A Structural Decomposition Analysis (SDA) of the Turkish Economy and Structural Change Between 2003 and 2019

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 66, 325 - 347, 21.10.2025

Kazim İlhan Yarikan

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2025.04.15

Öz

This study investigates the structural dynamics of Türkiye’s economic growth from 2003 to 2019 using Structural Decomposition Analysis (SDA) and Input-Output methods. Findings show that growth was primarily driven by final demand (105.96%), with limited contributions from value-added production (1.23%) and a negative impact from structural change (-7.19%). Sectoral analysis reveals weak performance in high-tech sectors and a reliance on imports over exports. Results highlight the need for more profound structural transformation to support sustainable growth and escape the middle-income trap.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economic Growth , Growth Quality , IO Table , Structural Change

Türkiye Ekonomisinin Yapısal Ayrıştırma Analizi (SDA) ve 2003-2019 Arasındaki Yapısal Değişim

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2003-2019 döneminde Türkiye ekonomisinin yapısal dinamiklerini Girdi-Çıktı (Input-Output) yöntemleri ve Yapısal Ayrıştırma Analizi (SDA) kullanarak incelemektedir. Bulgular, ekonomik büyümenin büyük ölçüde nihai talepten (%105,96) kaynaklandığını; katma değer üretiminin (%1,23) sınırlı katkı sağladığını ve yapısal değişimin (%-7,19) olumsuz etkide bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Sektörel analiz, yüksek teknoloji sektörlerinin zayıf performansını ve ihracat yerine ithalata dayalı bir büyüme yapısını ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, sürdürülebilir büyüme ve orta gelir tuzağından çıkış için daha derin bir yapısal dönüşüme ihtiyaç duyulduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik Büyüme , Büyüme Kalitesi , IO Tablosu , Yapısal Değişim

Kaynakça

• Cho, B.D. (2002), “A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Imports of Korea”, Economic Papers, 5(1), 179-195.
• Chuenchum, P. et al. (2018), “Cross-Sectoral Analysis of Water Usage in Thailand Using Input-Output Model”, Engineering Journal, 22(6), 93-115.
• de Figueiredo, H.L. & M.A. Oliveira (2016), “Structural changes in Brazilian industry (1995-2009)”, CEPAL Review, (120), 189-209.
• Doan, H.T. & T.Q. Long (2019), Technical Change, Exports, and Employment Growth in China: A Structural Decomposition Analysis, ERIA-DP.
• Enongene, B.E. (2024), “Structural transformation and poverty alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa countries: sectoral value-added analysis”, Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 4(4), 326-339.
• Filho, J.F. et al. (2021), “Structural changes in the Brazilian economy 1990-2015”, Economic Systems Research, 33(4), 555-575.
• Galindo-Rueda, F. & F. Verger (2016), “OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2016/04, OECD Publishing, Paris.
• Gonçalves, F.M. et al. (2021), “The economy of the North-East region of Brazil based on the 2011 regional input-output matrix”, CEPAL Review, (134), 195-212.
• Karkacier, O. & G. Bölük (2017), “The Structural Analysis of Agriculture, Food and Energy Sectors in Turkey: An Input-Output Model”, Al-Farabi Uluslararasi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 289-305.
• Kruger, J.J. (2008), “Productivity And Structural Change: A Review of The Literature”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(2), 330-363.
• Kuznets, S. (1973), “Modern economic growth: findings and reflections”, American Economic Review, 63, 247-258.
• Lianling, Y. & Y. Cuihong (2017), “Changes in domestic value added in China's exports: A structural decomposition analysis approach”, Journal of Economic Structures, 6(18), 1-12.
• Magacho, G.R. (2013), Incorporating Import Coefficients into a Structural Decomposition Analysis: An Empirical Investigation on Brazilian Growth Sources, <https://www3.eco.unicamp.br/neit/images/Downloads/seminarioagosto13.pdf>, 13.02.2025.
• Milana, C. (2001), The Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis of “Flexible” Production Systems, Rome: Istituto di Studi e Analisi Economica, Piazza dell’Indipendenza.
• Nakamoto, Y. (2019), “Spatial structural decomposition analysis with a focus on product lifetime”, Economic Systems Research, 32(2), 1-23.
• Pamukçu, T. & P. De Boer (2000), A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Imports of Turkey (1968-1990), Brussels: Free University of Brussels, Department of Economics.
• Papagiannaki, K. & D. Diakoulaki (2009), “Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from passenger cars: The cases of Greece and Denmark”, Energy Policy, 37(8), 3259-3267.
• Pei, J. et al. (2011), “Accounting for China's Import Growth: A Structural Decomposition for 1997-2005”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(12), 2971-2991.
• Plank, B. et al. (2018), “International Trade Drives Global Resource Use: A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Raw Material Consumption from 1990-2010”, Environmental Science & Technology, 52(7), 4190-4198.
• Tahsin, E. & F. Börü (2023), “Türkiye’nin Yapısal Dönüşümü ve Sektörel Dinamikler”, in: A. İncekara & S.A. Oktar (eds.), Cumhuriyetin 100. Yılında Türkiye Ekonomisi (367-382), Istanbul University Press.
• Tomasz, S. (2017), “Determinants of structural change”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 24, 95-131.
• Vázquez, E.F. et al. (2008), “Using Additional Information in Structural Decomposition Analysis: The Path Based Approach”, Economic Systems Research, 20(4), 367-394.
• Wang, C. et al. (2019), “Structural Decomposition Analysis of Driving Factors for Energy Use Before and After the Global Financial Crisis: Evidence from Top Energy Consumer Guangdong Province in China”, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 28(5), 3463-3474.