GÜVENLİK, DÜZEN VE GÖZETİM: GELECEĞİN DÜNYASINDA PROTESTO HAKKI

Öz

Günümüz dünyasında protesto eylemleri yalnızca demokratik olmayan rejimlerde değil, liberal demokrasilerde de engeller ve baskıyla karşılaşmaktadır. İklim, çevre ve sosyal adalet gibi alanlarda seslerini protestolar yoluyla duyurmak isteyen toplumsal hareketler bu olumsuz durumdan en fazla etkilenenler olarak öne çıkar. Protesto güvenliğinde protestocunun demokratik hak ve özgürlüklerini öncelikli gören, yöntem olarak müzakereyi benimseyen anlayış yerini kamu düzeni ve güvenliğini öncelik haline getiren, uzlaşmacı olmayan, etkisizleştirme stratejisini sıkça benimseyen bir protesto polisliğine bırakmıştır. Kimi toplumsal hareketlere karşın gösterilen tolerans ise kolluk kuvvetlerinin siyasileştiğine ve farklı hareketlere farklı standartlar uyguladıklarına yönelik eleştirileri daha da şiddetlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, İngiltere ve Kanada başta olmak üzere liberal demokrasilerde protesto hakkının kısıtlanması, gözetimi ve baskı altına alınmasına yönelik güncel eğilimler, bu eğilimler doğrultusunda geliştirilen yeni modeller, araçlar, teknolojiler, yasal çerçeveler ve iç güvenlik bürokrasilerine ilişkin sorunlar incelenmiştir. Protesto güvenliği ve polisliği alanında geçtiğimiz on yıllarda yaşanan dönüşüm ve son dönemde yaşanan gelişmeler, protesto hakkının geleceğine ilişkin demokrasi yanlısı kesimlerce son dönemde daha sık, yoğun biçimde dile getirilen endişe ve kaygıları haklı çıkaran bir görünüm arz eder. Protesto hakkına ilişkin söz konusu olumsuz görünüm ve eğilim, özellikle devlet baskısı ile yurttaşların demokratik arenalara katılımı arasındaki güç dengesizliklerine ilişkin geleceğe yönelik uyarılar içermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Protesto
• polis
• toplumsal hareketler
• demokrasi
• gözetim

SECURITY, ORDER AND SURVEILLANCE: THE RIGHT TO PROTEST IN THE WORLD OF THE FUTURE

Öz

In today's world, protests face obstacles and oppression not only in non-democratic regimes but also in liberal democracies. Social movements that want to make their voices heard through protests in areas such as climate, environment and social justice stand out as those most affected by repressive policing. The understanding that prioritizes democratic rights and freedoms for protesters and adopts negotiation as a method is being replaced by protest policing that prioritizes non-compromising public order and security that frequently uses incapacitation strategies. Further, the tolerance shown toward some social movements by law enforcement creates intensified criticism that law enforcement officers are politicized and apply different standards to different movements. In this study, current trends in the restriction, surveillance and suppression of the right to protest in liberal democracies, especially in the United States, England and Canada, and the problems related to new models, tools, technologies, legal frameworks and internal security bureaucracies developed in line with these trends are examined. Transformations in the field of protest security and policing in the past decades seem to justify the increasingly strident concerns expressed by pro-democracy segments regarding the future of the right to protest. The negative outlook and trend regarding the right to protest contain warnings about the future, especially regarding inbalances of power between state coercion and citizen participation in democratic arenas.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Protest
• police
• social movements
• democracy
• surveillance

Kaynakça

1. Amnesty International Canada. (February 11, 2022). Amnesty International Canada Statement on “Freedom Convoy 2022” Blockade. Amnesty International. Erişim adresi: https://www.amnesty.ca/human-rights-news/ottawa-protests-freedom-convoy-statement/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwyLGjBhDKARIsAFRNgW-4ZW4hwMhBjW8HQJzdzA0KQR_xsmr4znPTKnYPY7Hw4h3sWgLTSIkaAn9UEALw_wcB
2. Amnesty International. (2022). Protesto Hakkını Koru! Protesto Hakkını Neden Korumalıyız?. Erişim adresi: https://www.amnesty.org.tr/public/uploads/files/Rapor/Amnesty_ProtectTheProtest_TR_web.pdf
3. Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project. (2022). Fact Sheet: Freedom Convoys’ and Anti-Vaccine Demonstrations in Canada. Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project. Erişim adresi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep39761
4. BBC News Türkçe. (11 Ocak 2022). İngiltere Parlamentosu’nda tartışılan 'Polis, Suç ve Ceza Tasarısı' ne içeriyor, neden eleştiriliyor?. BBC News Türkçe. Erişim adresi: https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-59950394
5. Brock, A., Goodey, J. (2022). Policing the High Speed 2 (HS2) Train Line: Repression and Collusion Along Europe’s Biggest Infrastructure Project. In A. Dunlap, A. Brock (Eds.), Enforcing Ecocide. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99646-8_9
6. Brown, W. (2018). Neoliberalism's Frankenstein: Authoritarian Freedom in Twenty-First Century “Democracies”. Critical Times, 1 (1), 60–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-
7. Brown, W. (2021). Neoliberalizmin Harabelerinde Batı’da Antidemokratik Siyasetin Yükselişi. (Çev. B.O. Doğan). İstanbul: Metis.
8. Bump, P. (June 7, 2020). Over the past 60 years, more spending on police hasn’t necessarily meant less crime. The Washington Post. Erişim adresi: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/07/over-past-60-years-more-spending-police-hasnt-necessarily-meant-less-crime/

