'Modernleşme', 'Post-Modernizm' ve Siyaset

Zafer Cirhinlioğlu

'Modernleşme', 'Post-Modernizm' ve Siyaset

Öz

Bu makalede, 1960 ve 1970'li yıllarda yaygın bir şekilde benimsenmiş olan, 'modernleşme' kuramlarının içinde doğdukları ülkelerin dış siyasetleri doğrultusunda geliştirilmiş oldukları düşüncesi yeniden vurgulanmış ve 'bilimsel etik' açısından eleştirilmiştir. Kalkınma/gelişme sorunuııun her geçen gün azgelişmiş ülkelerin tartışma gündeminden uzaklaştığı günümüzde, 'modernleşme' çabaları yerini yavaş yavaş 'post-modern' söylemlere bırakmaya başlamıştır. Oysa, 'post-modern' söylemin, gelişmenin yönünü, rasyonellikten irrasyonelliğe doğru kaydırma ihtimali vardır. 'Modernleşme'lerini tamamlamamış ülkeler, 'post-modern' sürecin anlamını kavrama zorunda kalmışlardır. Bunun için, azgelişmiş ülkelerin kalkınmaları, Batı'dan ödünç alınacak 'modern' ya da 'post-modern' söylemlerle değil, ancak, kendilerinin üretecekleri gerçekci stratejilerle mümkün olabilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

ALATAS, H.S. (1974), "The Captive Mind in the Development Studies", International Social Science Journal, T.X.XIV, No.l.
AMİN S. (1976), Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formation of Peripherial Capitalism, The Harvest Press.
APTER, D. (1988) Rethinking Development: Modernization, Dependency, and Postmodern Politics, Newbuıypark: Sage.
BAŞKAYA, F. (1994), Gelişme Ekonomisinin Yükselişi ve Düşüş, Ankara: Imge Yay.
BAUDRILLARD, Jean (1975) The Mirror of Production, St.Louise.
BAUDRILLARD, Jean (1983) Simulations, Semiotext, New York.
BELL, D. (1960) The End of ldeology, Glencoe, III, Free Press.
BELL, D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, Landon: Basic,

