AB’NİN NORMATİF GÜÇ KİMLİĞİ VE SURİYE MÜLTECİ KRİZİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ ÜZERİNE IAN MANNERS’IN TEORİK YAKLAŞIMI ÇERÇEVESİNDE POLİTİK BİR ANALİZ

Öz

Avrupa Birliği’nin (AB) Suriye mülteci krizinin yönetimi noktasında izlediği politika uluslararası siyasette ve akademik literatürde eleştirilere maruz kalmıştır. Bu eleştirilerin önemli bir kısmı, AB’nin krize yönelik izlediği göç politikasının onun normatif güç kimliği ile uyumlu olup olmadığına odaklanır. AB, Ian Manners’ın teorik çerçevesine referansla sıklıkla normatif bir politik güç şeklinde tanımlanır. Normatif güç olan AB’nin mülteci krizine yönelik izlemesi gereken politikanın özetle şöyle bir nitelik göstermesi beklenir: AB değerleri ve bilhassa insan hakları odaklı, ulusüstü seviyede, kapsayıcı, proaktif ve uzun vadeli bir politika. Bu politika, başka bir deyişle, realist güç politikası eksenli, krizinin özellikle güvenlik boyutuna odaklanan, dışsallayıcı, reaktif ve kısa vadeli bir göç politikası olmamalıdır. Bu çerçevede, bu çalışmanın amacı, AB’nin Suriye mülteci krizine yönelik benimsediği göç politikasının AB’nin normatif güç kimliği ile uyumlu olup olmadığını incelemektir. Metodolojik olarak AB’nin göç politikası, teknik ve doktrinel yasal bir analizle detaylıca değil, AB’nin normatif kimliğine referansla teorik ve analitik olarak incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Birliği,Ian Manners,normatif güç,Suriye mülteci krizi,uluslararası siyaset

A Political Analysis on the Relationship between the EU’s Normative Power Identity and the Syrian Refugee Crisis within the Framework of Ian Manner’s Theoretical Perspective

Öz

European Union’s (EU) Migration policy on the Syrian refugee crisis, which has been embraced by the Union with regard to the management of the crisis, has been subjected to criticisms in the international politics and scholarly literature. A significant portion of these criticisms focuses on whether the EU’s policies on the Syrian refugee crisis are incompatible with its normative power identity. EU is described as a normative political power with reference to the theoretical framework provided by Ian Manners. Normative power EU’s migration policy on the Syrian refugee crisis is therefore expected to have the following features: EU values, especially human rights, based; at the supranational level, inclusive, proactive and long-reaching. This policy, in other words, should not be a policy which focuses on the security dimension of the crisis, is realist power politics and externalization oriented, reactive and short-sighted. In this sense, this study aims to examine whether the EU’s policy on the Syrian refugee crisis is compatible with its normative power identity. Methodologically, EU’s migration policy is examined by adapting, not a detailed technical and doctrinal legal, but a theoretical and analytical method with reference to the EU’s normative identity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• European Union,international politics,Ian Manners,normative power,Syrian refugee crisis

Kaynakça

1. Accession Criteria (1993). https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/policy/glossary/terms/accession-criteria_en (Erişim Tarihi Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
2. Aggestam, Lisbeth (2008). “Introduction: Ethical Power Europe”. International Affairs, C. 84, S. 1, s. 1-11.
3. Aldırmaz, Yaşar (2017). “Değerler Avrupası’ndan Duvarlar Avrupası’na Göç, Sığınmacılar ve Mülteci Krizi Çerçevesinde AB Hukuku ve Politikaları”. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, C. 16, S. 2, s. 83-103.
4. Alkan, Yavuz Selim (2008). The Effectiveness of the European Union as a Normative Power: Human Rights Conditionality in the Case of Turkey. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: ODTÜ.
