Kriz Dönemlerinde Ötekileştirme Politikaları: Tony Kushner’ın “Angels in America” Oyununun Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 46, 329 - 340, 31.01.2024

Mehmet Zeki Giritli

https://doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.1325393

Öz

Yakın zamandaki COVID-19 pandemisi sağlıkla ilgili krizlerin etkilerinin bazı grupları diğerlerine göre daha yoğun bir şekilde etkilediğini de bir kez daha gözler önüne sermiştir. Bu gruplar arasında tarihte olduğu gibi günümüzde de toplumsal ayrımcılığa maruz kalan “non-binary” ya da LGBTQ+ bireyler ön plana çıkmaktadır. LGBTQ+ bireylerin salgın hastalıklar sırasındaki dezavantajlı durumu, özellikle 80’li ve 90’lı yıllarda tiyatronun da ilgisini çeken bir konu olmuştur. Bunun sebebi 80’lerde baş gösteren AIDS salgını olarak açıklanabilirse de, bu salgından yola çıkarak bazı oyun yazarları LGBTQ+ bireylerin ötekileştirilme sorununu oyunlarına taşımışlardır. Bu oyun yazarlarından en önemlilerinden birisi ise Amerikalı oyun yazarı Tony Kushner’dır. Kushner, “Angels in America” oyunuyla sadece AIDS salgınında LGBTQ+ bireylerin yaşadığı sorunları değil, daha genel anlamda toplumsal ve politik bir sorun olarak ötekileştirmeyi ele almıştır. Bu makalenin amacı Kushner’ın oyununda Levinas ve Benjamin’in felsefelerinden yola çıkarak sorunsallaştırdığı “başkalarına karşı sorumluluk” ve “ötekileştirme” kavramlarını günümüz koşullarında politikacıların kriz dönemlerinde “ötekiler”e yaklaşımı ışığında yeniden değerlendirmektir. AIDS ve COVID-19 gibi kriz dönemlerinde dezavantajlı grupların yaşadığı problemlerin salgınların kendisinden çok sağ/muhafazakâr politikalardan kaynaklandığı ve bu durumun günümüzde de değişmediği iddia edilmektedir. Bu anlamda Kushner’ın aktivist tiyatrosu günümüzde “ötekilerin” yaşam koşullarının değerlendirilmesi açısından da yol göstericidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Covid-19, LGBTQ+, aktivist tiyatro, Tony Kushner, Angels in America

THE POLITICS OF OTHERNESS IN THE TIME OF CRISES: REVISITING TONY KUSHNER’S ANGELS IN AMERICA

Öz

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has revealed once again that the effects of health crises have been more severe for some groups compared to the others. The most prominent of these groups is non-binary or LGBTQ+ individuals who have long faced social discrimination. The disadvantaged position of LGBTQ+ people during worldwide epidemics attracted the attention of playwrights especially in 1980s and 90s. Although this could be attributed to the AIDS epidemic during the time, playwrights problematized the “otherness” issue influencing LGBTQ+ people through AIDS and the political response to it. One of the most significant of these was American playwright Tony Kushner. In “Angels in America”, Kushner put forth not only the problems of LGBTQ+ people during AIDS epidemic but also the problem of otherness in different levels as a social and political phenomenon. This article aims to explore the concepts of “responsibility” and “otherness”, which Kushner problematized in his play based on the philosophical approaches of Levinas and Benjamin, in light of the current developments regarding health crises and the political response. The article claims the disadvantaged position of minority groups during crises including AIDS and COVID-19 is more of a political issue regarding the attitudes of right-wing/conservative politics (which has not changed even today) rather than the difficulties posed by the pandemics themselves. In that respect, Kushner’s activist theatre proves to be guiding in evaluating the conditions of “the others” during the pandemic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Covid-19, LGBTQ+, theatrical activism, Tony Kushner, Angels in America