9. Calhoun, C. (1993). “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century. Social Science History, 17(3), 385–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171431
10. Carey, T.E., & Cisneros, Á.S. (2023). Policing Protest: An Examination of Support for Police Suppression of Protest. PS: Political Science & Politics, 56(2), 234–239. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522001354
11. Crosby, A. and Walby, K. (2023). Strategic incapacitation, scaled up: National security influence on protest policing for the 2018 Quebec G7 summit. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544231151676
12. Çetinkaya, Y.D. (2008). (Der.) Toplumsal Hareketler Tarih, Teori ve Deneyim. İstanbul: İletişim.
13. Della Porta, D. (1995). Social Movements and the State: Thoughts on the Policing of Protest. EUI Working Paper RSC, 95(13). San Domenico: European University Institute.
14. Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction (2nd edition), Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Della Porta, D. and Fillieule, O. (2004). Policing Social Protest. In D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule and H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch10
16. Dodd, V. (19 April 2023). Police Federation chair accepts Met is institutionally racist, sexist and homophobic. The Guardian. Erişim adresi: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/19/police-federation-chair-accepts-met-is-institutionally-racist-sexist-and-homophobic
17. Duffy, B., Hewlett, K., Murkin, G., Benson, R., Hesketh, R., Page, B., Skinner, G., and Gottfried, G. (2021). Culture wars in the UK: how the public understand the debate. Policy Institute at King's. Erişim adresi: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/culture-wars-in-the-uk-how-the-public-understand-the-debate.pdf
18. Duffy, B. (May 12, 2022). Britain’s descent into culture wars has been rapid, but it needn’t be terminal. The Conversation. Erişim adresi: https://theconversation.com/britain s-descent-into-culture-wars-has-been-rapid-but-it-neednt-be-terminal-182885
19. Dupuis‐Déri, F. (August 25, 2017). How Black Bloc activists have changed protests. CTV News. Erişim adresi: https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/how-black-bloc-activists-have-changed-protests-1.3561904
20. Dupuis‐Déri, Francis. (2010). The Black Blocs Ten Years after Seattle: Anarchism, Direct Action, and Deliberative Practices. Journal for the Study of Radicalism. doi: 4. 10.2307/41887658.
21. Earl, J., Maher, T.V. and Pan, J. (2022). The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review. Science advances, 8(10), eabl8198. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198
22. Ellefsen, R. and Jämte, J. (2022). The causes, content and consequences of repression: A framework for analyzing protest control in the counter-extremism era. Social Movement Studies, 1-16. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2022.2067140
23. Elliott, T., Earl, J., Maher, T.V. and Reynolds-Stenson, H. (2022). Softer Policing or the Institutionalization of Protest? Decomposing Changes in Observed Protest Policing over Time. American Journal of Sociology, 127(4), 1311-1365. https://doi.org/10.1086/719001
24. Ergut, F. (2001). Polis Çalışmaları İçin Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 34(1), 59-78.
25. Ergut, F. (2003). Polisliğin Uluslararası Boyutları: Avrupa Tarihinde Polis, Toplumsal Tarih, 117, 44-49.
26. Freedom House. (2023). Freedom in the World 2023. Freedom House. Erişim adresi: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/FIW_World_2023_DigtalPDF.pdf
27. Frevel, B. and Kuschewski, P. (2023). Policing divided societies. Requirements for the civic education of police officers, Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 9(2), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2022-0047
28. Genç Yılmaz, A. (2022). Eko-Terörizm Kavramı Üzerine Bir Tartışma: Yeryüzü Kurtuluş Cephesi ve Hayvan Kurtuluş Cephesi’nin Analizi. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 (2), 292-311. doi: 10.14782/marmarasbd.1030019
29. Gordon, T. (2022). The Freedom Convoy, the resurgence of the far Right, and the crisis of the petty bourgeoisie, Studies in Political Economy, 103(3), 280-293, doi: 10.1080/07078552.2022.2161226
30. Grassiani, E. (2022). The Shifting Face of the Enemy: ‘Less than Lethal’ Weaponry and the Criminalised Protestor. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 4(3), 323–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.137
31. Greene, J. (June 11, 2020). Microsoft won’t sell police its facial-recognition technology, following similar moves by Amazon and IBM. The Washington Post.
32. Greg, M. (2011). Showcasing security: the politics of policingspace at the 2007 Sydney APEC meeting, Policing & Society, 21(1), 27-48. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2010.540659