5. Ambrosetti, Elena (2015). The “Migration Crisis” – Furthering Identity Cleavages in the EU. https://munplanet.com/articles/international-relations/the-migration-crisis-furthering-identity-cleavages-in-the-eu (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
6. Ambrosetti, Elena ve Angela Paparusso (2015). “Immigration Policies in the EU: Failure or Success? Evidences from Italy”. Der: Strangio, Donatella ve Giuseppe Sancetta. Italy in a European Context: Research in Business, Economics, and the Environment. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 28-49.
7. Amnesty International (2015). “Balkans: Refugees and Migrants Beaten by Police, Left in Legal Limbo and Failed by EU”. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/07/balkansrefugees-and-migrants-beaten-by-police/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2019).
8. Arı, Tayyar (2006). Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika. İstanbul: Seçkin.

9. Avrupa Birliği Antlaşması ve Avrupa Birliği’nin İşleyişi Hakkında Antlaşma (2007). https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/pub/antlasmalar.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
10. Bárd, Petra vd. (2016). “An EU Mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights”. CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security in Europe, S. 91, s. 1-247.
11. Bauböck, Rainer (2017). “Refugee Protection and Burden‐Sharing in the European Union”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 56, S. 1, s. 141-156.
12. Bellamy, Richard ve Dario C. Castiglione (2003). “Legitimizing the Euro-‘Polity’ and its ‘Regime’: The Normative Turn in EU Studies”. European Journal of Political Theory, C. 2, S. 1, s. 7-34.
13. Benvenuti, Bianca (2017). “The Migration Paradox and EU-Turkey Relations”. IAI Working Papers, S. 17, s. 1-23.
14. Berend, Ivan T. (2016). The History of European Integration: A New Perspective. Oxon ve New York: Routledge.
15. Birchfield, Vicki L. (2011). “The EU’s Development Policy: Empirical Evidence of ‘Normative Power Europe’?”. Der: Richard G. Whitman. Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 141-160.
16. Bilgiç, Ali Ç. ve Michelle Pace (2017). “The European Union and Refugees: A Struggle over the Fate of Europe”. Global Affairs, C. 3, S. 1, s. 89-97.
17. Börzel, Tanja A. ve Thomas Risse (2009). “The Transformative Power of Europe: The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas”. KFG Working Paper, No. 1. https://www.polsoz.fuberlin.de/polwiss/forschung/international/atasp/publikationen/4_artikel_papiere/2010_TR_the_transformative_power_of_europe/WP_01_Juni_Boerzel_Risse.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2019).
18. Bretherton, Charlotte ve John Vogler (2003). The European Union as a Global Actor. New York: Routledge.
19. Buchan, George (2012). National Interests and the European Union. London: Bruges Group.
20. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Rights (2000). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
21. Carrera, Sergio ve Elspeth Guild (2015). “Can the New Refugee Relocation System Work? Perils in the Dublin Logic and Flawed Reception Conditions in the EU”. CEPS Policy Brief, S. 334. https://www.ceps.eu/publications/can-new-refugee-relocation-system-work-perils-dublin-logic-and-flawed-reception (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
22. Council Decision 2015/1601. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32015D1601 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2019).
23. Council of the European Union (2015). Resolution of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States Meeting within the Council on Relocating From Greece and Italy 40,000 Persons In Clear Need Of International Protection. http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11131-2015-INIT/en/pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
24. Del Sarto, Raffaella A. (2016). “Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, Its Borderlands, and the ‘Arab Spring’”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 54, S. 2, s. 215-232.
25. Deutsche Welle (2018). “AB-Türkiye Mülteci Anlaşmasının Ikinci Yılı Doldu”. https://www.dw.com/cda/tr/ab-t%C3%BCrkiye-m%C3%BClteci-anla%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1n%C4%B1n-ikinci-y%C4%B1l%C4%B1-doldu/a-43027606 (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
26. D’Humieres, Victoire (2018). “European Union/African Cooperation: The Externalisation of Europe’s Migration Policies”. Fondation Robert Schuman Policy Paper, No. 472, s. 1-9.
27. Dinan, Demond (2006). Der: Origins and Evolution of the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Diez, Thomas (2005). “Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe’”. Millennium, C. 33, S. 3, s. 613-636.
