Sosyal Düzensizlik ve Toplum Destekli Güvenlik Politikaları

Öz

Increased criminality and crime rates driven by urbanization in modern societies inspired many researchers to study criminality and social environment. Social disorganization theory has been accepted as one of the most important theories which analyzes the relationship between social environment and crime. The theory pays attention to the impact of an individual's social environment on crime and criminality without ignoring the impact of individual characteristics of the criminals. Although there were previous studies on the ecology of crime and social environment of criminality, Social Disorganization approach developed by Shaw and McKay at the beginning of the 20th Century has been accepted as one of the keystones of the modern criminology in many ways. In this study, social disorganization framework has been used to understand the underlying assumptions and role of community oriented security policies (which are relatively new in Turkey) in combating crime and criminality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Crime, Criminality, Social Disorganization, Systemic Control, Neighborhood Control, Quantitative research, Crime in Turkey.

Sosyal Düzensizlik ve Toplum Destekli Güvenlik Politikaları

Öz

Modern toplumlarda kentleşmeyle beraber artan suçluluk ve suç oranları araştırmacıları suç ve sosyal çevre üzerinde çalışmaya itmiştir. Sosyal Düzensizlik Teorisi sosyal çevre ve suç arasındaki etkileşimi inceleyen en önemli teorilerden birisi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Teori, suç ve suçluluğun oluşumu üzerinde suç işleyen bireylerin kişisel özelliklerinin yanı sıra bu bireyleri kuşatan sosyal çevrenin etkisine dikkat çekmektedir. Suç ekolojisi ve sosyal çevre konusunda daha önce yapılmış çalışmalar olmasına rağmen 20'nci yüzyılın başlarında Shaw ve McKay tarafından geliştirilen sosyal düzensizlik teorisinin birçok yönden modern kriminolojinin temellerini attığı kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada sosyal düzensizlik yaklaşımı kullanılarak ülkemizde nispeten yeni uygulanmaya başlayan toplum destekli güvenlik uygulamalarının temel varsayımları ve suç ve suçlulukla mücadeledeki rolü anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Suç, Suçluluk, Sosyal Düzensizlik, Sistemik Kontrol, Mahalle Kontrolü, Nicel Araştırma, Türkiye'de Suç.

Kaynakça

1. AGNEW, Robert 1985 A Revised Strain Theory of Delinquency, Social Forces, Vol. 64(1), s.151-167. BELLAIR, Paul E. 1997 Social Interaction and Community Crime: Examining the Importance of Neighbor Networks, Criminology, Vol. 35, s. 677-704.
2. BERRY, Brain Lobley ve John D. KASARDA 1977 Contemporary Urban Ecology, New York: Macmillan. BURKE, Roger An Introduction to Criminological Theory, Devon: Willan Publishing. BURSIK, Robert J. 1988 Social Disorganization and Theories of Crime and Delinquency: Problems and Prospects. Criminology, Vol. 26, s.519-551.
3. BURSIK, Robert J. ve Harold.G. GRASMICK Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control. New York: Lexington Books.
4. CHAMLIN, Mitchell B. 1989 A Macro Social Analysis of The Change In Robbery And Homicide Rates: Controlling for Static and Dynamic Effects, Sociological Focus, Vol. 22, s. 275−286.
5. CORDELLA, Peter ve Larry SIEGEL Readings in Contemporary Criminological Theory, PA: Northeastern University Press.
6. CRUTCHFIELD, Robert D., Mitchell R. GEERKEN ve Walter R. GOVE Crime Rate And Social Integration, Criminology, Vol. 20(3-4), s.467–478. CULLEN, Francis T. ve Robert AGNEW Criminological Theory: Past To Present, Third Edition Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.
7. DURKHEIM, Emile Suicide: A Study in Sociology. NY: The Free Press. DURKHEIM, Emile 1997 The Division of Labor in Society, NY: The Free Press. Hartnagel,
8. HARTNAGEL, F. Timothy ve G. Won LEE 1990 Urban Crime in Canada, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, s.591-606. HUNTER, Albert 1985 Private, Parochial, and Public Social Orders: The Problem of Crime and Incivility in Urban Communities." içinde Suttles G. D. And Zald M. N. (1985) The Challenge Of Social Control Citizenship And Institution Building In Modern Society. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, s.230-242.

