Çevre Vergileri, Karbon Emisyonu ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz

Yıl 2024, , 325 - 342, 31.01.2024

Füsun Çelebi Boz , Tuğba Örs Onur

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.14

Cited By: 1

Öz

Çevre vergileri, ekonomik büyüme ve karbon emisyonu arasındaki ilişki 34 OECD ülkesi ve 1995-2020 dönemi ele alınarak incelenmiştir. Çalışmada öncelikle karbon emisyonu, ekonomik büyüme ve çevre vergileri arasında ilişki olup olmadığını belirlemek amacıyla birim kök testleri uygulandıktan sonra ülkelere göre çevre vergileri ve karbon emisyonunun ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisini belirleyebilmek amacıyla panel kantil regresyon yöntemi ile model tahmini yapılmaya çalışılmıştır. Daha sonra ise heterojenliği dikkate alan Dumitrescu Hurlin panel testi ile değişkenler arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, çevre vergileri ile ekonomik büyüme arasında pozitif yönlü karbon emisyonu ile ekonomik büyüme arasında ise negatif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca gelişmekte olan ülkelerde çevre vergilerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi yüksek iken, gelişmiş ülkelerde ise bu etkinin düştüğü söylenebilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevre Vergisi, Ekonomik Büyüme, Karbon Emisyonu, OECD Ülkeleri

The Relationship Between Environmental Taxes, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth: An Analysis of OECD Countries

Öz

The study examined the relationship between environmental taxes, economic growth, and carbon emissions by considering 34 OECD countries from 1995 to 2020. First, unit root tests were carried out to determine whether there is a relationship between carbon emissions, economic growth and environmental taxes. Then, the Dumitrescu Panel Granger causality test was applied. The panel quantile regression method was used depending on the relationship that emerged. According to the results, it has been determined that there is a positive relationship between environmental taxes and economic growth and a negative relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth. In addition, it can be said that while the effect of environmental taxes on economic growth is high in developing countries, this effect decreases in developed countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Environmental Tax, Economic Growth, Carbon Emission, OECD Countries