29. _______ (2012). “Not Quite ‘Sui Generis’ Enough”. European Societies, C. 14, S. 4, s. 522-539.
30. _______ (2013). “Normative Power as Hegemony”. Cooperation and Conflict, C. 48, S. 2, s. 194-210.
31. Diez, Thomas ve Michelle Pace (2011). “Normative Power Europe and Conflict Transformation”. Der: Richard G. Whitman. Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 141-160.
32. Duchéne, Francis (1973). “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence”. Der: Kohnstamand, Max ve Wolfgang Hager. A Nation Writ Large? Foreign Policy Problems Before the European Community. Londra ve Basingstoke, s. 1‐21.
33. ECRE (2016). Dublin Regulation. http://www.ecre.org/topics/areas-ofwork/protection-in-europe/10-dublin-regulation.html (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2019).
34. European Commission (t.y.). “European Solidarity: A Refugee Relocation System”. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/docs/2_eu_solidarity_a_refugee_relocation_system_en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2019).
35. _______ (2015). “More Responsibility in Managing the Refugee Crisis: European Commission Adopts 40 Infringement Decisions to Make European Asylum System Work”. file:///C:/Users/YVZ/Downloads/IP-15-5699_EN.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
36. _______ (2016a). “Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast)”. COM (2016) 270 final.
37. _______ (2016b). “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: Second Report on the Progress Made in the Implementation of the Eu-Turkey Statement”. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160615/2nd_commission_report_on_progress_made_in_the_implementation_of_the_eu-turkey_agreement_en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
38. _______ (2016c). “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, and the Council: First Report on Relocation and Resettlement”. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016DC0165 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2019).
39. _______ (2019). “Communicatıon from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council Progress Report on the Implementation of the European Agenda on Migration”. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20190306_com-2019-126-report_en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2019).
40. European Council (2016). EU-Turkey Statement. www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/18-eu-turkey-statement/ (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
41. Forsberg, Tuomas (2011). “Normative Power Europe, Once Again: A Conceptual Analysis of an Ideal Type”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 49, S. 6, s. 1183-1204.
42. Geddes, Andrew (2003). The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: SAGE Publications.
43. Gilbert, Mark (2011). European Integration: A Concise History. Plymouth: Rowman&Littlefield.
44. Ginsberg, Roy (2001). The European Union in International Politics: Baptism by Fire. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
45. Greenhill, Kelly M. (2016). “Open Arms behind Barred Doors: Fear, Hypocrisy and Policy Schizophrenia in the European Migration Crisis”. European Law Journal, C. 22, S. 3, s. 317-332.
46. Grigonis, Simas (2016). “EU in the Face of Migrant Crisis: Reasons for Ineffective Human Rights Protection”. International Cooperative Jurisprudence, C. 2, S. 2, s. 93-98.
47. Güleç, Cansu (2015). “Avrupa Birliği’nin Göç Politikaları ve Türkiye’ye Yansımaları”. Tesam Akademi Dergisi, C. 2. S. 2. S. 81-100.
48. Haferlach, Lisa ve Dilek Kurban (2017). “Lessons Learnt from the EU-Turkey Refugee Agreement in Guiding EU Migration Partnerships with Origin and Transit Countries”. Global Policy, C. 8, S. 4, s. 85-93.
49. Hettne, Bjorn ve Fredrik Söderbaum (2002). “Theorising the Rise of Regionness”, Der: Shaun Breslin vd. New Regionalism in the Global Political Economy. London: Routledge. HRW World Report (2019). “Türkiye 2018 Olayları”. https://www.hrw.org/tr/world-report/2019/country-chapters/325436 (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
50. Hyde-Price, Adrian (2006). ‘“Normative’ Power Europe: A Realist Critique”’. Journal of European Public Policy, C. 13, S. 2, s. 217–34.
51. Hyndman, Jennifer ve Alison Mountz (2008). “Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-Refoulement and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe”. Government and Opposition, C. 43, S. 2. S. 249-269.
