With its liberal welfare regime and different understanding on social issues, United
Kingdom separates from continental European countries. These differences create
opportunities for UK’s governments to materialize “most advanced” neo-liberal
reforms in the fi eld of public employment services. Not only the current situation of
marketized employment services in UK, but also its historical developments provide
numbers of positive and negative examples for the countries planning to implement
similar reforms..
This study does not reach a conclusion indicating that UK has best or worst practices
in this fi eld. However, it suggests that the UK’s example contains very valuable
inputs about pros and cons of marketization in public employment services and how
this process should manage. In this scope, the study aims to derive lessons from UK
case for Turkish public employment services from objective point of view.
With its liberal welfare regime and different understanding on social issues, United
Kingdom separates from continental European countries. These differences create
opportunities for UK’s governments to materialize “most advanced” neo-liberal
reforms in the fi eld of public employment services. Not only the current situation of
marketized employment services in UK, but also its historical developments provide
numbers of positive and negative examples for the countries planning to implement
similar reforms..
This study does not reach a conclusion indicating that UK has best or worst practices
in this fi eld. However, it suggests that the UK’s example contains very valuable
inputs about pros and cons of marketization in public employment services and how
this process should manage. In this scope, the study aims to derive lessons from UK
case for Turkish public employment services from objective point of view.
Bölüm | Makaleler |
---|---|
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Temmuz 2017 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2017 |