Kaynakça

• Akyol, H. & K. Gül (2022), “Yolsuzluklar, ekonomik büyüme ve çevre vergileri ilişkisinin gözden geçirilmesi: OECD ülkeleri örneği”, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(24), 267-293.
• Alexeev, A. et al. (2016), “Environmental taxation and the double dividend in decentralized jurisdictions”, Ecological Economics, 122, 90-100.
• Andrei, J. et al. (2016), “The Impact and Determinants of Environmental Taxation on Economic Growth Communities in Romania”, Energies, 9(11), 902.
• Aubert, D. & M. Chiroleu-Assouline (2019), “Environmental tax reform and income distribution with imperfect heterogeneous labour markets”, European Economic Review, 116, 60-82.
• Bachus, K. & F. Vanswijgenhoven (2018), “The use of regulatory taxation as a policy instrument for sustainability transitions: old wine in new bottles or unexplored potential?”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(9), 1469-1486.
• Banday, U.J. & M. Kocoglu (2022), “Modelling simultaneous relationships between human development, energy, and environment: Fresh evidence from panel quantile regression”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(10), 1559-1581.
• Bedir, S. & H. Güneş (2016), “Çevre Vergileri ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: AB Ülkeleri için Eşbütünleşme ve Nedensellik Analizleri”, Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, (616), 9-21.
• Bekmez, S. & F. Nakıpoğlu (2012), “Çevre Vergisi-Ekonomik Büyüme İkilemi”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 641-658.
• Beladi, H. et al. (2021), “Environmental taxes and economic growth with multiple growth engines”, The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 21(2), 629-658.
• Bhujabal, P. et al. (2021), “ICT, Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Pollution in major Asia Pacific countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 42649-42669.
• Bovenberg, A.L. & A. de Mooij Ruud (1997), “Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth”, Journal of Public Economics, 63(2), 207-237.
• Boz, F.Ç. vd. (2019), “BRICS ve MIST Ülkelerinde Ar-Ge Harcamaları ile Yüksek Teknolojili Ürün İhracatı Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 1111-1124.
• BP (2022) Statistical Review of World Energy, June, <https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy economics /statistical-review-of-world-energy.html>, 01.01.2023.
• Breuer, J. et al. (2001), “Misleading Inference from Panel Unit Root Tests with an Illustration from Purchasing Power Parity”, Review of International Economics, 9(3), 482-493.
• Breusch, T. & A. Pagan (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• Canay, I.A. (2011), “A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data”, Econometrics Journal, 14, 368-386.
• Castiglione, C. et al. (2014), “Environmental taxation in Europe: What does it depend on?”, Cogent Economics & Finance, 2(1), 1-8.
• Cural, M. & H.E. Saygı (2016), “Avrupa Birliği’nde Çevre Vergisi Uygulamaları ve Çevre Vergilerinin Gelişimi”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(1), 77-92.
• Dumitrescu, E.I. & C. Hurlin (2012), “Testing for Granger Noncausality in Heterogeneous Panels”, Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
• Gao, X. et al. (2019), “Tax Policy, Environmental Concern and Level of Emission Reduction”, Sustainability, 11(4), 1-17.
• Güriş, S. vd. (2019), “Üçüz Açıklar Hipotezinin Geçerliliğinin Analizi: Panel Veri Yaklaşımı”, Social Sciences Research Journal (SSRJ), 8(3), 91-101.
• Hadri, K. & E. Kurozumi (2012), “A Simple Panel Stationarity Test in The Presence of Serial Correlation and A Common Factor”, Economics Letters, 115, 31-34.
• He, P. et al. (2019), “Does the double dividend of environmental tax really play a role in OECD countries? A study based on the panel ARDL Model”, Ekoloji, 28(107), 49-62.
• Iqbal, A. et al. (2022), “Investigating the nexus between CO2 emissions, renewable energy consumption, FDI, exports and economic growth: Evidence from BRICS countries”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 2234-2263.
• İlarslan, K. & M. Yıldız (2022), “Yenilenebilir enerji yatırımlarının finansal belirleyicileri üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir analiz: Asya-Pasifik ve Latin Amerika ülkeleri”, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(4), 1397-1415.
• Jamali, T. (2007), Ekolojik Vergiler, Yaklaşım Yayınları, Ankara.
• Kahouli, B. (2017), “The short and long run causality relationship among economic growth, energy consumption and financial development: Evidence from South Mediterranean Countries (SMCs)”, Energy Economics, 68, 19-30.
• Kılınç, E.C. & H. Altıparmak (2020), “Çevre Vergilerinin CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 217-227.
• Kirchner, M. et al. (2019), “CO2 taxes, equity and the double dividend-Macroeconomic model simulations for Austria”, Energy Policy, 126, 295-314.
• Koçbulut, Ö. & H. Altıntaş (2016), “İkiz Açıklar ve Feldstein-Horioka Hipotezi: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Yatay Kesit Bağımlılığı Altında Yapısal Kırılmalı Panel Eşbütünleşme Analizi”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 145-174.
