Studies Concerning Agricultural Heritage of Ottomans and the Development of the Rural Section in the Early Republic Period (The Case of Bursa)
Öz
Agriculture, the subject of our research, in general, had always been of
primary importance in history for the development of the countries and in
particular for the avoidance of periods of famine. A sturdy agricultural
structure reveals a sturdy city and sturdy industrial structure. While
discussing about the agricultural sector, its relation and interaction with
other sectors should be addressed with a holistic approach and assessments
should be based on a rational understanding. When the agricultural sector and
problems thereof are assessed singly in a limited and narrow frame, an
uneconomic perspective not based on effectiveness and rationality poses a
challenge before the development.
Agricultural production being done on closed (isolated) lands in the
last years of the Ottomans leaded the country, more than 80% of the population
of which inhabited in rural areas, become incapable to nourish its own urban
areas and even the adjacent agricultural areas. As a matter of fact, cereal
products such as wheat etc. needs of İstanbul were incessantly met from foreign
countries. Anatolia, at the beginning of the war of independence, was an
agricultural country with people engaged in the agricultural sector however
with hardly any active role in the entire economy.
For the development of the rural section which
constituted around 80% of the population in the Early Republic period, while on
one hand individuals were provided with primary school education or literacy
information, on the other hand attention was paid to improve the social status
of the individual as well. Public institutions were formed to serve villagers
generally in Turkey and specifically in Bursa. Within this context, one of the
initial actions of the Early Republic Government was to promulgate an act
concerning the administration of villages in Turkey.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1927 Bursa Vilayeti Salnamesi.
- Accounts&Papers, Report by Mr. Sandison, British Consul at Broussa, on the Trade of Consulate.
- Arı, Kemal (2008). “Tarihsel Süreçte Mübadele ve Bursa”. Bursa’nın Zenginliği Göçmenler, Ed: Zeynep Dörtok Abacı, Bursa: Osmangazi Belediyesi Yay.
- Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri II, 1906-1938 Açıklamalı Dizin İle (2006). Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi.
- Boratav, Korkut (2008). Türkiye İktisat Tarihi 1908-2007. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
- Bursa Coğrafyası (2009). Haz: M. Fatih Birgül ve Levent Ali Çanaklı, Yeşil Şehir Kitaplığı, Bursa İl Özel İdaresi Yay.
- Çetin, Türkan (1999). “Modern Türkiye Yaratma Projesinin Orijinal Bir Boyutu: Örnek Köyler”. 75 Yılda Köylerden Şehirlere, Ed: Oya Baydar, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yay.
- DİE (1927). Türkiye Milli Geliri. Yayım No: 374 ve 420, Ankara.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Hacer Karabağ
ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Ocak 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
16 Mart 2017
Kabul Tarihi
29 Kasım 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 32
Cited By
GİRİŞİMCİ BİR LİDER OLARAK ATATÜRK
Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1363578CUMHURİYET TÜRKİYE’SİNDE TARIMIN DÖNÜŞÜM SERÜVENİ: DÜN, BUGÜN VE YARIN
Akademik Hassasiyetler
https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1355647TÜRK MATBUATINDA JAPONYA: HAKİMİYET-İ MİLLİYE GAZETESİ ÖZELİNDE BİR İNCELEME (1929-1934)
Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute
https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1429730TARIMSAL PAZARLAMADA KADININ ROLÜ VE TÜRKİYE’DE KADIN KOOPERATİFLERİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ
Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.54993/syad.1736462
