Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SPORDA E-ÖĞRENME ORTAMINDA PİCKLEBALL BRANŞININ DENEYİMLENMESİ

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 101, 329 - 339, 24.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1574302

Öz

Bu çalışmada, ilkokul öğrencilerinin sporda e-öğrenme ortamında, sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutumun sanal ortamda Pickleball branşın deneyimlenmesinin gerçek ortama yansımasını ortaya koymayı amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, Ankara ilinde MEB’e bağlı, Şehit Ender Alper İlkokulu’nda öğrenim gören 7-11 yaş aralığında ve eğitimine devam eden, 180’i kız (%49,7) ve 182’si erkek (%50,3) olmak üzere toplam 362 gönüllü öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma modellerinden ön-test son-test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “Pickleball Branşı Öğrenme Basamaklaması” ve “Sporda E-öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Veriler, SPSS istatistik programında analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma grubunun demografik bilgileri ile sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeğine verilen cevaplar, yüzde (%), frekans (f), aritmetik ortalama (x̅) ve standart sapma (Ss) gibi tanımlayıcı istatistikler yardımıyla özetlenmiştir Ayrıca, nicel veri toplama aracı olarak belirlenen ölçekle yapılan ön test ve son testler aracılığıyla, sanal öğrenme ortamının gerçek öğrenme ortamına yansımalarını belirlemek amacıyla Paired Sample T-Test analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulardan hareketle, çalışmaya katılan öğrencilerin sporda e-öğrenme ortamında Pickleball branşının deneyimlenmesi için kullanılan sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeği ile yapılan analiz doğrultusunda ön-test ve son-test değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiş. Sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeğinin son test puan ortalamalarının, ön test puan ortalamalarından daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuca göre, sporda e-öğrenme ortamında video kayıtları aracılığıyla deneyimlenen Pickleball branşının, gerçek ortama olumlu ve pozitif bir şekilde aktarılabildiği belirlenmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, e-öğrenme ortamında izlenen görsel ve hareketli video kayıtlarıyla oluşan ön öğrenmelerin, gerçek ortamlarda uygulanabilir olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bulgu, görsel ve hareketli video içerikleriyle desteklenen ön öğrenmelerin pratik uygulamalara dönüştürülebileceğini ve e-öğrenmenin spor becerilerinin başarılı bir şekilde kazandırılmasında etkili bir yöntem olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, e-öğrenmenin sporda hem teorik hem de uygulamalı becerilerin geliştirilmesinde etkili bir öğretim yöntemi olarak daha geniş bir şekilde kullanılması önerilmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Agudo-Peregrina, á. F., Hernández-García, á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral Intention, Use Behavior and the Acceptance of Electronic Learning Systems: Differences between Higher Education and Lifelong Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34(2014), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035
  • Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 2(1), 15-44. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.003
  • Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University.
  • Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124.
  • Büyüköztük, Ş., Çakmak E., Akgün Ö., Karadeniz Ş., & Demirel F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (22. baskı). Pegem.
  • Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Mathew, V. N. (2020). Are you ready? An assessment of online learning readiness among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 301-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i1/7128
  • Daum, D. N., Goad, T., Mosier, B., & Killian, C. M. (2022). Toward quality online physical education: Research questions and future directions. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 6(4), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2021.1930295
  • Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43-62). Springer.
  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  • Fairclough, S. J., & Stratton, G. (2005). Physical education makes you fit and healthy. Physical education contribution to young people's physical activity levels. Health Education Research, 20(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg101
  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2004). E-learning in the 21st century: Framework for research and practice. Journal of distance learning, 8(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093
  • Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.63032
  • Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. Sage.
  • Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Yeni insan ve insanlar (10. basım). Evrim.
  • Kırık, A. M. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimin tarihsel gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 1(21), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.17829/midr.20142110299
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/
  • Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers college record, 115(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
  • Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220
  • Micua, D. B., San Gabriel, A. M., Garcia, R. B. M., & Domingo, M. S. (2023). Enhancing physical education learning through modernized interactive teaching approaches: a student perception and academic performance study. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 9(8), 384-391. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra14165
  • Moustakas, L., & Robrade, D. (2022). The challenges and realities of e-learning during COVID-19: The case of university sport and physical education. Challenges, 13(9), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010009
  • Mutlu Bozkurt, T., & Tamer, K. (2020). “Sporda E-Öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği”. International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 6(36), 1761-1771. http://dx.doi.org/10.31576/smryj.634
  • Pillay, H., Irving, K., & Tones, M. (2007). Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing tertiary students’ readiness for online learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310821
  • Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students' engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of computer assisted learning, 35(3), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12340
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(2008), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  • Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3 ed.). Bloomsbury.
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. ed.). Pearson.
  • Varea, V., & González-Calvo, G. (2021). Touchless classes and absent bodies: teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, education and society, 26(8), 831-845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814
  • Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41(2003), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4
  • Welk, G. J., Maduro, P. F., Laurson, K. R., & Brown, D. D. (2011). Field evaluation of the new FITNESSGRAM® criterion-referenced standards. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(4S2), 131– 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.011