• Koenker, R. & G. Bassett Jr (1978), “Regression Quantiles”, Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
• Koenker, R. (2004), “Quantile regression for Longitudinal Data”, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1), 74-89.
• Koenker, R. (2011), Quantile Regression LSE Short Course, CEMMAP and University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
• Labeaga, J. & X. Labandeira (2020), “Economics of environmental taxes and green tax Reforms”, Sustainability, 12(1), 350.
• Liao, H. & H.-S. Cao (2013), “How does carbon dioxide emission change with the economic development? Statistical experiences from 132 countries”, Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1073-1082.
• Menyah, K. et al. (2014), “Financial Development, Trade Openness and Economic Growth in African Countries: New Insights from a Panel Causality Approach”, Economic Modelling, 37, 386-394.
• Mirović, V. et al. (2021), “Panel Cointegration Analysis of Total Environmental Taxes and Economic Growth in EU Countries”, Economic Analysis, 54(1), 92-103.
• Mirović, V. et al. (2023), “Implications of Environmental Taxation for Economic Growth and Government Expenditures in Visegrad Group countries”, Politická Ekonomie, 71(4), 422-446.
• Mishra, S. et al. (2019), “Does oil price impede Islamic stock indices? Fresh insights from wavelet-based quantile-on-quantile approach”, Resources Policy, 62, 292-304.
• Mitić, P. et al. (2019), “A literature survey of the environmental Kuznets curve”, Economic Analysis, 52(1), 109-127.
• Morley, B. & S. Abdullah (2010), “Environmental taxes and economic growth: evidence from panel causality tests”, Bath Economics Research Papers, No: 04/10.
• Mutlu, A. (2006), “Küresel kamusal mallar bağlamında sağlık hizmetleri ve çevre kirlenmesi: Üretim, finansman ve yönetim sorunları”, Maliye Dergisi, 150, 53-78.
• OECD (2021), <https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ERTR>, 01.01.2023.
• Omri, A. (2013), “CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: Evidence from simultaneous equations models”, Energy Economics, 40, 657-664.
• Opoku, E.E.O. & O.A. Aluko (2021), “Heterogeneous effects of industrialization on the environment: Evidence from panel quantile regression”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 174-184.
• Özdemir, B. (2009), “Küresel kirlenme sürdürülebilir ekonomik büyüme ve çevre vergileri”, Maliye Dergisi, 156(1), 1-36.
• Pala, A. (2018), “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Enerji Tüketimi, Karbon Emisyonu ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisinin ARDL Yaklaşımı İle İncelenmesi”, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(Özel Sayı), 1-29.
• Patuelli, R. (2005), “Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: A meta-analytical performance assessment”, Ecological Economics, 55(4), 564-583.
• Pearce, D. (1991), “The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming”, The Economic Journal, 101(407), 938-948.
• Pesaran, M.H. & T. Yamagata (2008), “Testing slope homogeneity in large panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2004), “General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels”, University of Cambridge Working Paper, 0435.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2007), “A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M.H. et al. (2008), “A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence”, The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
• Popescu Ljungholm, D. (2015), “Pay-for-performance in the public sector. Geopolitics”, History and International Relations, 7(1), 90-95.
• Sharif, A. et al. (2020), “The renewable energy consumption-environmental degradation nexus in Top-10 polluted countries: Fresh insights from quantile-on-quantile regression approach”, Renewable Energy, 150, 670-690.
• Stram, B.N. (2014), “A new strategic plan for a carbon tax”, Energy Policy, 73, 519-523.
• Swamy, P.A.V.B. (1970), “Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model”, Econometrica, 38(2), 311-323.
• Tekin, B. & S.N. Bastak (2022), “Panel kantil regresyon yaklaşımı ile getiriyi etkileyen içsel faktörlerin modellenmesi: BIST 100 Örneği”, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(42), 194-208.
• Tiwari, K.A. (2011), “Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions And Economic Growth: A Revisit of The Evidence From India”, Applied Econometrics and International Development, 11(2), 165-189.
• Troster, V. et al. (2018), “Renewable energy, oil prices, and economic activity: A Granger-causality in quantiles analysis”, Energy Economics, 70, 440-452.
• Uyar, U. & A. Gökçe (2017), “Gelişmekte olan piyasalarda enerji tüketimi ve büyüme ilişkisinin panel kantil regresyon ile incelenmesi: VISTA ülkeleri örneği”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27, 364-373.
• Worldbank (2022), <https://databank.worldbank.org/source/sustainable-development-goals-(sdgs)/Series/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD>, 01.01.2023.
• Yıldız, Ş. & A. Ağ (2018), “Çevre vergileri ile büyüme arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye üzerine bir analiz (1994-2014)”, Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(22), 591-606.