Kaynakça

• Abramson, M. (2020, June 1). How AIDS remained an unspoken - But deadly - Epidemic for years. https://www.history.com/news/aids-epidemic-ronald-reagan
• Acosta, L. (2020, September 29). Trump’s failure to address Covid-19 pandemic has hit LGBTQ Americans harder than most. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/trumps-failure-to-address-covid-19-pandemic-has-hit-lgbtq-americans-harder-than-most
• Austin, M. (1997). Theology for the approaching millennium: “Angels in America”, activism, and the American religion. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 30(1), 25-44.
• Banerjee, D. & Vasundhara, S. N. (2020). The untold side of COVID-19: Struggles and perspectives of the sexual minorities. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 2(2), 113-120.
• Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations. (Trans: H. Zohn), H. Arendt (Ed.), Schocken Books.
• Bloom, H. (2005). Introduction. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Tony Kushner (pp. 1-7), Chelsea House Publishers.
• Burggraeve, R. (1999). Violence and the vulnerable face of the other: The vision of Emmanuel Levinas on moral evil and our responsibility. Journal of Social Philosophy, 30(1), 29-45.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022, August 10). Statistics overview. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/index.html#:~:text=Worldwide%2C%20there%20were%20about%201.5,the%20start%20of%20the%20epidemic
• Corby, J. (2011). The audacity of hope: Locating Kushner’s political vision in Angels in America. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 47(1), 16-35.
• De Beauvoir, S. (2011). The second sex. (Trans: C. Borde, S. Malovany-Chevallier), Vintage Books.
• Drabble, L. A. & Michele, J. E. (2021). Introduction to special issue: Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on LGBTQ+ health and well-being. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(4), 545-708.
• Farahani, M. V. & Behnoush, A. (2017). A critical inspection of socio-cultural realities in American society based on Tony Kushner’s Angels in America with the ethical lens of Emmanuel Levinas. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 5(6), 75-86.
• Freedman, J. (1998). Angels, Monsters, and Jews: Intersections of queer and Jewish identity in Kushner’s Angels in America. PMLA (Modern Language Association),113(1), 90-102.
• Garner, D. (2019, May 6). Reagan’s response. https://exhibits.library.gsu.edu/current/exhibits/show/out-in-the-archives/hiv-aids/hiv-aids--reagan---s-response
• Hand, S. (2009). Emmanuel Levinas. Routledge Critical Thinkers.
• Holloway, I. W. & Garner, A. (2021). Associations between physical distancing and mental health, sexual health and technology use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(4), 692-708.
• Human Immunodeficiency Virus. hiv.gov, 2021.Web.21 February 2021.
• Ilga Europe Report (2021). https://ilga-europe.org/report/annual-review-2021/
• Kushner, T. (2013). Angels in America: A gay fantasia on national themes. Theatre Communications Group.
• Levinas, E. (1989). Substitution. In S. Hand (Ed.), The Levinas Reader (pp. 88-127), Basil Blackwell.
• LGBTQ people and the coronavirus economy - HRC. Human Rights Campaign. (n.d.). https://www.hrc.org/resources/research-on-lgbtq-people-and-the-covid19-pandemic
• Lopez, G. (2016, December 1). The Reagan administration’s unbelievable response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. https://www.vox.com/2015/12/1/9828348/ronald-reagan-hiv-aids.
• McNulty, C. (2005). Angels in America: Tony Kushner’s theses on the philosophy of history. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Tony Kushner (pp. 43-59), Chelsea House Publishers.
• Mendelsohn, D. (2004). Winged messages. The New York Review of Books, 42-47.
• Omer-Sherman, R. (2007). The fate of the other in Tony Kushner’s ‘Angels in America’. MELUS (Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States), 32(2), 7-30.
• Rich, F. (1993, May 5). Angels in America: Millenium approaches: Embracing all possibilities in art and life. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/05/05/theater/review-theater-angels-america-millennium-approaches-embracing-all-possibilities.html.
• Savran, D. (2005). Ambivalence, utopia, and a queer sort of materialism: How Angels in America reconstructs the nation. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Tony Kushner (pp. 15-43), Chelsea House Publishers.
• Tumulty, K. (2021, April 12). Nancy Reagan’s real role in the AIDS crisis. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/04/full-story-nancy-reagan-and-aids-crisis/618552/
• Waterman, B. (2020). Plague time (again). American Literature, 92(4), 759-766.