KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA

Boran Ali Mercan

doi:10.18490/sosars.1687012

KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA

Öz

Bu makale negatif dayanışma tartışmasına ilişkin ön–kavramsal bir giriş ve ampirik saha araştırmaları için belirli bir sorunsal hattı kurgulamayı amaçlıyor. Dayanışma, sosyolojik tahayyülde, benzerliklerini fark eden insanlar arasında ahlaki bağları, duygusal ortaklığı ve karşılıklılığı kuran bir davranış ilkesi olarak kavranır. Böyle olduğu sürece dayanışma pozitif niteliktedir. Geçtiğimiz yüzyılda iş–çalışma ilişkileri bağlamında dayanışma iş yerinde ekonomik temelli kazanımların ulusal ölçekte politik haklara dönüşümünde önemli rol oynamıştır. Ancak geldiğimiz safhada, işçi ve fabrika imgesine dayalı emeğin kolektif niteliği neoliberal yönetim ideolojileri ve dijital teknolojilerin etkisiyle küresel ölçekte parçalanmış ve bireyleşmiştir. Sürekli ve aşırı çalışmaya karşı tepki bireysel, içe–dönük ve pasif niteliktedir. Makale, işin–çalışmanın dönüşümü neticesinde ortaya çıkan koşullarda negatif olarak tanımlanan yeni bir dayanışma türünün tezahürüne dikkat çekiyor. İlgili yazında negatif dayanışma işin maddi ve sembolik getirisinin olmadığı koşullarda düşük ücret, güvencesizlik ve anlamsızlığa katlanma mecburiyetinden türeyen hınç ve öfkenin potansiyel müşterekleri aşındırıcı etkisi bağlamında tartışılmaktadır. Günümüz iş–çalışma ilişkileri ve iş yeri sosyalliklerini kavramak adına negatif dayanışma, üzerinde düşünülmesi ve ampirik olarak araştırılması gereken bir sosyal sorun alanıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational misbehavior. London: Sage Publications.
Adinolfi, A. (2018). Professionalism and the fascist corporatist state: A historical perspective. Journal of Political Ideologies, 23(4), 421-438.
Aglietta, M. (1979). A theory of capitalist regulation: The US experience. London: New Left Books.
Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), 1435-1459.
Aykaç, A. (2016). The political economy of employment relations: Alternative theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Aytaç, A. M. (2011). Kitlelerin ruhu: Siyasal ve sosyal kuramda kalabalık tahayyülleri. Ankara: Dipnot.
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 367–393.
Battaly, H. (2022). Solidarity: Virtue or vice? In M. Alfano, J. de Ridder, & C. Klein (Eds.), Social virtue epistemology (pp. 303–324). Routledge.

