). Post retraction citations in context. In BIRNDL 2016 Bibliometric- enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries (p. 23-29). Newark: CEUR
  • Hesselmann, F., Graf, V. Schmidt, M., ve , Reinhart. M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600261/
  • John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., ve Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the pre- valence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532. doi:10.1177/ 0956797611430953
  • Kochan CA, ve Budd JM. The persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee case. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1992;43(7):488–493.
  • Laurence, J. P. ve Hull, R. (1971) The Peter Principle. Londra. Pan Books Ltd.
  • Letrud K. ve Hernes S (2019) Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three- in-one case study. PLoS ONE 14(9): e0222213.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1967) A Theory of Metamotivation : the Biological Rooting of the Value-Life First Published October 1, Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
  • Munafo, M. R., Hollands, J. G. & Marteau, M. T. (2018). Open science prevents mindless science. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193470/
  • Parkinson, C. N. (1957). Parkinson’s Law and other studies in administration. Cambridge Mass. Hougton Miffi Co.
  • Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL. (1990). The continued use of retracted, invalid literature. JAMA. 263(10):1420–1423. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100140020.
  • Robinson-Garcia, N. , Jiménez-Contreras, E., ve Torres-Salinas, D (2015). Analyzing data citation practices using the Data Citation Index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(12): 1-20.
  • Simkin M.V. ve Roychowdhur, V.P. (2002). Read before you cite! https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0212043.pdf
  • Taşkın, Z. ve Al, U. (2017). A content-based citation analysis study based on text categorisation. Scientometric.114 (1): 335-357.
  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005a) Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62, 133-143.
  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005b) For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3, 50-62.

  • Wang, X., Weaver, D., Li, X., ve Zhang, Y. (2016) In Butler (1980) we trust? Typology of citer motivations. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305698277_In_Butler_1980_we_trust_Typology_of_citer_motivations[accessed Feb 10 2020].
  • Wilhite AW ve Fong EA. (2012). Coercive Citations in Academic Publishing. Science 2012; 3 Feb:542–543. pmid:22301307
  • Zarezadeh, Z., Benckendorff, P. ve Gretzel, U. (2018). Lack of progress in tourist information search research: a critique of citation behaviour and knowledge development, Current Issues in Tourism, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2018.1459511
Toplam 42 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Turizm (Diğer)
Bölüm Akademik Görüş 2
Yazarlar

Atila Yüksel Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Nisan 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yüksel, A. (2020). Pozitivist-Ampirik Araştırmalarda İnsan: Yanıltmacanın Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını - 2. Seyahat Ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 17(1), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.24010/soid.720112

Cited By

Turizmin Gerçekliğini Açığa Çıkarmak: Tanrısal bir Armağan, Hayali bir Uçuş, Neoliberal Manipülasyon yoksa Karabasan mı? - 1
Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24010/soid.1526909
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği (Journal of Travel and Hotel Business) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
26935
Dergimiz EBSCOhost, Index Copernicus, Ulakbim,  DRJI, Research Bible, SOBİAD ve ASOS tarafından indekslenmektedir.