BELL, D. (1976) Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, New York.
BELLAH, Robert. N. (1957), Togugawa Religion, Baston: Beacon
BELLAH, Robert. N. (1958) "Religiouse Aspect of Modemisation in Turkey and Japan", American Journal of Sociology, 64, pp.1-5.
BENDIX, R. (1967) 'Tradition and Modemity Reconsidered', Comperative Studies in Society and History, IX(3), pp.292-346.
BOGARD, W. (1990) "Closing Down The Social: Baudrillard's Challange to Contemporary Sociology", Sociological Theory, 8:1-5.
BURGIN, Victor. (1986) The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Postmodernity, London.
CALLINICOS, Alex. (1990) Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique, New York.
CARDOSO, F. H. () 982) "Dependency and Development in Latin America", in H. Alavi, & T. Shanin (eds), Introduction to the Sociology of Developing Societies, London: Macmillian
CARDOSO, F.H. (1977) "The Consumption ofDependency Theory in the United States", Latin America Research Review, XII(3)P.7-24.
COHEN, R. (1983) "The Sociology ofDevelopment and the Development of Sociology", Social Science Teacher, 12., no.2.
COLEMAN, James S. (1965) Education and Political Develeopment, Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.
CROOK, S., J. Pakulski, M. Waters (1992) Postmodernisation, London: Sage.
DAHRENDORF, Raif (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, Stanfodr University Press.
DAVIS, Winston (1987) "Religion and Development: Weber and East Asia Experiences", in Myron Weiner and Samual Huntington (eds), Understanding Political Development, Boston: Little Brown, p.221-279.
DERRIDA, Jacque (1987) The Truth in Painthing, London.
DOS SANTOS, T. (1971), "The Structure of Dependency", in, K. T. Kan and Donald C. Hodges (eds.), Readings in the U.S. lmperialism. Boston: Extending Horizons, pp.225-236.
DURKHEIM, Emile (1933) The Division ofLabour in Society, The Free Press.
DURKHEIM, Emile (1990) Selected Writings, A.Giddens (ed)., Cambridge University Press.
EHRENREICH, B. and J. EHRENREICH, (1996), "Profesyonel-Yonetici Sınıf', iç Zafer Cirhinlioğlu (der ve çev.), Meslekler ve Sosyoloji, Ankara: Gündoğan Yay.
EISENSTADT, S.N. (1964), "Social Change, Differentiation and Evoluation", American Sociological Review, vol:29.
EISENSTADT, S.N. (1970), 'Social Change and Development', in S.N.Eisenstadt, (ed.), Reading in Social Evolution and Development, Oxford: Pergamon, pp.3-33.
ETZIONI, Amatai (1968) Active Society, Free Press, London.
FEKETE, John. (ed.) (1988), Life after Post-modernism, London.
FEYERABEND, Paul. K. (1975) Against Method, London.
FRANK, Andre Gunder (1967) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, New Y ork: Mounthly Review Press
FRANK, Andre Gunder (1969) Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution, New York: Monthly Review Press
GIDDENS, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Oxford.
HABERMAS, Jurgen. (1985), "A Philosophico-Political Profile", New Left Review, 151, p.75-105.
HABERMAS, Jurgen (1987) A Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Oxford and Cambridge.
HARVEY, D. (1989) The Condition of Post-modern, Oxford:Blackwell.
HASSAN, Ihab (1980) "The Question of Post-modernizm", in Harry R. Garvin (ed.), Romanticism, Modernism, Post-modernism, London: Bucknell Review, pp.117-26.
HOBSBAWN, E. (1979) "The Development of the World Economy", Cambridge Journal ofEconomics, 3(3), pp.305-318.
HOSELITZ, B. (1960) Sociological Aspect of Economic Growth, New York: Free Press.
HUNTINGTON, S. (1984) "Will More Countries Become More Democratic?", Political Science Quarterly, 99:193-218.
JAMESON, Frederic (1984) "Post-modernism and the Cultural Logic of Capitalism", New Left Review, 146: 53-93.
KELLNER, D. (1988) "Post-modernism as Social Theory: Some Challenges and Problems", Theory, Culture and Society, 5:239-69.
KELLNER, D. (1990) "The Post-modern Tıırn; Positions, Problems, and Prospects, in G.Ritzer (ed.), Frontiers of Social Theoy: The New Styntheses, New York: Colombia University Press, pp.255-286.
LASH, S. and J. Urry. (1987) The End of Organized Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.
LEVY, M.J. (1966) Modernizatiou and the Structure of Society, Prenciton University Press.
LEYS, C. (1982) "Samuel Huntington and the End of Classical Modernization Thoery", in H. Alavi, & T. Shanin (eds)., Introduction to the Sociology of Developing Sodeties, London:Macmillian.
LIPSET, S.M. (1963) "Economic Development and Democracy", in S.M, Lipset (ed), Political Man, Garden City, NY:Anchor.
LYOTARD, Jean-François (1984) The Post-Modern Condition, University of Minneapolis Press.
McCLELLAND, David (1976) The Achieving Society, New York: Van Nostrand.
MOUZELIS, N.P. (1988) "Sociology of Development: Reflection on the Present Crisis", Sociology, Vo.22 No.l. .
NISPET, Robert, (1969), Social Change and History; Aspect of the Wester Theory of Development, New York: Oxford University Press.
PARSONS, T. (1971) The System of Modern Societies, Englewood Cliffs.N.J: Prentice-Hall.
PARSONS. T. (1966) Societies; Evolutionary and Comperative Perspectives, Englewood Cliffs.N.J: Prentice-Hall.
ROSE, M. (1991) The Post-Modern and the Post-Industrial, Cambridge University Press.
ROSTOW, W.W. (1960) The Stages of Economic Growth: A nonCommunist Menifesto, London: Cambridege University Presss.
SMELSER, Neil (1964) "Toward a Theory of Modemization", in Amatai Etzioni and Eva Etzioni, (ed.), Social Change, New York: Basic Book, pp.268-284.
SMITH, M.G. (1965) The Plural Society in the British West Indies, Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.
SPENCER, H. (1947) ilk Prensipler, (çev., Selmin Evrim), ist.: Milli Egitim Basımevi.
SRINIVAS, M.N. (1962) Castle in Modern lndia, London: J.K. Publisher.
TIPPS, D.C. (1973) "Modemization Theory and The Comparative Study of Socities: Critical Perspective", Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol.15.
TOENNIES, F. (1957) Community and Society, Michigan: Michigan State University Press, East Lansing.
WALLERSTEIN, I. (1976) The Modern World System, New York Academic Press.
WALLERSTEIN, L (1982) "The World Capitalist System", in Hamza Alavi & T. Shanin, (eds.) Introduction to the Sociology of Developing Societies, London: MacMillan.
WATERS, Malcom. (1994) Modern Sociological Theory, London: Sage.
WEBER, Max. (1968) Economy and Society, New York: Bedminster Press.
WEBER, Max. (1985) Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu, (çev. Zeynep Aruoba), İstanbul: Hill Yayınevi.
WEBER, Max. (1989) Selections in Transition, W.G.Runciman (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
WEINER, Myron and Samuel Huntington (eds.). (1987) Understanding Political Development, Boston: Little Brown.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Siyaset Sosyolojisi

Bölüm

Teorik Makale

Yazarlar

Zafer Cirhinlioğlu Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ekim 1998

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Haziran 1998

Kabul Tarihi

1 Eylül 1998

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1998 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1-2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Cirhinlioğlu, Z. (1998). ’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1-2), 60-85. https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM

AMA

1.Cirhinlioğlu Z. ’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset. SAD / JSR. 1998;1(1-2):60-85. https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM

Chicago

Cirhinlioğlu, Zafer. 1998. “’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 1 (1-2): 60-85. https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM.

EndNote

Cirhinlioğlu Z (01 Ekim 1998) ’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 1 1-2 60–85.

IEEE

[1]Z. Cirhinlioğlu, “’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset”, SAD / JSR, c. 1, sy 1-2, ss. 60–85, Eki. 1998, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM

ISNAD

Cirhinlioğlu, Zafer. “’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 1/1-2 (01 Ekim 1998): 60-85. https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM.

JAMA

1.Cirhinlioğlu Z. ’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset. SAD / JSR. 1998;1:60–85.

MLA

Cirhinlioğlu, Zafer. “’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 1, sy 1-2, Ekim 1998, ss. 60-85, https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM.

Vancouver

1.Zafer Cirhinlioğlu. ’Modernleşme’, ’Post-Modernizm’ ve Siyaset. SAD / JSR [Internet]. 01 Ekim 1998;1(1-2):60-85. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA84HB72NM