Bauman, Z. (1991). The pragmatics of self-identity: The present and future of sociology. London: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
Benería, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. S. (2015). Gender, development, and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered. New York: Routledge.
Berg, P., Bosch, G., & Charest, J. (2014). Working-time configurations: A framework for analyzing diversity across countries. ILR Review, 67(3), 805–837.
Blatterer, H. (2022). Friendship and solidarity. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(2), 217–234.
Borzaga, C., Salvatori, G., & Bodini, R. (2019). Social and solidarity economy and the future of work. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 5(1), 37–57.
Bowring, F. (2016). Durkheim and the law. Law and Social Inquiry, 41(2), 413–440.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Budd, J. W. (2004). Employment with a human face: Balancing efficiency, equity, and voice. Ithaca: ILR Press.
Budd, J. W. (2010). Labor relations: Striking a balance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Burger, A. S. (2020). Extreme work hours in Western Europe and North America: Diverging trends since the 1970s. Socio-Economic Review, 18(4), 1065–1087.
Casey, C. (1995). Work, self and society: After industrialism. London: Routledge.
Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64-88.
Courpasson, D., Dany, F., & Clegg, S. R. (2012). The new spirit of capitalism: Work and solidarity in the neoliberal economy. London: Sage.
Courpasson, D., Dany, F., & Clegg, S. R. (2021). The neoliberal workplace and the fragmentation of solidarity. New York: Routledge.
Courpasson, D., Dany, F., & Marti, I. (2016). The limits of neoliberalism: Understanding organizational resistance through solidarity. Organization, 23(5), 768-786.
Courpasson, D., Younes, M., & Reed, M. (2021). Resisting neoliberalism in organizations: The power of alternative forms of solidarity. Organization Studies, 42(6), 935-952.
Dahl, R. A. (1985). A preface to economic democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dean, E. N., Dadzie, R. B., & Pham, X. (2022). The instinct of workmanship and the incidence of bullshit jobs. Journal of Economic Issues, 56(3), 673–698.
Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488.
Durkheim, É. ([1893] 2013). The division of labour in society (S. Lukes, Ed.; W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York: Free Press.
Durkheim, É. ([1957] 2003). The professional ethics and civic morals (C. Brookfield, Trans.). New York: Routledge.
Fine, G. A. (1986). Sharing the work: The division of labor in the household. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fleming, P. (2009). Authenticity and the cultural politics of work: New forms of informal control. Oxford: OUP.
Fleming, P. (2017a). The death of homo economicus: Work, debt and the myth of endless accumulation. London: Pluto Press.
Fleming, P. (2017b). The human capital hoax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization. Organization Studies, 38(5), 691–709.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a distance: The implications of telework for organizational control and job design. Human Relations, 56(6), 708–736.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in management and organization: A critical introduction. London: Sage Publications.
Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A. (2011). Managing the unmanageable: Power, control, and resistance in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franz, B. (2021). Living in neoliberal America: Extremism, pauperization, and negative solidarity. International Relations, 9(12), 501-514.
Fudge, J. (2005). The transformation of labour relations in Canada: The politics of workers' rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Gabriel, Y. (1995). The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivity. Organization Studies, 16(3), 477-501.
Gall, G. (2014). New forms of labour conflict: A transnational overview. In M. Atzeni (Ed.), Workers and labour in a globalised capitalism: Contemporary themes and theoretical issues (pp. 210–229). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewicz, M. (Eds.). (1994). Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Gerstel, N., & Clawson, D. (2018). Control over time: Employers, workers, and families shaping work schedules. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 77–97.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gillespie, R. (1991). Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. (2020). Talking about youth: The depoliticization of young people in the public domain. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(5), 591-607.
Glynos, J. (2008). Ideological fantasy at work. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(3), 275-296.
Gough, I., Wood, G., Barrientos, A., Bevan, P., Davis, P., & Room, G. (2004). Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America: Social policy in development contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graeber, D. (2018). Bullshit jobs: A theory. London: Allen Lane.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harvey, D. (1999). The limits to capital. London: Verso.
Harvey, D. (2006). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, T. ([1651] 2007). Leviathan (Ş. T. Duralı, Trans.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Hope, P., & Hendry, J. (1995). Firms, control and the structuring of labor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopkins, T. K., & Wallerstein, I. (1996). The world-system: Five hundred years or five thousand? Theory and Society, 25(2), 231-235.
Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027.
Hyman, R. (2016). The very idea of democracy at work. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 22(1), 11-24.
Itzkovich, Y., & Heilbrunn, S. (2016). The role of co-workers’ solidarity as an antecedent of incivility and deviant behavior in organizations. Deviant Behavior, 37(8), 861-876.
Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kanigel, R. (2005). The one best way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the enigma of efficiency. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2019). Work and Value Creation in the Platform Economy. In S.P. Vallas & A. Kovalainen (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Work (pp. 13–41). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Publishing.
Komter, A. (2004). Social solidarity and the gift. Cambridge University Press.
Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. New York: Free Press.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Laitinen, A., & Pessi, A. B. (2015). Solidarity—Theory and practice: An introduction. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 1–29). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Lok, J., & Willmott, H. (2014). Identities and identifications in organizations: Dynamics of antipathy, deadlock, and alliance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3), 215-230.
Lindenberg, S. (1998). Solidarity: An organizational perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lipietz, A. (1989). Mirages and miracles: The crisis of global Fordism. London: Verso.
Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet quitting–causes and opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9-19.
Marks, L. (1994). The politics of work: The transformations of work in modern society. London: Sage Publications.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mauss, M. ([1950] 2002). The Gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (W. D. Halls, Trans.). London: Routledge.
McCartin, J. (1997). Labor, work and the politics of inequality. New York: State University of New York Press.
Mercan, B. A., & Aytaç, A. M. (2024). Sahicilik ve teknoloji siyaseti kiskacinda: bir kaynak olarak insan. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (39), 317-345.
Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (2015) [1994]. Crime and the American dream (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2012). Urban poverty in the global south: Scale and nature. Routledge.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
Morrison, R.L., & Nolan, T. (2007). Negative relationships in the workplace: a qualitative study. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 4(3), 203-221.
Mosoetsa, S., & Williams, M. (Eds.). (2012). Labour in the global south: Challenges and alternatives for workers. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Mundlak, G. (2007). Industrial citizenship, social citizenship, corporate citizenship: I just want my wages. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2), 719-748.
Neely, M. T. (2020). The portfolio ideal worker: Insecurity and inequality in the new economy. Qualitative Sociology, 43(2), 271–296.
Özşuca, Ş.T. & Toksöz, G. (2003). Sosyal koruma yoksunluğu, enformel sektör ve küçük işletmeler. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
Nichols, T., & Sugur, N. (2004). Global management, local labour: Turkish workers and modern industry. New York: Springer.
Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
Polanyi, K. ([1957] 2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Polanyi, K. ([1957] 2018). Economy as instituted process. In M. Granovetter & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (3rd ed., pp. 61–97). London: Routledge.
Pontes, A. M., Silva, J. M., & Oliveira, A. R. (2017). Migrant workers and social justice: The impact of migration on labor rights in the global north. Journal of Labor and Society, 20(4), 567-586.
Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2018). Solidarity in biomedicine and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quade, M.J., Greenbaum, R.L., & Mawritz, M.B. (2019). “If Only My Coworker Was More Ethical”: When ethical and performance comparisons lead to negative emotions, social undermining, and ostracism. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 567-586.
Raelin, J. A. (2011). The end of managerial control? Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 135-160.
Read, J. (2024). The double shift: Spinoza and Marx on the politics of work. Verso Books.
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
Rifkin, J. (1995). The end of work: The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Robertson, S. L. (2015). Globalization, education and development: The politics of the global education race. Routledge.
Rozakou, K. (2016). Socialities of solidarity: Revisiting the gift taboo in times of crises. Social Anthropology, 24(2), 185–199.
Rozakou, K. (2017). Solidarity as a political concept: The case of Greece's refugee crisis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(3), 296-309.
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
Sanson, A., & Courpasson, D. (2022). Neoliberalism and the reinvention of solidarity in the workplace: Alternative forms of resistance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(5), 734-750.
Sassen, S. (2016). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sayer, A. (2015). Why we can’t afford the rich. Bristol: Policy Press.
Schmitz, H. (1995). Collective efficiency: Growth path for small-scale industry. The Journal of Development Studies, 31(4), 529-566.
Scholz, S. (2008). Civic and political solidarity: Theories and practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scholz, S. (2015). The ethics of solidarity: A philosophical perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Silva, J. M. (2013). The globalization of the working class: The impact of migration on labor markets in the global north. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 54(1), 3-22.
Silva, J. M. (2023). Migration and the working class: The political economy of labor in the global north. Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, N. H. (2015). Solidarity and work: A reassessment. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 155–177). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Sørensen, J. (2002). Complexity, local rationality and organizational change. Organization Studies, 23(3), 437–465.
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sun, S., Jiang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Silent boycott: Workplace ostracism and employee withdrawal. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(1), 147-163.
Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, P. (2020). The changing nature of work: Solidarity and individualism in contemporary organizations. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 466-483.
Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work-discipline and industrial capitalism. Past and Present: A Journal of Scientific History, 38: 56–76.
Tönnies, F. ([1887] 2001). Community and society (C. P. Loomis, Trans.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Wallerstein, I. (2005). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.
Wallwork, E. (1985). Durkheim's sociology of morality. Sociology, 19(2), 171–188.
Willmott, H. (2013). Theorizing the organization of work: A critical perspective. London: Sage Publications.
Wolff, J. (2015). The Christian conception of society and solidarity: Fascism, Nazism, and the idea of particularistic solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Çalışma Sosyolojisi, Değişme, Azgelişmişlik ve Modernleşme Sosyolojisi

