GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT

Haktan Ural

doi:10.18490/sosars.927266

GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT

Öz

The geographies of home are discerned as having a particular significance in the lives of gay men. The individual homes of lesbians and gay men are amenable to affirming non-heterosexual identities and subverting the cultural norms of heterosexual family life. This study contributes to understanding this construction of lesbian/gay identity at home. Drawing on gay men’s everyday experiences within Turkey’s cultural context, I deal with home as a spatial domain laden with diverse meanings and affective registers. I suggest that Turkey’s cultural context structures gay men’s habitus and informs their knowledge of possible actions that are available to them. In this discursive terrain, they attribute specific meanings of safety and autonomy to their homes. However, these meaning-making practices should not be reduced to an experience of closeting, as gay men’s domestic life opens up a space of comfort for gay identities. Insofar as gay men can re-inscribe their homes as sites for the comfort of gay identities, these homes seamlessly become a performative domain. Within them, the men’s situated activities pave the way for creation and affirmation of gay identities, in both individual and collective ways. Therefore, I suggest that gay men’s affective dispositions (namely safety and comfort) arise out of their relations with people, objects and places, and lead to restructuring their habitus in a way so as to validate their gay identities in domestic life. Yet this is an unfinished project and needs to be renegotiated to ensure gay men’s safety and comfort in their everyday lives.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Acar, F., & Altunok, G. (2013). The ‘politics of intimate’ at the intersection of neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism in contemporary Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2012.10.001
Addison, M. (2017). Overcoming Arlie Hochschild’s concepts of the ‘real’ and ‘false’ self by drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of habitus. Emotion, Space and Society, 23, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2017.01.003
Ahlm, J. (2017). Respectable promiscuity: Digital cruising in an era of queer liberalism. Sexualities, 20(3), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716665783
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
Ataman, H. (2011). Less than citizens: The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender question in Turkey. Içinde R. Ö. Dönmez & P. Enneli (Ed.), Societal Peace and Ideal Citizenship for Turkey (ss. 125–158). Lexington.
Bereket, T., & Adam, B. D. (2008). Navigating Islam and same-sex liaisons among men in Turkey. Journal of Homosexuality, 55(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802129428
Beşpınar, F. U. (2014). Women and Gender. Içinde B. Shane & M. Herzog (Ed.), Turkey and the Politics of National Identity: Social, Economic and Cultural Transformation (ss. 118–144). IB Tauris.
Binnie, J., & Skeggs, B. (2004). Cosmopolitan knowledge and the production and consumption of sexualized space: Manchester’s gay village. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00441.x

Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2006). Home. Routledge. Blunt, A., & Varley, A. (2004). Introduction: Geographies of Home. Cultural Geographies, 11, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474004eu289xx
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Polity Press.
Brown, G. (2008). Ceramics, clothing and other bodies: affective geographies of homoerotic cruising encounters. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(8), 915–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802441457
Brown, G., Browne, K., & Lim, J. (2007). Introduction, or why have a book on geographies of sexualities? Içinde K. Browne, J. Lim, & G.
Brown (Ed.), Geographies of Sexualities: Theories, Practices, Politics (ss. 1–20). Ashgate. Burkitt, I. (2014). Emotions and Social Relations. Sage.
Çarkoğlu, A., & Toprak, B. (2007). Religion, Society and Politics in a Changing Turkey.
Cattan, N., & Vanolo, A. (2014). Gay and lesbian emotional geographies of clubbing: reflections from Paris and Turin. Içinde Gender, Place &
Culture (C. 21, Sayı 9, ss. 1158–1175). https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.810603
Chase, S. (2005). Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices. Içinde N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (ss. 651–680). Sage.
Cindoglu, D., & Unal, D. (2017). Gender and sexuality in the authoritarian discursive strategies of “New Turkey”. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816679003
Collins, D. (2005). Identity, Mobility, and Urban Place-Making: Exploring Gay Life in Manila. Gender & Society, 19(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204272707
Davis, M., Flowers, P., Lorimer, K., Oakland, J., & Frankis, J. (2016). Location, safety and (non) strangers in gay mens narratives on ’hook-up apps. Sexualities, 19(7), 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716629334
Duncan, N. (1996). Renegotiating Gender and Sexuality in Public and Private Spaces. Içinde N. Duncan (Ed.), Bodyspace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality (ss. 127–144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Elwood, S. (2000). Lesbian Living Spaces: Multiple Meanings of Home. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 4(1), 11–27.
Erol, M., & Ozbay, C. (2017). No andropause for gay men? The body, aging and sexuality in Turkey. Journal of Gender Studies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1329715
Eslen-Ziya, H., & Koc, Y. (2016). Being a gay man in Turkey: internalised sexual prejudice as a function of prevalent hegemonic masculinity perceptions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(7), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1133846
Gabriel, Y., & Ulus, E. (2015). “It’s all in the plot”: Narrative explorations of work-related emotions. Içinde H. Flam & J. Kleres (Ed.), Methods of Exploring Emotions (ss. 36–45). Routledge.
Gorman-Murray, A. (2006a). Gay and Lesbian Couples at Home: Identity Work in Domestic Space. Home Cultures, 3(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.2752/174063106778053200
Gorman-Murray, A. (2006b). Homeboys: uses of home by gay Australian men. Social & cultural geography, 7(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360500452988
Gorman-Murray, A. (2007). Contesting Domestic Ideals: Queering the Australian home. Australian Geographer, 38(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180701392766
Gorman-Murray, A. (2008). Queering the family home: Narratives from gay, lesbian and bisexual youth coming out in supportive family homes in Australia. Gender, Place & Culture, 15(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690701817501
Green, A. I. (2008). Erotic habitus: toward a sociology of desire. Theory and Society, 37(6), 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9059-4
Güney, M. E., & Selçuk, İ. A. (2016). LGBTTs of Turkey between the east and the west – the city and the world through their eyes in the case of Izmir. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(10), 1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2016.1160870
Held, N. (2015). Comfortable and safe spaces? Gender, sexuality and “race” in night-time leisure spaces. Emotion, Space and Society, 14, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2014.12.003
Holliday, R. (1999). The Comfort of Identity. Sexualities, 2(4), 475–491.
Johnston, L., & Valentine, G. (1995). Wherever I lay my girlfriend, that’s my home: the performance and surveillance of lesbian identities in domestic environments. Içinde D. Bell & G. Valentine (Ed.), Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities (ss. 99–113). Routledge.
Kentlyn, S. (2008). The Radically Subversive Space of the Queer Home: ‘Safety House’ and ‘Neighbourhood Watch’. Australian Geographer, 39(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180802270523
Korkut, U., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2016). The Discursive Governance of Population Politics: The Evolution of a Pro-birth Regime in Turkey. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 23(4), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxw003 McNay, L. (2008). Against Recognition. Polity Press.
Misgav, C., & Johnston, L. (2014). Dirty dancing: the (non)fluid embodied geographies of a queer nightclub in Tel Aviv. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(7), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.916744
Ozyegin, G. (2012). Reading the closet through connectivity. Social Identities, 18(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2012.652845
Podmore, J. (2001). Lesbians in the Crowd: Gender, sexuality and visibility along Montreal’s Boul. St-Laurent. Gender, Place & Culture, 8(4), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690120111591
Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236934
Seidman, S., Meeks, C., & Traschen, F. (1999). Beyond the Closet? The Changing Social Meaning of Homosexuality in the United States.
Sexualities, 2(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346099002001002
Sümer, S., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2017). New waves for old rights? Womens mobilization and bodily rights in Turkey and Norway. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815619878
Taylor, Y., & Falconer, E. (2015). ‘Seedy bars and grotty pints’: close encounters in queer leisure spaces. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.939708
Ural, H., & Beşpınar, F. U. (2017). Class and Habitus in the Formation of Gay Identities, Masculinities, and Respectability in Turkey. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 13(2), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-3861323
Valentine, G., Skelton, T., & Butler, R. (2003). Coming out and outcomes: Negotiating lesbian and gay identities with, and in, the family. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1068/d277t
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Sage.
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and Discourse – What’s the problem? From Affect as Excess to Affective/Discursive Practice. Subjectivity, 6(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.13
Wimark, T. (2016). The impact of family ties on the mobility decisions of gay men and lesbians. Gender Place and Culture, 23(5), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1034246
Yılmaz, V., & Göçmen, İ. (2016). Denied Citizens of Turkey: Experiences of Discrimination Among LGBT Individuals in Employment, Housing and Health Care. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(5), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12122
Young, I. M. (2005). On Female Body Experience: “Throwing like a Girl” and Other Essays. Oxford University Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Haktan Ural Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Nisan 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Mayıs 2020

Kabul Tarihi

23 Kasım 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.927266

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA99UW98FL

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ural, H. (2021). GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24(2), 349-378. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.927266

AMA

1.Ural H. GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT. SAD / JSR. 2021;24(2):349-378. doi:10.18490/sosars.927266

Chicago

Ural, Haktan. 2021. “GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 24 (2): 349-78. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.927266.

EndNote

Ural H (01 Nisan 2021) GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 24 2 349–378.

IEEE

[1]H. Ural, “GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT”, SAD / JSR, c. 24, sy 2, ss. 349–378, Nis. 2021, doi: 10.18490/sosars.927266.

ISNAD

Ural, Haktan. “GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 24/2 (01 Nisan 2021): 349-378. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.927266.

JAMA

1.Ural H. GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT. SAD / JSR. 2021;24:349–378.

MLA

Ural, Haktan. “GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 24, sy 2, Nisan 2021, ss. 349-78, doi:10.18490/sosars.927266.

Vancouver

1.Haktan Ural. GAY MEN’S HOME-MAKING AS AFFECTIVE PRACTICE IN TURKEY: THE PURSUIT OF SAFETY AND COMFORT. SAD / JSR. 01 Nisan 2021;24(2):349-78. doi:10.18490/sosars.927266