33. Greig, J. (May 26, 2021). One year after Amazon, Microsoft and IBM ended facial recognition sales to police, smaller players fill void. ZDNet.
34. Heh, E. & Wainwright, J. (2022). No privacy, no peace: Urban surveillance and the movement for Black lives, Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, 3(2), 121-141. doi: 10.1080/26884674.2022.2061392
35. INCLO; PHR & Omega Research Foundation. (March 22, 2023). Lethal in Disguise 2 How Crowd-Control Weapons Impact Health and Human Rights. Physicians for Human Rights. Erişim adresi: https://files.inclo.net/content/pdf/83/LID2-Main-Report-Pages-Final.pdf
36. Kurtz, D.L. & Upton, L.L. (2018). The Gender in Stories: How War Stories and Police Narratives Shape Masculine Police Culture, Women & Criminal Justice, 28(4),282-300. doi: 10.1080/08974454.2017.1294132
37. Jasper, J.M. (2017). Protesto Toplumsal Hareketlere Kültürel Bir Giriş. (Çev. A. Önal). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
38. Jenkins, S. (Jan 17, 2023). The police don’t need powers to further curtail our right to protest. Just teach them the law. The Guardian. Erişim adresi: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jan/17/police-powers-stop-protest-law-culture-wars-freedom-order
39. Johansen, A. (2018). Soldiers as police: the French and Prussian Armies and the policing of popular protest, 1889-1914, Oxon: Routledge.
40. Kesgin, B. (2022). Başlangıcından Günümüze İklim Hareketi: Sorunlar, Sınırlar ve Fırsatlar. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 14 (1), 59-107. doi: 10.55978/sobiadsbd.910047
41. Kesgin, B. (2022). Pandeminin Maskesini Düşürmek: COVID-19 Kısıtlamalarına Karşı Protesto Hareketleri. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 23 (50), 60-97. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sobbiad/issue/70637/1098401
42. Keyes, V.D. and Keyes, L. (2022). Dynamics of an American countermovement: Blue Lives Matter. Sociology Compass, 16(9), e13024. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13024
43. Kochel, T.R. (2022). Policing unrest: on the front lines of the Ferguson protests. New York: New York University Press.
44. Koehler, D. (2022). From Superiority to Supremacy: Exploring the Vulnerability of Military and Police Special Forces to Extreme Right Radicalization, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2022.2090047
45. Leman-Langlois, S. (2002). The Myopic Panopticon: The Social Consequences of Policing Through the Lens, Policing and Society, 13(1), 43-58. doi: 10.1080/1043946022000005617
46. Le Bon, G. (2002). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (T. Fisher Unwin, Trans.) Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
47. LeBrun, L. (October 25, 2022) Ottawa Police Intelligence Unit Relied on Dubious and Politically-Biased Information About Convoy. PressProgress. Erişim adresi: https://pressprogress.ca/ottawa-police-intelligence-unit-relied-on-dubious-and-politically-biased-information-about-convoy/
48. Lee, N.T. & Chin, C. (2022). Police surveillance and facial recognition: Why data privacy is imperative for communities of color. The Brookings Institution. Erişim adresi: https://www.brookings.edu/research/police-surveillance-and-facial-recognition-why-data-privacy-is-an-imperative-for-communities-of-color/
49. The London Policing College. (August 10, 2022). LPC Policing Public Protest Workshop [Video]. Youtube. Erişim adresi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HAX3gWhE84&t=29s
50. The London Policing College. (August 19, 2022). Policing Public Protest in Germany [Video]. Youtube. Erişim adresi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX4FFmdQh0s&list=LL&index=39&t=3832s
51. Malm, A. (2022). Bir Boru Hattı Nasıl Patlatılır. (Çev. K.K. Işıtan) İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
52. Melgaço, L. & Monaghan, J. (Eds.) (2018). Protests in the Information Age: Social Movements, Digital Practices and Surveillance. In Routledge Studies in Crime, Security and Justice. Oxon: Routledge.
53. Mercan, B.A. (2021). Polislik Sosyolojisinin Eleştirisine Doğru: Hukuk, Şiddet ve Egemenlik. Mülkiye Dergisi, 45 (2), 367-368. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mulkiye/issue/64281/975615
54. Metcalfe, C. & Pickett, J. T. (2022). Public fear of protesters and support for protest policing: An experimental test of two theoretical models. Criminology, 60, 60-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12291
55. Morton, B. (Jan 16, 2023). New plans to widen police powers for disruptive protests. BBC News. Erişim adresi: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-64282962