Bölüm

Teorik Makale

Yazarlar

Boran Ali Mercan
0000-0002-1125-7528
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Nisan 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

27 Ocak 2025

Kabul Tarihi

6 Nisan 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1687012

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA79CW26GW

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Mercan, B. A. (2025). KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 28(1), 88-119. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1687012

AMA

1.Mercan BA. KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA. SAD / JSR. 2025;28(1):88-119. doi:10.18490/sosars.1687012

Chicago

Mercan, Boran Ali. 2025. “KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 28 (1): 88-119. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1687012.

EndNote

Mercan BA (01 Nisan 2025) KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 28 1 88–119.

IEEE

[1]B. A. Mercan, “KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA”, SAD / JSR, c. 28, sy 1, ss. 88–119, Nis. 2025, doi: 10.18490/sosars.1687012.

ISNAD

Mercan, Boran Ali. “KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 28/1 (01 Nisan 2025): 88-119. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1687012.

JAMA

1.Mercan BA. KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA. SAD / JSR. 2025;28:88–119.

MLA

Mercan, Boran Ali. “KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 28, sy 1, Nisan 2025, ss. 88-119, doi:10.18490/sosars.1687012.

Vancouver

1.Boran Ali Mercan. KOLEKTİFTEN BİREYE İŞYERİNDE DAYANIŞMANIN DÖNÜŞEN ANLAMI: NEGATİF DAYANIŞMA. SAD / JSR. 01 Nisan 2025;28(1):88-119. doi:10.18490/sosars.1687012

Cited By

SOSYAL MEDYA, KÜLTÜR SAVAŞLARI VE DİJİTAL DAYANIŞMA

Sosyoloji Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.59572/sosder.1667152