Experıence of Pıckleball Branch in E-Learnıng Envıronment in Sport

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 101, 329 - 339, 24.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1574302

Öz

This study aims to reveal the reflection of primary school students' attitude towards e-learning in sports in the e-learning environment in the real environment of experiencing the Pickleball branch in the virtual environment. The study group of the research consists of a total of 362 volunteer students, 180 girls (%49.7) and 182 boys (%50.3), who are between the ages of 7-11 and continuing their education at Şehit Ender Alper Primary School, affiliated to the Ministry of National Education in Ankara. In the study, a quasi-experimental design with pre-test post-test control group from qualitative research models was used. ‘Personal Information Form’, ‘Pickleball Branch Learning Cascade’ and ‘Attitude Scale towards E-learning in Sport’ were used as data collection tools. The data were analysed using SPSS statistical software. The demographic information of the research group and the answers given to the attitude scale towards e-learning in sport were summarised with the help of descriptive statistics such as percentage (%), frequency (f), arithmetic mean (x̅) and standard deviation (sd). In addition, a Paired Sample T-Test analysis was performed to determine the reflections of the virtual learning environment on the real learning environment through pre-tests and post-tests with the scale determined as the quantitative data collection tool. Based on the findings obtained from the research, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test values in line with the analysis made with the attitude scale towards e-learning in sports used for the students participating in the study to experience the Pickleball branch in the e-learning environment. It was determined that the post-test score averages of the attitude scale towards e-learning in sports were higher than the pre-test score averages. According to this result, it was determined that the Pickleball branch experienced through video recordings in the e-learning environment in sports could be transferred to the real environment in a positive and positive way. The research findings reveal that the preliminary learning formed with visual and animated video recordings watched in the e-learning environment can be applied in real environments. This finding shows that the preliminary learning supported by visual and animated video content can be transformed into practical applications and that e-learning is an effective method in the successful acquisition of sports skills. As a result, it is recommended that e-learning be used more widely as an effective teaching method in the development of both theoretical and practical skills in sports.

Kaynakça

  • Agudo-Peregrina, á. F., Hernández-García, á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral Intention, Use Behavior and the Acceptance of Electronic Learning Systems: Differences between Higher Education and Lifelong Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34(2014), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035
  • Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 2(1), 15-44. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.003
  • Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University.
  • Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124.
  • Büyüköztük, Ş., Çakmak E., Akgün Ö., Karadeniz Ş., & Demirel F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (22. baskı). Pegem.
  • Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Mathew, V. N. (2020). Are you ready? An assessment of online learning readiness among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 301-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i1/7128
  • Daum, D. N., Goad, T., Mosier, B., & Killian, C. M. (2022). Toward quality online physical education: Research questions and future directions. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 6(4), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2021.1930295
  • Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43-62). Springer.
  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  • Fairclough, S. J., & Stratton, G. (2005). Physical education makes you fit and healthy. Physical education contribution to young people's physical activity levels. Health Education Research, 20(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg101
  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2004). E-learning in the 21st century: Framework for research and practice. Journal of distance learning, 8(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093
  • Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.63032
  • Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. Sage.
  • Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Yeni insan ve insanlar (10. basım). Evrim.
  • Kırık, A. M. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimin tarihsel gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 1(21), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.17829/midr.20142110299
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/
  • Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers college record, 115(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
  • Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220
  • Micua, D. B., San Gabriel, A. M., Garcia, R. B. M., & Domingo, M. S. (2023). Enhancing physical education learning through modernized interactive teaching approaches: a student perception and academic performance study. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 9(8), 384-391. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra14165
  • Moustakas, L., & Robrade, D. (2022). The challenges and realities of e-learning during COVID-19: The case of university sport and physical education. Challenges, 13(9), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010009
  • Mutlu Bozkurt, T., & Tamer, K. (2020). “Sporda E-Öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği”. International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 6(36), 1761-1771. http://dx.doi.org/10.31576/smryj.634
  • Pillay, H., Irving, K., & Tones, M. (2007). Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing tertiary students’ readiness for online learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310821
  • Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students' engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of computer assisted learning, 35(3), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12340
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(2008), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  • Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3 ed.). Bloomsbury.
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. ed.). Pearson.
  • Varea, V., & González-Calvo, G. (2021). Touchless classes and absent bodies: teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, education and society, 26(8), 831-845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814
  • Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41(2003), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4
  • Welk, G. J., Maduro, P. F., Laurson, K. R., & Brown, D. D. (2011). Field evaluation of the new FITNESSGRAM® criterion-referenced standards. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(4S2), 131– 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.011
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Beden Eğitimi ve Eğitim Programlarının Geliştirilmesi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Tuğba Mutlu Bozkurt 0000-0001-8663-2188

Bengü Sezer Bu kişi benim 0009-0001-2443-0123

Mine Özkan Bu kişi benim 0009-0004-6450-7326

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 16 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 6 Şubat 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 101

Kaynak Göster

APA Mutlu Bozkurt, T., Sezer, B., & Özkan, M. (2025). SPORDA E-ÖĞRENME ORTAMINDA PİCKLEBALL BRANŞININ DENEYİMLENMESİ. EKEV Akademi Dergisi(101), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1574302