52. Independent (2016). “EU-Turkey Refugee Deal: UN and Amnesty Attack ‘Short-Sighted and Inhumane’ Plan”. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/eu-turkey-refugee-deal-un-and-amnesty-attack-short-sighted-and-inhumane-plan-a6919966.html (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
53. Kıyıcı, Gülnihan G. ve Ummuhan Kaygısız (2018). “Avrupa Birliği’nin Geri Kabul Anlaşmalarının Avrupa Birliği Göç Politikaları ve İnsan Hakları Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, C. 10, S. 25, s. 467-484).
54. Knodt, Michele ve Sebastian Princen (2003). Understanding the European Union’s External Relations. London: Routledge.
55. Koenig, Nicole (2017). “The EU’s External Migration Policy: Towards Win-Win-Win Partnerships”. Jacques Delors Institut. http://www.delorsinstitut.de/en/all-publications/win-win-win-partnerships-in-eu-migration- policy/ (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
56. Koenig, Nicole ve Marie Walter-Franke (2017). “One Year On: What Lessons From The EU-Turkey ‘Deal’?”. Jacques Delors Institut. www.delorsinstitut.de/en/publications/posttype/blog-post-en/one-year-on-what-lessons-from-the-eu-turkey-deal (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
57. Kostakopoulou, Dora vd. (2014). “EU Migration Law: The Opportunities and Challenges Ahead”. Der: Arcarazo vd. EU Security and Justice Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, s. 129-145.
58. Krasner, Stephen D. (1983). Der: International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
59. Larive, Maxime H. A. (2015). “A Crisis for the Ages: The European Union and the Migration Crisis”. The Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series, S. 15, s. 1-17.
60. Larsen, Henrik (2014). “The EU as a Normative Power and the Research on External Perceptions: The Missing Link”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 52, N. 4, s. 896-910.
61. Lavenex, Sandra (1999). Safe Third Countries: Extending the EU Asylum and Immigration Policies to Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press. _______ (2006). “Shifting Up And Out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control”. West European Politics, C. 29, S. 2, s. 329-350.
62. _______ (2018). “‘Failing Forward’ towards Which Europe? Organized Hypocrisy in the Common European Asylum System”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 56, S. 5, s. 1195-1212.
63. Lehne, Stefan (2016). “How the Refugee Crisis Will Reshape the EU”. Carnegie Europe. www.carnagieeurope.eu/2016/02/04/how-refugee-crisis-will-reshape-eu-pub-62650 (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
64. Mananashvili, Sergo (2015). How Normative is the EU’s Power in the Field of Asylum. www.google.com.tr/amp/how-normative-is-the-eus-power-in-the-field-of-asylum/amp/ (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
65. Manners, Ian (2001). “Normative Power Europe: The International Role of the EU”. European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Biennial Conference, 31 Mayıs-2 Haziran 2001, Madison, Wisconsin, s. 1-30.
66. _______ (2002). “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 40, S. 2, s. 235-258.
67. _______ (2006a). “Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads”. Journal of European Public Policy, C. 13, S. 2, s. 182-199.
68. _______ (2006b). “The European Union as a Normative Power: A Response to Thomas Diez”. Millennium, C. 35, S. 1, s. 167-180.
69. _______ (2011). “The European Union’s Normative Power: Critical Perspectives and Perspectives on the Critical”, Der: Whitman, Richard G. Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 226-247.
70. _______ (2008) “The Normative Ethics of the European Union”. International Affairs, C. 84, S. 1, s. 45-60.
71. Martin-Maze, Médéric (2015). “Unpacking Interests in Normative Power Europe”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 53, S. 6, s. 1285-1300.
72. Niemann, Arne ve Natascha Zaun (2018). “EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 56, S. 1, s. 3-22.
73. Øhrgaard, Jacob C. (1997). “Less than Supranational, More than Intergovernmental: European Political Cooperation and the Dynamics of Intergovernmental Integration”. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, C. 26, S. 1. s. 1-29.
74. Park, Jeanne (2015). Europe’s Migration Crisis. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/europes-migration-crisis (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
75. Pace, Michelle (2007). “The Construction of EU Normative Power”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 45, S. 5, s. 1041-1064.