56. Nepstad, S.E. (2023). Toward an agency-centered iterative approach to social movement repression. Sociology Compass, e13078. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13078
57. Oriola, T. (Feb 8, 2022). What the ‘freedom convoy’ reveals about the ties among politics, police and the law. The Conversation. Erişim adresi: https://theconversation.com/what-the-freedom-convoy-reveals-about-the-ties-among-politics-police-and-the-law-176680
58. Oxford Analytica. (2022). "Ottawa vaccine protest inquiry examines role of police". Expert Briefings. Erişim adresi: https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB274088
59. Parkin, W.S., Mills, C.E. and Gruenewald, J. (2021). Far-Right Extremism's Threat to Police Safety and the Organizational Legitimacy of Law Enforcement in the United States. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society, 22(2), 1-24.
60. Privacy International. (2021). Free to Protest: The protestor's guide to police surveillance and how to avoid it. Erişim adresi: https://netpol.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/FREE_TO_PROTEST-UK-EDITION.pdf
61. Regan, M.C. (2021) Citizens, Suspects, and Enemies: Examining Police Militarization. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works, 2346. Erişim adresi: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2346
62. Reynolds-Stenson, H. (2018). Protesting the police: anti-police brutality claims as a predictor of police repression of protest. Social Movement Studies, 17(1), 48-63. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2017.1381592
63. Roberts, A. (2013). The New Method of Controlling Disorder. In The End of Protest: How Free-Market Capitalism Learned to Control Dissent , 58-93. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt20d88nv.7
64. Robinson, W.I. (2020). The Global Police State. London: Pluto Press.
65. Rudé, G. (1973). Protest and Punishment in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/4048354
66. Smith, M. (2023). Protest Policing and Human Rights: A Dialogical Approach. Oxon: Routledge.
67. Solomon, J. & Martin, A. (2019). Competitive victimhood as a lens to reconciliation: An analysis of the black lives matter and blue lives matter movements. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 37, 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21262
68. Stoughton, S. (2015). Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem. Harvard Law Review, 128(6), 225-234. Erişim adresi: https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-128/law-enforcements-warrior-problem/
69. Terpstra, J. (2011). Two theories on the police – The relevance of Max Weber and Emile Durkheim to the study of the police. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 39(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.01.009.
70. Thomas, M. P. & Tufts, S. (2020). Blue Solidarity: Police Unions, Race and Authoritarian Populism in North America. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019863653
71. Tilly, C., Castañeda, E. and Wood, L.J. (2020). Toplumsal Hareketler, 1768-2018. (Çev. O. Düz). İstanbul: ALFA Basım Yayım.
72. Tilly, C. (2003). Inequality, Democratization, and De-Democratization. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 37-43. Erişim adresi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3108607
73. Tilly, C. (2005a). Repression, Mobilization, and Explanation. In C. Davenport, C. Mueller and H. Johnston (Eds.), Repression And Mobilization (pp. 211-226). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
74. Tilly, C. (2005b). Trust and Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Tilly, C. (2014). Demokrasi. (Çev. E. Arıcan). Ankara: Phoenix.
76. Uluslararası Af Örgütü. (2022). “Uluslararası Af Örgütü, tüm dünyada protesto hakkına yönelik eşi benzeri görülmemiş tehdide karşı durmak için küresel bir kampanya başlatıyor”. Erişim adresi: https://www.amnesty.org.tr/icerik/uluslararasi-af-orgutu-tum-dunyada-protesto-hakkina-yonelik-esi-benzeri-gorulmemis-tehdide-karsi-durmak-icin-kuresel-bir-kampanya-baslatiyor
77. Uysal, A. (2017). Sokakta Siyaset Türkiye’de Protesto Eylemleri, Protestocular ve Polis. İstanbul: İletişim.
78. Weber, M. (2004). Sosyoloji Yazıları (Çev. T. Parla). İstanbul: İletişim.
79. Weber, M. (2019). Economy and Society A New Translation (Trans. K. Tribe). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
80. Williams, D.M. (2018). Contemporary anarchist and anarchistic movements. Sociology Compass, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12582
81. Wood, L.J. (2014). Crisis and control :the militarization of protest policing. London: Pluto Press.
82. Wright, J. E., Gaozhao, D., Dukes, K. & Templeton, D. (2023). The Power of Protest on Policing: Black Lives Matter Protest and Civilian Evaluation of the Police. Public Administration Review, 83(1), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13498