9. KORNHAUSER, Ruth Rosner Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
10. LILLY, J.Robert, Francis T. CULLEN ve Richard A. BALL Criminological Theory: Context And Consequences, London: Sage.
11. LOFTIN, Colin ve Robert Nash PARKER An Errors-In-Variable Model Of The Effects Of Poverty And Urban Homicide Rates. Criminology, Vol. 23, s.269−285.
12. LOWENKAMP, Christopher T., Francis T. CULLEN ve Travis C. PRATT Replicating Sampson and Groves's Test of Social Disorganization Theory: Revisiting A Criminological Classic, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 40, s.351.
13. MERTON, Robert 1938 Social Structure and Anomie, American Sociological Review, Vol.3, s.672-82.
14. MIETHE, Terance D. ve Robert F. MEIER 1990 Opportunity, Choice, and Criminal Victimization: A Test of A Theoretical Model. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency Vol. 27, s.243-266.
15. MIETHE, Terance D. ve Robert F. MEIER 1994 Crime and Its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16. MOYER, Imogene 2001 Criminological Theories: Traditional and Nontraditional Voices and Themes. London: Sage.
17. NEUMAN, W.Lawrence ve Ronald J. BERGER 1988 Competing Perspectives on Cross-National Crime: An Evaluation of Theory and Evidence, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol.29, s.281-313.
18. PATTERSON, E. Britt Poverty, Income Inequality, And Community Crime Rates, Criminology, Vol. 29(4), s.755–776.
19. PFOHL, Stephen J. 1985 Images of Deviance And Social Control. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
20. REID, Sue Titus Crime And Criminology, 9th Ed., Mcgraw-Hill.
21. SAMPSON, Robert .J. 1986 Neighborhood Family Structure And The Risk Of Criminal Victimization, içinde Byrne, J., Sampson, R. (1986) The Social Ecology Of Crime, New York: Springer-Verlag, s. 25-46.
22. SAMPSON, Robert J. Communities And Crime, içinde Gottfredson, M.R., Hirschi, T. (1987). Positive Criminology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, s. 91-114
23. SAMPSON, Robert J. ve W.Byron GROVES Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social Disorganization Theory. American Journal of Sociology, Vol.94, s.774-802.
24. SAMPSON, Robert J. Organized For What? Recasting Theories Of Social (Dis)Organization, içinde Waring E. ve Weisburd, D. (2002), Crime And Social Organization, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
25. SCOTT, Jason D. Assessing the Relationship between Police-Community Coproduction and Neighborhood-Level Social Capital. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 18 No.12, s.147-166.
26. SHAW, Clifford R.ve Henry D. MCKAY Juvenile Delinquency And Urban Areas, Third Edition, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
27. SILVER, Eric ve Lisa.L . MILLER 2004 Sources of Informal Social Control in Chicago Neighborhoods, Criminology, 42, 3, s.551-583.
28. SKOGAN, Wesley The Promise Of Community Policing, içinde Weisburd, D. ve Braga, A.A. (2006), Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives, NY:Cambridge University Press, s.27-43.
29. SMITH, Douglas A. ve G. Roger JARJOURA Social Structure and Criminal Victimization, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 25(1), s.27–52. SNELL, Clete 2001 Neighborhood Structure, Crime, And Fear Of Crime: Testing Bursik And Grasmick’s Neighborhood Control Theory, NY:LFB.
30. SUN, Ivan, Ruth TRIPLETT ve Randy, R. GAINEY Neighborhood Characteristics And Crime: A Test of Sampson and Grove’s Model of Social Disorganization. Western Criminology Review, Vol. 5, s. 1-16. VELEZ, Maria The Role of Public Social Control in Urban Neighborhoods. Criminology, Vol. 39, s.837-863
31. VEYSEY, Bonita. M., ve Steven F. MESSNER Future Testing Of Social Disorganization Theory: An Elaboration of Sampson and Grove’s Community Structure and Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 36, s.156-174.
32. VOID, B. George, Thomas.J. BERNAND ve Jeffry B. SNIPES Theoretical Criminology NY: Oxford University Press.
33. WARNER, Barbara D. ve Gleen L. PIERCE Reexamining Social Disorganization Theory Using Calls To The Police As A Measure Of Crime. Criminology, Vol. 31(4), s.493–517.