76. Penev, Daniel (2017). Normative Power Europe and Migration: A ‘Refugee Crisis’ or a ‘Normative Crisis’?”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Budapest: Central European University.
77. Pernice, Ingolf (2008). “The Treaty of Lisbon and Fundamental Rights”. Der: Griller S. ve Jacques Ziller. The Lisbon Treaty: EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty?. New York: Springer, s. 235-256.
78. Risse, Thomas ve Anja Wiener (2001). “The Construction of Social Constructivism”, Der: Christensen T. vd. The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage Publications. Scheipers, Sibylle ve Daniella Sicurelli (2007). “Normative Power Europe: A Credible Utopia?”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 45, S. 2, s. 435-457.
79. Sjursen, Helene (2006). “The EU as a Normative Power: How Can This Be”. Journal of European Public Policy, C. 13, S. 2, s. 235-251.
80. TFEU (2012). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
81. Trauner, Florian (2016). “Asylum Policy: The EU's ‘Crises’ and the Looming Policy Regime Failure”. Journal of European Integration, C. 38, S. 3, s. 311-325.
82. Triandafyllidou, Anna (2014). “Multi-Levelling and Externalizing Migration And Asylum: Lessons from the Southern European Islands”. Island Studies Journal, C. 9, S. 1, s. 7-22. UNHCR (2016a). UNHCR Viewpoint: ‘Refugee’ Or ‘Migrant’ – Which Is Right?. http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2016/7/55df0e556/unhcr-viewpoint-refugee-migrant-right.html (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
83. _______ (2016b). “Legal Considerations on the Return of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees from Greece to Turkey as Part of the EU-Turkey Cooperation in Tackling the Migration Crisis Under the Safe Third Country and First Country of Asylum Concept”. http://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/47237 (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
84. _______ (2017). “Response to Query Related to UNHCR’s Observation of Syrians Readmitted in Turkey”. http://www.statewatch.org/news/2017/jan/eu-turkey-unhcr.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
85. _______ (2019). “Desperate Journeys: Refugees and Migrants Arriving in Europe and at Europe’s Borders”. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/67712#_ga=2.128593871.252180583.1554999245-1380199155.1554999245 (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
86. Uluslararası Af Örgütü (2017), “AB: Türkiye Ile Yapılan Mülteci Anlaşmasının Ortaya Çıkardığı Insan Haklarının Bedeli Başka Bir Yerde Tekrarlanamayacak Kadar Yüksek”. https://www.amnesty.org.tr/icerik/ab-turkiye-ile-yapilan-multeci-anlasmasinin-ortaya-cikardigi-insan-haklarinin-bedeli-baska-bir-yerde-tekrarlanamayacak-kadar-yuksek (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2018)
87. Vogel, Toby (2017). The Migration Crisis Undermined EU’s Fundamental Values. https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2017/09/20/migration-crisis-undermined-eus-fundamental-values/ (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
88. von Helldorff, Jelena (2015). “The EU Migration Dilemma”. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://eu.boell.org/en/2015/09/03/eu-migration-dilemma (Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2018).
89. Walter-Franke, Marie (2018). “Two Years into the EU-Turkey ‘Deal’ – Taking Stock”. Jacques Delors Institut. https://www.delorsinstitut.de/en/all-publications/two-years-into-the-eu-turkey-deal-taking-stock/ (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2019).
90. Whitman, Richard G. (1998) From Civilian Power to Superpower? The International Identity of the European Union, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
91. _______ (2011). Der: Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
92. _______ (2013) “The Neo-Normative Turn in Theorizing the EU’s International Presence”. Cooperation and Conflict, C. 48, S. 2, s. 171-183.
93. Wolfers, Arnold (1962). Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
94. Yılmaz Elmas, Fatma (2016). Avrupa Kapı Duvar: Göç Yaklaşımında Söylem-Eylem Tutarsızlığı. İstanbul: USAK Yayınları.
95. Youngs, Richard (2004). “Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU’s External Identity”. Journal of Common Market Studies, C. 42, S. 2, s. 415-435.